Law firm

Kingsley Napley LLP

Kingsley Napley LLP is named as solicitors in at least 216 UK judgments from 2003 to 2026, most often in public and administrative law and family and children.

216
judgments
89
in the last five years
6
in the Supreme Court or Privy Council
45
in the Court of Appeal

Practice areas

  • Public and administrative law53
  • Family and children31
  • Commercial disputes21
  • Trusts, wills and private client18
  • Insolvency and restructuring17
  • Professional discipline and regulation17
  • Cross-border disputes14
  • Civil fraud and asset recovery13

Courts

  • Supreme Court5
  • Privy Council1
  • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)38
  • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)7
  • High Court156
  • Employment Appeal Tribunal5
  • Upper Tribunal4

Counsel most often instructed

  • Ben Norton6
  • Sara Mansoori6
  • Patrick Green5
  • William McCormick5
  • Antony White4
  • Belinda McRae4
  • Ben Silverstone4
  • David Thomas4

Judgments by year

  • 202619
  • 202521
  • 202411
  • 202319
  • 202219
  • 20216
  • 20206
  • 20199
  • 20187
  • 201712
  • 20167
  • 20159
  • 201413
  • 20134
  • 20126
  • 20116
  • 20106
  • 20093
  • 20086
  • 20076

Cases later courts cite most

Cases Kingsley Napley LLP acted in that later judgments cite most often.

Date Case Cited by
19 Dec 2017
[2017] UKSC 80 · Supreme Court
Permission to serve proceedings outside the jurisdiction requires a plausible evidential basis for an applicable gateway. Where disputed facts can be assessed…
126
20 Oct 2021
[2021] UKSC 45 · Supreme Court
For the domestic tort gateway in paragraph 3.1(9)(a) of Civil Procedure Rules 1998 Practice Direction 6B, “damage” means actionable harm caused by the alleged…
78
10 Mar 2017
[2017] EWHC 433 (QB) · High Court: Queen's Bench Division
The meaning of a tweet is assessed impressionistically through the ordinary reasonable reader, taking account of the whole statement and its relevant context.…
60
22 May 2018
[2018] EWCA Civ 1176 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
A transaction at an undervalue falls within section 423 of the Insolvency Act 1986 if putting assets beyond a claimant’s reach was a purpose of entering into…
39
28 Oct 2004
[2004] EWCA Civ 1418 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
The rule against apparent bias applies to construction adjudicators. The question is whether a fair-minded and informed observer, having considered all…
38
18 May 2012
[2012] EWHC 1321 (Comm) · High Court: Commercial Court
Subscription applications for an investment scheme are not ordinarily subject to implied conditions precedent which are unclear, evaluative or concern future…
27
28 Nov 2011
[2011] EWHC 3221 (Comm) · High Court: Commercial Court
Permission to amend pleadings is a fact-sensitive exercise requiring a fair balance between the applicant’s ability to present the real dispute and prejudice…
24
23 Oct 2013
[2013] EWCA Civ 1288 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
A party which receives a serious invitation to participate in alternative dispute resolution (ADR) must normally engage with it. Silence is, as a general rule…
21
3 Jul 2015
[2015] EWCA Civ 665 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
At the jurisdiction stage, a claimant must show a good arguable case: more than a merely arguable case, but less than proof on the balance of probabilities.…
18
30 Sep 2022
[2022] EWHC 2431 (Comm) · High Court: Commercial Court
A split trial is exceptional and requires a real and substantial advantage over a single trial. The court must undertake a pragmatic balancing exercise…
11

Recent cases

Date Case Cited by
14 Sep 2026
[2026] UKUT 351 (TCC) · Upper Tribunal: Tax and Chancery Chamber
Integrity in financial regulation is assessed contextually and objectively. It is broader than honesty and may be absent where a person’s ethical judgment is…
11 Aug 2026
[2026] EWHC 2143 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
In an interim judicial review concerning closed material, the High Court exercises its own inherent Haralambous jurisdiction. It is not bound to reproduce the…
27 Jul 2026
[2026] EWHC 1927 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
Amendment of an application challenging an insolvency office-holder’s remuneration is a discretionary case-management exercise under CPR 3.1(2)(p), applied by…
30 Jun 2026
[2026] EWHC 1604 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Disbarment for dishonesty is ordinarily required to maintain public confidence, but the principle is not mechanical. The question is whether disbarment is…
9 Jun 2026
[2026] EWHC 1388 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
For jurisdiction under Insolvency Act 1986, carrying on business is a fact-sensitive question of mixed fact and law. It ordinarily involves commercial activity…
28 May 2026
[2026] EWHC 1279 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
An order made on a party’s application remains a response to that application even where the application is decided on paper. It is not an order made by the…
9 Mar 2026
[2026] EWHC 525 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
In case-management decisions involving closed material procedures, the court should pursue a timetable that achieves a prompt and workable resolution while…
3 Feb 2026
[2026] UKUT 47 (TCC) · Upper Tribunal: Tax and Chancery Chamber
For Principle 1 of the FCA’s Principles for Business, a firm’s business is identified by considering the employee’s role, the connection between that role and…
1
30 Jan 2026
[2026] EWHC 300 (Pat) · High Court: Patents Court
In costs budgeting, the court approves only costs that are both reasonable and proportionate on an inter partes basis. The exercise concerns the reasonable and…
21 Jan 2026
[2026] EWHC 98 (Pat) · High Court: Patents Court
A strike-out application should not be used to obtain an unintended preliminary ruling on difficult statutory construction, particularly where the issue is…
1 Dec 2025
[2025] EWCA Civ 1547 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Judicial proceedings immunity does not protect an employer from a statutory whistleblowing detriment claim based on commencing court or arbitral proceedings…
25 Nov 2025
[2025] EWHC 3107 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
Where the Companies Act 2006 confers an express private right on members of a private company to require circulation of written resolutions, the criminal…

Based on judgments published by The National Archives (Find Case Law) in which Kingsley Napley LLP is named as solicitors, counted under the firm's current name. The figures are minimums: not every judgment names the solicitors, and a judgment is counted only when we are confident who acted. The selection of cases listed here is limited, and does not include family, criminal or anonymised cases. Firm details include data from the Solicitors Regulation Authority. zoomLaw is independent and not connected with Kingsley Napley LLP. Something wrong or missing? Tell us. All law firms.