Shaw, R. v

[2010] EWCA Crim 982

Case details

Case citations
[2010] EWCA Crim 982
Court
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
Judgment date
19 April 2010
Judgment text

This feature is available to zoomLaw Pro members.

Subjects
Criminal Sentencing appeals Compassionate release
Keywords
appeal against sentence extension of time compassionate grounds post-sentence medical condition stroke in prison release on licence Secretary of State Criminal Justice Act 2003 section 248 manifestly excessive sentence
Outcome
extension of time and leave to appeal against sentence refused
Judicial consideration

This feature is available to zoomLaw Pro members.

Summary

An appellate court reviews the sentencing decision made in the Crown Court. It will ordinarily interfere only if the sentence was unlawful, wrong in principle or manifestly excessive when imposed.

Compassionate release because of a prisoner's later medical condition is normally a matter for the Secretary of State under section 248(1) of the Criminal Justice Act 2003. The appellate court should usually leave that decision to the Secretary of State, who can obtain current medical evidence and determine whether exceptional compassionate circumstances justify release on licence.

Factual background

The applicant had received a total sentence of three years' imprisonment after guilty pleas to possession of amphetamine with intent to supply, handling a stolen vehicle, possession of heroin and dangerous driving. He later suffered a serious stroke in prison.

He sought an extension of time and leave to appeal against sentence. He accepted that the sentences were neither unlawful nor manifestly excessive. His sole submission was that the court should reduce the sentence on compassionate grounds so that he could obtain treatment in the community.

The central issue was whether compassionate release in light of post-sentence medical developments was for the Court of Appeal or the Secretary of State.

Held

  1. The court refused an extension of time and leave to appeal against sentence. Any appeal would be bound to fail because the total sentence was neither unlawful, wrong in principle nor manifestly excessive when imposed.

  2. The Court of Appeal's function is to review the sentencing process in the Crown Court. Later events, such as progress in prison, may sometimes be relevant, but ordinarily only after the court has already found the original sentence excessive or unduly lenient and is deciding the substitute sentence.

  3. Section 248(1) of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 permits the Secretary of State to release a fixed-term prisoner on licence where exceptional circumstances justify compassionate release. That power is discretionary and may be subject to judicial review only on ordinary public-law grounds.

  4. Where a prisoner relies on a serious post-sentence medical condition as a compassionate ground for release, the appropriate course will normally be to leave the question to the Secretary of State. The Secretary of State can obtain full and current medical evidence about the prisoner's condition, prognosis and future treatment. The court expressed no view on the merits of any application for release on licence.

The court’s approach to earlier authorities

This feature is available to zoomLaw Pro members.

Appellate history

  • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division): refused the application for an extension of time and leave to appeal against sentence: [2010] EWCA Crim 982.
  • Crown Court: imposed consecutive sentences totalling three years' imprisonment for the offences to which the applicant pleaded guilty.

Lower court decision

Judgment appealed:
Not stated in the judgment
Outcome:
extension of time and leave to appeal against sentence refused

Key cases cited

This feature is available to zoomLaw Pro members.

Cases citing this case

This feature is available to zoomLaw Pro members.