Law firm

Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP

Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP is named as solicitors in at least 44 UK judgments from 2004 to 2026, most often in intellectual property and commercial disputes.

44
judgments
16
in the last five years
13
in the Court of Appeal

Practice areas

  • Intellectual property16
  • Commercial disputes8
  • Competition and regulated industries6
  • Arbitration4
  • Cross-border disputes3
  • Public and administrative law3
  • Media, defamation and privacy1
  • Civil fraud and asset recovery1

Courts

  • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)13
  • High Court31

Counsel most often instructed

  • MICHAEL BLOCH4
  • Brian Nicholson3
  • Daniel Selmi3
  • Geoffrey Pritchard3
  • Lindsay Lane3
  • Simon Malynicz3

Judgments by year

  • 20263
  • 20251
  • 20242
  • 20234
  • 20226
  • 20211
  • 20203
  • 20195
  • 20180
  • 20171
  • 20160
  • 20154
  • 20142
  • 20131
  • 20122
  • 20110
  • 20101
  • 20091
  • 20082
  • 20071

Cases later courts cite most

Cases Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP acted in that later judgments cite most often.

Date Case Cited by
30 Jul 2004
[2004] EWCA Civ 1021 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
A patent claim must be construed purposively through the eyes of the skilled person reading the specification as a whole. Language requiring a connection to be…
25
11 May 2015
[2015] EWHC 1250 (Comm) · High Court: Commercial Court
Contract damages are assessed by reference to causation and on the assumption that the claimant responded reasonably to the breach. Where the claimant takes a…
18
25 Apr 2007
[2007] EWCA Civ 364 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
A final, unappealable judgment that a patent is valid and infringed conclusively determines the parties’ rights to financial relief for the infringements…
18
29 Jul 2013
[2013] EWCA Civ 918 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
A regulatory authority does not irrevocably discontinue enforcement proceedings merely by making an internal decision or publishing an unauthorised website…
13
15 Dec 2023
[2023] EWCA Civ 1478 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
An online marketplace operator uses a third party’s sign in its own commercial communication where a well-informed and reasonably observant user would link the…
8
11 Feb 2020
[2020] EWHC 525 (Comm) · High Court: Commercial Court
Whether to order separate trials of liability and quantum requires a pragmatic balancing exercise under the overriding objective. The court must assess how the…
7
20 Nov 2015
[2015] EWHC 3361 (Comm) · High Court: Commercial Court
A tribunal’s provisional payment order may be enforced under Arbitration Act 1996, section 42. Section 41(5) is not confined to orders concerning procedural…
7
10 Jul 2020
[2020] EWHC 1789 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
A clearly drafted contractual option permitting partial withdrawal from a service programme is ordinarily effective according to its terms. It is not confined…
3
29 Oct 2009
[2009] EWHC 2607 (Comm) · High Court: Commercial Court
For service out of the jurisdiction, the claimant must show that it has much the better of the argument that the contract is governed by English law. Under…
3
1 May 2025
[2025] EWCA Civ 552 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
In fixing FRAND terms for a standards-essential patent portfolio, the court should identify the closest comparable licence or licences and evaluate…
3

Recent cases

Date Case Cited by
1 May 2026
[2026] EWHC 1003 (Comm) · High Court: Commercial Court
Under the Arbitration Act 1996, non-mandatory default rules on recoverable arbitration costs may be displaced by the parties’ agreement, including…
10 Apr 2026
[2026] EWHC 827 (Comm) · High Court: Commercial Court
A challenge under section 68(2)(d) of the Arbitration Act 1996 requires the court to identify an essential issue, determine whether it was put to the tribunal…
1
30 Jan 2026
[2026] EWHC 179 (Pat) · High Court: Patents Court
For an interim RAND licence, the court’s task is to hold the ring pending the final determination, rather than conduct a mini-trial of the ultimate royalty.…
1
1 May 2025
[2025] EWCA Civ 552 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
In fixing FRAND terms for a standards-essential patent portfolio, the court should identify the closest comparable licence or licences and evaluate…
3
27 Nov 2024
[2024] EWHC 3046 (Comm) · High Court: Commercial Court
The Shareholder Rule should no longer be applied in English law. Its historical proprietary justification disappeared when the separate legal personality of…
1
14 Feb 2024
[2024] EWHC 197 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
Where information constitutes a statutory trade secret, the open justice principle yields to the protection of that information to the extent necessary. The…
2
15 Dec 2023
[2023] EWCA Civ 1478 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
An online marketplace operator uses a third party’s sign in its own commercial communication where a well-informed and reasonably observant user would link the…
8
4 Jul 2023
[2023] EWCA Civ 758 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
In a patent claim to a product defined by functional language such as “adapted to”, the product is ordinarily within the claim if it is suitable or capable of…
25 Apr 2023
[2023] EWCA Civ 438 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
In an appeal on patent obviousness, the claimed invention must be assessed as a whole and with care against hindsight. A logical sequence of routine steps…
1
15 Jul 2022
[2022] EWHC 1895 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
An injunction should ordinarily be granted for trade mark infringement unless the defendant establishes special reasons, including disproportionality or an…
2
28 Jun 2022
[2022] EWHC 1648 (Comm) · High Court: Commercial Court
Extensions of time to challenge an arbitral award are exceptional because the Arbitration Act 1996 promotes speedy finality. The court must assess all relevant…
13 Jun 2022
[2022] EWCA Civ 792 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
A patent claim must be construed through the eyes of the skilled person, in its technical context and purposively. General statements that embodiments are…
1

Based on judgments published by The National Archives (Find Case Law) in which Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP is named as solicitors, counted under the firm's current name. The figures are minimums: not every judgment names the solicitors, and a judgment is counted only when we are confident who acted. The selection of cases listed here is limited, and does not include family, criminal or anonymised cases. Firm details include data from the Solicitors Regulation Authority. zoomLaw is independent and not connected with Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP. Something wrong or missing? Tell us. All law firms.