(1) Subject to section 167A, section 165(4) shall not apply where the transferee is a company which is within subsection (2) below.
(2)A company is within this subsection if it is controlled by a person who, or by persons each of whom—
(a)is not resident in the United Kingdom, and
(b) is or is connected with the person making the disposal.
(3)For the purposes of subsection (2) above, a person who (either alone or with others) controls a company by virtue of holding assets relating to that or any other company and who is resident in the United Kingdom is to be regarded as not resident there if—
(a)he is regarded for the purposes of any double taxation relief arrangements as resident in a territory outside the United Kingdom, and
(b)by virtue of the arrangements he would not be liable in the United Kingdom to tax on a gain arising on a disposal of the assets.
Cases considering section 167 3
[2007] EWCA Civ 8 · 17 January 2007Limits
Provides the complementary exclusion from hold-over relief where the transferee company is within section 167(2). The appeal turned on the construction and application of that exclusion. (see paras [8]; [48]-[64])
Limits section 165(4) relief where the transferee is a company within section 167(2). (see para [8])
Applies where the transferee is controlled by a person, or persons, each non-resident and connected with the transferor. Irish Life was treated as the controlling person. (see paras [8]; [13]; [48])
Applies the non-residence condition to the person controlling the transferee company. Irish Life satisfied that condition. (see paras [8]; [13])
Interprets the connection requirement by permitting section 286(7) to establish the connection between the non-resident controlling company and the transferor. (see paras [48]-[64])
[2018] UKUT 293 (TCC) · 26 September 2018Interprets
The foreign-control restriction must be read so that associate attribution is limited to connected non-residents who control the transferee by virtue of holding assets relating to that or another company. A non-resident connected person with no interest in the transferee cannot trigger the restriction (see paras [89]-[96]).
[2005] EWHC 2958 (Ch) · 20 December 2005Defines
Excludes section 165(4) relief where the transferee is a company within section 167(2). The court upheld the application of that exclusion on the unchallenged findings below. (see paras [7], [27]-[32])
Prevents hold-over relief where the transferee company is controlled by persons who are non-resident and connected with the transferor. The provision was compatible with Article 43 on the facts because the Irish insurer’s establishment rights were not engaged. (see paras [27]-[32], [68]-[80])
Provides a residence deeming rule for persons controlling a company through assets relating to that or another company. It was quoted as part of the statutory scheme, but no decision turned on it. (see para [7])
What each judgment says about section 167 is in the case-law panel in the full Act.