Law firm

Sach Solicitors

Sach Solicitors is named as solicitors in at least 12 UK judgments from 2008 to 2025, most often in commercial disputes and arbitration.

12
judgments
1
in the last five years

Practice areas

  • Commercial disputes10
  • Arbitration5
  • Insurance and reinsurance2
  • Shipping, aviation and trade1
  • Cross-border disputes1

Courts

  • High Court12

Counsel most often instructed

  • Chirag Karia4
  • Charles Priday3

Judgments by year

  • 20260
  • 20251
  • 20240
  • 20230
  • 20220
  • 20210
  • 20201
  • 20191
  • 20181
  • 20170
  • 20160
  • 20151
  • 20140
  • 20134
  • 20121
  • 20110
  • 20100
  • 20091
  • 20081

Cases later courts cite most

Cases Sach Solicitors acted in that later judgments cite most often.

Date Case Cited by
4 Feb 2013
[2013] EWHC 658 (Comm) · High Court: Commercial Court
Security for costs need not take the conventional form of a first-class London bank guarantee. The essential question is whether the proposed security provides…
6
11 Aug 2008
[2008] EWHC 1979 (Comm) · High Court: Commercial Court
A bank is not bound by a guarantee issued by an employee unless actual authority, ratification or ostensible authority is established. Ostensible authority…
4

Recent cases

Date Case Cited by
7 Aug 2025
[2025] EWHC 2089 (Comm) · High Court: Commercial Court
For service out under Civil Procedure Rules 1998, r 6.33(2B)(b), the jurisdiction agreement must be contained in a contract which the defendant is bound by and…
20 Mar 2020
[2020] EWHC 661 (Admlty) · High Court: Admiralty Court
Where a contract names a company as principal, that description is evidence of the intended contractual relationship and places a substantial burden on the…
1
6 Dec 2019
[2019] EWHC 3368 (Comm) · High Court: Commercial Court
Arbitral proceedings fall within the meaning of judicial proceedings in regulation 14(14) of the Merchant Shipping (Accident Reporting and Investigation)…
14 Jun 2013
[2013] EWHC 1667 (Comm) · High Court: Commercial Court
Permission to make a very late amendment is a discretionary question requiring a fair balance between the applicant, the opposing party and other litigants.…
14 Jun 2013
[2013] EWHC 1666 (Comm) · High Court: Commercial Court
Under a marine time policy, a fortuitous ingress of seawater may constitute a loss by perils of the seas even where the ingress was caused by crew negligence…
2
4 Feb 2013
[2013] EWHC 658 (Comm) · High Court: Commercial Court
Security for costs need not take the conventional form of a first-class London bank guarantee. The essential question is whether the proposed security provides…
6
18 Jul 2012
[2012] EWHC 1984 (Comm) · High Court: Commercial Court
On an appeal under section 69 of the Arbitration Act 1996, a voyage charterer may be unable to rely on frustration where the event relied upon was caused by…
8 Apr 2009
[2009] EWHC 739 (Comm) · High Court: Commercial Court
A time charterer’s approximate redelivery notice does not, without more, operate as a contractual option or impose an implied term preventing later changes of…
11 Aug 2008
[2008] EWHC 1979 (Comm) · High Court: Commercial Court
A bank is not bound by a guarantee issued by an employee unless actual authority, ratification or ostensible authority is established. Ostensible authority…
4

Based on judgments published by The National Archives (Find Case Law) in which Sach Solicitors is named as solicitors, counted under the firm's current name. The figures are minimums: not every judgment names the solicitors, and a judgment is counted only when we are confident who acted. The selection of cases listed here is limited, and does not include family, criminal or anonymised cases. Firm details include data from the Solicitors Regulation Authority. zoomLaw is independent and not connected with Sach Solicitors. Something wrong or missing? Tell us. All law firms.