Law firm

Khans Solicitors

Khans Solicitors is named as solicitors in at least 12 UK judgments from 2011 to 2017, most often in public and administrative law and immigration and asylum.

12
judgments
0
in the last five years

Practice areas

  • Public and administrative law9
  • Immigration and asylum8
  • Civil liberties and human rights2
  • Planning and environment1
  • Crime1

Courts

  • High Court9
  • Upper Tribunal3

Judgments by year

  • 20260
  • 20250
  • 20240
  • 20230
  • 20220
  • 20210
  • 20200
  • 20190
  • 20180
  • 20172
  • 20161
  • 20153
  • 20143
  • 20131
  • 20121
  • 20111

Cases later courts cite most

Cases Khans Solicitors acted in that later judgments cite most often.

Date Case Cited by
19 Dec 2014
[2014] EWHC 4328 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
A Tier 4 sponsor’s licence is conditional on rigorous compliance with sponsor duties. Those duties include checking prospective students’ ability and intention…
11

Recent cases

Date Case Cited by
18 Jul 2017
[2017] EWHC 2901 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
A final order may be varied retrospectively in exceptional circumstances, having regard to finality in litigation and the need to prevent a second attempt to…
18 Jul 2017
[2017] EWHC 2558 (QB) · High Court: Queen's Bench Division
A final order may be varied retrospectively where the circumstances justify relief, although finality remains important. The court should distinguish an…
31 Mar 2015
[2015] EWHC 749 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
A Tier 4 sponsor must exercise rigorous and continuing vigilance when assessing students, monitoring compliance and assigning Confirmations of Acceptance for…
2
23 Feb 2015
[2015] UKUT 134 (IAC) · Upper Tribunal: Immigration and Asylum Chamber
A human-rights claim may rationally be certified as clearly unfounded where the claimant identifies no feature capable of taking the Article 8 case outside the…
22 Jan 2015
[2015] UKUT 137 (IAC) · Upper Tribunal: Immigration and Asylum Chamber
For the purposes of Immigration Rules paragraph EX.1(b), insurmountable obstacles are significant difficulties in continuing family life abroad which cannot be…
19 Dec 2014
[2014] EWHC 4328 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
A Tier 4 sponsor’s licence is conditional on rigorous compliance with sponsor duties. Those duties include checking prospective students’ ability and intention…
11
11 Nov 2014
[2014] EWHC 3755 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Where an administrative body publishes a policy governing the exercise of its powers, it must follow that policy unless there are very sound reasons for…
16 Jul 2014
[2014] EWHC 2586 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
An unsigned immigration application was invalid under the Immigration Rules. The Secretary of State was nevertheless required to consider whether exceptional…
5 Jun 2013
[2013] EWHC 1793 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
A public authority may rely on an additional ground when reconsidering an earlier refusal, unless special circumstances make reliance unfair or abusive. A…
9 Feb 2012
[2012] EWHC 323 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
A challenge under Town and Country Planning Act 1990, section 288, concerns legality, not planning merits. Questions of planning judgment and weight belong to…
9 Sep 2011
[2011] UKUT 351 (IAC) · Upper Tribunal: Immigration and Asylum Chamber
A mandatory refusal under paragraph 322(1A) of the Immigration Rules requires deception. This applies equally to false representations, false documents or…

Based on judgments published by The National Archives (Find Case Law) in which Khans Solicitors is named as solicitors, counted under the firm's current name. The figures are minimums: not every judgment names the solicitors, and a judgment is counted only when we are confident who acted. The selection of cases listed here is limited, and does not include family, criminal or anonymised cases. Firm details include data from the Solicitors Regulation Authority. zoomLaw is independent and not connected with Khans Solicitors. Something wrong or missing? Tell us. All law firms.