Oracle Solicitors: court cases and practice areas

Practice areas

Extradition24
Public and administrative law23
Trusts, wills and private client2
Shipping, aviation and trade1
Civil fraud and asset recovery1
Commercial disputes1
Civil liberties and human rights1

Courts

Supreme Court1
Court of Appeal (Civil Division)1
High Court25

Counsel most often instructed

Saoirse Townshend8

Judgments by year

20260
20250
20240
20230
20222
20212
20209
20195
20182
20172
20161
20153
20141

Cases later courts cite most

Cases Oracle Solicitors acted in that later judgments cite most often.

Date	Case	Cited by
26 Jun 2020	Gerulskis & Anor v The Prosecutor General's Office of the Republic of Lithuania [2020] EWHC 1645 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court Extradition to a member state must be refused where clear, cogent and compelling evidence establishes a real risk of treatment contrary to Article 3 of the…	8
29 Apr 2021	Bacau District Court Romania v Iancu [2021] EWHC 1107 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court Under the Extradition Act 2003, an executing court considering an Article 3 prison-conditions objection must follow the Aranyosi process. Generic evidence of…	5
24 Nov 2020	Danfelds v General Prosecutor's Office, Latvia [2020] EWHC 3199 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court In extradition cases, mutual trust requires a presumption that the requesting state will comply with Article 3 ECHR and Article 4 of the Charter. That…	4
16 Jul 2018	Fuzesi & Anor v Budapest-Capital Regional Court, Hungary [2018] EWHC 1885 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court In extradition cases involving a recognised systemic risk of treatment contrary to Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights, a solemn individual…	4
21 Jul 2014	Sosik v Prosecutor General, Lithuania [2014] EWHC 2487 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court In an extradition appeal involving Article 8, exceptionality, a high threshold, and striking or unusual facts are not legal tests. The court must balance the…	3

Recent cases

Date	Case	Cited by
3 Aug 2022	Pistachios in the Park Limited & Anor. v Sharn Panesar Limited & Anor. [2022] EWHC 2088 (QB) · High Court: Queen's Bench Division In a deceit claim, causation is established where the misrepresentation played a real and substantial part in inducing the transaction. It need not be the…
20 Aug 2021	Sigitas Janusevicius v Prosecutor General’s Office of the Republic of Lithuania [2021] EWHC 2346 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court In an extradition appeal, a requested person’s particular history of gang violence or intravenous drug use does not, without more, constitute a special risk…
29 Apr 2021	Bacau District Court Romania v Iancu [2021] EWHC 1107 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court Under the Extradition Act 2003, an executing court considering an Article 3 prison-conditions objection must follow the Aranyosi process. Generic evidence of…	5
24 Nov 2020	Danfelds v General Prosecutor's Office, Latvia [2020] EWHC 3199 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court In extradition cases, mutual trust requires a presumption that the requesting state will comply with Article 3 ECHR and Article 4 of the Charter. That…	4
20 Nov 2020	Petrovics v Prosecutor Generals Office of Hungary [2020] EWHC 3145 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court In an extradition appeal based on medical condition, oppression under section 25 requires a high threshold. The court must compare the requested person’s…
11 Nov 2020	Maczkowski v Circuit Court In Gdansk Poland [2020] EWHC 3061 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court When considering an Article 8 challenge to extradition, the court may assess the position by projecting forward to the likely date of a substantive appeal…
27 Oct 2020	Lloyd v Government of Canada [2020] EWHC 2832 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court On an extradition appeal, the appellate court must decide whether the district judge’s decision was wrong. It must respect factual findings, particularly…
16 Oct 2020	Rahim & Anor v Assize Court of Bolzano (Italy) [2020] EWHC 2748 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court In a Part 1 extradition case, inaccuracies in a European Arrest Warrant justify discharge only where they meet the high threshold of affecting the extradition…	1
28 Jul 2020	Danfelds & Anor v General Prosecutor's Office, Latvia [2020] EWHC 2042 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court On a renewed application for permission to appeal in extradition proceedings, it is reasonably arguable that a district judge erred by failing to engage with…	2
26 Jun 2020	Gerulskis & Anor v The Prosecutor General's Office of the Republic of Lithuania [2020] EWHC 1645 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court Extradition to a member state must be refused where clear, cogent and compelling evidence establishes a real risk of treatment contrary to Article 3 of the…	8
23 Dec 2019	Asenov v Local Court of Arad Romania [2019] EWHC 3489 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court In extradition proceedings on a conviction warrant, differences between the sentencing regimes of Member States do not ordinarily justify refusal of…
7 Mar 2019	Bartulis & Ors v Panevezys Regional Court, Lithuania & Anor [2019] EWHC 504 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court In an extradition appeal, permission should be granted where the proposed ground is reasonably arguable on evidence that prison conditions may create a real…	1

Based on judgments published by The National Archives (Find Case Law) in which Oracle Solicitors is named as solicitors, counted under the firm's current name. The figures are minimums: not every judgment names the solicitors, and a judgment is counted only when we are confident who acted. The selection of cases listed here is limited, and does not include family, criminal or anonymised cases. Firm details include data from the Solicitors Regulation Authority. zoomLaw is independent and not connected with Oracle Solicitors. Something wrong or missing? Tell us. All law firms.