Practice areas
Courts
Judgments by year
Cases later courts cite most
Cases Maples Teesdale LLP acted in that later judgments cite most often.
| Date | Case | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Dec 2018 |
[2018] UKSC 62 · Supreme Court
For a landlord to oppose a business tenant’s new tenancy under section 30(1)(f) of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, it must have a firm and settled intention…
|
10 |
| 20 Jul 2005 |
[2005] EWCA Civ 868 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
A contract must be construed in its commercial context. Where circumstances have changed in a way the parties did not contemplate, the court should apply the…
|
6 |
| 27 Jul 2022 |
[2022] EWCA Civ 1021 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
A detailed commercial lease will not ordinarily relieve a tenant from rent merely because a legal restriction prevents the intended use of the premises. A…
|
4 |
| 13 Jul 2010 |
[2010] EWHC 1459 (TCC) · High Court: Technology and Construction Court
Under section 18(1) of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1927, the court first assesses common-law damages reasonably compensating the landlord for breach of a…
|
4 |
Recent cases
| Date | Case | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Sep 2026 |
[2026] EWHC 2278 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
In judicial review of a planning permission, an earlier appeal decision may be a material consideration where a later comparative assessment necessarily agrees…
|
|
| 22 Jul 2026 |
[2026] EWHC 1870 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Where a consideration is not prescribed by statute, failure to take it into account is unlawful only if it was so obviously material that omission was…
|
|
| 9 Dec 2025 |
[2025] EWHC 3235 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Publicity for a neighbourhood plan is judged by its likely effect, rather than by prescribed methods. The qualifying body has a broad discretion to choose…
|
|
| 10 Sep 2024 |
[2024] EWHC 2294 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
A statutory moratorium linked to arbitration continues according to the express mechanical terms of the legislation. It is not curtailed because an appeal…
|
|
| 26 Jul 2023 |
[2023] EWHC 1925 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
The Commercial Rent (Coronavirus) Act 2022 confers substantive rights concerning relief from protected rent debts independently of its statutory moratorium on…
|
|
| 27 Jul 2022 |
[2022] EWCA Civ 1021 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
A detailed commercial lease will not ordinarily relieve a tenant from rent merely because a legal restriction prevents the intended use of the premises. A…
|
4 |
| 22 Apr 2021 |
[2021] EWHC 1013 (QB) · High Court: Queen's Bench Division
Commercial lease rent remains payable during pandemic-related closure unless the lease, properly construed, provides otherwise. Rent cesser clauses referring…
|
|
| 5 Dec 2018 |
[2018] UKSC 62 · Supreme Court
For a landlord to oppose a business tenant’s new tenancy under section 30(1)(f) of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, it must have a firm and settled intention…
|
10 |
| 3 Jul 2017 |
[2017] EWHC 1670 (QB) · High Court: Queen's Bench Division
For Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 ground (f), the landlord’s intention must be honest, genuine, fixed, settled and unconditional as assessed at the hearing. It…
|
2 |
| 25 Jan 2013 |
[2013] EWHC 58 (QB) · High Court: Queen's Bench Division
An order expressly binding third parties in a privacy claim should be made only where it is shown to be necessary and proportionate. A reasonable expectation…
|
|
| 18 May 2012 |
[2012] EWCA Civ 666 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
A statutory scheme that permits a further notice after a defined waiting period ordinarily carries the right to pursue the statutory court process on that…
|
|
| 29 Jul 2010 |
[2010] EWHC 1981 (TCC) · High Court: Technology and Construction Court
The successful party is the usual starting point for a costs order, but the court retains a broad discretion to make an order that reflects the justice of the…
|
Based on judgments published by The National Archives (Find Case Law) in which Maples Teesdale LLP is named as solicitors, counted under the firm's current name. The figures are minimums: not every judgment names the solicitors, and a judgment is counted only when we are confident who acted. The selection of cases listed here is limited, and does not include family, criminal or anonymised cases. Firm details include data from the Solicitors Regulation Authority. zoomLaw is independent and not connected with Maples Teesdale LLP. Something wrong or missing? Tell us. All law firms.