Law firm

Judge & Priestley LLP

Judge & Priestley LLP is named as solicitors in at least 22 UK judgments from 2003 to 2026, most often in public and administrative law and real estate.

22
judgments
8
in the last five years
8
in the Court of Appeal

Practice areas

  • Public and administrative law6
  • Real estate6
  • Commercial disputes3
  • Family and children2
  • Housing2
  • Trusts, wills and private client2
  • Social welfare and education2
  • Civil fraud and asset recovery1

Courts

  • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)8
  • High Court13
  • Upper Tribunal1

Counsel most often instructed

  • Michael Walsh3

Judgments by year

  • 20263
  • 20251
  • 20241
  • 20232
  • 20221
  • 20211
  • 20201
  • 20191
  • 20180
  • 20171
  • 20160
  • 20150
  • 20140
  • 20131
  • 20120
  • 20110
  • 20101
  • 20091
  • 20082
  • 20070

Cases later courts cite most

Cases Judge & Priestley LLP acted in that later judgments cite most often.

Date Case Cited by
23 Mar 2006
[2006] EWCA Civ 281 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
A court determining whether possession of a secure tenancy is reasonable must proceed on properly established facts. It cannot assume an unquantified…
18
28 May 2021
[2021] EWHC 1459 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Under the Community Infrastructure Levy regime, liability to pay CIL arises on commencement of the chargeable development. The date and amount payable are…
3

Recent cases

Date Case Cited by
2 Feb 2026
[2026] EWHC 192 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
For the statutory restriction on disconnection or installation of a pre-payment meter to apply, there must be an amount genuinely in dispute. An asserted…
30 Oct 2025
[2025] UKUT 371 (LC) · Upper Tribunal: Lands Chamber
A lease must be construed as a whole. A plan described as being for identification only cannot simply be disregarded where the verbal description does not…
14 Jun 2023
[2023] EWHC 1445 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
A court order requiring compulsory transfer of a registered freehold can constitute an equitable interest in land from the moment it is made. The order’s…
15 Jul 2022
[2022] EWHC 1844 (QB) · High Court: Queen's Bench Division
Permission to appeal from a County Court first appeal should be granted only where the proposed ground has a real prospect of success or there is some other…
28 May 2021
[2021] EWHC 1459 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Under the Community Infrastructure Levy regime, liability to pay CIL arises on commencement of the chargeable development. The date and amount payable are…
3
26 Feb 2020
[2020] EWHC 545 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
On an appeal against a winding up order, the appellate court must decide whether the order was wrong or unjust because of a serious procedural irregularity.…
3 May 2019
[2019] EWHC 1396 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
The High Court’s equitable jurisdiction to relieve against forfeiture for non-payment of rent is not subject to an absolute six-month guillotine, but the…
29 Mar 2010
[2010] EWCA Civ 326 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Liability for procuring a breach of contract requires an act which precedes the breach and has a causal connection with it. Knowledge of the contract need not…
18 Dec 2008
[2008] EWCA Civ 1450 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Discretionary housing payments are not confined to cases where an applicant has a current shortfall between housing benefit and eligible rent. Where the…
8 Apr 2008
[2008] EWHC 663 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Discretionary housing payments require both entitlement to housing benefit or council tax benefit and an apparent need for further assistance with housing…
23 Mar 2006
[2006] EWCA Civ 281 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
A court determining whether possession of a secure tenancy is reasonable must proceed on properly established facts. It cannot assume an unquantified…
18
16 Nov 2004
[2004] EWHC 2780 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
For council tax liability orders, a person’s “last known place of abode” means the last place known to the billing authority after taking reasonable steps to…
1

Based on judgments published by The National Archives (Find Case Law) in which Judge & Priestley LLP is named as solicitors, counted under the firm's current name. The figures are minimums: not every judgment names the solicitors, and a judgment is counted only when we are confident who acted. The selection of cases listed here is limited, and does not include family, criminal or anonymised cases. Firm details include data from the Solicitors Regulation Authority. zoomLaw is independent and not connected with Judge & Priestley LLP. Something wrong or missing? Tell us. All law firms.