The Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999, regulation 22

Restriction of civil liability for breach of statutory duty

[F24 22.—(1) Breach of a duty imposed by regulation 16, 16A, 17 or 17A shall, so far as it causes damage, be actionable by the new or expectant mother.

(2) Any term of an agreement which purports to exclude or restrict any liability for such a breach is void.F24]

Definitions used in regulation 22 1

new or expectant mother

“new or expectant mother" means an employee who is pregnant; who has given birth within the previous six months; or who is breastfeeding;

Defined in reg.1 · see it in the full Regulations

Cases considering regulation 22 8

Webster & Ors v Ridgeway Foundation School

[2010] EWHC 157 (QB) · 5 February 2010Limits

The regulation was relied upon only to confirm that breach of the Regulations did not confer a civil right of action, subject to immaterial qualifications. (see para [111])

Sayers v Cambridgeshire County Council

[2006] EWHC 2029 (QB) · 31 July 2006

Applies Regulation 22 as excluding a civil right of action for breach of duties imposed by the Regulations. The 2003 substitution was not retrospective, so the claimant had no statutory damages claim for the 2002 events (see paras [290]; [306]; [314]-[322]).

Gray v Fire Alarm Fabrication Services Ltd & Ors

[2006] EWHC 849 (QB) · 3 March 2006Disapplies

Applies regulation 22(1) to exclude reliance on breach of the regulatory duty as establishing civil liability in these proceedings. (see para [52])

What each judgment says about regulation 22 is in the case-law panel in the full Regulations.

Amendments and notes

1 notes from legislation.gov.uk

Amendments

  1. F24Reg. 22 substituted (1.10.2013) by The Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 (Civil Liability) (Exceptions) Regulations 2013 (S.I. 2013/1667), regs. 1(2), 3