Law firm

Virtuoso Legal

Virtuoso Legal is named as solicitors in at least 16 UK judgments from 2013 to 2026, most often in intellectual property and employment.

16
judgments
2
in the last five years
3
in the Court of Appeal

Practice areas

  • Intellectual property13
  • Employment4
  • Commercial disputes4

Courts

  • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)3
  • High Court13

Judgments by year

  • 20261
  • 20251
  • 20240
  • 20230
  • 20220
  • 20212
  • 20201
  • 20193
  • 20184
  • 20171
  • 20160
  • 20151
  • 20141
  • 20131

Cases later courts cite most

Cases Virtuoso Legal acted in that later judgments cite most often.

Date Case Cited by
9 Oct 2018
[2018] EWCA Civ 2211 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
For unfair advantage under Article 9(1)(c) of the Community Trade Mark Regulation, a commercial benefit obtained through use of a reputed mark is not, without…
24
4 Jan 2019
[2018] EWHC 3644 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
On an application for an interim injunction enforcing post-termination restraints, the court must assess the practical effect of the order and calibrate…
3

Recent cases

Date Case Cited by
14 Aug 2026
[2026] EWHC 2142 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
In intellectual property proceedings, a claimant with a real prospect of financial relief should ordinarily receive an inquiry or account unless…
4 Sep 2025
[2025] EWHC 2241 (Pat) · High Court: Patents Court
For UK unregistered design right, originality under section 213(1) of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 has the same meaning as originality in…
2 Dec 2021
[2021] EWCA Civ 1770 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
A signed written instrument may assign copyright without using the words copyright, grant or assign, if its objective construction shows an intention that…
15 Feb 2021
[2021] EWHC 293 (IPEC) · High Court: Intellectual Property Enterprise Court
Whether a copyright work is made by an employee in the course of employment under Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, section 11(2), requires a…
7 May 2020
[2020] EWCA Civ 609 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
The strict jurisdiction protecting a former client’s confidential information applies where the solicitor obtained that information through a true fiduciary…
2
5 Jul 2019
[2019] EWHC 1733 (IPEC) · High Court: Intellectual Property Enterprise Court
Applications to restrain solicitors from acting because they possess confidential information require a fact-sensitive and proportionate assessment. Where the…
1
20 Mar 2019
[2019] EWHC 638 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
Post-termination restraints in employment contracts are enforceable only where they protect a legitimate proprietary interest and go no further than reasonably…
21 Jan 2019
[2019] EWHC 58 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
An express post-termination confidentiality clause is unenforceable if it restrains the use of information forming part of an employee’s general skill and…
1
4 Jan 2019
[2018] EWHC 3644 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
On an application for an interim injunction enforcing post-termination restraints, the court must assess the practical effect of the order and calibrate…
3
9 Oct 2018
[2018] EWHC 2633 (IPEC) · High Court: Intellectual Property Enterprise Court
Damages for trade mark infringement and passing off are compensatory, not punitive. The claimant bears the burden of proving loss, but damages may be assessed…
9 Oct 2018
[2018] EWCA Civ 2211 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
For unfair advantage under Article 9(1)(c) of the Community Trade Mark Regulation, a commercial benefit obtained through use of a reputed mark is not, without…
24
15 Feb 2017
[2017] EWHC 231 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
For EU trade mark infringement based on website activity, accessibility from the territory is insufficient. The court must assess objectively whether the…
2

Based on judgments published by The National Archives (Find Case Law) in which Virtuoso Legal is named as solicitors, counted under the firm's current name. The figures are minimums: not every judgment names the solicitors, and a judgment is counted only when we are confident who acted. The selection of cases listed here is limited, and does not include family, criminal or anonymised cases. Firm details include data from the Solicitors Regulation Authority. zoomLaw is independent and not connected with Virtuoso Legal. Something wrong or missing? Tell us. All law firms.