Luffman & Anor, R v

[2008] EWCA Crim 1752

Summary

The Court of Appeal dismissed both criminal appeals. The supplied judgment records the disposition only and states that written reasons would be given later. It therefore establishes no discernible proposition of law on the material provided.

Factual background

Two appellants, Yvette Michelle Luffman and Wayne Briscoe, appealed in criminal proceedings to the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division). After hearing submissions, the court announced that both appeals would be dismissed and said that written reasons would follow.

The supplied text does not identify the convictions, sentences, lower-court decision, or grounds of appeal.

Held

  1. Both appeals were dismissed.
  2. The court stated that it had given the matter careful consideration and would provide written reasons before the end of term.
  3. The supplied transcript contains no substantive reasoning, legal analysis, or final written judgment from which a ratio decidendi can be extracted.

The court’s approach to earlier authorities

Available to signed-in members.

Appellate history

  • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division): Both appeals were dismissed in [2008] EWCA Crim 1752 . The supplied text does not identify the decision appealed from.

Appeal route

  1. Appealed fromNot stated in the judgmentThis appealappeals dismissed
  2. This judgment [2008] EWCA Crim 1752 Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)

Key cases cited

Available to signed-in members.

Cases citing this case

Available to signed-in members.