Luffman & Anor, R v

[2008] EWCA Crim 1752

Case details

Case citations
[2008] EWCA Crim 1752
Court
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
Judgment date
15 July 2008
Judgment text

This feature is available to zoomLaw Pro members.

Subjects
Criminal Criminal appeals
Keywords
criminal appeal appeals dismissed written reasons
Outcome
appeals dismissed
Judicial consideration

This feature is available to zoomLaw Pro members.

Summary

The Court of Appeal dismissed both criminal appeals. The supplied judgment records the disposition only and states that written reasons would be given later. It therefore establishes no discernible proposition of law on the material provided.

Factual background

Two appellants, Yvette Michelle Luffman and Wayne Briscoe, appealed in criminal proceedings to the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division). After hearing submissions, the court announced that both appeals would be dismissed and said that written reasons would follow.

The supplied text does not identify the convictions, sentences, lower-court decision, or grounds of appeal.

Held

  1. Both appeals were dismissed.
  2. The court stated that it had given the matter careful consideration and would provide written reasons before the end of term.
  3. The supplied transcript contains no substantive reasoning, legal analysis, or final written judgment from which a ratio decidendi can be extracted.

The court’s approach to earlier authorities

This feature is available to zoomLaw Pro members.

Appellate history

  • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division): Both appeals were dismissed in [2008] EWCA Crim 1752. The supplied text does not identify the decision appealed from.

Lower court decision

Judgment appealed:
Not stated in the judgment
Outcome:
appeals dismissed

Key cases cited

This feature is available to zoomLaw Pro members.

Cases citing this case

This feature is available to zoomLaw Pro members.