Practice areas
Courts
Counsel most often instructed
Judgments by year
Cases later courts cite most
Cases McDaniel & Co acted in that later judgments cite most often.
| Date | Case | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Apr 2016 |
[2016] EWHC 891 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
For service of a claim form under rule 6.7(1)(b) of the Civil Procedure Rules, the defendant’s solicitor must have notified the claimant in writing that the…
|
4 |
Recent cases
| Date | Case | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Jun 2022 |
[2022] EWHC 1634 (IPEC) · High Court: Intellectual Property Enterprise Court
In IPEC proceedings, the general rule is that costs of an application made during the proceedings are reserved until trial under CPR 63.26(1). That rule…
|
|
| 25 Mar 2022 |
[2022] EWHC 689 (IPEC) · High Court: Intellectual Property Enterprise Court
UK unregistered design right protects a design that is original and not commonplace in the relevant design field. The commonplace exclusion is applied…
|
|
| 18 Jan 2021 |
[2021] EWHC 11 (IPEC) · High Court: Intellectual Property Enterprise Court
A trade mark registration is not deceptive under the absolute-ground provisions merely because consumers may be confused about which undertaking uses the mark.…
|
|
| 28 Feb 2020 |
[2020] EWHC 291 (Comm) · High Court: Commercial Court
A claim for restitution may arise where services are provided at the defendant’s request in anticipation of a contract which is never concluded. Enrichment may…
|
|
| 12 Jul 2018 |
[2018] EWCA Civ 1635 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
A damages assessment after judgment on liability is not confined to the narrowest formulation of the claim. The question is whether the allegedly expanded…
|
|
| 13 Jul 2016 |
[2016] EWHC 1711 (IPEC) · High Court: Intellectual Property Enterprise Court
Design right subsists where a designer has contributed sufficient skill and effort to create an original design, even though the designer was influenced by…
|
2 |
| 6 Apr 2016 |
[2016] EWHC 891 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
For service of a claim form under rule 6.7(1)(b) of the Civil Procedure Rules, the defendant’s solicitor must have notified the claimant in writing that the…
|
4 |
| 18 May 2015 |
[2015] EWHC 1372 (IPEC) · High Court: Intellectual Property Enterprise Court
In an inquiry as to damages for design infringement, lost sales must be established by a counterfactual assessment of the sales the claimant would probably…
|
2 |
| 24 Oct 2014 |
[2014] EWHC 3495 (QB) · High Court: Queen's Bench Division
Confidential information may include a customer list which is not publicly available and which collates commercially valuable information, even where…
|
1 |
| 27 Jul 2012 |
[2012] EWCA Civ 1048 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Negligence requires more than a foreseeable possibility of injury. The question is whether a reasonable person in the defendant’s position would regard the…
|
|
| 15 Sep 2011 |
[2011] EWHC 2363 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
Partnership goodwill is not necessarily owned equally by all partners, or by every partner. Its ownership depends on the agreement governing the partnership…
|
1 |
Based on judgments published by The National Archives (Find Case Law) in which McDaniel & Co is named as solicitors, counted under the firm's current name. The figures are minimums: not every judgment names the solicitors, and a judgment is counted only when we are confident who acted. The selection of cases listed here is limited, and does not include family, criminal or anonymised cases. Firm details include data from the Solicitors Regulation Authority. zoomLaw is independent and not connected with McDaniel & Co. Something wrong or missing? Tell us. All law firms.