Law firm

Rice-Jones & Smiths

Rice-Jones & Smiths is named as solicitors in at least 5 UK judgments from 2007 to 2017, most often in civil fraud and asset recovery and commercial disputes.

5
judgments
0
in the last five years
4
in the Court of Appeal

Practice areas

  • Civil fraud and asset recovery2
  • Commercial disputes2
  • Cross-border disputes1
  • Real estate1
  • Housing1
  • Employment1

Courts

  • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)4
  • High Court1

Judgments by year

  • 20260
  • 20250
  • 20240
  • 20230
  • 20220
  • 20210
  • 20200
  • 20190
  • 20180
  • 20172
  • 20161
  • 20150
  • 20140
  • 20130
  • 20120
  • 20111
  • 20100
  • 20090
  • 20080
  • 20071

Cases later courts cite most

Cases Rice-Jones & Smiths acted in that later judgments cite most often.

Date Case Cited by
15 Dec 2017
[2017] EWCA Civ 2141 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
The County Court has jurisdiction under sections 23(g) and 38 of the County Courts Act 1984 to hear independent proceedings seeking to set aside its own final…
14

Recent cases

Date Case Cited by
15 Dec 2017
[2017] EWCA Civ 2141 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
The County Court has jurisdiction under sections 23(g) and 38 of the County Courts Act 1984 to hear independent proceedings seeking to set aside its own final…
14
26 Jul 2017
[2017] EWCA Civ 1098 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
In collective enfranchisement, an initial notice under section 13 of the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 that is not protected under…
1
23 Jun 2016
[2016] EWHC 1466 (QB) · High Court: Queen's Bench Division
A county court is a statutory court and has no inherent jurisdiction to rescind its own final judgment for fraud. Section 23(g) of the County Courts Act 1984…
1
12 Oct 2011
[2011] EWCA Civ 1129 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Pay protection under paragraph 132 of the NHS Terms and Conditions preserves remuneration attached to the incremental point reached in the previous…
24 Apr 2007
[2007] EWCA Civ 474 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
A bailee or other person holding another’s goods must normally deliver them forthwith on demand. A genuine doubt about the claimant’s entitlement permits only…

Based on judgments published by The National Archives (Find Case Law) in which Rice-Jones & Smiths is named as solicitors, counted under the firm's current name. The figures are minimums: not every judgment names the solicitors, and a judgment is counted only when we are confident who acted. The selection of cases listed here is limited, and does not include family, criminal or anonymised cases. Firm details include data from the Solicitors Regulation Authority. zoomLaw is independent and not connected with Rice-Jones & Smiths. Something wrong or missing? Tell us. All law firms.