A person is guilty of an offence if he uses, or causes or permits another to use, a motor vehicle or trailer on a road when—
(a)the condition of the motor vehicle or trailer, or of its accessories or equipment, or
(b)the purpose for which it is used, or
(c)the number of passengers carried by it, or the manner in which they are carried, or
(d)the weight, position or distribution of its load, or the manner in which it is secured,
is such that the use of the motor vehicle or trailer involves a danger of injury to any person.
Cases considering section 40A 6
[2003] EWCA Crim 2099 · 21 July 2003Interprets
The court contrasted section 40A, which concerns a vehicle’s condition and can encompass latent defects, with section 2A(2), which requires an obvious danger in the vehicle’s current state. (see paras [27]; [29]-[30])
[2024] EWHC 2803 (KB) · 6 November 2024
The court considered the statutory danger-of-injury standard in assessing competing expert opinions about whether the missing belly pan could make the motorcycle undriveable. The issue was treated as a disputed factual and expert matter for trial (see paras [41]-[49]; [133]; [137]).
[2004] EWHC 3118 (Admin) · 15 December 2004Interprets
The judgment interprets section 40A as creating an absolute offence. The prosecution need not prove any state of mind; the issue is whether the vehicle’s condition, while being used on a road, involved a danger of injury to any person. The provision was applied to the condition of the lorry’s wheel and wheel nuts. (see paras [9]-[18])
What each judgment says about section 40A is in the case-law panel in the full Act.