Practice areas
Courts
Counsel most often instructed
Judgments by year
Cases later courts cite most
Cases Joseph Hage Aaronson & Bremen LLP acted in that later judgments cite most often.
| Date | Case | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Apr 2016 |
[2016] EWCA Civ 376 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Where domestic dividends are exempt but foreign dividends are taxed under an imputation system, EU law requires equivalent treatment. If domestic companies…
|
31 |
| 30 Sep 2024 |
[2024] EWCA Civ 1109 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
For a freezing injunction, a good arguable case on the merits is a case which is more than barely capable of serious argument. It does not require the court to…
|
27 |
| 25 Jul 2018 |
[2018] UKSC 39 · Supreme Court
EU law requires foreign portfolio dividends to receive a tax credit calculated by reference to the foreign nominal tax rate where domestic dividends are…
|
19 |
| 18 Dec 2014 |
[2014] EWHC 4302 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
EU law required a dual credit when calculating corporation tax on qualifying dividends from EU-resident subsidiaries: credit for underlying foreign tax and…
|
11 |
| 23 Jul 2021 |
[2021] UKSC 31 · Supreme Court
Where tax paid prematurely is later set off against lawful tax or repaid, the time-value claim is not a separate restitutionary claim in unjust enrichment.…
|
9 |
| 24 Oct 2013 |
[2013] EWHC 3249 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
Where domestic tax legislation treats foreign dividends less favourably than domestic dividends, it must be construed, so far as possible, to comply with…
|
8 |
| 20 Dec 2023 |
[2023] EWHC 3231 (Comm) · High Court: Commercial Court
To obtain a freezing order, an applicant must show a good arguable case, an objectively assessed real risk that a future judgment will be defeated by…
|
5 |
| 20 Feb 2019 |
Claimants Listed in Class 8 of the Group Register of the CFC & Dividend GLO v HM Revenue and Customs
[2019] EWHC 338 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
Where legislation provides an exclusive statutory remedy for recovery of overpaid tax, expressly ousting common-law claims, those claims cannot proceed merely…
|
4 |
| 24 Nov 2016 |
[2016] EWCA Civ 1180 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
EU law requires equivalent treatment of domestic and foreign dividends. Where domestic dividends are exempt and foreign dividends are taxed under an imputation…
|
4 |
| 20 Apr 2023 |
[2023] EWHC 850 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
On an application to substitute security for costs, the court must first determine whether there has been a material change of circumstances. If so, it retains…
|
4 |
Recent cases
| Date | Case | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Aug 2026 |
[2026] UKUT 329 (TCC) · Upper Tribunal: Tax and Chancery Chamber
Income derived from immovable property under Article 6 is not confined to rent or income earned while the owner retains the land. A developer’s trading profits…
|
|
| 27 Jul 2026 |
[2026] UKSC 24 · Supreme Court
A judgment or order on a group-litigation issue binds claims already on the register unless the court orders otherwise under rule 19.23(1)(a) of the Civil…
|
|
| 12 Jun 2026 |
[2026] EWCA Civ 744 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
An exit charge restricting freedom of establishment is compatible with EU law if payment can be deferred. Where legislation imposes the charge but omits that…
|
|
| 7 Nov 2025 |
[2025] EWCA Civ 1392 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
When a payment made under a court order is later set aside on appeal, the payer is in principle entitled to restitution. Interest on the restitutionary amount…
|
|
| 23 Oct 2025 |
[2025] UKUT 362 (TCC) · Upper Tribunal: Tax and Chancery Chamber
There is no general principle that extended disclosure must be reciprocal. Disclosure is assessed by reference to the circumstances of each party, the pleaded…
|
|
| 8 Oct 2025 |
[2025] EWCA Civ 1271 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
For limitation under the Limitation Act 1980 section 32(1)(c), time starts when a claimant, exercising reasonable diligence, could recognise that a mistake of…
|
1 |
| 17 Jul 2025 |
[2025] UKUT 236 (TCC) · Upper Tribunal: Tax and Chancery Chamber
The power to de-register a taxable person for VAT purposes under Ablessio does not require proof that the company’s directors knew, or should have known, of…
|
1 |
| 2 Jul 2025 |
[2025] EWHC 1662 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
Article 21(1)(d) of the Cross-Border Insolvency Regulations 2006 must be construed purposively. Information may concern a debtor’s affairs or assets even where…
|
|
| 16 May 2025 |
[2025] EWCA Civ 623 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
HMRC may deregister a taxable person who, although not the direct VAT defaulter, knew or should have known that it was participating in transactions connected…
|
2 |
| 6 May 2025 |
[2025] UKUT 143 (TCC) · Upper Tribunal: Tax and Chancery Chamber
A company is not within the first example in paragraph 10 of HMRC’s Statement of Practice (05/01) merely because it believed known profits were outside the…
|
|
| 25 Feb 2025 |
[2025] EWCA Civ 166 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Statutory claims for double taxation relief must comply with the applicable domestic procedural rules, provided those rules are reasonable, fixed in advance…
|
3 |
| 20 Dec 2024 |
[2024] EWHC 3325 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
A contractual right to terminate on reasonable notice is not inferred where the agreement, read as a whole, provides for indefinite duration and expressly…
|
Earlier names
These figures include judgments naming firms that have since merged into, or been renamed as, Joseph Hage Aaronson & Bremen LLP: Joseph Hage Aaronson LLP, Hage Aaronson Ltd.
Based on judgments published by The National Archives (Find Case Law) in which Joseph Hage Aaronson & Bremen LLP is named as solicitors, counted under the firm's current name. The figures are minimums: not every judgment names the solicitors, and a judgment is counted only when we are confident who acted. The selection of cases listed here is limited, and does not include family, criminal or anonymised cases. Firm details include data from the Solicitors Regulation Authority. zoomLaw is independent and not connected with Joseph Hage Aaronson & Bremen LLP. Something wrong or missing? Tell us. All law firms.