Practice areas
Courts
Counsel most often instructed
Judgments by year
Cases later courts cite most
Cases Pannone Corporate LLP acted in that later judgments cite most often.
| Date | Case | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Jul 2015 |
[2015] EWHC 1943 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
The court retains common-law jurisdiction to permit a double derivative claim; sections 260 to 264 of the Companies Act 2006 do not remove it. The claimant…
|
19 |
| 6 Apr 2016 |
[2016] EWHC 643 (QB) · High Court: Queen's Bench Division
A data controller claiming an exemption from subject access rights must justify it by convincing evidence and cannot rely on generalised or blanket assertions.…
|
9 |
| 19 Mar 2018 |
[2018] EWCA Civ 519 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Section 284 of the Insolvency Act 1986 only avoids a post-petition disposition. It creates no freestanding monetary remedy. Recovery is governed by the general…
|
8 |
| 30 Jan 2023 |
[2023] EWCA Civ 52 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
An oral commercial arrangement does not create an overarching contract unless the parties undertake sufficiently definite, enforceable commitments beyond their…
|
3 |
Recent cases
| Date | Case | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Oct 2025 |
[2025] EWCA Civ 1341 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
For registration under the applicable trade mark regime, the requirements that a sign exist, be graphically represented with sufficient clarity and precision…
|
|
| 14 Oct 2025 |
[2025] EWHC 2628 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
On an application for an interim mandatory injunction, the court applies the American Cyanamid framework: serious issue to be tried, adequacy of damages and…
|
|
| 27 May 2025 |
[2025] EAT 92 · Employment Appeal Tribunal
Legal advice privilege is not displaced by the iniquity exception merely because privileged communications reveal that dismissal was likely, or because a…
|
|
| 3 Apr 2025 |
[2025] EWHC 805 (IPEC) · High Court: Intellectual Property Enterprise Court
Unregistered design right protects the physical shape or configuration of a whole or part of an article, not an abstract design concept, construction method…
|
|
| 11 Mar 2025 |
[2025] EWHC 547 (IPEC) · High Court: Intellectual Property Enterprise Court
For validity under Trade Marks Act 1994 sections 1(1), 3(1) and 47(1), the clarity and precision of a figurative mark are assessed as at registration from the…
|
|
| 30 May 2023 |
[2023] EWHC 1275 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
A party seeking a without-notice freezing order must make full and frank disclosure of all material facts, assessed objectively by the court. Proper inquiries…
|
|
| 30 Jan 2023 |
[2023] EWCA Civ 52 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
An oral commercial arrangement does not create an overarching contract unless the parties undertake sufficiently definite, enforceable commitments beyond their…
|
3 |
| 5 Jul 2022 |
[2022] EWHC 3721 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
On an application to adjourn a return hearing for interim freezing relief, the guiding question is whether the hearing would be unfair if it proceeded. The…
|
|
| 5 Jul 2022 |
[2022] EWHC 3720 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
On applications for freezing relief, the normal costs rule differs from that governing ordinary interim injunctions. Costs should ordinarily follow the event…
|
|
| 31 Mar 2021 |
[2021] EWHC 804 (TCC) · High Court: Technology and Construction Court
Under an NEC-style adjudication contract, a notice preserving the right to challenge an adjudicator’s decision must be clear and unambiguous, but it need not…
|
2 |
| 2 Apr 2020 |
[2020] EWHC 883 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
A claim in tort may concern a matter arising out of an arbitration agreement where the tort issues have a sufficiently close connection with contractual…
|
|
| 24 May 2019 |
[2019] EWHC 1337 (QB) · High Court: Queen's Bench Division
In determining defamatory meaning, the court must assess the words as a whole and the inferences a reasonable reader would draw from their context. Chase…
|
1 |
Based on judgments published by The National Archives (Find Case Law) in which Pannone Corporate LLP is named as solicitors, counted under the firm's current name. The figures are minimums: not every judgment names the solicitors, and a judgment is counted only when we are confident who acted. The selection of cases listed here is limited, and does not include family, criminal or anonymised cases. Firm details include data from the Solicitors Regulation Authority. zoomLaw is independent and not connected with Pannone Corporate LLP. Something wrong or missing? Tell us. All law firms.