Practice areas
Courts
Counsel most often instructed
Judgments by year
Cases later courts cite most
Cases Kesar & Co Solicitors acted in that later judgments cite most often.
| Date | Case | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| 20 Dec 2017 |
[2017] EWCA Civ 2181 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
A Parole Board direction may make a life or indeterminate-sentence prisoner's release subject to licence conditions integral to the management of risk. Where…
|
16 |
| 11 Jun 2015 |
[2015] EWCA Civ 596 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
For a foreign criminal sentenced to at least four years’ imprisonment, the public interest in deportation carries very great weight. Deportation will infringe…
|
9 |
| 29 Jun 2018 |
[2018] UKUT 245 (IAC) · Upper Tribunal: Immigration and Asylum Chamber
Before re-making an appeal under Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007, section 12(2)(b)(ii), the Upper Tribunal retains jurisdiction to vary or depart…
|
5 |
| 5 Aug 2016 |
[2016] EWHC 2057 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Where the Parole Board directs release subject to residence at specified Approved Premises, the Secretary of State’s duty to release does not arise until that…
|
3 |
Recent cases
| Date | Case | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Jul 2025 |
[2025] EWCA Civ 831 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Article 2 of Protocol No. 1 guarantees effective and non-discriminatory access to an established system of education. It does not require education of a…
|
|
| 18 Jun 2025 |
[2025] EWHC 1507 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
The Secretary of State is the sole decision-maker on whether a prisoner should be transferred to open conditions. The Secretary of State has a two-tier…
|
|
| 7 Sep 2023 |
[2023] EWHC 2230 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Prisoners do not have an automatic entitlement to education facilities identical to those available in the community. Differences in funding, library access…
|
|
| 1 Jul 2022 |
[2022] EWHC 1692 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
A Parole Board’s assessment of release risk is a specialist judicial function. The court must respect the Board’s evaluation of evidence and the weight…
|
|
| 25 May 2022 |
[2022] EWHC 1263 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
In judicial review proceedings, venue should ordinarily be determined promptly where the claim appears to have been issued in a region lacking its closest…
|
1 |
| 27 May 2021 |
[2021] EWCA Civ 805 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
A foreign prisoner serving a life sentence after expiry of the minimum term may be subject to both extradition and deportation powers. An outstanding…
|
|
| 1 Aug 2018 |
[2018] EWHC 2026 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Where entitlement to British citizenship depends on whether an applicant is the person named in a birth record, the court must determine that identity issue…
|
1 |
| 25 Jul 2018 |
[2018] EWHC 1844 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
A decision not to prosecute is reviewable only in rare circumstances, but the court will intervene where the prosecutor materially misapplies the evidential or…
|
1 |
| 29 Jun 2018 |
[2018] UKUT 245 (IAC) · Upper Tribunal: Immigration and Asylum Chamber
Before re-making an appeal under Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007, section 12(2)(b)(ii), the Upper Tribunal retains jurisdiction to vary or depart…
|
5 |
| 20 Dec 2017 |
[2017] EWCA Civ 2181 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
A Parole Board direction may make a life or indeterminate-sentence prisoner's release subject to licence conditions integral to the management of risk. Where…
|
16 |
| 28 Jul 2017 |
[2017] EWHC 1967 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Compassionate release under section 30 of the Crime (Sentences) Act 1997 requires the Secretary of State to decide whether exceptional circumstances justify…
|
2 |
| 28 Jul 2017 |
[2017] EWHC 1939 (QB) · High Court: Queen's Bench Division
The lawfulness of immigration detention pending deportation depends on the Hardial Singh principles and all the circumstances known to the Secretary of State…
|
Based on judgments published by The National Archives (Find Case Law) in which Kesar & Co Solicitors is named as solicitors, counted under the firm's current name. The figures are minimums: not every judgment names the solicitors, and a judgment is counted only when we are confident who acted. The selection of cases listed here is limited, and does not include family, criminal or anonymised cases. Firm details include data from the Solicitors Regulation Authority. zoomLaw is independent and not connected with Kesar & Co Solicitors. Something wrong or missing? Tell us. All law firms.