Practice areas
Courts
Counsel most often instructed
Judgments by year
Cases later courts cite most
Cases Stuart & Co. acted in that later judgments cite most often.
| Date | Case | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Nov 2019 |
[2019] EWHC 3208 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
The EU-law principle of effectiveness applies only where a claimant identifies a directly effective EU right. It does not convert a standstill clause into a…
|
6 |
| 22 Nov 2011 |
[2011] EWCA Civ 1314 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Under the Land Registration Act 2002, an equitable easement is not an overriding interest under Schedule 3 paragraph 3, which is confined to legal easements.…
|
4 |
Recent cases
| Date | Case | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Nov 2019 |
[2019] EWHC 3208 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
The EU-law principle of effectiveness applies only where a claimant identifies a directly effective EU right. It does not convert a standstill clause into a…
|
6 |
| 8 Feb 2017 |
[2017] EWHC 297 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Applications under the 1973 immigration rules must be assessed on their merits and in the round. The factors identified in the rules are matters to consider…
|
1 |
| 8 Feb 2016 |
[2016] EWHC 297 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Applications under the 1973 immigration rules must be assessed on their merits and in the round. Specified factors guide the exercise of discretion; they are…
|
|
| 17 Feb 2012 |
[2012] EWHC 551 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
A judicial review claim that has become academic may be withdrawn, but withdrawal does not prevent the court from making an order for costs. Where the claimant…
|
|
| 22 Nov 2011 |
[2011] EWCA Civ 1314 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Under the Land Registration Act 2002, an equitable easement is not an overriding interest under Schedule 3 paragraph 3, which is confined to legal easements.…
|
4 |
| 4 Apr 2008 |
[2008] EWHC 950 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Detention pending removal is not automatically unlawful because outstanding representations may constitute a fresh asylum claim. The power remains subject to…
|
|
| 17 Dec 2007 |
[2007] EWCA Civ 1517 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
On a renewed application for permission to appeal, an arguable failure by an immigration tribunal to confront materially relevant authority on revocation of a…
|
|
| 8 Apr 2005 |
[2005] EWCA Civ 427 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Permission to appeal should be confined to grounds with a real prospect of success; granting permission does not predict the result. Where a proposed ground…
|
Based on judgments published by The National Archives (Find Case Law) in which Stuart & Co. is named as solicitors, counted under the firm's current name. The figures are minimums: not every judgment names the solicitors, and a judgment is counted only when we are confident who acted. The selection of cases listed here is limited, and does not include family, criminal or anonymised cases. Firm details include data from the Solicitors Regulation Authority. zoomLaw is independent and not connected with Stuart & Co.. Something wrong or missing? Tell us. All law firms.