Practice areas
Courts
Judgments by year
Cases later courts cite most
Cases RCN acted in that later judgments cite most often.
| Date | Case | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| 11 May 2022 |
[2022] UKUT 134 (AAC) · Upper Tribunal: Administrative Appeals Chamber
Under Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups Act 2006, a finding that a person may harm a child or vulnerable adult is an appealable predictive finding of fact. It is…
|
16 |
Recent cases
| Date | Case | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Dec 2025 |
[2025] EWHC 3339 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
An appellate court reviewing professional disciplinary sanction must respect the specialist tribunal’s evaluative judgment. It may interfere only for an error…
|
|
| 15 Dec 2025 |
[2025] EWCA Civ 1631 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
In a professional regulatory appeal, quashing a fitness-to-practise committee’s findings does not make remittal automatic. Under the Nursing and Midwifery…
|
|
| 26 Nov 2024 |
[2024] EWHC 2991 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
A professional disciplinary panel must engage with the registrant’s central case, including any factual context relied upon to justify the conduct. It must…
|
|
| 11 May 2022 |
[2022] UKUT 134 (AAC) · Upper Tribunal: Administrative Appeals Chamber
Under Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups Act 2006, a finding that a person may harm a child or vulnerable adult is an appealable predictive finding of fact. It is…
|
16 |
| 10 Apr 2013 |
[2013] EWHC 696 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
In an appeal from a professional disciplinary decision, the court must respect the specialist tribunal’s assessment of evidence and professional standards…
|
|
| 24 Mar 2009 |
[2009] EWHC 517 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
A professional disciplinary panel’s principal purpose is to preserve public confidence in the profession, rather than to punish criminal conduct. On a…
|
Based on judgments published by The National Archives (Find Case Law) in which RCN is named as solicitors, counted under the firm's current name. The figures are minimums: not every judgment names the solicitors, and a judgment is counted only when we are confident who acted. The selection of cases listed here is limited, and does not include family, criminal or anonymised cases. Firm details include data from the Solicitors Regulation Authority. zoomLaw is independent and not connected with RCN. Something wrong or missing? Tell us. All law firms.