Practice areas
Courts
Judgments by year
Cases later courts cite most
Cases Taylor Walton LLP acted in that later judgments cite most often.
| Date | Case | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Feb 2010 |
[2010] EWHC 244 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
A director appointed by the board under article 95 of the 1948 Table A holds office only until the next annual general meeting and must then be re-elected.…
|
12 |
| 16 Dec 2004 |
[2004] EWHC 2948 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
Permission to serve proceedings out of the jurisdiction requires the claimant to establish three matters: a cause of action with a reasonable prospect of…
|
5 |
Recent cases
| Date | Case | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Apr 2025 |
[2025] UKUT 135 (LC) · Upper Tribunal: Lands Chamber
An approval covenant requiring plans to receive the reasonable approval of “the Vendor” is personal to the original vendor where the conveyance does not extend…
|
|
| 17 Sep 2024 |
[2024] EWHC 2629 (TCC) · High Court: Technology and Construction Court
Adjudication decisions should be enforced summarily unless a serious breach of natural justice is established. The alleged breach must have made a material…
|
|
| 18 Dec 2020 |
[2020] EWHC 3471 (QB) · High Court: Queen's Bench Division
A settlement agreement is interpreted as a unitary exercise. The court considers the natural and ordinary meaning of the language, the agreement as a whole…
|
|
| 25 Oct 2019 |
[2019] EWHC 2830 (QB) · High Court: Queen's Bench Division
In determining meaning in a defamation claim, the court must identify the single natural and ordinary meaning conveyed to the ordinary reasonable reader…
|
1 |
| 10 May 2018 |
[2018] EWHC 1113 (TCC) · High Court: Technology and Construction Court
An option is exercised according to the proper construction of the agreement. A deposit is not a condition precedent merely because the agreement requires…
|
2 |
| 13 Apr 2018 |
[2018] EWHC 658 (TCC) · High Court: Technology and Construction Court
Damages for wrongful termination are assessed by asking what benefits the claimant would have received if the contract had continued until the earliest date on…
|
1 |
| 23 Jun 2016 |
[2016] EWHC 1508 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
A limited partnership has no legal personality and cannot hold a legal estate in land. Where a partnership has more than four partners, the legal owners cannot…
|
|
| 2 Dec 2015 |
[2015] EWHC 3458 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Section 70A of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 permits a local planning authority to decline to determine a later application where the statutory…
|
|
| 21 Jul 2014 |
[2014] EWHC 2395 (QB) · High Court: Queen's Bench Division
A claim based on alleged rescission of jewellery transactions requires proof that the parties agreed to rescind and that repayment was made on terms requiring…
|
|
| 5 Feb 2014 |
[2014] EWHC 209 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
Costs on an interim application are governed by the general rule that the successful party should receive its costs, subject to the court’s discretion having…
|
|
| 20 Mar 2012 |
[2012] EWHC 1265 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
Where a responsible professional body seeks to replace insolvency office-holders with reputable and independent practitioners, the court should presume that…
|
|
| 15 Feb 2010 |
[2010] EWHC 244 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
A director appointed by the board under article 95 of the 1948 Table A holds office only until the next annual general meeting and must then be re-elected.…
|
12 |
Based on judgments published by The National Archives (Find Case Law) in which Taylor Walton LLP is named as solicitors, counted under the firm's current name. The figures are minimums: not every judgment names the solicitors, and a judgment is counted only when we are confident who acted. The selection of cases listed here is limited, and does not include family, criminal or anonymised cases. Firm details include data from the Solicitors Regulation Authority. zoomLaw is independent and not connected with Taylor Walton LLP. Something wrong or missing? Tell us. All law firms.