Practice areas
Courts
Judgments by year
Recent cases
| Date | Case | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| 21 Aug 2026 |
[2026] EWHC 2213 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Under s 7 of Public Libraries and Museums Act 1964, a local authority may reorganise library provision if it reasonably concludes that the resulting service…
|
|
| 2 Apr 2026 |
[2026] EWHC 810 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
An inquest must focus on determining who the deceased was and how, when and where the death occurred. A coroner may limit findings to the central, potentially…
|
|
| 25 Jan 2024 |
[2024] EWHC 116 (KB) · High Court: King's Bench Division
Misuse of private information requires a fact-sensitive assessment of reasonable expectation of privacy, breach, and the balance between privacy and freedom of…
|
|
| 15 Aug 2023 |
[2023] EWHC 2058 (KB) · High Court: King's Bench Division
The tort of misuse of private information requires a fact-sensitive two-stage analysis. The claimant must first establish a reasonable expectation of privacy…
|
|
| 29 Jul 2022 |
[2022] EWHC 2048 (QB) · High Court: Queen's Bench Division
A claimant alleging inadequate consent must prove, on the balance of probabilities, what decision he would have made if properly advised. The assessment is…
|
|
| 19 Jun 2019 |
[2019] EWHC 1567 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
Correction of a mistaken name in a formal instrument is part of the single task of interpreting the instrument in its context. The court may correct the…
|
1 |
| 4 May 2006 |
[2006] EWCA Civ 1485 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
In construing a will, the court must identify the testator’s intention from the words used in their factual and family context. A rigid application of earlier…
|
|
| 20 Apr 2005 |
[2005] EWCA Civ 442 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
For permission purposes, a tribunal must not assume that a claim under Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights is answered merely by findings…
|
Based on judgments published by The National Archives (Find Case Law) in which Harding Evans LLP is named as solicitors, counted under the firm's current name. The figures are minimums: not every judgment names the solicitors, and a judgment is counted only when we are confident who acted. The selection of cases listed here is limited, and does not include family, criminal or anonymised cases. Firm details include data from the Solicitors Regulation Authority. zoomLaw is independent and not connected with Harding Evans LLP. Something wrong or missing? Tell us. All law firms.