Law firm

Latham & Watkins

Latham & Watkins is named as solicitors in at least 88 UK judgments from 2006 to 2026, most often in company and partnership and insolvency and restructuring.

88
judgments
33
in the last five years
6
in the Supreme Court or Privy Council
19
in the Court of Appeal

Practice areas

  • Company and partnership24
  • Insolvency and restructuring23
  • Cross-border disputes14
  • Commercial disputes12
  • Arbitration9
  • Public and administrative law8
  • Competition and regulated industries8
  • Trusts, wills and private client6

Courts

  • Supreme Court3
  • Privy Council3
  • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)19
  • High Court63

Counsel most often instructed

  • Alan Roxburgh11
  • Andrew Onslow9
  • Edward Harrison8
  • Sarah Tulip5
  • Tom Smith5
  • Stephen Houseman4
  • Adam Kramer3
  • Alex Barden3

Judgments by year

  • 20261
  • 20258
  • 20248
  • 20237
  • 20229
  • 202110
  • 202011
  • 20196
  • 20181
  • 20174
  • 20161
  • 20155
  • 20145
  • 20131
  • 20123
  • 20112
  • 20100
  • 20094
  • 20080
  • 20071

Cases later courts cite most

Cases Latham & Watkins acted in that later judgments cite most often.

Date Case Cited by
10 Jun 2022
[2022] EWCA Civ 782 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
For Limitation Act 1980 section 32(1)(b), deliberate concealment postpones time only until the claimant knows, or could reasonably know, that it has a…
23
27 Jan 2022
[2022] EWCA Civ 43 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
A claim in knowing receipt requires beneficial receipt of assets traceable to the claimant’s trust property and knowledge making it unconscionable to retain…
21
8 Apr 2020
[2020] EWHC 853 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
An English court may enforce disclosure notwithstanding a real risk that compliance will expose a foreign litigant to prosecution abroad. Foreign law does not…
15
20 Dec 2023
[2023] UKSC 51 · Supreme Court
A personal claim in knowing receipt requires the claimant to retain an equitable proprietary interest in the property when the defendant receives or retains it…
15
14 Mar 2019
[2019] EWCA Civ 416 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
A new cause of action introduced after expiry of the limitation period may relate back only if it arises from the same or substantially the same facts as are…
12
18 Sep 2024
[2024] UKSC 30 · Supreme Court
A general choice of law governing a contract ordinarily governs an arbitration clause contained in it, even where the arbitration has a foreign seat. The law…
12
11 Aug 2009
[2009] EWHC 2114 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
A company may select the creditors with whom it enters a scheme and need not include creditors whose rights are unaffected or who have no real economic…
10
16 Apr 2014
[2014] UKPC 9 · Privy Council
A mistaken payment cannot be recovered as unjust enrichment where it discharged a valid contractual debt, unless the mistake avoided the contract. Only an…
9
18 Nov 2019
[2019] EWHC 3107 (Comm) · High Court: Commercial Court
A widely worded jurisdiction clause may extend to a separate document where the documents form one closely connected commercial package, no competing…
8
5 Jun 2020
[2020] EWHC 1499 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
At a scheme convening hearing, the court does not determine the merits or fairness of the proposed scheme. It should, however, identify any jurisdictional…
7

Recent cases

Date Case Cited by
10 Jun 2026
[2026] EWHC 1414 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
At a scheme convening hearing, the court assesses whether the proposed scheme is jurisdictionally available and whether any apparent roadblock makes refusal of…
21 Nov 2025
[2025] EWHC 3081 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
The court has an unfettered discretion whether to sanction a scheme of arrangement. It will ordinarily do so where the statutory requirements are met, the…
2 Sep 2025
[2025] EWHC 2318 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
At a convening hearing for a scheme under Companies Act 2006 Part 26, the court considers jurisdiction, notice, class composition and explanatory material…
5 Jun 2025
[2025] EWHC 1386 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
At the convening stage of a scheme under Companies Act 2006 Part 26, the court does not decide the scheme’s merits or fairness. It considers notice…
11 Feb 2025
[2025] EWCA Civ 99 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
A final anti-suit injunction may, in an appropriate and exceptional case, be varied or revoked under CPR Part 3.1(7). The importance of finality remains…
1
31 Jan 2025
[2025] EWCA Civ 62 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
An unrecognised and unregistered foreign money judgment has no direct operation in England and Wales. It cannot be used as a sword to invoke the collective…
1
16 Jan 2025
[2025] UKPC 3 · Privy Council
For an IBCA company, the shareholder bargain is defined by its constitution and the statutory framework. At an annual general meeting, the election of…
14 Jan 2025
[2025] EWHC 40 (Comm) · High Court: Commercial Court
A challenge to an arbitral award under Arbitration Act 1996 section 68 is a longstop remedy. The applicant must show a serious procedural irregularity of a…
20 Dec 2024
[2024] EWHC 3340 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
Relief under article 21 of the UNCITRAL Model Law requires both a jurisdictional basis and a discretionary assessment. The court must be satisfied that the…
20 Dec 2024
[2024] EWHC 3322 (Comm) · High Court: Commercial Court
For jurisdiction applications, the court must avoid conducting a mini-trial where disputed credibility, authenticity and expert evidence prevent a reliable…
1
4 Dec 2024
[2024] EWHC 3022 (Comm) · High Court: Commercial Court
Under Spanish law, commercial contracts are construed by ascertaining the parties’ evident intention from all available evidence. The literal wording remains…
18 Sep 2024
[2024] UKSC 30 · Supreme Court
A general choice of law governing a contract ordinarily governs an arbitration clause contained in it, even where the arbitration has a foreign seat. The law…
12

Based on judgments published by The National Archives (Find Case Law) in which Latham & Watkins is named as solicitors, counted under the firm's current name. The figures are minimums: not every judgment names the solicitors, and a judgment is counted only when we are confident who acted. The selection of cases listed here is limited, and does not include family, criminal or anonymised cases. Firm details include data from the Solicitors Regulation Authority. zoomLaw is independent and not connected with Latham & Watkins. Something wrong or missing? Tell us. All law firms.