Practice areas
Courts
Counsel most often instructed
Judgments by year
Cases later courts cite most
Cases Sullivan & Cromwell LLP acted in that later judgments cite most often.
| Date | Case | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| 12 May 2021 |
[2021] EWHC 1246 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
Where the statutory conditions for cross-class cram down are met, the court must still exercise an informed discretion under Companies Act 2006, Part 26A.…
|
26 |
| 1 Apr 2021 |
[2021] EWHC 814 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
For a restructuring plan under Companies Act 2006 Part 26A, creditor classes are determined by the legal rights which are released, varied or conferred…
|
12 |
| 1 Nov 2023 |
[2023] EWHC 2849 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
At a restructuring-plan convening hearing, the court should decide matters properly before it wherever possible and should not routinely defer them to…
|
7 |
| 4 Mar 2024 |
[2024] EWHC 468 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
Part 26A requires a proposed compromise or arrangement for every class of creditor or member to which the proposal is directed. A proposal that simply…
|
7 |
| 11 Feb 2025 |
[2025] EWHC 279 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
Part 26A of the Companies Act 2006 permits a restructuring plan to bind a dissenting class only where the statutory conditions are satisfied and the court…
|
6 |
| 13 May 2014 |
[2014] UKPC 15 · Privy Council
Courts enforcing New York Convention awards must adopt a pro-enforcement approach and refuse enforcement only on limited statutory grounds. The enforcing court…
|
5 |
| 16 Apr 2021 |
[2021] EWHC 911 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
Costs in restructuring-plan proceedings under Part 26A are a matter for the court’s discretion. There is no established principle or presumption that an…
|
4 |
Recent cases
| Date | Case | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Feb 2025 |
[2025] EWHC 279 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
Part 26A of the Companies Act 2006 permits a restructuring plan to bind a dissenting class only where the statutory conditions are satisfied and the court…
|
6 |
| 3 Sep 2024 |
[2024] EWHC 2598 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
At the convening stage of a restructuring plan application, the court decides whether the statutory jurisdictional conditions are met, whether the proposed…
|
|
| 7 Mar 2024 |
[2024] EWHC 563 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
The court has a broad discretion when deciding whether to sanction a restructuring plan under Part 26A of the Companies Act 2006. Where there is no cross-class…
|
|
| 4 Mar 2024 |
[2024] EWHC 468 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
Part 26A requires a proposed compromise or arrangement for every class of creditor or member to which the proposal is directed. A proposal that simply…
|
7 |
| 1 Nov 2023 |
[2023] EWHC 2849 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
At a restructuring-plan convening hearing, the court should decide matters properly before it wherever possible and should not routinely defer them to…
|
7 |
| 9 Jun 2023 |
[2023] EWHC 1426 (Comm) · High Court: Commercial Court
For the purposes of CPR 36.17(4)(a)
|
|
| 9 Jun 2023 |
[2023] EWHC 1425 (Comm) · High Court: Commercial Court
Post-judgment interest is governed by the compensatory principle. The court should assess the appropriate rate in the post-judgment context and should not…
|
|
| 9 Jun 2023 |
[2023] EWHC 1424 (Comm) · High Court: Commercial Court
Where a claimant has beaten a Part 36 offer, the court must consider all the circumstances when deciding whether the enhanced consequences would be unjust. The…
|
|
| 9 Jun 2023 |
[2023] EWHC 1422 (Comm) · High Court: Commercial Court
Under Civil Procedure Rules 1998, r 36.17(4)(a), enhanced interest following rejection of a Part 36 offer compensates the successful claimant for non-financial…
|
|
| 9 Jun 2023 |
[2023] EWHC 1421 (Comm) · High Court: Commercial Court
When making a proportionate costs order, the court should identify costs attributable to individual issues and costs common to several issues. The overall…
|
|
| 5 Apr 2023 |
[2023] EWHC 711 (Comm) · High Court: Commercial Court
Contractual construction is a unitary and iterative exercise. The court must read the disputed wording in the context of the contract as a whole, test rival…
|
1 |
| 12 May 2021 |
[2021] EWHC 1246 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
Where the statutory conditions for cross-class cram down are met, the court must still exercise an informed discretion under Companies Act 2006, Part 26A.…
|
26 |
Based on judgments published by The National Archives (Find Case Law) in which Sullivan & Cromwell LLP is named as solicitors, counted under the firm's current name. The figures are minimums: not every judgment names the solicitors, and a judgment is counted only when we are confident who acted. The selection of cases listed here is limited, and does not include family, criminal or anonymised cases. Firm details include data from the Solicitors Regulation Authority. zoomLaw is independent and not connected with Sullivan & Cromwell LLP. Something wrong or missing? Tell us. All law firms.