Practice areas
Courts
Judgments by year
Cases later courts cite most
Cases Smithfield Partners acted in that later judgments cite most often.
| Date | Case | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Dec 2014 |
[2014] EWHC 4184 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
A Divisional Court may have power to apply the civil costs regime in criminal proceedings, but a third-party costs order remains exceptional. A prosecution…
|
5 |
Recent cases
| Date | Case | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sep 2020 |
[2020] EWHC 2392 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
Damages awarded in substitution for specific performance are ordinarily assessed at the hearing date, rather than automatically at the date of breach. That…
|
2 |
| 14 Feb 2020 |
[2020] EWHC 293 (QB) · High Court: Queen's Bench Division
An appellate court must assess whether the trial was fair overall where a judge rejects a witness’s evidence on a significant ground that was not put to that…
|
|
| 28 Nov 2017 |
[2017] EWCA Civ 1875 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
An objection that proceedings brought in a company’s name lack proper authority should be raised promptly. Once the proceedings are shown to be improperly…
|
|
| 4 Dec 2015 |
[2015] EWHC 3465 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
For mutual legal assistance, the court issuing a domestic search warrant must have reasonable grounds to believe that the conduct alleged abroad would…
|
|
| 9 Oct 2015 |
[2015] EWHC 2826 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
For the 42-day period governing a trustee’s notice claiming after-acquired property, “knowledge” requires actual knowledge that the property was acquired by…
|
2 |
| 15 Dec 2014 |
[2014] EWHC 4184 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
A Divisional Court may have power to apply the civil costs regime in criminal proceedings, but a third-party costs order remains exceptional. A prosecution…
|
5 |
| 18 Jan 2011 |
[2011] EWHC 1 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
Proprietary estoppel requires an assurance that is clear enough in context, reasonable reliance, and substantial detriment causally connected with that…
|
1 |
Based on judgments published by The National Archives (Find Case Law) in which Smithfield Partners is named as solicitors, counted under the firm's current name. The figures are minimums: not every judgment names the solicitors, and a judgment is counted only when we are confident who acted. The selection of cases listed here is limited, and does not include family, criminal or anonymised cases. Firm details include data from the Solicitors Regulation Authority. zoomLaw is independent and not connected with Smithfield Partners. Something wrong or missing? Tell us. All law firms.