Practice areas
Courts
Judgments by year
Cases later courts cite most
Cases Rustem Guardian Solicitors acted in that later judgments cite most often.
| Date | Case | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Feb 2013 |
[2013] EWHC 526 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
In an extradition appeal, fugitive status does not make delay irrelevant to the European Convention on Human Rights Article 8 proportionality assessment. A…
|
5 |
| 9 Jul 2009 |
[2009] EWHC 18921 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Judicial review is not the appropriate method for challenging an Administrative Court Office decision not to issue an apparently out-of-time notice of appeal.…
|
3 |
Recent cases
| Date | Case | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Jul 2018 |
[2018] EWCA Civ 1673 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
The amended statutory scheme does not require customs officers to establish an individual necessity before stopping and searching baggage. The relevant…
|
|
| 19 Apr 2018 |
[2018] EWHC 854 (QB) · High Court: Queen's Bench Division
The common-law defence of illegality requires a policy-based and proportionate assessment. The court must consider the purpose of the prohibition, any…
|
|
| 19 Feb 2013 |
[2013] EWHC 526 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
In an extradition appeal, fugitive status does not make delay irrelevant to the European Convention on Human Rights Article 8 proportionality assessment. A…
|
5 |
| 15 Feb 2013 |
[2013] EWHC 226 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
On an appeal under the Extradition Act 2003, fresh evidence may be admitted only where it was genuinely unavailable at the extradition hearing and would…
|
|
| 17 Oct 2012 |
[2012] EWHC 3039 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
In an accusation case, whether conduct constitutes an extraditable offence is assessed from the arrest warrant as a whole. An omission to tick a particular…
|
|
| 9 Jul 2009 |
[2009] EWHC 18921 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Judicial review is not the appropriate method for challenging an Administrative Court Office decision not to issue an apparently out-of-time notice of appeal.…
|
3 |
Based on judgments published by The National Archives (Find Case Law) in which Rustem Guardian Solicitors is named as solicitors, counted under the firm's current name. The figures are minimums: not every judgment names the solicitors, and a judgment is counted only when we are confident who acted. The selection of cases listed here is limited, and does not include family, criminal or anonymised cases. Firm details include data from the Solicitors Regulation Authority. zoomLaw is independent and not connected with Rustem Guardian Solicitors. Something wrong or missing? Tell us. All law firms.