Practice areas
Courts
Counsel most often instructed
Judgments by year
Cases later courts cite most
Cases Proskauer Rose (London) LLP acted in that later judgments cite most often.
| Date | Case | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| 31 Jul 2019 |
[2019] EWCA Civ 1361 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
A written contract may be rectified for common mistake where it fails to record the parties’ actual common intention at execution. Where there is no prior…
|
42 |
| 23 Apr 2013 |
[2013] EWCA Civ 416 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Commercial contracts are construed objectively from their wording, read in context and against the relevant factual background. The text remains the starting…
|
20 |
Recent cases
| Date | Case | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Apr 2026 |
[2026] EWHC 1002 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
On an application to amend a statement of case, the proposed claim must have a real, rather than fanciful, prospect of success and carry some degree of…
|
|
| 5 Jan 2026 |
[2026] EWHC 12 (KB) · High Court: King's Bench Division
A course of conduct may amount to harassment when its overall character is persistent, deliberate, unreasonable and oppressive, even if individual acts appear…
|
|
| 21 Nov 2025 |
[2025] EWHC 3065 (Comm) · High Court: Commercial Court
The court’s case-management discretion permits bifurcation where the likely saving in cost and procedural efficiency outweighs overlap, delay, appellate and…
|
|
| 22 Oct 2025 |
[2025] EWHC 2733 (KB) · High Court: King's Bench Division
An injunction made in proceedings for the statutory tort of harassment is not automatically a protective injunction for the purposes of Part 7A of the Courts…
|
|
| 22 May 2025 |
[2025] EWHC 1228 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
Issues for disclosure concern documents likely to be relevant and important to the fair resolution of the case. They are distinct from issues for trial and…
|
|
| 21 Mar 2025 |
[2025] EWHC 632 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
A non-enforcement undertaking accompanying a worldwide freezing order is construed by reference to whether foreign relief is similar to an order enforcing the…
|
|
| 5 Jul 2024 |
[2024] EWHC 1740 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
For a freezing injunction, the merits threshold described in The Niedersachsen remains applicable: the claim must be more than barely capable of serious…
|
|
| 7 Jun 2024 |
[2024] EWHC 1422 (Comm) · High Court: Commercial Court
Practical control over documents held by a third party requires evidence of an existing arrangement or understanding giving the litigating party access. A…
|
|
| 22 Mar 2024 |
[2024] EWHC 725 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
For a freezing order, the applicant must establish a good arguable case, an objectively assessed real risk that assets will be dissipated so that a judgment…
|
|
| 31 Jul 2019 |
[2019] EWCA Civ 1361 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
A written contract may be rectified for common mistake where it fails to record the parties’ actual common intention at execution. Where there is no prior…
|
42 |
| 20 Jul 2018 |
[2018] EWHC 1936 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
The court may appoint an additional administrator after an administration has begun, including on an interim basis, but only in accordance with the conditions…
|
1 |
| 26 Jan 2015 |
[2015] EWHC 121 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
For each company in a corporate group, centre of main interests (COMI) must be assessed separately. The registered-office presumption may be rebutted only by a…
|
1 |
Based on judgments published by The National Archives (Find Case Law) in which Proskauer Rose (London) LLP is named as solicitors, counted under the firm's current name. The figures are minimums: not every judgment names the solicitors, and a judgment is counted only when we are confident who acted. The selection of cases listed here is limited, and does not include family, criminal or anonymised cases. Firm details include data from the Solicitors Regulation Authority. zoomLaw is independent and not connected with Proskauer Rose (London) LLP. Something wrong or missing? Tell us. All law firms.