Law firm

Taylor Emmet solicitors

Taylor Emmet solicitors is named as solicitors in at least 19 UK judgments from 2005 to 2026, most often in family and children and trusts, wills and private client.

19
judgments
5
in the last five years
1
in the Supreme Court or Privy Council
5
in the Court of Appeal

Practice areas

  • Family and children5
  • Trusts, wills and private client4
  • Planning and environment3
  • Public and administrative law3
  • Clinical negligence2
  • Civil liberties and human rights2
  • Media, defamation and privacy1
  • Company and partnership1

Courts

  • Supreme Court1
  • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)5
  • High Court13

Judgments by year

  • 20262
  • 20251
  • 20240
  • 20231
  • 20221
  • 20210
  • 20202
  • 20191
  • 20180
  • 20170
  • 20161
  • 20151
  • 20143
  • 20132
  • 20120
  • 20110
  • 20102
  • 20091
  • 20080
  • 20070

Cases later courts cite most

Cases Taylor Emmet solicitors acted in that later judgments cite most often.

Date Case Cited by
11 Dec 2014
[2014] EWCA Civ 1609 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Permission to amend a statement of case is subject to proportionate case management. The court must consider the proposed pleading’s focus, explanation…
40
11 Mar 2014
[2014] EWHC 654 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Under Green Belt policy, development is prima facie inappropriate and harmful and requires very special circumstances unless it falls within the defined…
29
22 Jan 2015
[2015] EWCA Civ 10 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
A material change of use creating a cemetery in the Green Belt is inappropriate development under the National Planning Policy Framework. The exception in…
17
25 Jul 2005
[2005] EWCA Civ 932 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
An employee’s refusal on sincere religious grounds to work on a particular day may make a resulting dismissal unfair under the Employment Rights Act 1996.…
9
4 Nov 2010
[2010] EWHC 2720 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
A claim against an unincorporated partnership is, in substance, a claim against the individuals who were partners when the relevant causes of action accrued.…
4

Recent cases

Date Case Cited by
4 Oct 2022
[2022] EWHC 2462 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
Fraudulent calumny requires proof that a false representation about a beneficiary was made to the testator to induce a testamentary change, knowing it to be…
1 Jul 2020
[2020] EWHC 1727 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
A trust for a private members’ club may be valid even though its purposes are not exclusively charitable, where the members have enforceable contractual rights…
20 Mar 2020
[2020] EWHC 683 (QB) · High Court: Queen's Bench Division
Potentially large numbers of similar clinical negligence claims do not, without more, justify delaying claims that are ready to proceed. Where each claimant’s…
29 Mar 2019
[2019] EWHC 784 (QB) · High Court: Queen's Bench Division
Informed consent requires a doctor to take reasonable care to ensure that a patient understands material risks, including their possible severity and impact.…
1
9 Feb 2016
[2016] EWHC 220 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
In applying paragraph 88 of the National Planning Policy Framework, very special circumstances in the Green Belt require the decision-maker to weigh the…
22 Jan 2015
[2015] EWCA Civ 10 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
A material change of use creating a cemetery in the Green Belt is inappropriate development under the National Planning Policy Framework. The exception in…
17
11 Dec 2014
[2014] EWCA Civ 1609 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Permission to amend a statement of case is subject to proportionate case management. The court must consider the proposed pleading’s focus, explanation…
40
11 Mar 2014
[2014] EWHC 654 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Under Green Belt policy, development is prima facie inappropriate and harmful and requires very special circumstances unless it falls within the defined…
29
5 Mar 2014
[2014] EWHC 568 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
Permission to amend pleadings should be refused where the proposed amendment is late, disproportionate, prolix, inadequately particularised, or lacks a real…
1
22 Apr 2013
[2013] EWHC 956 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
An agreement to sell a business together with the right to occupy premises is an agreement relating to land. If it fails to comply with Law Reform…
4 Nov 2010
[2010] EWHC 2720 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
A claim against an unincorporated partnership is, in substance, a claim against the individuals who were partners when the relevant causes of action accrued.…
4
25 Jul 2005
[2005] EWCA Civ 932 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
An employee’s refusal on sincere religious grounds to work on a particular day may make a resulting dismissal unfair under the Employment Rights Act 1996.…
9

Based on judgments published by The National Archives (Find Case Law) in which Taylor Emmet solicitors is named as solicitors, counted under the firm's current name. The figures are minimums: not every judgment names the solicitors, and a judgment is counted only when we are confident who acted. The selection of cases listed here is limited, and does not include family, criminal or anonymised cases. Firm details include data from the Solicitors Regulation Authority. zoomLaw is independent and not connected with Taylor Emmet solicitors. Something wrong or missing? Tell us. All law firms.