Insaidoo v. Metropolitan Resources North West Ltd

[2010] UKEAT 0365_10_0112

Case details

Case citations
[2010] UKEAT 0365_10_0112
Court
Employment Appeal Tribunal
Judgment date
1 December 2010
Judgment text

This feature is available to zoomLaw Pro members.

Subjects
Employment Employment tribunal jurisdiction Unfair dismissal procedure
Keywords
unfair dismissal constructive dismissal Employment Tribunal jurisdiction judge sitting alone three-person tribunal pay claims remittal Employment Tribunals Act 1996 section 4
Outcome
appeal allowed in part; unfair dismissal issue remitted
Judicial consideration

This feature is available to zoomLaw Pro members.

Summary

An unfair dismissal claim must be determined by a three-person Employment Tribunal. A decision on that claim by a judge sitting alone is made without jurisdiction and cannot stand.

Pay claims may be determined by a judge sitting alone. Accordingly, an appeal concerning pay claims may be dismissed where the single judge had jurisdiction and gave adequate reasons, while the unfair dismissal issue is remitted for determination by a differently constituted three-person tribunal.

Factual background

The claimant appealed against an Employment Tribunal decision concerning constructive unfair dismissal and various payment claims. The Employment Tribunal had dismissed the unfair dismissal issue and dealt with the payment claims through a judge sitting alone.

At a preliminary hearing, the Employment Appeal Tribunal considered whether the procedure and jurisdiction of the Employment Tribunal were properly addressed. The central issue was whether a single judge could determine the unfair dismissal claim and the payment claims.

Held

  1. Unfair dismissal. The Employment Tribunals Act 1996, section 4 required the unfair dismissal claim to be determined by a three-person tribunal. The determination of that claim by a one-person tribunal involved a fundamental jurisdictional defect.
  2. The unfair dismissal issue therefore had to return to the Employment Tribunal for determination by a three-person tribunal and a different judge. The Respondent was given 14 days to state whether it would consent to the appeal being allowed by agreement.
  3. Payment claims. The judge sitting alone had jurisdiction to determine the pay claims, as such claims were customarily dealt with by a single judge. The Employment Appeal Tribunal agreed with the President that the grounds concerning those claims were hopeless, since the Tribunal had given reasons for its conclusions.
  4. The Notice of Appeal was dismissed except in relation to unfair dismissal, which was sent to a full hearing.

The court’s approach to earlier authorities

This feature is available to zoomLaw Pro members.

Appellate history

  • Employment Tribunal: Judge Shotter determined the unfair dismissal and payment claims. The unfair dismissal claim was dismissed and the payment claims were addressed in the Tribunal’s reasons.
  • Employment Appeal Tribunal: The appeal was dismissed in relation to the payment claims. The unfair dismissal issue was remitted for determination by a three-person tribunal with a different judge.

Key cases cited

This feature is available to zoomLaw Pro members.

Cases citing this case

This feature is available to zoomLaw Pro members.