Practice areas
Courts
Counsel most often instructed
Judgments by year
Cases later courts cite most
Cases National Legal Service acted in that later judgments cite most often.
| Date | Case | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Jul 2018 |
[2018] EWHC 1762 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
In extradition cases, Article 3 requires substantial grounds for believing that the requested person faces a real risk of inhuman or degrading treatment.…
|
8 |
| 17 Jun 2022 |
[2022] EWHC 1507 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Under section 20 of the Extradition Act 2003, entitlement to a retrial may be established even where reopening depends on a requesting state court deciding…
|
5 |
| 16 Nov 2018 |
[2018] EWHC 3130 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
In extradition cases alleging a real risk of treatment contrary to Article 3, the court must assess current conditions and may proceed on the basis of mutual…
|
3 |
Recent cases
| Date | Case | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Jun 2022 |
[2022] EWHC 1507 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Under section 20 of the Extradition Act 2003, entitlement to a retrial may be established even where reopening depends on a requesting state court deciding…
|
5 |
| 10 May 2022 |
[2022] EWHC 1088 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
In an extradition appeal under the Extradition Act 2003, material factual errors in the first-instance proportionality assessment require the appellate court…
|
2 |
| 11 Feb 2022 |
[2022] EWHC 286 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
In an extradition appeal raising Article 8 rights, delay does not make extradition disproportionate merely because it has contributed to established family…
|
|
| 14 Jan 2022 |
[2022] EWHC 55 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
In an Article 8 extradition case, delay must be analysed by reference to its cause, whether the requested person was responsible for it, and its effect on the…
|
2 |
| 27 May 2021 |
[2021] EWHC 1410 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
An extradition assurance must be read in its full context. Where the requesting state is a party to the proceedings, an authoritative submission explaining the…
|
2 |
| 20 Apr 2021 |
[2021] EWHC 983 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
For the purposes of Extradition Act 2003, culpable or inexcusably dilatory delay may contribute to injustice or oppression, but delay alone will not ordinarily…
|
|
| 13 Nov 2020 |
[2020] EWHC 3021 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
For dual criminality, the mens rea of the equivalent English offence may be inferred from the conduct alleged in a European Arrest Warrant where it is the only…
|
|
| 11 Jun 2020 |
[2020] EWHC 1580 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
In extradition proceedings, the United Kingdom court’s proportionality assessment is distinct from the requesting judicial authority’s decision whether to…
|
|
| 21 Apr 2020 |
[2021] EWHC 996 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
In an extradition case engaging Article 8, the public interest will usually outweigh private and family life interests unless the consequences of extradition…
|
|
| 16 Nov 2018 |
[2018] EWHC 3130 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
In extradition cases alleging a real risk of treatment contrary to Article 3, the court must assess current conditions and may proceed on the basis of mutual…
|
3 |
| 12 Jul 2018 |
[2018] EWHC 1762 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
In extradition cases, Article 3 requires substantial grounds for believing that the requested person faces a real risk of inhuman or degrading treatment.…
|
8 |
Based on judgments published by The National Archives (Find Case Law) in which National Legal Service is named as solicitors, counted under the firm's current name. The figures are minimums: not every judgment names the solicitors, and a judgment is counted only when we are confident who acted. The selection of cases listed here is limited, and does not include family, criminal or anonymised cases. Firm details include data from the Solicitors Regulation Authority. zoomLaw is independent and not connected with National Legal Service. Something wrong or missing? Tell us. All law firms.