Law firm

Kuit Steinart Levy LLP

Kuit Steinart Levy LLP is named as solicitors in at least 31 UK judgments from 2004 to 2026, most often in intellectual property and commercial disputes.

31
judgments
5
in the last five years
6
in the Court of Appeal

Practice areas

  • Intellectual property16
  • Commercial disputes10
  • Real estate4
  • Trusts, wills and private client3
  • Company and partnership2
  • Media, defamation and privacy2
  • Insolvency and restructuring2
  • Employment1

Courts

  • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)6
  • High Court25

Counsel most often instructed

  • Jonathan Hill4
  • Martin Howe3

Judgments by year

  • 20261
  • 20252
  • 20241
  • 20230
  • 20221
  • 20212
  • 20200
  • 20192
  • 20181
  • 20172
  • 20161
  • 20152
  • 20141
  • 20132
  • 20121
  • 20114
  • 20101
  • 20092
  • 20081
  • 20070

Cases later courts cite most

Cases Kuit Steinart Levy LLP acted in that later judgments cite most often.

Date Case Cited by
24 May 2011
[2011] EWCA Civ 618 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
A communication threatens trade mark infringement proceedings if a reasonable recipient, knowing the relevant circumstances and reading it as a whole, would…
16
9 Jun 2009
[2009] EWHC 1221 (Pat) · High Court: Patents Court
Patent claims must be construed purposively, by reading the claims in the context of the specification and asking what the skilled person would understand the…
8

Recent cases

Date Case Cited by
7 May 2026
[2026] EWHC 1046 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
A company’s payment of a shareholder’s personal acquisition price may be a transaction at an undervalue where the company receives only a promise of repayment…
5 Nov 2024
[2024] EWHC 3625 (TCC) · High Court: Technology and Construction Court
Payment of a deposit is a condition precedent to exercising a land option only where the contract, properly construed, makes it an essential constituent of…
5 Sep 2022
[2022] EWHC 2325 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
Permission to amend a statement of case during trial may be granted where the amendment better reflects the real dispute and can be accommodated without…
19 Mar 2021
[2021] EWHC 978 (Comm) · High Court: Commercial Court
An application made before the deadline for serving a defence is an in-time case-management application, not an application for relief from sanctions. The…
1
19 Mar 2021
[2021] EWHC 626 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
A database right subsists where there has been substantial investment in obtaining, verifying or presenting the database contents. Investment in ascertaining…
14 May 2019
[2019] EWHC 1150 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
Trade mark infringement requires an objective use of a sign which affects the functions of the mark; the user’s subjective intention is not decisive.…
1
12 Oct 2018
[2018] EWHC 2564 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
A notice to complete under the Standard Commercial Property Conditions is valid if, when served, the party serving it is ready, able and willing to complete.…
1
5 Oct 2017
[2017] EWCA Civ 1390 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
An estoppel affecting an easement requires representation or encouragement, reliance, detriment and a sufficient causal connection. These matters must be…
20 Jan 2016
[2016] EWHC 75 (IPEC) · High Court: Intellectual Property Enterprise Court
A passing-off claimant relying on packaging get-up must prove goodwill in the pleaded combination of features, not merely a reputation in the product name or…
30 Jul 2015
[2015] EWHC 2291 (IPEC) · High Court: Intellectual Property Enterprise Court
Where a designer is commissioned to create a logo for a client, the contract will ordinarily be construed as giving the client ownership of the copyright or…
6 Feb 2015
[2015] EWHC 216 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
UK unregistered design right protects the identified shape or configuration of an article or part of an article, not general design ideas. Infringement…
16 May 2014
[2014] EWHC 1499 (IPEC) · High Court: Intellectual Property Enterprise Court
For invalidity under art 3(1)(c) of the Trade Mark Directive, the question is whether the average consumer would immediately perceive the sign, without further…

Based on judgments published by The National Archives (Find Case Law) in which Kuit Steinart Levy LLP is named as solicitors, counted under the firm's current name. The figures are minimums: not every judgment names the solicitors, and a judgment is counted only when we are confident who acted. The selection of cases listed here is limited, and does not include family, criminal or anonymised cases. Firm details include data from the Solicitors Regulation Authority. zoomLaw is independent and not connected with Kuit Steinart Levy LLP. Something wrong or missing? Tell us. All law firms.