Practice areas
Courts
Judgments by year
Recent cases
| Date | Case | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| 14 May 2025 |
[2025] EWHC 1073 (KB) · High Court: King's Bench Division
An enforcement agent may take control of goods where the statutory conditions for entry are met and the agent reasonably believes that the premises are a place…
|
|
| 24 May 2022 |
[2022] EWHC 1256 (QB) · High Court: Queen's Bench Division
Under regulation 12 of the Taking Control of Goods (Fees) Regulations 2014, a vulnerable debtor must receive an adequate opportunity to obtain advice and…
|
|
| 10 Feb 2021 |
[2021] EWHC 246 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Interim relief in judicial review requires a real prospect of success at the substantive hearing and, if that threshold is met, consideration of the balance of…
|
|
| 18 Jul 2013 |
[2013] EWCA Civ 869 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
A secured creditor does not lose its security merely because it proves for the whole debt in a bankrupt debtor’s estate and receives a dividend. Bankruptcy…
|
|
| 25 Oct 2012 |
[2012] EWCA Civ 1889 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Permission to appeal was granted where the proposed appeal had a real prospect of success and raised important points of principle. The modest value of the…
|
|
| 7 Apr 2006 |
[2006] EWHC 727 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
A public body's decision to award a commercial contract is not generally amenable to judicial review merely because the body exercises statutory powers or…
|
1 |
Based on judgments published by The National Archives (Find Case Law) in which LG Williams & Prichard is named as solicitors, counted under the firm's current name. The figures are minimums: not every judgment names the solicitors, and a judgment is counted only when we are confident who acted. The selection of cases listed here is limited, and does not include family, criminal or anonymised cases. Firm details include data from the Solicitors Regulation Authority. zoomLaw is independent and not connected with LG Williams & Prichard. Something wrong or missing? Tell us. All law firms.