Law firm

Oglethorpe, Sturton & Gillibrand

Oglethorpe, Sturton & Gillibrand is named as solicitors in at least 8 UK judgments from 2004 to 2024, most often in real estate and trusts, wills and private client.

8
judgments
1
in the last five years
4
in the Court of Appeal

Practice areas

  • Real estate3
  • Trusts, wills and private client2
  • Company and partnership2
  • Intellectual property1
  • Civil fraud and asset recovery1
  • Insolvency and restructuring1

Courts

  • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)4
  • High Court4

Counsel most often instructed

  • David Cavender3
  • Tamara Kagan3

Judgments by year

  • 20260
  • 20250
  • 20241
  • 20230
  • 20220
  • 20210
  • 20200
  • 20190
  • 20180
  • 20171
  • 20160
  • 20150
  • 20143
  • 20131
  • 20120
  • 20110
  • 20101
  • 20090
  • 20080
  • 20070

Cases later courts cite most

Cases Oglethorpe, Sturton & Gillibrand acted in that later judgments cite most often.

Date Case Cited by
30 Mar 2017
[2017] EWCA Civ 186 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
A company director is a trustee within the extended meaning of Limitation Act 1980, section 21, by virtue of the director’s status and fiduciary…
13

Recent cases

Date Case Cited by
18 Oct 2024
[2024] EWHC 2620 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
A deed of priority referring to a maximum capital sum plus interest and costs ordinarily gives priority for the lender’s properly recoverable debt, interest…
30 Mar 2017
[2017] EWCA Civ 186 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
A company director is a trustee within the extended meaning of Limitation Act 1980, section 21, by virtue of the director’s status and fiduciary…
13
22 Jul 2014
[2014] EWCA Civ 1034 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
The ordinary rule that costs follow the event remains appropriate where fresh evidence is admitted on appeal but the successful party was not unreasonable in…
21 May 2014
[2014] EWCA Civ 703 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Fresh evidence may be admitted on appeal where the overriding objective of doing justice requires it, although Ladd v Marshall remains relevant and persuasive.…
25 Mar 2014
[2014] EWHC 866 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
A conspiracy to compete is not necessarily a conspiracy to injure. The tort of conspiracy to injure by unlawful means requires a combination, an intention to…
1
15 Mar 2013
[2013] EWHC 1033 (Pat) · High Court: Patents Court
Agreed bundles do not automatically dispense with fair notice when a party seeks to rely on hearsay evidence, particularly to prove a central and…
1
7 May 2010
[2010] EWHC 1772 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
A contractual right allowing a creditor to appropriate money only upon specified default events may constitute a charge, even where the surrounding arrangement…
27 Oct 2004
[2004] EWCA Civ 1369 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
For adverse possession under the Limitation Act 1980, “adverse” describes the claimant’s capacity, not hostility. The claimant must prove factual possession…

Based on judgments published by The National Archives (Find Case Law) in which Oglethorpe, Sturton & Gillibrand is named as solicitors, counted under the firm's current name. The figures are minimums: not every judgment names the solicitors, and a judgment is counted only when we are confident who acted. The selection of cases listed here is limited, and does not include family, criminal or anonymised cases. Firm details include data from the Solicitors Regulation Authority. zoomLaw is independent and not connected with Oglethorpe, Sturton & Gillibrand. Something wrong or missing? Tell us. All law firms.