(1)While cash is detained under section 295 , 297C or 297D , an application for the forfeiture of the whole or any part of it may be made—
(a)to a magistrates’ court by the Commissioners of Customs and Excise , an accredited financial investigator , a constable or an SFO officer ,
(b)(in Scotland) to the sheriff by the Scottish Ministers.
(2)The court or sheriff may order the forfeiture of the cash or any part of it if satisfied that the cash or part—
(a)is recoverable property, or
(b)is intended by any person for use in unlawful conduct.
(3)But in the case of recoverable property which belongs to joint tenants, one of whom is an excepted joint owner, the order may not apply to so much of it as the court thinks is attributable to the excepted joint owner’s share.
(4)Where an application for the forfeiture of any cash is made under this section, the cash is to be detained (and may not be released under any power conferred by this Chapter) until any proceedings in pursuance of the application (including any proceedings on appeal) are concluded.
Cases considering section 298 38
[2017] EWCA Civ 1161 · 28 July 2017Interprets
The court construed forfeiture as a distinct statutory stage governed by the factual conditions in section 298(2), without requiring a prior determination of the legality of seizure or detention (see paras [5]-[7], [17]-[20]).
The court interpreted section 298(1) as imposing only a temporal limit on the constable’s ability to apply for forfeiture, not a substantive gateway requiring lawful prior detention (see para [17]).
The court held that the forfeiture inquiry is whether, as a matter of fact, the cash is recoverable property or intended for use in unlawful conduct. Earlier illegality may be examined only if relevant to proving those matters (see paras [17]-[18]).
The court identified recoverable property as one alternative factual condition for forfeiture, without deciding the factual merits of that condition on this appeal (see paras [5], [17]-[18]).
The court identified intended use in unlawful conduct as the alternative factual condition for forfeiture, without deciding the factual merits of that condition on this appeal (see paras [5], [17]-[18]).
The court confirmed that once a forfeiture application is made, the cash cannot be released under a power conferred by the statutory chapter until the proceedings, including any appeal, are concluded (see para [7]).
[2011] EWCA Civ 332 · 25 March 2011
The court quashed a cash-forfeiture order made under this provision because the affected person had no notice of the hearing. The police could seek a fresh determination concerning detention of the money. (see paras [47]; [54])
[2010] EWCA Civ 40 · 4 February 2010
The court applied the provision in assessing the police’s decision to pursue forfeiture. Reasonable grounds to believe that cash was intended for unlawful conduct made it responsible to seek a forfeiture order, although the application ultimately failed. (see para [44])
18 more judgments, and what each says about section 298, are in the
case-law panel in the full Act.
413.Section 298 enables the magistrates’ court (or, in Scotland, the sheriff) to order the forfeiture of cash or any part of it if satisfied that it is recoverable property or is intended for use in unlawful conduct. The balance of probabilities is the evidential standard that applies to the proceedings, this being the normal civil standard of proof (section 241(3)).
414.Where the cash is recoverable property belonging to joint tenants, one of whom falls within the definition in section 270(4), the court must not forfeit the cash that it thinks attributable to the “innocent” partner’s share. An example of this might be a joint bank account into which drug trafficking proceeds (dirty money) has been paid by one signatory and clean money by the other. If the former withdraws all the cash and it is subsequently seized, the court must then distinguish between the clean and dirty money. The court may then return to the “innocent” partner his share of the money.
415.Subsection (4) provides that cash cannot be released under any circumstance once an application for the forfeiture of that cash is made, until such time as forfeiture proceedings have concluded.