Practice areas
Courts
Judgments by year
Recent cases
| Date | Case | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Dec 2021 |
[2021] EWHC 3327 (QB) · High Court: Queen's Bench Division
For slander to be actionable per se on the ground that it imputes a criminal offence, the words must convey to ordinary reasonable hearers, in context…
|
|
| 5 Feb 2018 |
[2018] EWHC 178 (TCC) · High Court: Technology and Construction Court
An oral construction contract is sufficient to engage the statutory adjudication regime. Whether a contract was concluded, and the identity of the contracting…
|
|
| 17 Feb 2017 |
[2016] EWHC 3583 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
Copyright in architectural drawings may subsist despite the drawings being based partly on an existing building or earlier survey material, provided sufficient…
|
|
| 25 Nov 2016 |
[2016] EWHC 3007 (TCC) · High Court: Technology and Construction Court
An adjudicator cannot ordinarily determine whether a contract exists at all where one party has clearly reserved its jurisdictional objection. Agreement to the…
|
2 |
| 2 Dec 2015 |
[2015] EWCA Civ 1247 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
A decision of the Upper Tribunal on valuation is not deprived of evidential value merely because it is not designated a guidance case. Under the tribunal…
|
|
| 17 Jul 2014 |
[2014] EWCA Civ 986 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
The Secretary of State has an implied power to withdraw a course designation where there are reasonable grounds to believe that public money is being paid for…
|
1 |
Based on judgments published by The National Archives (Find Case Law) in which WH Matthews & Co is named as solicitors, counted under the firm's current name. The figures are minimums: not every judgment names the solicitors, and a judgment is counted only when we are confident who acted. The selection of cases listed here is limited, and does not include family, criminal or anonymised cases. Firm details include data from the Solicitors Regulation Authority. zoomLaw is independent and not connected with WH Matthews & Co. Something wrong or missing? Tell us. All law firms.