Law firm

Sidley Austin LLP

Sidley Austin LLP is named as solicitors in at least 61 UK judgments from 2006 to 2026, most often in commercial disputes and insolvency and restructuring.

61
judgments
20
in the last five years
1
in the Supreme Court or Privy Council
9
in the Court of Appeal

Practice areas

  • Commercial disputes24
  • Insolvency and restructuring20
  • Company and partnership12
  • Banking and finance10
  • Trusts, wills and private client5
  • Cross-border disputes3
  • Employment3
  • Arbitration2

Courts

  • Privy Council1
  • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)9
  • High Court50
  • Employment Appeal Tribunal1

Counsel most often instructed

  • Tom Smith10
  • HENRY PHILLIPS6
  • Jonathan Nash5
  • Alex Barden4
  • Benjamin Strong4
  • Jasbir Dhillon4
  • BRIAN KENNELLY3
  • Clara Benn3

Judgments by year

  • 20263
  • 20252
  • 20242
  • 202311
  • 20222
  • 20212
  • 20205
  • 20194
  • 20183
  • 20170
  • 20166
  • 20154
  • 20145
  • 20132
  • 20121
  • 20111
  • 20102
  • 20092
  • 20081
  • 20072

Cases later courts cite most

Cases Sidley Austin LLP acted in that later judgments cite most often.

Date Case Cited by
30 Jun 2020
[2020] EWCA Civ 821 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
A standard-form loan provision excusing default for non-payment made in order to comply with a mandatory provision of law may encompass foreign…
21
17 Oct 2007
[2007] EWHC 2402 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
A contractual insolvency trigger incorporating the commercial insolvency test in Insolvency Act 1986 section 123(1) permits consideration of debts falling due…
18
15 Jul 2011
[2011] EWHC 1822 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
Automatic termination of an ISDA derivative agreement may constitute an early-redemption event in a structured investment, even where termination follows the…
11
20 Sep 2023
[2023] UKPC 33 · Privy Council
An arbitration agreement is generally given effect unless public policy or a rule of law makes the relevant dispute incapable of arbitration. For a stay under…
7
25 Apr 2012
[2012] EWHC 1067 (Comm) · High Court: Commercial Court
For the purposes of a stay under section 9 of the Arbitration Act 1996, proceedings are “in respect of” a referred matter where that matter will foreseeably…
6
23 Jun 2020
[2020] EWHC 1619 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
Where a claimant makes a Part 36 offer and obtains judgment at least as advantageous as the offer, the court must generally apply the specified consequences…
6
30 Jul 2010
[2010] EWHC 2005 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
For the purposes of Insolvency Act 1986, section 123(2), contingent and prospective liabilities cannot simply be added to present liabilities at face value.…
5
16 Jan 2014
[2014] EWHC 34 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
Proceedings challenging the admission, amount or ranking of a claim in an insolvency distribution fall within the insolvency exclusion in article 1(2)(b) of…
5
9 Jun 2006
[2006] EWHC 1335 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
The English court has jurisdiction to sanction a scheme of arrangement for a foreign or EEA insurance company where the company is capable of being wound up…
5
6 Aug 2014
[2014] EWHC 2785 (Comm) · High Court: Commercial Court
A contractual bonus formula may require the employer to calculate the relevant performance measure using its established internal methodology. The court will…
4

Recent cases

Date Case Cited by
23 Jul 2026
[2026] EWHC 1871 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
Permission to continue a common-law double derivative claim requires more than pleading an arguable breach. The claimant must show, on the totality of the…
7 Jul 2026
[2026] EWCA Civ 872 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
The Competition Appeal Tribunal has jurisdiction to decide any issue necessary to resolve a competition infringement claim, including logically anterior…
12 Jun 2026
[2026] EWHC 1463 (Comm) · High Court: Commercial Court
On an application under Civil Procedure Rules 1998, rule 25.27(b)(ii), security for costs may be ordered where the evidence gives the court real reason to…
8 Dec 2025
[2025] EWHC 3202 (Comm) · High Court: Commercial Court
Where parties have agreed to English jurisdiction, a stay on forum non conveniens grounds requires strong, or potentially very strong, reasons. Foreseeable…
1
3 Feb 2025
[2025] EWHC 205 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
In a restructuring plan involving dissenting creditor classes, the court must identify a particular and realistically achievable relevant alternative. A vague…
3
11 Nov 2024
[2024] EWHC 2851 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
At a convening hearing for a restructuring plan involving a foreign company, the court must be satisfied that the statutory conditions for a plan are met and…
5 Mar 2024
[2024] EAT 18 · Employment Appeal Tribunal
For the jurisdictional condition in section 121(1) of the Equality Act 2010, a service complaint need not be a legal pleading or use technical language.…
3
17 Nov 2023
[2023] EWHC 3076 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
At a restructuring-plan sanction hearing, the court should ask whether the statutory requirements have been met, creditors were fairly represented and acted…
20 Oct 2023
[2023] EWHC 2754 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
At a convening hearing for restructuring plans, the court must determine whether there are jurisdictional or practical obstacles to convening creditor…
12 Oct 2023
[2023] EWHC 2240 (Comm) · High Court: Commercial Court
A contractual right to terminate for a brand’s loss of reputation must be construed in its contractual and commercial context. Where the clause refers to a…
9 Oct 2023
[2023] EWCA Civ 1135 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
For purposes of section 239 of the Insolvency Act 1986, the relevant decision to prefer a creditor may precede the payment, but the court must identify the…
22 Sep 2023
[2023] EWHC 2348 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
Costs ordinarily follow the successful party. Failure on some issues does not, without more, justify departing from that rule. An issue-based adjustment may be…
1

Based on judgments published by The National Archives (Find Case Law) in which Sidley Austin LLP is named as solicitors, counted under the firm's current name. The figures are minimums: not every judgment names the solicitors, and a judgment is counted only when we are confident who acted. The selection of cases listed here is limited, and does not include family, criminal or anonymised cases. Firm details include data from the Solicitors Regulation Authority. zoomLaw is independent and not connected with Sidley Austin LLP. Something wrong or missing? Tell us. All law firms.