Law firm

Schillings International LLP

Schillings International LLP is named as solicitors in at least 115 UK judgments from 2003 to 2025, most often in media, defamation and privacy and civil liberties and human rights.

115
judgments
12
in the last five years
1
in the Supreme Court or Privy Council
27
in the Court of Appeal

Practice areas

  • Media, defamation and privacy76
  • Civil liberties and human rights30
  • Intellectual property13
  • Family and children10
  • Public and administrative law5
  • Commercial disputes4
  • Cross-border disputes3
  • Crime2

Courts

  • Supreme Court1
  • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)27
  • High Court87

Counsel most often instructed

  • Justin Rushbrooke23
  • Richard Spearman22
  • Hugh Tomlinson17
  • David Sherborne15
  • Matthew Nicklin12
  • James Price9
  • Jane Phillips9
  • Martin Pointer7

Judgments by year

  • 20260
  • 20251
  • 20243
  • 20234
  • 20224
  • 20217
  • 202010
  • 20192
  • 20182
  • 20172
  • 20164
  • 20152
  • 20142
  • 20134
  • 20128
  • 201113
  • 201011
  • 20098
  • 20085
  • 20079

Cases later courts cite most

Cases Schillings International LLP acted in that later judgments cite most often.

Date Case Cited by
7 May 2008
[2008] EWCA Civ 446 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Misuse of private information is assessed in two stages. The court first asks objectively whether the claimant had a reasonable expectation of privacy, having…
83
3 Apr 2007
[2007] EWCA Civ 295 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
A confidential relationship does not make every item of information obtained during it private. A reasonable expectation of privacy must be assessed separately…
45
16 Nov 2010
[2010] EWCA Civ 1276 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
In a claim concerning proposed publication of private information, the court must first determine whether the information attracts a reasonable expectation of…
28
1 May 2020
[2020] EWHC 1058 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
Liability for misuse of private information is determined objectively. Dishonesty, malice and bad faith on the publisher’s part are irrelevant both to whether…
25
11 Feb 2021
[2021] EWHC 273 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
Personal correspondence about private and family life is presumptively private. Public status, previous publicity about related matters, a recipient’s…
19
29 Jul 2011
[2011] EWCA Civ 937 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
An allegation that a person seeks to change a sport’s structure, negotiates confidentially, induces a breach of contract or contravenes its regulations is not…
15
12 Apr 2011
[2011] EWCA Civ 409 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Information about family or private life does not automatically attract protection under article 8. The claimant must have a reasonable expectation of privacy.…
14
30 Apr 2008
[2008] EWCA Civ 432 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
A fair and accurate report of public legislative proceedings which satisfies section 15 of the Defamation Act 1996 attracts qualified privilege. The report…
13
19 Jul 2013
[2013] EWCA Civ 886 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
A principal is entitled to require a former agent to produce documents relating to the principal’s affairs for inspection and copying. That incident of agency…
13
25 Jul 2023
[2023] EWCA Civ 884 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
In a defamation claim, an unnamed claimant is identified if the words would reasonably lead persons acquainted with the claimant to believe that it was the…
11

Recent cases

Date Case Cited by
2 May 2025
[2025] EWCA Civ 548 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
A public authority with a justiciable policy must ordinarily follow it, but may depart where it has a good reason. The court determines the policy’s meaning…
1
28 Feb 2024
[2024] EWHC 418 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
A public authority’s policy or established practice may be justiciable even where it concerns national security and the Royal Prerogative. The duty to follow…
27 Feb 2024
[2024] EWHC 400 (KB) · High Court: King's Bench Division
In determining the meaning of a television broadcast, the court must assess the broadcast as a whole from the perspective of the ordinary reasonable viewer…
29 Jan 2024
[2024] EWHC 138 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
For the purposes of the core-terms exemption in regulation 6(2) of the Unfair Terms in Consumer Regulations 1999, a dependent contract is not treated as part…
8 Dec 2023
[2023] EWHC 3120 (KB) · High Court: King's Bench Division
At an interlocutory stage, a defence of honest opinion should be struck out only if it discloses no reasonable grounds, or summarily dismissed only if it has…
2
1 Dec 2023
[2023] EWHC 3092 (KB) · High Court: King's Bench Division
In a claim for libel based on an expression of opinion, the statutory defence of honest opinion permits reliance on additional facts closely connected with the…
4
25 Jul 2023
[2023] EWCA Civ 884 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
In a defamation claim, an unnamed claimant is identified if the words would reasonably lead persons acquainted with the claimant to believe that it was the…
11
23 May 2023
[2023] EWHC 1228 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
A public authority may formulate a general policy on whether privately funded specialist police protection should be made available, even though the statutory…
31 Oct 2022
[2022] EWHC 2718 (KB) · High Court: King's Bench Division
In a defamation claim involving a corporate group, reference depends on identifying the person or company that is the subject of the allegations. A publication…
3
26 Jul 2022
[2022] EWHC 2469 (QB) · High Court: Queen's Bench Division
In determining meaning in a libel claim, the court must assess the publication as a whole and identify whether particular passages convey fact, opinion, or…
1
8 Jul 2022
[2022] EWHC 1755 (QB) · High Court: Queen's Bench Division
In determining the meaning of a publication, the court must identify the single natural and ordinary meaning conveyed to the hypothetical ordinary reasonable…
24 Mar 2022
[2022] EWHC 682 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Restrictions on public access to court documents must represent the minimum necessary derogation from open justice. The court must balance public access to…
1

Based on judgments published by The National Archives (Find Case Law) in which Schillings International LLP is named as solicitors, counted under the firm's current name. The figures are minimums: not every judgment names the solicitors, and a judgment is counted only when we are confident who acted. The selection of cases listed here is limited, and does not include family, criminal or anonymised cases. Firm details include data from the Solicitors Regulation Authority. zoomLaw is independent and not connected with Schillings International LLP. Something wrong or missing? Tell us. All law firms.