Practice areas
Courts
Judgments by year
Cases later courts cite most
Cases Systech Law acted in that later judgments cite most often.
| Date | Case | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Jul 2013 |
[2013] EWHC 1983 (TCC) · High Court: Technology and Construction Court
An adjudicator’s error of fact, law or procedure does not ordinarily justify refusing enforcement. The court will intervene where there has been an actual or…
|
8 |
| 8 Apr 2014 |
[2014] EWHC 1058 (TCC) · High Court: Technology and Construction Court
An adjudication decision is enforceable despite an alleged error of fact or law, provided its terms are sufficiently certain. A party may reserve its…
|
7 |
| 11 Mar 2015 |
[2015] EWHC 587 (TCC) · High Court: Technology and Construction Court
An adjudicator has no jurisdiction to determine which adjudication provisions govern his appointment or conduct where competing provisions make a material…
|
3 |
| 19 Oct 2010 |
[2010] EWHC 2595 (TCC) · High Court: Technology and Construction Court
Ordinary contractual disputes remain civil and commercial matters for the purposes of the Jurisdiction and Judgments Regulation 44/2001, even where one party…
|
3 |
Recent cases
| Date | Case | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Nov 2015 |
[2015] EWHC 3244 (TCC) · High Court: Technology and Construction Court
On a summary judgment application, the court may decide a short point of law or construction where the evidence is sufficient and the parties have had a proper…
|
|
| 11 Mar 2015 |
[2015] EWHC 587 (TCC) · High Court: Technology and Construction Court
An adjudicator has no jurisdiction to determine which adjudication provisions govern his appointment or conduct where competing provisions make a material…
|
3 |
| 8 Apr 2014 |
[2014] EWHC 1058 (TCC) · High Court: Technology and Construction Court
An adjudication decision is enforceable despite an alleged error of fact or law, provided its terms are sufficiently certain. A party may reserve its…
|
7 |
| 12 Jul 2013 |
[2013] EWHC 1983 (TCC) · High Court: Technology and Construction Court
An adjudicator’s error of fact, law or procedure does not ordinarily justify refusing enforcement. The court will intervene where there has been an actual or…
|
8 |
| 19 Oct 2010 |
[2010] EWHC 2595 (TCC) · High Court: Technology and Construction Court
Ordinary contractual disputes remain civil and commercial matters for the purposes of the Jurisdiction and Judgments Regulation 44/2001, even where one party…
|
3 |
| 7 Oct 2010 |
[2010] EWHC 2670 (TCC) · High Court: Technology and Construction Court
A construction contract falls within the statutory adjudication regime only where all its terms are in writing or evidenced in writing. An adjudicator lacks…
|
1 |
Based on judgments published by The National Archives (Find Case Law) in which Systech Law is named as solicitors, counted under the firm's current name. The figures are minimums: not every judgment names the solicitors, and a judgment is counted only when we are confident who acted. The selection of cases listed here is limited, and does not include family, criminal or anonymised cases. Firm details include data from the Solicitors Regulation Authority. zoomLaw is independent and not connected with Systech Law. Something wrong or missing? Tell us. All law firms.