Law firm

Stuart Miller Solicitors

Stuart Miller Solicitors is named as solicitors in at least 11 UK judgments from 2003 to 2026, most often in extradition and public and administrative law.

11
judgments
4
in the last five years
4
in the Court of Appeal

Practice areas

  • Extradition5
  • Public and administrative law5
  • Crime5
  • Civil liberties and human rights2

Courts

  • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)4
  • High Court7

Judgments by year

  • 20261
  • 20251
  • 20240
  • 20231
  • 20221
  • 20210
  • 20201
  • 20190
  • 20180
  • 20170
  • 20160
  • 20150
  • 20142
  • 20130
  • 20120
  • 20110
  • 20101
  • 20090
  • 20080
  • 20070

Cases later courts cite most

Cases Stuart Miller Solicitors acted in that later judgments cite most often.

Date Case Cited by
13 Feb 2003
[2003] EWHC 193 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Damages for breach of Article 5.4 are not automatic. Under section 8 of the Human Rights Act 1998 and Article 5.5, an award is required only where necessary to…
13

Recent cases

Date Case Cited by
20 Oct 2020
[2020] EWHC 2877 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
On a renewed application for permission to appeal in an extradition case, permission should be granted only where there is a reasonably arguable prospect that…
20 Nov 2014
[2014] EWHC 4416 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Section 12 of the Extradition Act 2003 incorporates both limbs of the rule against double jeopardy. Extradition is barred where the requested person could…
14 Oct 2005
[2005] EWHC 2611 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
For the statutory bar based on delay, unjust principally concerns prejudice to the fairness of the trial, while oppressive concerns hardship caused by changes…
16 Mar 2005
[2005] EWHC 604 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Where a decision maintains a person’s detention, fairness may require reasons as of right. The reasons must address the statutory criterion that is legally…
1
13 Feb 2003
[2003] EWHC 193 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Damages for breach of Article 5.4 are not automatic. Under section 8 of the Human Rights Act 1998 and Article 5.5, an award is required only where necessary to…
13

Based on judgments published by The National Archives (Find Case Law) in which Stuart Miller Solicitors is named as solicitors, counted under the firm's current name. The figures are minimums: not every judgment names the solicitors, and a judgment is counted only when we are confident who acted. The selection of cases listed here is limited, and does not include family, criminal or anonymised cases. Firm details include data from the Solicitors Regulation Authority. zoomLaw is independent and not connected with Stuart Miller Solicitors. Something wrong or missing? Tell us. All law firms.