Practice areas
Courts
Counsel most often instructed
Judgments by year
Cases later courts cite most
Cases JFH Law acted in that later judgments cite most often.
| Date | Case | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Jun 2022 |
[2022] EAT 91 · Employment Appeal Tribunal
Worker status under section 230(3)(b) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 requires a structured application of the statutory language. The tribunal must…
|
7 |
| 13 Mar 2020 |
[2020] EWHC 603 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
A prosecution appeal remitted under section 106 of the Extradition Act 2003 does not create a fresh extradition hearing. The judge must continue from the…
|
6 |
Recent cases
| Date | Case | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Apr 2026 |
[2026] EAT 52 · Employment Appeal Tribunal
In employment proceedings, Investigatory Powers Act 2016 section 56(1)(b) must, so far as possible, be read compatibly with fair-trial rights. It applies where…
|
|
| 19 Dec 2025 |
[2025] EWHC 3364 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
Under Arbitration Act 1996, s.9(3), a party loses the right to a stay only by conduct which objectively and unequivocally accepts that the dispute should be…
|
|
| 30 Apr 2025 |
[2025] EWHC 1037 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
In extradition cases engaging Article 8, the court must assess whether interference with private and family life is outweighed by the public interest in…
|
|
| 27 Feb 2024 |
[2024] EWHC 417 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
For an extradition appeal, the statutory period for giving notice under section 26(4) of the Extradition Act 2003 runs for seven calendar days up to midnight…
|
1 |
| 16 Nov 2023 |
[2023] EWHC 2902 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
In an extradition case engaging Article 8 ECHR, the court must undertake a fact-specific assessment of all affected Convention rights. It must carefully weigh…
|
|
| 24 Mar 2023 |
[2023] EWHC 661 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
An appeal under section 29 of the Dentists Act 1984 is by way of rehearing, but the court gives appropriate weight to a specialist disciplinary tribunal’s…
|
2 |
| 29 Jul 2022 |
[2022] EWHC 2050 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
On an appeal against discharge under sections 28 and 29 of the Extradition Act 2003, the relevant question is the issue whose determination caused the…
|
2 |
| 16 Jun 2022 |
[2022] EAT 91 · Employment Appeal Tribunal
Worker status under section 230(3)(b) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 requires a structured application of the statutory language. The tribunal must…
|
7 |
| 20 Aug 2020 |
[2020] EWHC 2349 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
At the permission stage of an extradition appeal, the appellate court asks whether the requested person has shown a reasonably arguable basis for concluding…
|
|
| 18 Mar 2020 |
[2020] EWHC 1941 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
On an appeal concerning Article 8 and extradition, the appellate court must decide whether the district judge’s overall evaluation was wrong. It may intervene…
|
|
| 13 Mar 2020 |
[2020] EWHC 603 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
A prosecution appeal remitted under section 106 of the Extradition Act 2003 does not create a fresh extradition hearing. The judge must continue from the…
|
6 |
| 20 Dec 2018 |
[2018] EWHC 3503 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
In a professional disciplinary appeal, a conviction for serious criminal conduct may be taken at face value, even where the conviction was obtained abroad and…
|
Based on judgments published by The National Archives (Find Case Law) in which JFH Law is named as solicitors, counted under the firm's current name. The figures are minimums: not every judgment names the solicitors, and a judgment is counted only when we are confident who acted. The selection of cases listed here is limited, and does not include family, criminal or anonymised cases. Firm details include data from the Solicitors Regulation Authority. zoomLaw is independent and not connected with JFH Law. Something wrong or missing? Tell us. All law firms.