Proceeds of Crime Act 2002, section 252

Restrictions on dealing etc. with property

Part 5 Civil recovery of the proceeds etc. of unlawful conduct

(1)An interim receiving order must, subject to any exclusions made in accordance with this section, prohibit any person to whose property the order applies from dealing with the property.

(2)Exclusions may be made when the interim receiving order is made or on an application to vary the order.

(3)An exclusion may, in particular, make provision for the purpose of enabling any person—

(a)to meet his reasonable living expenses, or

(b)to carry on any trade, business, profession or occupation,

and may be made subject to conditions.

[F815 (4)Where the court exercises the power to make an exclusion for the purpose of enabling a person to meet legal expenses that he has incurred, or may incur, in respect of proceedings under this Part, it must ensure that the exclusion—

(a)is limited to reasonable legal expenses that the person has reasonably incurred or that he reasonably incurs,

(b)specifies the total amount that may be released for legal expenses in pursuance of the exclusion, and

(c)is made subject to the required conditions (see section 286A) in addition to any conditions imposed under subsection (3).

(4A)The court, in deciding whether to make an exclusion for the purpose of enabling a person to meet legal expenses of his in respect of proceedings under this Part—

(a)must have regard (in particular) to the desirability of the person being represented in any proceedings under this Part in which he is a participant, and

(b)must, where the person is the respondent, disregard the possibility that legal representation of the person in any such proceedings might, were an exclusion not made, be [F816 made available under arrangements made for the purposes of Part 1 of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 or funded byF816] [F817 the Department of JusticeF817] .F815]

(5)If the excluded property is not specified in the order it must be described in the order in general terms.

(6)The power to make exclusions must [F818, subject to subsection (4A),F818] be exercised with a view to ensuring, so far as practicable, that the satisfaction of any right of the enforcement authority to recover the property obtained through unlawful conduct is not unduly prejudiced.

Definitions used in section 252 8

interim receiving order

“interim receiving order” has the meaning given by section 246(2),

Defined in s.316(1) · see it in the full Act
dealing

“dealing” with property includes disposing of it, taking possession of it or removing it from the United Kingdom,

Defined in s.316(1) · see it in the full Act
the court

(10) In this section, sections 120 to 140 and Schedule 3 “the court” means—

(a)the Court of Session, where a trial diet or a diet fixed for the purposes of section 76 of the Procedure Act in proceedings for the offence or offences concerned is to be, is being or has been held in the High Court of Justiciary;

(b)the sheriff exercising his civil jurisdiction, where a diet referred to in paragraph (a) is to be, is being or has been held in the sheriff court.

Defined in s.119(10) · see it in the full Act

“the court” (except in sections 253(2) and (3) and 262(2) and (3) and Chapters 3, 3A , 3B, 3C, 3D, 3E and 3F ) means the High Court or (in relation to proceedings in Scotland) the Court of Session,

Defined in s.316(1) · see it in the full Act
part

“part”, in relation to property, includes a portion,

Defined in s.316(1) · see it in the full Act
respondent

“respondent” means—

(a)

where proceedings are brought by the enforcement authority by virtue of Chapter 2, the person against whom the proceedings are brought,

(b)

where no such proceedings have been brought but the enforcement authority has applied for a property freezing order, an interim receiving order, a prohibitory property order or an interim administration order, the person against whom he intends to bring such proceedings,

Defined in s.316(1) · see it in the full Act
the Department of Justice

“the Department of Justice” means the Department of Justice in Northern Ireland;

Defined in s.316(1) · see it in the full Act
enforcement authority

“enforcement authority”—

(a)

in relation to England and Wales, means the Financial Conduct Authority, Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs, the National Crime Agency , the Director of Public Prosecutions ... or the Director of the Serious Fraud Office,

(b)

in relation to Scotland, means the Scottish Ministers,

(c)

in relation to Northern Ireland, means the Financial Conduct Authority, Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs, the National Crime Agency , the Director of the Serious Fraud Office or the Director of Public Prosecutions for Northern Ireland,

Defined in s.316(1) · see it in the full Act
property obtained through unlawful conduct

“property obtained through unlawful conduct” has the meaning given by section 242,

Defined in s.316(1) · see it in the full Act

Cases considering section 252 5

S v Customs and Excise

[2004] EWCA Crim 2374 · 1 October 2004Interprets

The Court considered the power to make exclusions from an interim receiving order as part of a contextual comparison within the same Act. (see paras [45]-[46]) The Court noted the express exclusions for living expenses and for carrying on a trade, business, profession or occupation when comparing the statutory regimes. (see paras [45]-[46]) The express prohibition on exclusions for legal expenses in civil-recovery proceedings was a contextual indication of Parliament’s consistent approach to preserving property rather than funding challenges from it. (see paras [45]-[47])

Serious Organised Crime Agency v Agidi & Anor

[2011] EWHC 175 (QB) · 7 February 2011

Section 252 formed part of the legal-expense exclusion framework considered by the court. The court applied the balancing approach and refused release because other substantial property was available to meet the respondents’ legal costs. (see paras [102]-[109])

Serious Organised Crime Agency v Szepietowski & Ors

[2009] EWHC 1560 (Ch) · 1 July 2009Limits

Interprets the provision as permitting exclusion orders to be made when an interim receiving order is made or on an application to vary it. This supported the conclusion that an exclusion was open to later variation or setting aside. (see para [38]) Interprets the power to make an exclusion subject to conditions as permitting a condition equivalent to paragraph 7A.4(2) of the Practice Direction. The provision therefore supported future reconsideration of an exclusion where free assets became available. (see para [38]) The provision was discussed as part of the statutory history of exclusions for legal expenses. The court rejected the submission that the legislative scheme guaranteed that an exclusion, once made, would remain effective. (see paras [36]-[44]) The provision was referred to in explaining the legislative policy permitting legal representation in civil recovery proceedings. It did not create a guarantee that an exclusion would ultimately fund the defendant’s legal expenses. (see paras [36], [43]-[44]) The provision was considered as part of the statutory provisions governing exclusions for legal expenses. The court held that the scheme did not make an exclusion immune from later challenge where free assets became available. (see paras [36]-[44])

What each judgment says about section 252 is in the case-law panel in the full Act.

Explanatory note

320.Subsection (1) provides that the interim receiving order must prevent any dealing with the property to which it applies, subject to any exclusions which may be made under the rest of the section. This is to prevent the property being dissipated pending a resolution of the civil recovery case. ‘Dealing’ is explained in section 316(1) as including disposing of the property, taking possession of it or removing it from the United Kingdom. A person who has notice of the order and contravenes it will be liable to be proceeded against for contempt of court.

321.Subsection (2) states that exclusions may be made either when the order is made or, later, by variation. Subsection (3) states that an exclusion may in particular provide for property to be used for meeting any person’s reasonable living expenses or to carry on a trade, business, profession or occupation. Living expenses would be likely to include the living expenses of dependants. But the court’s discretion to release property is limited by subsections (4) (no release of property to meet legal expenses arising from civil recovery) and (6) (the court must ensure that the Director’s “right to recover” the property (defined at section 316(8)) is not be unduly prejudiced). Persons involved in civil recovery proceedings will be able to apply to the Community Legal Service scheme, or the Legal Aid scheme which applies in Northern Ireland, for their legal costs, or of course to use any unfrozen assets they may have available, so there will be no need for them to draw from the property subject to the order.

All the explanatory notes for the Act

Amendments and notes

5 notes from legislation.gov.uk

Amendments

  1. F815S. 252(4)(4A) substituted for s. 252(4) (1.1.2006) by Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005 (c. 15), s. 178(8), Sch. 6 para. 14(2); S.I. 2005/3136, art. 3(c)
  2. F816Words in s. 252(4A)(b) substituted (1.4.2013) by Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (c. 10), s. 151(1), Sch. 5 para. 60; S.I. 2013/453, art. 3(h) (with savings and transitional provisions in S.I. 2013/534, art. 6) this amendment is subject to savings and/or transitional provisions, see the commentary.
  3. F817Words in s. 252(4A)(b) substituted (N.I.) (1.4.2015) by Legal Aid and Coroners‘ Courts Act (Northern Ireland) 2014 (c. 11), s. 12(1), Sch. 2 para. 4 (with ss. 2(3), 9, Sch. 1 para. 3(3)); S.R. 2015/193, art. 2(e)
  4. F818Words in s. 252(6) inserted (1.1.2006) by Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005 (c. 15), s. 178(8), Sch. 6 para. 14(3); S.I. 2005/3136, art. 3(c)

Commencement

  1. I233S. 252 in force at 24.2.2003 by S.I. 2003/120, art. 2, Sch. (with arts. 3, 4) (as amended (20.2.2003) by S.I. 2003/333, art. 14)