| Date | Case | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| 10 May 2013 |
[2010] UKEAT 0259_12_1005
An appellate court will rarely interfere with an Employment Tribunal’s discretionary costs decision. Intervention requires an error of legal principle, failure…
|
|
| 3 Aug 2011 |
[2010] UKEAT 0240_10_0308
An appeal from an Employment Tribunal is not an opportunity to reargue the facts or invite the Employment Appeal Tribunal to substitute its assessment of the…
|
|
| 26 Jul 2011 |
[2010] UKEAT 135_10_2607
In a constructive dismissal claim, the implied term of mutual trust and confidence is breached only where the employer’s conduct, without reasonable and proper…
|
|
| 29 Jun 2011 |
[2010] UKEAT 232_10_2906
An appellate tribunal may intervene only for an error of law and must not substitute its assessment of facts or evaluative judgments for that of the employment…
|
|
| 28 Jun 2011 |
[2010] UKEAT 0388_09_2806
An Employment Tribunal judgment may use a narrative structure, but it must contain both formal and substantial compliance with rule 30(6) of the Employment…
|
|
| 9 May 2011 |
[2010] UKEAT 55_10_905
In mass equal-pay litigation, tribunals should be ready to permit correction of accidental job-title misdescriptions, subject to real prejudice, jurisdictional…
|
|
| 9 May 2011 |
[2010] UKEAT 0056_10_0905 (9 May 2011)
It is not correct to refuse correction of innocuous job‑title errors in mass equal pay litigation on purely procedural grounds; tribunals should permit…
|
|
| 9 May 2011 |
[2010] UKEAT 0040_10_0905
In mass equal-pay litigation, tribunals should readily permit correction of accidental job-title misdescriptions, subject to real prejudice, jurisdictional…
|
|
| 9 May 2011 |
[2010] UKEAT 0037_10_0905
In mass equal-pay litigation, tribunals should readily permit correction of accidental job-title misdescriptions unless the amendment creates real prejudice…
|
1 |
| 5 May 2011 |
[2010] UKEAT 0090_10_0505
In assessing compensation under section 123 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, an Employment Tribunal may apportion loss where dismissal competes with other…
|
|
| 20 Apr 2011 |
[2010] UKEAT 0283_10_2004
Victimisation cannot be inferred merely from a respondent’s unsatisfactory answers to a statutory questionnaire. The tribunal must assess, in the circumstances…
|
|
| 13 Apr 2011 |
[2010] UKEAT 53_9_1304
In a capability dismissal, the tribunal must ask whether the employer genuinely believed in the stated reason, conducted a reasonable investigation and had…
|
|
| 13 Apr 2011 |
[2010] UKEAT 0093_10_1304
An Employment Tribunal assessing compensation after an unfair dismissal must base any Polkey reduction on evidence and adequate reasoning. A percentage…
|
|
| 10 Feb 2011 |
[2010] UKEAT 0216_10_1002
In a Polkey assessment, the tribunal must assess the chance that a fair procedure would have produced dismissal. The exercise is probabilistic, not a…
|
|
| 20 Jan 2011 |
[2010] UKEAT 268_10_0707
A contract is an apprenticeship according to its substantial character and purpose, rather than the labels used in the documents. The central question is…
|
|
| 17 Dec 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0943_10_1712
An extension of time for an Employment Appeal Tribunal appeal requires an exceptional explanation for non-compliance with the 42-day limit. The tribunal…
|
2 |
| 17 Dec 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0533_09_1712
A contractual attendance criterion framed as a commitment to achieving high levels of attendance is not necessarily satisfied or defeated solely by whether an…
|
|
| 17 Dec 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0307_10_1712
An employer seeking a Polkey reduction must raise the issue and identify the evidential basis for it before the Employment Tribunal. The EAT will rarely permit…
|
|
| 17 Dec 2010 |
Roberts v Carlin [2010] UKEAT 0183_09_1712
The Employment Appeal Tribunal held that an employment tribunal must give clear, Meek-compliant reasons so parties can understand why credibility findings and…
|
|
| 15 Dec 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0266_10_1512
In a conduct dismissal, an employment tribunal must assess whether the employer’s distinction between the present case and an earlier disciplinary case was…
|
|
| 14 Dec 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 1385_09_1205
An Employment Appeal Tribunal should refuse to interfere with an Employment Tribunal’s discretionary decision unless an error of law is shown. In deciding…
|
|
| 14 Dec 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0767_10_1412
For a term-time employee paid under an annual contract, statutory redundancy pay is calculated by reference to the weeks for which the employee is paid…
|
|
| 14 Dec 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0325_10_1412
Future loss in discrimination and unfair dismissal cases is a predictive assessment. The tribunal must make the best overall estimate it can of the claimant’s…
|
|
| 10 Dec 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0362_10_1012
In a conduct dismissal case, an Employment Tribunal must review the employer’s decision rather than substitute its own view of the facts or sanction. The…
|
|
| 10 Dec 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0221_10_1012
An Employment Appeal Tribunal appeal must be lodged within the prescribed time and accompanied by properly particularised grounds and supporting documents. The…
|
|
| 9 Dec 2010 |
Neafsey v. Small & Ors [2010] UKEAT 0828_10_0912
It is insufficient for a wasted costs order to state a conclusion without specifying the improper, unreasonable or negligent acts relied on. Instead the judge…
|
|
| 7 Dec 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0225_10_0712
Where Employment Tribunal and High Court proceedings cover substantially the same factual and legal territory, concurrent proceedings are generally…
|
|
| 7 Dec 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0065_10_0712
For a disclosure to an employer to be protected, it must be made in good faith. The statutory question is not whether the worker had mixed motives or whether…
|
|
| 6 Dec 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0318_10_0612
An Employment Tribunal must record and give reasons for an important procedural decision, particularly where a written application for postponement has been…
|
|
| 2 Dec 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0263_10_0212
For statutory employment time limits, the effective date of termination is governed by the relevant statute. The employee must be informed of the dismissal, or…
|
|
| 1 Dec 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0365_10_0112
An unfair dismissal claim must be determined by a three-person Employment Tribunal. A decision on that claim by a judge sitting alone is made without…
|
|
| 1 Dec 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0315_10_0112
New points of law are rarely permitted on appeal where they require further findings of fact. The restriction is especially strong where the point was not…
|
|
| 30 Nov 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0237_10_3011
An Employment Tribunal may limit compensation for unfair dismissal by reference to the period for which the employee would probably have remained employed. The…
|
|
| 29 Nov 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0517_10_2911
Under section 111(2)(b) of the Employment Rights Act 1996, an employee must establish both that it was not reasonably practicable to present the complaint…
|
|
| 29 Nov 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0285_10_2911
In a misconduct dismissal, the tribunal must assess whether the employer genuinely believed in the employee’s guilt, had reasonable grounds for that belief…
|
|
| 26 Nov 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0528_10_2611
In a misconduct dismissal, the Employment Tribunal must assess whether the employer had a genuine belief in the misconduct, reasonable grounds for that belief…
|
|
| 26 Nov 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0023_10_2611
An Employment Tribunal may grant a claimant leave to amend an ET1, but it has no power to draft and impose an amendment of its own choosing. The proposed…
|
|
| 25 Nov 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0466_09_2511
A dismissal to impose new employment terms may be for some other substantial reason under section 98(1)(b) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 where the employer…
|
|
| 25 Nov 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0239_10_2511
On an appeal concerning commission payable after termination, the appellate tribunal must apply the contractual construction determined below unless that…
|
|
| 24 Nov 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0219_10_2411
An ordained Methodist minister’s entitlement to complain of unfair dismissal depends on whether she entered or worked under a contract of employment within…
|
|
| 23 Nov 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0295_10_2311
A finding of automatic unfair dismissal does not prevent a Polkey reduction in compensation. The tribunal must assess whether, and when, dismissal would…
|
|
| 23 Nov 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0287_10_2311
An Employment Tribunal determining unfair dismissal must apply a neutral burden of proof when assessing the employer’s reasonableness and the adequacy of its…
|
|
| 23 Nov 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0172_10_2311
Pay protection provisions must be construed according to the rate of remuneration protected, rather than merely the amount previously received. A part-time…
|
|
| 22 Nov 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0280_10_2211
Where an employer withholds voluntary overtime from a worker who declines to waive protection against working more than 48 hours, the tribunal must consider…
|
|
| 19 Nov 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0296_10_1911
In a TUPE appeal, the Employment Appeal Tribunal will not interfere with an Employment Tribunal’s factual conclusion unless the high threshold for perversity…
|
|
| 18 Nov 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 364_10_1811
The 42-day time limit for lodging a properly constituted appeal to the Employment Appeal Tribunal is prescriptive. Litigants in person receive appropriate…
|
|
| 18 Nov 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0308_10_1811
An Employment Tribunal may strike out a claim where the available material shows that it cannot be tried fairly or where the claimant has failed to comply with…
|
|
| 18 Nov 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0291_09_1811
An employee’s agreement to a stated salary does not, without more, amount to consent to an unauthorised deduction that was unknown to the employee. Contractual…
|
|
| 18 Nov 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0274_10_1811
The 42-day time limit for instituting an appeal to the Employment Appeal Tribunal is prescriptive. An appellant must lodge a properly constituted Notice of…
|
|
| 16 Nov 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0255_10_1611
A person may be a partner without holding a substantial share of profits, making a substantial capital contribution, or enjoying extensive management rights.…
|
|
| 15 Nov 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0648_10_1511
An Employment Tribunal may proceed with a hearing in the absence of a party who has chosen not to attend, provided the tribunal fairly manages the case and…
|
|
| 15 Nov 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0512_09_1511
Under the Polkey approach, compensation for unfair dismissal is limited when the employment would have ended, by fair dismissal or resignation, for reasons…
|
|
| 15 Nov 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0343_10_1511
A strike-out power under rule 18(7) of the Employment Tribunal (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2004 is a stringent remedy. A claim may be…
|
|
| 12 Nov 2010 |
UKEAT/0489/09
Where statutory dismissal procedures are not followed, a finding of automatic unfair dismissal under section 98A(1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 cannot be…
|
|
| 10 Nov 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0253_10_1011
The EAT has a broader discretion to extend time for lodging a Respondent’s Answer than for instituting an appeal. The relevant considerations include the…
|
|
| 9 Nov 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0200_10_0911
For the purposes of a reasonable-adjustment duty, an employer may be required to alter normal appointment or recruitment processes where that is reasonable in…
|
|
| 8 Nov 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0508_09_0811
In a misconduct dismissal, the tribunal must apply the objective band of reasonable responses test and must not substitute its own assessment of the evidence…
|
|
| 8 Nov 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0298_10_0811
Victimisation requires less favourable treatment because the claimant carried out a protected act. The statutory protection does not apply where the relevant…
|
|
| 5 Nov 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0397_10_0511
For mental impairment, disability under the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 does not require proof of a clinically well-recognised condition. The question…
|
|
| 5 Nov 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0245_10_0511
An oral employment tribunal judgment may constitute an award even though some figures remain to be calculated from an agreed formula and are later included in…
|
|
| 5 Nov 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0013_10_0511
Age discrimination cannot be established by comparing the pension consequences of hypothetical retirement with the position of an employee who remains in…
|
|
| 3 Nov 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0292_10_0311
An employer’s duty to make reasonable adjustments requires an active investigation of suitable alternative employment and possible modifications to available…
|
|
| 2 Nov 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0016_10_0211
At the first stage of the misconduct test, the tribunal must decide whether the employer genuinely believed that the employee was guilty. It must not assess…
|
|
| 28 Oct 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0143_10_2810
An Employment Appeal Tribunal may interfere with an Employment Tribunal’s decision only for an error of law. A perversity challenge faces a high hurdle and…
|
|
| 27 Oct 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0440_10_2710
A tribunal considering whether to strike out proceedings because of a compromise agreement must first determine whether the agreement is valid and enforceable.…
|
|
| 27 Oct 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0278_10_2710
An employer proposing 20 or more redundancy dismissals must itself undertake timely, meaningful collective consultation with the appropriate representatives.…
|
|
| 27 Oct 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0015_10_2710
An employment tribunal may refuse to extend the time for seeking a review where the application is substantially late and the delay reflects a party’s failure…
|
|
| 26 Oct 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0017_10_2610
Where an employee alleges dismissal for making a protected disclosure but the employer advances misconduct as the reason, the tribunal must first determine the…
|
|
| 22 Oct 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0269_10_2210
Personal service is an essential element of both a contract of employment and a limb (b) worker relationship. Where an individual has an unfettered right to…
|
|
| 22 Oct 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0198_10_2210
In a redundancy dismissal, an employer has substantial discretion when defining the selection pool. That discretion requires genuine consideration of the…
|
|
| 21 Oct 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0313_10_2110
Where a discrimination claim alleges a series of connected incidents, a continuing act need not be pleaded in formal or technical words. The question is…
|
|
| 21 Oct 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0081_10_2110
An Employment Tribunal must give intelligible and adequate reasons showing why each party won or lost. Its judgment should identify the issues, the parties’…
|
|
| 14 Oct 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0205_10_1410
For direct race discrimination, the employer’s belief that misconduct occurred may explain the dismissal under Employment Rights Act 1996, section 98, while…
|
|
| 14 Oct 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0002_10_1410
A capability dismissal may remain fair under Employment Rights Act 1996, section 98(4), despite a procedural breach, where the employment tribunal finds that…
|
|
| 13 Oct 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0447_10_1310
An application to join an additional respondent after the limitation period has expired is not automatically barred. The expiry of time is a factor in the…
|
|
| 12 Oct 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0030_10_1210
In a post-employment victimisation claim, the tribunal must determine whether the alleged discriminator acted because of the protected act. The question is the…
|
|
| 8 Oct 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0087_10_0810
Direct discrimination on grounds of religion or belief requires treatment because of the protected belief itself. A distinction may be drawn between the belief…
|
|
| 7 Oct 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0303_10_0710
A Step 1 grievance may incorporate detailed allegations by reference to an earlier ET1, provided that, read fairly and in context, the employer could be…
|
|
| 7 Oct 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0062_10_0710
Statutory fairness under section 98(4) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 is distinct from the contractual question whether conduct amounts to gross misconduct.…
|
|
| 6 Oct 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0190_10_0610
A person who has not applied for a job may have difficulty establishing that discriminatory recruitment arrangements affected them. Even if discriminatory job…
|
|
| 1 Oct 2010 |
Hammonds LLP & Ors v Mwitta [2010] UKEAT 0026_10_0110
The burden under Race Relations Act 1976 s54A shifts to a respondent only where the claimant proves facts from which a tribunal could properly conclude, on the…
|
|
| 24 Sep 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0191_10_2409
An ET1 may contain only minimal detail, but it must still identify the nature of the claim. It must either make a specific allegation of a claim within the…
|
|
| 22 Sep 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 15_10_2209
For an unfair-dismissal claim presented outside the primary three-month limit, the tribunal must first decide whether it was reasonably practicable to present…
|
|
| 21 Sep 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0189_10_2109
Loss caused by a prospective employer’s unlawful response to a damaging discriminatory reference is not necessarily too remote from the reference-giver’s…
|
|
| 16 Sep 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0342_10_1609
An employment award must be made against the legal entity that employed the claimant. A director is not personally liable for the company’s employment…
|
|
| 16 Sep 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0195_10_1609
Constructive dismissal requires a significant breach of contract going to its root, resignation in response to that breach, and timely acceptance of it. The…
|
|
| 13 Sep 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0541_10_1309
An Employment Appeal Tribunal hearing under rule 3(10) is a fresh consideration of whether the appeal discloses a reasonable ground, rather than an appeal…
|
|
| 13 Sep 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0435_09_1309
An employment tribunal determining a reasonable-adjustments claim must identify the provision, criterion or practice, any relevant physical feature, the…
|
|
| 10 Sep 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0166_10_1009
In a misconduct dismissal, fairness is assessed by the reasonable-employer standard under Employment Rights Act 1996, section 98(4). The employer must show a…
|
|
| 10 Sep 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0121_10_1009
Compliance with the statutory grievance procedure is determined by substance, not by the document’s heading or form. A document may serve a dual purpose: it…
|
|
| 8 Sep 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0359_10_0809
Employment Tribunal claims are not required by statute or formal practice direction to remain in the regional office associated with the claimant’s workplace.…
|
|
| 8 Sep 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0199_10_0809
For continuity of employment, the reason for terminating the first contract is the relevant inquiry when deciding whether an interval between contracts…
|
|
| 8 Sep 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0163_10_0809
In determining whether a dismissal is unfair, the tribunal must ask whether the employer’s decision fell within the range of reasonable responses open to a…
|
|
| 2 Sep 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0153_10_0209
An adjournment will ordinarily be required where a litigant whose presence is necessary for a fair trial cannot attend through no fault of their own and…
|
|
| 26 Aug 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0286_09_2608 (26 August 2010)
The Employment Appeal Tribunal confirmed that a statutory comparator remains necessary when deciding whether treatment is "less favourable" under the…
|
|
| 26 Aug 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0194_10_2608
In a constructive dismissal case based on non-payment of contractual wages, the tribunal must determine every wage complaint relied on and assess whether the…
|
|
| 24 Aug 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0141_10_2408
In an age-discrimination claim, a tribunal may find that the burden of proof has shifted where a recruitment specification expressly seeks a “younger”…
|
|
| 20 Aug 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0349_10_2008
An application to strike out an unfair dismissal claim should ordinarily be determined as a preliminary issue where the issue is short and, if resolved for the…
|
|
| 19 Aug 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0506_09_1908
An employment tribunal must assess whether dismissal falls within the range of reasonable responses open to a reasonable employer. It must not substitute its…
|
|
| 19 Aug 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0398_09_1908
Under the former statutory dismissal procedure, an employee must be told at Step 1 that dismissal is contemplated or is a possible outcome. The warning may be…
|
|
| 18 Aug 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0014_10_1808
Where an employment contract distinguishes normal hours from additional or overtime hours and provides that holiday entitlement is based on the employee’s…
|
|
| 17 Aug 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0010_10_1708
When deciding whether it is just and equitable to extend the time limit for a discrimination claim, a tribunal must consider all the circumstances. A…
|
|
| 12 Aug 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0532_09_1208
To qualify as a worker under section 230(3) of the Employment Rights Act 1996, an individual must undertake to perform work or services personally. An…
|
|
| 10 Aug 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0348_10_1008
A statutory grievance must identify the complaint later pursued in sufficiently clear terms. Technical precision is unnecessary, but a general allegation of…
|
|
| 10 Aug 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0184_10_1008
An Employment Tribunal is entitled to resolve conflicting evidence and make findings of fact, including findings based on documentary material and recorded…
|
|
| 9 Aug 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0160_10_0908
Under regulation 15(2) of the 2004 Dispute Resolution Regulations, the relevant question is whether the claimant actually held, and had reasonable grounds for…
|
|
| 6 Aug 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0330_09_0608
Compensation for injury to feelings must reflect the seriousness of the discriminatory conduct by reference to the established bands. Serious conduct does not…
|
|
| 6 Aug 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0108_10_0608
An employer’s failure to control pregnancy-related gossip may constitute unwanted conduct amounting to harassment and sex or pregnancy discrimination. A…
|
|
| 3 Aug 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0131_10_0308
In a conduct dismissal, the question is whether dismissal fell within the range of reasonable responses open to a reasonable employer. The tribunal must assess…
|
|
| 3 Aug 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0129_10_0308
For a redundancy dismissal subject to the statutory procedure, the employee must receive sufficient information before the Step 2 meeting to enable a…
|
|
| 30 Jul 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0517_09_3007
In a redundancy dismissal, an employer within a group of companies must consider whether assistance or alternative work may be available elsewhere in the…
|
|
| 30 Jul 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0217_10_3007
An individual affected employee may bring a complaint concerning an employer’s failure to comply with the information and consultation duties under the…
|
|
| 30 Jul 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0067_09_3007
An Employment Judge may exercise the wide case-management power under rule 10 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations…
|
|
| 28 Jul 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0032_10_2807
An employer must identify the true reason for dismissal by reference to the decision-maker’s evidence. Where the decision-maker reasonably believes that an…
|
|
| 27 Jul 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0273_09_2707
An employment tribunal must give parties a fair opportunity to address any issue on which it proposes to rely. It cannot treat an unpleaded and unargued breach…
|
|
| 27 Jul 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0161_10_2707
Indirect discrimination requires proof that the claimant personally suffered a disadvantage from the provision, criterion or practice, as well as proof of…
|
|
| 27 Jul 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0064_09_2707
An employee is not dismissed merely because the employer stops salary payments or accepts the employee’s repudiatory breach. Dismissal depends on termination…
|
|
| 23 Jul 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0287_09_2307
Where section 98A(2) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 applies, an employer can avoid a finding of unfair dismissal by proving, on the balance of…
|
|
| 23 Jul 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0091_10_2307
For the purposes of determining whether an impairment is likely to last at least 12 months, “likely” means that it may well, or could well, happen. It does not…
|
|
| 22 Jul 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0210_10_2207
Under the Education (Modification of Enactments Relating to Employment) (England) Order 2003, the governing body of a school with a delegated budget is treated…
|
|
| 16 Jul 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0397_09_1607
An Employment Tribunal must consider the utility of a proposed reasonable adjustment in a disability discrimination claim. A finding that the adjustment was…
|
|
| 14 Jul 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 1477_09_1407
When assessing compensation for unfair dismissal under Employment Rights Act 1996, section 123, the principal consideration is the claimant’s loss attributable…
|
|
| 14 Jul 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0535_09_1407
Compensation for discriminatory dismissal must reflect the loss actually caused by the dismissal. A tribunal should not apply overlapping discounts where one…
|
|
| 14 Jul 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0322_10_1407
An appellate tribunal should interfere with a case-management decision only where the discretion was exercised on an improper basis, relevant matters were…
|
|
| 14 Jul 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0145_10_1407
In a redundancy selection exercise, an employment tribunal must assess both whether the selection criteria are fair and whether the employer applied them…
|
|
| 13 Jul 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0518_09_1307
A Step 1 disciplinary letter complies with the Employment Act 2002 where it clearly indicates that dismissal is contemplated and gives sufficient factual…
|
|
| 13 Jul 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0137_10_1307
Where employment is terminated by notice, the effective date of termination is ordinarily the date on which the notice expires under the Employment Rights Act…
|
|
| 12 Jul 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 1708_09_1207
An Employment Tribunal’s decision on review will stand where it has correctly identified the review gateways, conducted a fair hearing and concluded that the…
|
|
| 9 Jul 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0521_09_0907
A term in a collective agreement is not incorporated into an employee’s contract merely because the relevant handbook was available, a later employer referred…
|
|
| 9 Jul 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0095_10_0907
An employment tribunal’s reasons must be assessed for substance rather than style. A judgment is not unlawful merely because it omits express references to…
|
|
| 8 Jul 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 1315_09_0807
An appeal against refusal to register an out-of-time Employment Appeal Tribunal notice is a fresh hearing. The judge may reconsider the exercise of discretion…
|
|
| 8 Jul 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0527_09_0807 (8 July 2010)
On a review of a default judgment for late service of a response, the absence of a good reason for delay is not determinative. The Employment Tribunal must…
|
|
| 7 Jul 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0354_09_0707
An employment tribunal has a broad discretion under section 31 of the Employment Act 2002 to determine the appropriate uplift for failure to complete statutory…
|
|
| 6 Jul 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0514_09_0607
For the purposes of Equal Pay Act 1970, whether employees at different establishments are in the same employment depends on a broad, common-sense comparison of…
|
|
| 6 Jul 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0507_09_0607
A tribunal member should recuse themselves where they have already given a formal and apparently definitive decision on issues which a newly constituted…
|
|
| 6 Jul 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0139_10_0607
An employee must take reasonable steps to mitigate loss caused by dismissal, but the standard expected is not demanding because the employer is the wrongdoer.…
|
|
| 6 Jul 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0062_09_0607
Section 3A of the Sex Discrimination Act 1975 does not protect a man from less favourable treatment because of another woman’s pregnancy. Pregnancy…
|
|
| 2 Jul 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0541_09_0207 (2 July 2010)
For discrimination arising from maternity leave, the question is why the claimant received the treatment complained of. Where the treatment is not inherently…
|
|
| 30 Jun 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0156_10_3006
A claimant bringing a whistleblowing claim must identify the protected disclosure relied on with sufficient clarity for the respondent to understand the case…
|
|
| 25 Jun 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0106_10_2506
Non-payment of wages or holiday pay does not invariably amount to a repudiatory breach of an employment contract. The question is whether the breach, assessed…
|
|
| 24 Jun 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0167_10_2406
A qualifying disclosure requires a disclosure of information which the worker reasonably believes tends to show a statutory matter, such as danger to health…
|
|
| 24 Jun 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0069_10_2406
Whether an employee has been dismissed or has resigned is determined by identifying who really terminated the contract. An Employment Tribunal is entitled to…
|
|
| 24 Jun 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0005_10_2406
An Employment Tribunal has a discretion to permit an amendment adding a new comparator to an equal pay claim, even where the claim would have been out of time…
|
|
| 23 Jun 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0058_09_2306
Under Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2004, success in an unfair dismissal claim does not prevent a finding that the…
|
|
| 22 Jun 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0045_09_2206
In a redundancy dismissal, the tribunal must decide whether the employer acted reasonably under Employment Rights Act 1996, section 98(4). It must not…
|
|
| 21 Jun 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0226_09_2106
Direct discrimination under the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 requires treatment for a reason relating to, or on the ground of, the claimant’s actual…
|
|
| 18 Jun 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0322_09_1806
When determining disability under section 1 of the Disability Discrimination Act 1995, an Employment Tribunal must address four sequential questions…
|
|
| 17 Jun 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0094_10_1706
An Employment Tribunal should usually adjourn where a litigant whose presence is needed for a fair hearing is genuinely unable to attend or conduct the case…
|
|
| 17 Jun 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0061_09_1706
An employee’s entitlement to sick pay does not create an absolute rule that remunerative work during sickness absence can never justify dismissal. Where the…
|
|
| 16 Jun 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0485_09_1606
In an unfair dismissal case, the employer bears the burden of showing the potentially fair reason for dismissal. The burden is neutral on whether the employer…
|
|
| 16 Jun 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0057_10_1606
Under the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006, the duty to inform employee representatives is distinct from the duty to…
|
|
| 16 Jun 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0057_09_1606
Under the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006, the duty to inform employee representatives is distinct from the duty to…
|
|
| 15 Jun 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0154_10_1506
An Employment Tribunal must give intelligible reasons for each material element of a compensation award. This includes the basis and period of any future loss…
|
|
| 10 Jun 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0035_10_1006
Claims under the Fixed-Term Employees (Prevention of Less Favourable Treatment) Regulations 2002 require a staged analysis. The tribunal must first determine…
|
|
| 9 Jun 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0047_09_0906
For the statutory grievance regime, the relevant grievance is identified by its substantial subject-matter. It may embrace both the complained-of act or…
|
|
| 9 Jun 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0010_10_0906
Direct race discrimination requires less favourable treatment on racial grounds. A policy which reduces overtime opportunities across racial groups does not…
|
|
| 28 May 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0011_10_2805
Constructive dismissal requires a serious, repudiatory breach of the employment contract. For breach of the implied term of trust and confidence, the…
|
|
| 27 May 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 54_9_2705
In an indirect discrimination claim concerning refusal of flexible working, the comparison pool should comprise employees who wanted the benefit in question.…
|
|
| 27 May 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0484_09_2705
An appeal is not properly constituted where an Employment Tribunal has issued judgment in separate tranches and the appellant fails to lodge the written record…
|
|
| 27 May 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0448_09_2705
Established fairness principles must be applied within the factual context. Although summary dismissal without the employee’s participation will ordinarily be…
|
|
| 27 May 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0103_10_2705
For the statutory dismissal procedure, an employer must provide sufficient information to enable an employee to make an informed response to a proposed…
|
|
| 26 May 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0366_09_2605
In a conduct dismissal, once the employer has shown a genuine belief in misconduct, reasonable grounds and a reasonable investigation, the tribunal must…
|
|
| 26 May 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0318_09_2605
Step 1 of the statutory dismissal procedure requires written notice of the circumstances leading the employer to contemplate dismissal and an invitation to…
|
|
| 26 May 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0044_09_2605
The statutory dismissal procedures required no advance notice of matters an employer intended to raise at an appeal meeting. The appeal stage differed from the…
|
|
| 25 May 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0540_09_2505
Under section 111(2)(b) of the Employment Rights Act 1996, the question whether it was reasonably practicable to present an unfair-dismissal complaint within…
|
|
| 25 May 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0250_09_2505
The without prejudice rule broadly excludes communications made in genuine negotiations to settle litigation or a legal dispute. Its exceptions remain narrow.…
|
|
| 25 May 2010 |
Nugent Care v. Boardman [2010] UKEAT 0277_09_2505
Tribunals must test fairness of a misconduct dismissal by asking whether the employer carried out a reasonable investigation and genuinely believed on…
|
|
| 21 May 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0104_10_2105
Under section 111(2) of the Employment Rights Act 1996, the further period allowed after expiry of the primary limitation period must itself be reasonable. The…
|
|
| 20 May 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0429_09_2005
An Employment Tribunal may find a conduct dismissal unfair where the employer’s investigation was not reasonable. An appellate tribunal should not interfere…
|
|
| 20 May 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0070_10_2005
In assessing pension loss after unfair dismissal, an Employment Tribunal must first identify the loss and then determine a just and equitable compensatory…
|
|
| 19 May 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 1712_09_1905
An Employment Tribunal does not err by finding that an employer’s investigation of a grievance, raised in the context of anticipated disciplinary proceedings…
|
|
| 18 May 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0023_10_1805
For the purposes of regulation 9(1)(a) of the Employment Act 2002 (Dispute Resolution) Regulations 2004, a collective grievance is written to the employer when…
|
|
| 17 May 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0076_10_1705
An application to amend a claim by adding substantially new, out-of-time discrimination complaints may be refused where the proposed claims were not…
|
|
| 14 May 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0178_10_1405
Disclosure in employment proceedings is governed by necessity, not relevance alone. Documents created from the point when litigation became the dominant…
|
|
| 14 May 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0056_09_1405
An Employment Tribunal has a broad discretion to refuse a late amendment introducing a new discrimination claim. Relevant considerations include whether the…
|
|
| 13 May 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0132_10_1305
An appeal against refusal to revoke an unless order may be competent where the refusal itself is an order. However, an appeal will be dismissed as academic…
|
|
| 13 May 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0068_09_1305
In a direct race discrimination claim, unreasonable or differential treatment does not itself justify an inference of discrimination. The tribunal must…
|
|
| 12 May 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0060_09_1205
A settlement of employment tribunal proceedings is concluded when a sufficiently definite offer covering the essential terms is objectively accepted. A later…
|
|
| 11 May 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0412_09_1105
An Employment Tribunal’s erroneous view that illegality deprived it of jurisdiction does not require an appeal to succeed where its alternative findings…
|
|
| 7 May 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0537_09_0705
An Employment Tribunal has a broad case-management discretion when deciding whether to adjourn a hearing on health grounds. An adjournment is not automatically…
|
|
| 7 May 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0490_09_0705
An employer may bring a counterclaim under Article 4 of the Employment Tribunals (Extension of Jurisdiction) England and Wales Order 1994 where the employee…
|
|
| 7 May 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0155_10_0705 (7 May 2010)
On an appeal concerning refusal to review a decision rejecting a late response, the Employment Appeal Tribunal must consider more than the explanation for…
|
|
| 6 May 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0067_10_0605 (6 May 2010)
A warning that dismissal may occur after a future period does not itself terminate employment. Actual dismissal requires communication of termination and a…
|
|
| 5 May 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0510_09_0505 (5 May 2010)
For the purposes of Regulation 15(2) of the Employment Act 2002 (Dispute Resolution) Regulations 2004, the substance of the tribunal complaint means the…
|
|
| 29 Apr 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0491_09_2904
The duty to make reasonable adjustments under the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 is assessed objectively and according to the particular circumstances. The…
|
|
| 29 Apr 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0099_10_2904
An Employment Tribunal does not err in law merely because its conclusions are brief, provided its findings disclose the essential reasoning and the decision is…
|
|
| 29 Apr 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0087_10_2904
Article 6 does not entitle a claimant in civil discrimination proceedings to confront or cross-examine a particular witness for a corporate respondent. Article…
|
|
| 27 Apr 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0545_09_2704
For limitation purposes, the relevant date is the date fixed by the applicable statutory provision: the effective date of termination for unfair dismissal and…
|
|
| 27 Apr 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0526_09_2704
A penalty under the Information and Consultation of Employees Regulations 2004 is mandatory following a declaration by the Central Arbitration Committee and an…
|
|
| 27 Apr 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0333_09_2704
Under section 31(3) of the Employment Act 2002, a 10 per cent uplift is mandatory where the statutory procedure was not completed because of the employer’s…
|
|
| 27 Apr 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0254_09_2704
An employment tribunal deciding whether an employer has made reasonable adjustments may evaluate management evidence for itself. It is not required to accept…
|
|
| 23 Apr 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 1510_09_2304
An application under rule 3(10) to extend time is governed by an open discretion. The tribunal may consider the explanation for delay, the applicant’s ability…
|
|
| 23 Apr 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0509_09_2304
For a claim under section 4A of the Disability Discrimination Act 1995, an Employment Tribunal must identify the relevant provision, criterion or practice, the…
|
|
| 23 Apr 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0270_09_2304
In misconduct dismissals, an employment tribunal must review whether the employer acted reasonably. It must not substitute its own assessment of the evidence…
|
|
| 22 Apr 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0469_09_2204
An appellate tribunal will not revisit an issue recorded by the Employment Tribunal as having been withdrawn, particularly where no application was made to…
|
|
| 22 Apr 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0212_10_2204
Appeals against interim case-management decisions are exceptional, but intervention is justified where the decision is wrong in principle. The overriding…
|
|
| 21 Apr 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 1570_09_2104
An Employment Appeal Tribunal appeal based on fresh evidence will usually be more appropriately pursued by applying to the original Employment Tribunal for a…
|
|
| 21 Apr 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0453_09_2104
In a misconduct dismissal, an Employment Tribunal must decide whether dismissal fell within the range of reasonable responses open to the employer. It must not…
|
|
| 21 Apr 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0276_09_2104
An employment tribunal may reformulate the juridical basis of a complaint where the factual basis remains unchanged and the opposing party suffers no…
|
|
| 21 Apr 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0174_09_2104
Constructive dismissal requires a repudiatory breach of contract, not merely unreasonable conduct. The statutory inquiry has two stages: whether the employee…
|
|
| 20 Apr 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0433_09_2004
When reviewing a dismissal for misconduct, an Employment Tribunal must assess whether the employer’s investigation, disciplinary process and sanction fell…
|
|
| 20 Apr 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0062_09_2004
An amendment adding an associative disability discrimination claim cannot be refused on the assumption that a statutory grievance was required for every form…
|
|
| 19 Apr 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0029_10_1904
An unfair dismissal claim must be presented within three months of the effective date of termination. Where the evidence supports a finding that termination…
|
|
| 16 Apr 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0465_09_1604
In a misconduct dismissal, an employer may proceed under disciplinary procedures where it reasonably suspects dishonesty, even if an absence-management…
|
|
| 16 Apr 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0338_09_1604
For a claim under section 146 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992, the tribunal must determine on the evidence whether the…
|
|
| 15 Apr 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0505_09_1504
A contractual redundancy policy expressed in mandatory terms may confer an entitlement even where the benefit is subject to a stated cap. The words “not more…
|
|
| 15 Apr 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0442_09_1504
A protected disclosure requires information which, in the worker’s reasonable belief, tends to show a breach of a legal obligation. An expression of…
|
|
| 15 Apr 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0232_09_1504
An Employment Tribunal must address the central facts and legal issues on which its discrimination findings depend. In claims of direct discrimination, less…
|
1 |
| 15 Apr 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0102_10_1504
A claim form should be accepted where it contains the required information and is sufficiently legible to be read in the original. Partial difficulty in…
|
|
| 14 Apr 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0175_10_1404
An appeal rendered redundant by subsequent events may be dismissed on withdrawal. The Employment Appeal Tribunal may encourage conciliation, but should not…
|
|
| 14 Apr 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0002_09_1404
For equal-pay purposes, an establishment is not necessarily confined to a single workplace. The proper question is whether it is fair and reasonable to treat…
|
|
| 13 Apr 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0351_09_1304
In an unfair-dismissal case involving alleged professional misconduct, the reasonableness of the employer’s investigation and sanction must be assessed in…
|
|
| 9 Apr 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0025_10_0904
An appellate tribunal may intervene for error of law where the reasoning of an Employment Tribunal falls outside the range of reasonable responses, or where no…
|
|
| 8 Apr 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0084_10_0804
The effective date of termination is a statutory construct. It depends on what passed between the parties, rather than on the date they seek to agree or…
|
|
| 7 Apr 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0516_09_0704
In an unfair-dismissal compensation assessment, a tribunal must distinguish reasonable mitigation from a voluntary career change. Where an employee retrains…
|
|
| 6 Apr 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0480_09_0604
Employment status must be assessed from the contract and the parties’ conduct throughout the relationship. A tribunal should not treat post-termination…
|
|
| 6 Apr 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0126_10_0604
Rule 3(9) does not prevent an Employment Judge, at a later pre-hearing review, from reconsidering whether a claim was validly presented merely because an…
|
|
| 31 Mar 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0488_09_3103
Under Employment Rights Act 1996, an employer will only rarely act outside the range of reasonable responses by beginning disciplinary proceedings before…
|
|
| 30 Mar 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0080_10_3003
Claims for holiday pay under regulations 14 and 16 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 may be brought as unauthorised deduction from wages claims under…
|
|
| 29 Mar 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0233_09_2903
In a constructive dismissal claim, the question is whether the employer’s conduct breached the implied Malik term of mutual trust and confidence. The tribunal…
|
|
| 26 Mar 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0966_09_2603
Where an unfair dismissal claim is presented outside the statutory time limit, the claimant must show that it was not reasonably practicable to present it in…
|
|
| 25 Mar 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0471_09_2503
For a service provision change under the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006, the relevant activities are identified as a…
|
|
| 24 Mar 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0539_09_2403
Where disciplinary allegations are also investigated by the police, the employer’s decision-maker has a wide discretion whether to continue or postpone the…
|
|
| 24 Mar 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0380_09_2403
An Employment Tribunal determining a constructive dismissal claim must identify and decide whether the employer committed the alleged fundamental breach…
|
|
| 23 Mar 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0007_10_2303
An individual may be a worker’s employer even where the worker remains technically employed by a company. The question is determined from the factual…
|
|
| 22 Mar 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0416_09_2203
Compensation for unfair dismissal is assessed on a just and equitable basis by reference to loss caused by the dismissal. Where there is a firm finding that…
|
|
| 19 Mar 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0382_09_1903
In disability discrimination claims, the tribunal must identify the relevant comparator or comparators and assess the claimant’s circumstances against those of…
|
|
| 18 Mar 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0414_09_1803
Employment tribunals may use case-management powers to require detailed particulars and evidence in complex discrimination and protected-disclosure claims.…
|
|
| 15 Mar 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 525_9_1503
In an unfair dismissal claim, the employer’s reason and investigation must be assessed by reference to the standards in Burchell and the band of reasonable…
|
|
| 12 Mar 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0528_09_1203
For a transfer under regulation 3(1)(a) of TUPE 2006, an economic entity may retain its identity despite a temporary cessation of operations at the putative…
|
|
| 12 Mar 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0474_09_1203
An Employment Tribunal gives adequate reasons where its fact-finding method is rational and sufficiently explains why particular allegations are accepted or…
|
|
| 12 Mar 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0051_09_1203
When an amendment introduces a fresh claim which would have been time-barred if presented independently, the statutory time limit is not an absolute bar to…
|
|
| 12 Mar 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0018_10_1203
When assessing compensation for unfair dismissal, a tribunal must estimate the loss flowing from the dismissal, including employment benefits the claimant…
|
|
| 11 Mar 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0262_09_1103
An Employment Appeal Tribunal may interfere with factual conclusions only where an overwhelming case shows that no reasonable tribunal, properly applying the…
|
|
| 11 Mar 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0096_10_1103
A discrimination claim may allege a continuing act where later grievance proceedings are said to continue the discriminatory treatment complained of. At a…
|
|
| 11 Mar 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0004_10_1103
A written grievance must be read in its factual and procedural context. Where an employee makes a protected disclosure by grievance and later alleges detriment…
|
|
| 9 Mar 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0534_09_0903
A tribunal reducing compensation for unfair dismissal because of contributory conduct must identify conduct that is culpable or blameworthy. For a compensatory…
|
|
| 9 Mar 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0346_09_0903
An employment tribunal has a broad discretion to exclude evidence obtained through covert recording of private deliberations in disciplinary or capability…
|
|
| 9 Mar 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0039_09_0903
The doctrine of lis pendens has no separate application in Employment Tribunals. Its underlying purpose is addressed through the statutory procedural rules…
|
|
| 4 Mar 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0391_09_0403
An employer’s mistaken interpretation of statutory deadlines does not, without more, constitute a reasonable excuse for failing to implement default…
|
|
| 4 Mar 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0347_09_0403
A claim should be struck out for having no reasonable prospect of success only in exceptional circumstances where central facts are disputed. Whistle-blowing…
|
|
| 2 Mar 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0269_09_0203
Victimisation requires less favourable treatment because the claimant carried out a protected act. The tribunal must identify the treatment, ask whether it was…
|
|
| 1 Mar 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0378_09_0103
An employment tribunal assessing compensation for unfair dismissal must evaluate any realistic chance that the employee would have been dismissed following a…
|
|
| 23 Feb 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0486_09_2302
Apparent bias is assessed by asking whether the fair-minded and informed observer, having considered all relevant circumstances, would conclude that there was…
|
|
| 23 Feb 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0371_09_2302
A child who performs work is not necessarily employed under a contract of service. The question remains whether the ordinary requirements of employment are…
|
|
| 22 Feb 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0411_09_2202
Under section 188(7) of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992, the tribunal must ask whether special circumstances existed, whether…
|
|
| 22 Feb 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0373_09_2202
In a racial harassment claim, unreasonable or unfair treatment does not, without more, shift the burden of proof. The claimant must establish facts from which…
|
|
| 19 Feb 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0392_09_1902
A tribunal must give the parties a fair opportunity to address a material point on which it proposes to decide the case, particularly where that point…
|
|
| 19 Feb 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0289_09_1902
An employment tribunal deciding whether an employer failed to make reasonable adjustments must identify the relevant provision, criterion or practice, any…
|
|
| 19 Feb 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0251_09_1902
At a preliminary hearing, discrimination complaints should not be treated as out of time where the pleaded facts are capable of amounting to an act extending…
|
|
| 18 Feb 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0243_09_1802
Allegations of apparent bias and procedural irregularity must be assessed on the facts found by the appellate tribunal, applying the fair-minded and informed…
|
|
| 17 Feb 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0278_09_1702
Liability for discrimination by an agency worker cannot be imposed on the end-user merely because the worker was treated like an employee in day-to-day…
|
|
| 15 Feb 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0368_09_1502
A contested review of an automatic strike-out under rule 36(1) of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2004 should ordinarily be determined at a hearing. The paper…
|
|
| 15 Feb 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0364_09_1502 (15 February 2010)
Interim relief under Employment Rights Act 1996 ss.128–129 is not limited to disputes of a "clear and simple" factual nature. A tribunal must decide the…
|
|
| 11 Feb 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0221_09_1102
An employment contract may reserve an employer a unilateral power to vary contractual terms, including pay and working arrangements, but the language must…
|
|
| 10 Feb 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0376_09_1002
A dismissal is automatically unfair where the employer has decided to dismiss before completing the statutory capability procedure. The tribunal’s finding on…
|
|
| 10 Feb 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0360_09_1002
A valid written grievance under the statutory grievance procedure need not use technical language or identify itself as a grievance. It must, however, identify…
|
|
| 10 Feb 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0034_09_1002
An office-holder is not an employee merely because the office carries remuneration or other benefits. An office-holder may also be an employee, but only where…
|
|
| 8 Feb 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0315_09_0802
Failure to comply with step 2 of the Standard Procedure under the Employment Act 2002 makes a dismissal automatically unfair. An employee must be told not only…
|
|
| 5 Feb 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0458_09_0502
An employment tribunal does not impose a legal burden of proof merely because it expects an employer to answer strong evidence suggesting that a dismissal…
|
|
| 5 Feb 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0419_09_0502
In a discrimination appeal, an Employment Tribunal need not treat the hypothetical-comparator question as confined to the initial stage of the burden-of-proof…
|
|
| 5 Feb 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0201_09_0502
An originating application must be read as a whole to decide whether it contains a particular discrimination complaint. Particulars may explain a claim, but…
|
|
| 4 Feb 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0339_09_0402
Employment Tribunal claim forms must be considered judicially, not by mechanical checklist. Where the material identifying a claimant and pleading the claim…
|
|
| 2 Feb 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0443_09_0202
An employment tribunal must identify the issues, make relevant findings of fact, state the applicable law and explain how that law was applied. Reasons must…
|
|
| 28 Jan 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0377_09_2801
Where an employer takes over a going-concern business and communicates total continuity of employment, including protection of wages and accrued holiday, that…
|
|
| 28 Jan 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0359_09_2801
An Employment Tribunal’s findings of persistent unwanted sexual harassment and constructive unfair dismissal will not be disturbed on perversity grounds where…
|
|
| 28 Jan 2010 |
UKEAT/0206/09
An employer may, subject to safeguards, rely on an official police disclosure that an employee presents a risk to children, even where the information is…
|
16 |
| 27 Jan 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0407_09_2701
The Employment Appeal Tribunal dismissed the appeal. A finding by the Certification Officer on whether a union branch existed was essentially factual and could…
|
|
| 26 Jan 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0340_08_2601
An Employment Tribunal must give adequate reasons identifying the factual findings and statutory route by which a disability discrimination claim succeeds.…
|
|
| 26 Jan 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0309_09_2601
In an indirect sex discrimination claim, an employer must objectively justify a requirement for full-time work by balancing its business reasons against the…
|
|
| 26 Jan 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0296_09_2601
In a direct race-discrimination claim, an employer may rely on a mistake as the reason for adverse treatment. The reason need not be morally or objectively…
|
|
| 26 Jan 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0229_09_2601
An employee’s appeal under the statutory disciplinary procedure must be assessed by reference to the statutory requirements, rather than the employer’s…
|
|
| 26 Jan 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0029_09_2601
A collective agreement may supply enforceable terms of an individual employment contract even though the agreement itself is presumed not to be legally…
|
|
| 25 Jan 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0500_08_2501
For statutory grievance purposes, each equal-pay comparison gives rise to a distinct claim. A failure to correlate one comparator does not bar claims based on…
|
|
| 25 Jan 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0370_09_2501
A contract of employment is not tainted by illegality merely because immigration-related conditions may have been breached. Illegality depends on the…
|
|
| 25 Jan 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0303_09_2501
Constructive dismissal requires an objective assessment of whether the employer, without reasonable and proper cause, seriously damaged the relationship of…
|
|
| 22 Jan 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0324_09_2201
Where an Employment Tribunal fails to consider material evidence capable of affecting its conclusions on the fairness of a dismissal, its decision cannot…
|
|
| 22 Jan 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0317_09_2201
In an unfair dismissal case, the reasonable range of responses test applies to the disciplinary process as a whole, including the investigation and the…
|
|
| 21 Jan 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0355_09_2101
An Employment Tribunal’s assessment of whether conduct breaches the implied term of trust and confidence must be made objectively and in context. Conduct that…
|
|
| 20 Jan 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 55_9_2001
Employment has a sufficient connection with Great Britain where the employee performs work there that is more than de minimis. The statutory gateway for work…
|
|
| 20 Jan 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0799_09_2001
Under Rule 3(8) of the Employment Appeal Tribunal Rules 1993, an appellant may lodge one fresh Notice of Appeal after a Rule 3(7) rejection. The fresh notice…
|
|
| 20 Jan 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0386_09_2001
Whether an implied agreement exists under Regulation 24 of the School Staffing (England) Regulations 2003 is determined by ordinary contractual principles. The…
|
|
| 19 Jan 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0498_08_1901
For the statutory grievance procedure to confer jurisdiction, the grievance must remain extant when the tribunal claim is presented. A grievance which has been…
|
|
| 19 Jan 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0182_08_1901
For an unfair dismissal claim, time may be extended only where it was not reasonably practicable to present the claim within the statutory period. For…
|
|
| 18 Jan 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0496_09_1801
For the purpose of calculating time for an appeal to the Employment Appeal Tribunal, a judgment is “sent” when it is handed to the Post Office, rather than…
|
|
| 18 Jan 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0123_09_1801
An employment tribunal may find disability-related discrimination where the employer’s reasons for dismissal include disability-related assumptions…
|
|
| 15 Jan 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0423_09_1501
An employment tribunal must give adequate reasons for preferring one witness’s evidence over another on a crucial disputed issue. A bare preference is…
|
|
| 15 Jan 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0147_09_1501
An Employment Tribunal must give sufficient reasons for a costs award and for a substantial assessment of future loss. Where serious issues arise about the…
|
|
| 14 Jan 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0476_09_1401
An employment tribunal’s territorial jurisdiction depends on whether the employer resides or carries on business in England and Wales, rather than simply where…
|
|
| 14 Jan 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0390_09_1401
For disability under the Disability Discrimination Act 1995, the question whether an impairment is likely to last at least twelve months requires the statutory…
|
|
| 14 Jan 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0134_09_1401 (14 January 2010)
An application for adjournment based on religious observance is a case-management matter to be decided by balancing competing rights. Tribunals retain a wide…
|
|
| 13 Jan 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0487_09_1301
Relief from an unless order is determined by a broad assessment of the interests of justice and the overriding objective. Relevant considerations generally…
|
1 |
| 13 Jan 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0455_09_1301
An Employment Tribunal must determine the issues presented by the parties. Where a pre-hearing review identifies the issues, the Tribunal may ordinarily…
|
|
| 11 Jan 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0252_09_1101
A perversity appeal is not a rehearing on the facts. The appellate tribunal must respect findings made by the Employment Tribunal, which heard the evidence…
|
|
| 7 Jan 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0553_08_0701
Constructive dismissal requires a repudiatory breach of contract. Unreasonable employer conduct, without more, is insufficient. In a claim based on trust and…
|
|
| 7 Jan 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0369_08_0701
An Employment Appeal Tribunal will interfere with an employment tribunal’s factual decision on perversity grounds only where an overwhelming case shows that no…
|
|
| 7 Jan 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0086_09_0701
An Employment Appeal Tribunal should assess an employment tribunal’s reasons as a whole and should not subject them to unrealistically detailed scrutiny.…
|
|
| 5 Jan 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0356_09_0501
When deciding whether to extend time for an employment claim, the tribunal must apply the statutory test and consider all the circumstances. It need not…
|
|
| 5 Jan 2010 |
[2010] UKEAT 0020_09_0501
Pregnancy discrimination law does not create a general regime of positive discrimination or require employers to abandon disciplinary or other management…
|
|
|
[2010] UKEAT 0495_08_2306
An unless order takes effect on the date specified if the required act is not completed. An application to vary, revoke or extend time does not itself amount…
|
1 | |
|
[2010] UKEAT 0439_09_0103
An employment tribunal has a wide discretion to regulate its procedure and to determine the weight given to hearsay evidence. A written witness statement is…
|
1 | |
|
[2010] UKEAT 0399_10_1304
Under section 98A(2) of the Employment Rights Act 1996, the employer bears the burden of proving, on the balance of probabilities, that the employee would have…
|
2 |