Law firm

Rosenblatt Law

Rosenblatt Law is named as solicitors in at least 93 UK judgments from 2003 to 2026, most often in commercial disputes and company and partnership.

93
judgments
35
in the last five years
3
in the Supreme Court or Privy Council
16
in the Court of Appeal

Practice areas

  • Commercial disputes31
  • Company and partnership14
  • Cross-border disputes9
  • Trusts, wills and private client8
  • Insolvency and restructuring8
  • Public and administrative law7
  • Civil fraud and asset recovery6
  • Construction and engineering5

Courts

  • Supreme Court3
  • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)16
  • High Court73
  • Employment Appeal Tribunal1

Counsel most often instructed

  • Richard Leiper7
  • Daniel Isenberg6
  • Catherine Foster5
  • Mark James5
  • Bernard Weatherill4
  • Peter Griffiths4
  • Adam Temple3
  • Ali Malek3

Judgments by year

  • 20265
  • 20254
  • 20247
  • 202310
  • 20229
  • 20217
  • 20206
  • 20195
  • 20183
  • 20176
  • 20164
  • 20154
  • 20141
  • 20130
  • 20123
  • 20114
  • 20105
  • 20094
  • 20083
  • 20070

Cases later courts cite most

Cases Rosenblatt Law acted in that later judgments cite most often.

Date Case Cited by
10 May 2021
[2021] EWCA Civ 680 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Serious delay in delivering judgment requires special care when reviewing factual findings. Delay alone does not justify setting judgment aside. Where material…
38
14 Mar 2012
[2012] UKSC 9 · Supreme Court
For limitation purposes, an injury is attributable to an act or omission when there is a real, rather than fanciful, possibility of a causal link. Knowledge…
22
22 Nov 2010
[2010] EWCA Civ 1317 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Knowledge for personal injury limitation purposes arises when a claimant knows of a significant injury and of a real possibility that it is attributable to the…
16
29 Jul 2011
[2011] EWCA Civ 937 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
An allegation that a person seeks to change a sport’s structure, negotiates confidentially, induces a breach of contract or contravenes its regulations is not…
15
1 Jun 2011
[2011] EWHC 1370 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
Costs in an unfair prejudice petition are governed by the ordinary statutory and procedural discretion. There are no special costs principles merely because…
15
9 Jun 2023
[2023] EWCA Civ 655 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
An action to set aside a judgment for fraud is a free-standing cause of action concerning the conduct of the earlier proceedings. The claimant must establish…
10
31 Jul 2019
[2019] EWCA Civ 1376 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
A unilateral contractual notice is construed objectively. The question is how a reasonable recipient, with the admissible factual context, would understand the…
7
17 Dec 2021
[2021] EWHC 3399 (QB) · High Court: Queen's Bench Division
Under Rome I Regulation (EC) No 593/2008, an implied choice of law is assessed objectively. An exclusive jurisdiction clause, references to local law and a…
6
20 Nov 2008
[2008] EWHC 2810 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
A shareholder petition under Companies Act 2006, section 994, requires conduct in the affairs of the company which is both prejudicial and unfair, with a…
6
14 Apr 2016
[2016] EWHC 792 (TCC) · High Court: Technology and Construction Court
An adjudicator may decide an issue on a basis for which neither party expressly contended, provided the relevant material was before the parties and the…
5

Recent cases

Date Case Cited by
3 Sep 2026
[2026] EWHC 2280 (Comm) · High Court: Commercial Court
Pre-action disclosure is an exceptional case-management remedy. Under rule 31.16 of the Civil Procedure Rules 1998, the applicant must show that the parties…
1 Jul 2026
[2026] UKSC 19 · Supreme Court
Issue estoppel arises only from an issue that was necessary and fundamental to the earlier decision. It attaches to the immediate legal foundation of that…
3
8 May 2026
[2026] EWHC 1069 (TCC) · High Court: Technology and Construction Court
Permission to appeal was refused. A challenge to the exercise of the broad discretion to make a building liability order must identify an error of law…
1 Apr 2026
[2026] EWHC 789 (TCC) · High Court: Technology and Construction Court
The High Court may make a building liability order before the original company’s relevant liability has been finally established. The order is available where…
1
16 Dec 2025
[2025] EWHC 3287 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
Contractual remuneration provisions may protect an adviser against avoidance even where the principal agreement expires rather than being terminated early.…
23 May 2025
[2025] EWCA Civ 673 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Whether a body is a public authority under section 6 of the Human Rights Act 1998 is fact-sensitive. A political party’s election of its leader is a private…
14 Jan 2025
[2025] EWHC 40 (Comm) · High Court: Commercial Court
A challenge to an arbitral award under Arbitration Act 1996 section 68 is a longstop remedy. The applicant must show a serious procedural irregularity of a…
19 Nov 2024
[2024] EWCA Civ 1409 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Where a bank’s governing framework delegates authority to a manager within the manager’s functional remit, later signature rules conferring authority for…
7 Jun 2024
[2024] EWHC 1377 (KB) · High Court: King's Bench Division
The purely personal or household activity exception does not apply where an individual shares personal data collected and held by a company in connection with…
5 Dec 2023
[2023] EWHC 3088 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
A political party’s selection of a leader is not a public function merely because the selection has a known constitutional consequence. The party’s internal…
3
19 Oct 2023
[2023] EWHC 2606 (Comm) · High Court: Commercial Court
For the consumer jurisdiction gateway, a claimant must show a good arguable case that the contract is a consumer contract within the statutory regime. The…
4
2 Aug 2023
[2023] EWHC 2019 (Comm) · High Court: Commercial Court
Whether a contractual obligation is subject to a condition precedent depends on construction of the agreement. The triggering event and circumstances must be…

Based on judgments published by The National Archives (Find Case Law) in which Rosenblatt Law is named as solicitors, counted under the firm's current name. The figures are minimums: not every judgment names the solicitors, and a judgment is counted only when we are confident who acted. The selection of cases listed here is limited, and does not include family, criminal or anonymised cases. Firm details include data from the Solicitors Regulation Authority. zoomLaw is independent and not connected with Rosenblatt Law. Something wrong or missing? Tell us. All law firms.