Employment Appeal Tribunal judgments, 2010

302 judgments, newest first. Open any case for its summary, the legal points it decides and how later courts have treated it.

Date Case Cited by
10 May 2013
[2010] UKEAT 0259_12_1005
An appellate court will rarely interfere with an Employment Tribunal’s discretionary costs decision. Intervention requires an error of legal principle, failure…
3 Aug 2011
[2010] UKEAT 0240_10_0308
An appeal from an Employment Tribunal is not an opportunity to reargue the facts or invite the Employment Appeal Tribunal to substitute its assessment of the…
26 Jul 2011
[2010] UKEAT 135_10_2607
In a constructive dismissal claim, the implied term of mutual trust and confidence is breached only where the employer’s conduct, without reasonable and proper…
29 Jun 2011
[2010] UKEAT 232_10_2906
An appellate tribunal may intervene only for an error of law and must not substitute its assessment of facts or evaluative judgments for that of the employment…
28 Jun 2011
[2010] UKEAT 0388_09_2806
An Employment Tribunal judgment may use a narrative structure, but it must contain both formal and substantial compliance with rule 30(6) of the Employment…
9 May 2011
[2010] UKEAT 55_10_905
In mass equal-pay litigation, tribunals should be ready to permit correction of accidental job-title misdescriptions, subject to real prejudice, jurisdictional…
9 May 2011
[2010] UKEAT 0056_10_0905 (9 May 2011)
It is not correct to refuse correction of innocuous job‑title errors in mass equal pay litigation on purely procedural grounds; tribunals should permit…
9 May 2011
[2010] UKEAT 0040_10_0905
In mass equal-pay litigation, tribunals should readily permit correction of accidental job-title misdescriptions, subject to real prejudice, jurisdictional…
9 May 2011
[2010] UKEAT 0037_10_0905
In mass equal-pay litigation, tribunals should readily permit correction of accidental job-title misdescriptions unless the amendment creates real prejudice…
1
5 May 2011
[2010] UKEAT 0090_10_0505
In assessing compensation under section 123 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, an Employment Tribunal may apportion loss where dismissal competes with other…
20 Apr 2011
[2010] UKEAT 0283_10_2004
Victimisation cannot be inferred merely from a respondent’s unsatisfactory answers to a statutory questionnaire. The tribunal must assess, in the circumstances…
13 Apr 2011
[2010] UKEAT 53_9_1304
In a capability dismissal, the tribunal must ask whether the employer genuinely believed in the stated reason, conducted a reasonable investigation and had…
13 Apr 2011
[2010] UKEAT 0093_10_1304
An Employment Tribunal assessing compensation after an unfair dismissal must base any Polkey reduction on evidence and adequate reasoning. A percentage…
10 Feb 2011
[2010] UKEAT 0216_10_1002
In a Polkey assessment, the tribunal must assess the chance that a fair procedure would have produced dismissal. The exercise is probabilistic, not a…
20 Jan 2011
[2010] UKEAT 268_10_0707
A contract is an apprenticeship according to its substantial character and purpose, rather than the labels used in the documents. The central question is…
17 Dec 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0943_10_1712
An extension of time for an Employment Appeal Tribunal appeal requires an exceptional explanation for non-compliance with the 42-day limit. The tribunal…
2
17 Dec 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0533_09_1712
A contractual attendance criterion framed as a commitment to achieving high levels of attendance is not necessarily satisfied or defeated solely by whether an…
17 Dec 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0307_10_1712
An employer seeking a Polkey reduction must raise the issue and identify the evidential basis for it before the Employment Tribunal. The EAT will rarely permit…
17 Dec 2010
Roberts v Carlin [2010] UKEAT 0183_09_1712
The Employment Appeal Tribunal held that an employment tribunal must give clear, Meek-compliant reasons so parties can understand why credibility findings and…
15 Dec 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0266_10_1512
In a conduct dismissal, an employment tribunal must assess whether the employer’s distinction between the present case and an earlier disciplinary case was…
14 Dec 2010
[2010] UKEAT 1385_09_1205
An Employment Appeal Tribunal should refuse to interfere with an Employment Tribunal’s discretionary decision unless an error of law is shown. In deciding…
14 Dec 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0767_10_1412
For a term-time employee paid under an annual contract, statutory redundancy pay is calculated by reference to the weeks for which the employee is paid…
14 Dec 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0325_10_1412
Future loss in discrimination and unfair dismissal cases is a predictive assessment. The tribunal must make the best overall estimate it can of the claimant’s…
10 Dec 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0362_10_1012
In a conduct dismissal case, an Employment Tribunal must review the employer’s decision rather than substitute its own view of the facts or sanction. The…
10 Dec 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0221_10_1012
An Employment Appeal Tribunal appeal must be lodged within the prescribed time and accompanied by properly particularised grounds and supporting documents. The…
9 Dec 2010
Neafsey v. Small & Ors [2010] UKEAT 0828_10_0912
It is insufficient for a wasted costs order to state a conclusion without specifying the improper, unreasonable or negligent acts relied on. Instead the judge…
7 Dec 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0225_10_0712
Where Employment Tribunal and High Court proceedings cover substantially the same factual and legal territory, concurrent proceedings are generally…
7 Dec 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0065_10_0712
For a disclosure to an employer to be protected, it must be made in good faith. The statutory question is not whether the worker had mixed motives or whether…
6 Dec 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0318_10_0612
An Employment Tribunal must record and give reasons for an important procedural decision, particularly where a written application for postponement has been…
2 Dec 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0263_10_0212
For statutory employment time limits, the effective date of termination is governed by the relevant statute. The employee must be informed of the dismissal, or…
1 Dec 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0365_10_0112
An unfair dismissal claim must be determined by a three-person Employment Tribunal. A decision on that claim by a judge sitting alone is made without…
1 Dec 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0315_10_0112
New points of law are rarely permitted on appeal where they require further findings of fact. The restriction is especially strong where the point was not…
30 Nov 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0237_10_3011
An Employment Tribunal may limit compensation for unfair dismissal by reference to the period for which the employee would probably have remained employed. The…
29 Nov 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0517_10_2911
Under section 111(2)(b) of the Employment Rights Act 1996, an employee must establish both that it was not reasonably practicable to present the complaint…
29 Nov 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0285_10_2911
In a misconduct dismissal, the tribunal must assess whether the employer genuinely believed in the employee’s guilt, had reasonable grounds for that belief…
26 Nov 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0528_10_2611
In a misconduct dismissal, the Employment Tribunal must assess whether the employer had a genuine belief in the misconduct, reasonable grounds for that belief…
26 Nov 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0023_10_2611
An Employment Tribunal may grant a claimant leave to amend an ET1, but it has no power to draft and impose an amendment of its own choosing. The proposed…
25 Nov 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0466_09_2511
A dismissal to impose new employment terms may be for some other substantial reason under section 98(1)(b) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 where the employer…
25 Nov 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0239_10_2511
On an appeal concerning commission payable after termination, the appellate tribunal must apply the contractual construction determined below unless that…
24 Nov 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0219_10_2411
An ordained Methodist minister’s entitlement to complain of unfair dismissal depends on whether she entered or worked under a contract of employment within…
23 Nov 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0295_10_2311
A finding of automatic unfair dismissal does not prevent a Polkey reduction in compensation. The tribunal must assess whether, and when, dismissal would…
23 Nov 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0287_10_2311
An Employment Tribunal determining unfair dismissal must apply a neutral burden of proof when assessing the employer’s reasonableness and the adequacy of its…
23 Nov 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0172_10_2311
Pay protection provisions must be construed according to the rate of remuneration protected, rather than merely the amount previously received. A part-time…
22 Nov 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0280_10_2211
Where an employer withholds voluntary overtime from a worker who declines to waive protection against working more than 48 hours, the tribunal must consider…
19 Nov 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0296_10_1911
In a TUPE appeal, the Employment Appeal Tribunal will not interfere with an Employment Tribunal’s factual conclusion unless the high threshold for perversity…
18 Nov 2010
[2010] UKEAT 364_10_1811
The 42-day time limit for lodging a properly constituted appeal to the Employment Appeal Tribunal is prescriptive. Litigants in person receive appropriate…
18 Nov 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0308_10_1811
An Employment Tribunal may strike out a claim where the available material shows that it cannot be tried fairly or where the claimant has failed to comply with…
18 Nov 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0291_09_1811
An employee’s agreement to a stated salary does not, without more, amount to consent to an unauthorised deduction that was unknown to the employee. Contractual…
18 Nov 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0274_10_1811
The 42-day time limit for instituting an appeal to the Employment Appeal Tribunal is prescriptive. An appellant must lodge a properly constituted Notice of…
16 Nov 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0255_10_1611
A person may be a partner without holding a substantial share of profits, making a substantial capital contribution, or enjoying extensive management rights.…
15 Nov 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0648_10_1511
An Employment Tribunal may proceed with a hearing in the absence of a party who has chosen not to attend, provided the tribunal fairly manages the case and…
15 Nov 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0512_09_1511
Under the Polkey approach, compensation for unfair dismissal is limited when the employment would have ended, by fair dismissal or resignation, for reasons…
15 Nov 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0343_10_1511
A strike-out power under rule 18(7) of the Employment Tribunal (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2004 is a stringent remedy. A claim may be…
12 Nov 2010
UKEAT/0489/09
Where statutory dismissal procedures are not followed, a finding of automatic unfair dismissal under section 98A(1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 cannot be…
10 Nov 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0253_10_1011
The EAT has a broader discretion to extend time for lodging a Respondent’s Answer than for instituting an appeal. The relevant considerations include the…
9 Nov 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0200_10_0911
For the purposes of a reasonable-adjustment duty, an employer may be required to alter normal appointment or recruitment processes where that is reasonable in…
8 Nov 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0508_09_0811
In a misconduct dismissal, the tribunal must apply the objective band of reasonable responses test and must not substitute its own assessment of the evidence…
8 Nov 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0298_10_0811
Victimisation requires less favourable treatment because the claimant carried out a protected act. The statutory protection does not apply where the relevant…
5 Nov 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0397_10_0511
For mental impairment, disability under the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 does not require proof of a clinically well-recognised condition. The question…
5 Nov 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0245_10_0511
An oral employment tribunal judgment may constitute an award even though some figures remain to be calculated from an agreed formula and are later included in…
5 Nov 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0013_10_0511
Age discrimination cannot be established by comparing the pension consequences of hypothetical retirement with the position of an employee who remains in…
3 Nov 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0292_10_0311
An employer’s duty to make reasonable adjustments requires an active investigation of suitable alternative employment and possible modifications to available…
2 Nov 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0016_10_0211
At the first stage of the misconduct test, the tribunal must decide whether the employer genuinely believed that the employee was guilty. It must not assess…
28 Oct 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0143_10_2810
An Employment Appeal Tribunal may interfere with an Employment Tribunal’s decision only for an error of law. A perversity challenge faces a high hurdle and…
27 Oct 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0440_10_2710
A tribunal considering whether to strike out proceedings because of a compromise agreement must first determine whether the agreement is valid and enforceable.…
27 Oct 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0278_10_2710
An employer proposing 20 or more redundancy dismissals must itself undertake timely, meaningful collective consultation with the appropriate representatives.…
27 Oct 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0015_10_2710
An employment tribunal may refuse to extend the time for seeking a review where the application is substantially late and the delay reflects a party’s failure…
26 Oct 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0017_10_2610
Where an employee alleges dismissal for making a protected disclosure but the employer advances misconduct as the reason, the tribunal must first determine the…
22 Oct 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0269_10_2210
Personal service is an essential element of both a contract of employment and a limb (b) worker relationship. Where an individual has an unfettered right to…
22 Oct 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0198_10_2210
In a redundancy dismissal, an employer has substantial discretion when defining the selection pool. That discretion requires genuine consideration of the…
21 Oct 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0313_10_2110
Where a discrimination claim alleges a series of connected incidents, a continuing act need not be pleaded in formal or technical words. The question is…
21 Oct 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0081_10_2110
An Employment Tribunal must give intelligible and adequate reasons showing why each party won or lost. Its judgment should identify the issues, the parties’…
14 Oct 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0205_10_1410
For direct race discrimination, the employer’s belief that misconduct occurred may explain the dismissal under Employment Rights Act 1996, section 98, while…
14 Oct 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0002_10_1410
A capability dismissal may remain fair under Employment Rights Act 1996, section 98(4), despite a procedural breach, where the employment tribunal finds that…
13 Oct 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0447_10_1310
An application to join an additional respondent after the limitation period has expired is not automatically barred. The expiry of time is a factor in the…
12 Oct 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0030_10_1210
In a post-employment victimisation claim, the tribunal must determine whether the alleged discriminator acted because of the protected act. The question is the…
8 Oct 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0087_10_0810
Direct discrimination on grounds of religion or belief requires treatment because of the protected belief itself. A distinction may be drawn between the belief…
7 Oct 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0303_10_0710
A Step 1 grievance may incorporate detailed allegations by reference to an earlier ET1, provided that, read fairly and in context, the employer could be…
7 Oct 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0062_10_0710
Statutory fairness under section 98(4) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 is distinct from the contractual question whether conduct amounts to gross misconduct.…
6 Oct 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0190_10_0610
A person who has not applied for a job may have difficulty establishing that discriminatory recruitment arrangements affected them. Even if discriminatory job…
1 Oct 2010
Hammonds LLP & Ors v Mwitta [2010] UKEAT 0026_10_0110
The burden under Race Relations Act 1976 s54A shifts to a respondent only where the claimant proves facts from which a tribunal could properly conclude, on the…
24 Sep 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0191_10_2409
An ET1 may contain only minimal detail, but it must still identify the nature of the claim. It must either make a specific allegation of a claim within the…
22 Sep 2010
[2010] UKEAT 15_10_2209
For an unfair-dismissal claim presented outside the primary three-month limit, the tribunal must first decide whether it was reasonably practicable to present…
21 Sep 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0189_10_2109
Loss caused by a prospective employer’s unlawful response to a damaging discriminatory reference is not necessarily too remote from the reference-giver’s…
16 Sep 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0342_10_1609
An employment award must be made against the legal entity that employed the claimant. A director is not personally liable for the company’s employment…
16 Sep 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0195_10_1609
Constructive dismissal requires a significant breach of contract going to its root, resignation in response to that breach, and timely acceptance of it. The…
13 Sep 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0541_10_1309
An Employment Appeal Tribunal hearing under rule 3(10) is a fresh consideration of whether the appeal discloses a reasonable ground, rather than an appeal…
13 Sep 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0435_09_1309
An employment tribunal determining a reasonable-adjustments claim must identify the provision, criterion or practice, any relevant physical feature, the…
10 Sep 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0166_10_1009
In a misconduct dismissal, fairness is assessed by the reasonable-employer standard under Employment Rights Act 1996, section 98(4). The employer must show a…
10 Sep 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0121_10_1009
Compliance with the statutory grievance procedure is determined by substance, not by the document’s heading or form. A document may serve a dual purpose: it…
8 Sep 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0359_10_0809
Employment Tribunal claims are not required by statute or formal practice direction to remain in the regional office associated with the claimant’s workplace.…
8 Sep 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0199_10_0809
For continuity of employment, the reason for terminating the first contract is the relevant inquiry when deciding whether an interval between contracts…
8 Sep 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0163_10_0809
In determining whether a dismissal is unfair, the tribunal must ask whether the employer’s decision fell within the range of reasonable responses open to a…
2 Sep 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0153_10_0209
An adjournment will ordinarily be required where a litigant whose presence is necessary for a fair trial cannot attend through no fault of their own and…
26 Aug 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0286_09_2608 (26 August 2010)
The Employment Appeal Tribunal confirmed that a statutory comparator remains necessary when deciding whether treatment is "less favourable" under the…
26 Aug 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0194_10_2608
In a constructive dismissal case based on non-payment of contractual wages, the tribunal must determine every wage complaint relied on and assess whether the…
24 Aug 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0141_10_2408
In an age-discrimination claim, a tribunal may find that the burden of proof has shifted where a recruitment specification expressly seeks a “younger”…
20 Aug 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0349_10_2008
An application to strike out an unfair dismissal claim should ordinarily be determined as a preliminary issue where the issue is short and, if resolved for the…
19 Aug 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0506_09_1908
An employment tribunal must assess whether dismissal falls within the range of reasonable responses open to a reasonable employer. It must not substitute its…
19 Aug 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0398_09_1908
Under the former statutory dismissal procedure, an employee must be told at Step 1 that dismissal is contemplated or is a possible outcome. The warning may be…
18 Aug 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0014_10_1808
Where an employment contract distinguishes normal hours from additional or overtime hours and provides that holiday entitlement is based on the employee’s…
17 Aug 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0010_10_1708
When deciding whether it is just and equitable to extend the time limit for a discrimination claim, a tribunal must consider all the circumstances. A…
12 Aug 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0532_09_1208
To qualify as a worker under section 230(3) of the Employment Rights Act 1996, an individual must undertake to perform work or services personally. An…
10 Aug 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0348_10_1008
A statutory grievance must identify the complaint later pursued in sufficiently clear terms. Technical precision is unnecessary, but a general allegation of…
10 Aug 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0184_10_1008
An Employment Tribunal is entitled to resolve conflicting evidence and make findings of fact, including findings based on documentary material and recorded…
9 Aug 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0160_10_0908
Under regulation 15(2) of the 2004 Dispute Resolution Regulations, the relevant question is whether the claimant actually held, and had reasonable grounds for…
6 Aug 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0330_09_0608
Compensation for injury to feelings must reflect the seriousness of the discriminatory conduct by reference to the established bands. Serious conduct does not…
6 Aug 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0108_10_0608
An employer’s failure to control pregnancy-related gossip may constitute unwanted conduct amounting to harassment and sex or pregnancy discrimination. A…
3 Aug 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0131_10_0308
In a conduct dismissal, the question is whether dismissal fell within the range of reasonable responses open to a reasonable employer. The tribunal must assess…
3 Aug 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0129_10_0308
For a redundancy dismissal subject to the statutory procedure, the employee must receive sufficient information before the Step 2 meeting to enable a…
30 Jul 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0517_09_3007
In a redundancy dismissal, an employer within a group of companies must consider whether assistance or alternative work may be available elsewhere in the…
30 Jul 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0217_10_3007
An individual affected employee may bring a complaint concerning an employer’s failure to comply with the information and consultation duties under the…
30 Jul 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0067_09_3007
An Employment Judge may exercise the wide case-management power under rule 10 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations…
28 Jul 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0032_10_2807
An employer must identify the true reason for dismissal by reference to the decision-maker’s evidence. Where the decision-maker reasonably believes that an…
27 Jul 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0273_09_2707
An employment tribunal must give parties a fair opportunity to address any issue on which it proposes to rely. It cannot treat an unpleaded and unargued breach…
27 Jul 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0161_10_2707
Indirect discrimination requires proof that the claimant personally suffered a disadvantage from the provision, criterion or practice, as well as proof of…
27 Jul 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0064_09_2707
An employee is not dismissed merely because the employer stops salary payments or accepts the employee’s repudiatory breach. Dismissal depends on termination…
23 Jul 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0287_09_2307
Where section 98A(2) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 applies, an employer can avoid a finding of unfair dismissal by proving, on the balance of…
23 Jul 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0091_10_2307
For the purposes of determining whether an impairment is likely to last at least 12 months, “likely” means that it may well, or could well, happen. It does not…
22 Jul 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0210_10_2207
Under the Education (Modification of Enactments Relating to Employment) (England) Order 2003, the governing body of a school with a delegated budget is treated…
16 Jul 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0397_09_1607
An Employment Tribunal must consider the utility of a proposed reasonable adjustment in a disability discrimination claim. A finding that the adjustment was…
14 Jul 2010
[2010] UKEAT 1477_09_1407
When assessing compensation for unfair dismissal under Employment Rights Act 1996, section 123, the principal consideration is the claimant’s loss attributable…
14 Jul 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0535_09_1407
Compensation for discriminatory dismissal must reflect the loss actually caused by the dismissal. A tribunal should not apply overlapping discounts where one…
14 Jul 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0322_10_1407
An appellate tribunal should interfere with a case-management decision only where the discretion was exercised on an improper basis, relevant matters were…
14 Jul 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0145_10_1407
In a redundancy selection exercise, an employment tribunal must assess both whether the selection criteria are fair and whether the employer applied them…
13 Jul 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0518_09_1307
A Step 1 disciplinary letter complies with the Employment Act 2002 where it clearly indicates that dismissal is contemplated and gives sufficient factual…
13 Jul 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0137_10_1307
Where employment is terminated by notice, the effective date of termination is ordinarily the date on which the notice expires under the Employment Rights Act…
12 Jul 2010
[2010] UKEAT 1708_09_1207
An Employment Tribunal’s decision on review will stand where it has correctly identified the review gateways, conducted a fair hearing and concluded that the…
9 Jul 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0521_09_0907
A term in a collective agreement is not incorporated into an employee’s contract merely because the relevant handbook was available, a later employer referred…
9 Jul 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0095_10_0907
An employment tribunal’s reasons must be assessed for substance rather than style. A judgment is not unlawful merely because it omits express references to…
8 Jul 2010
[2010] UKEAT 1315_09_0807
An appeal against refusal to register an out-of-time Employment Appeal Tribunal notice is a fresh hearing. The judge may reconsider the exercise of discretion…
8 Jul 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0527_09_0807 (8 July 2010)
On a review of a default judgment for late service of a response, the absence of a good reason for delay is not determinative. The Employment Tribunal must…
7 Jul 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0354_09_0707
An employment tribunal has a broad discretion under section 31 of the Employment Act 2002 to determine the appropriate uplift for failure to complete statutory…
6 Jul 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0514_09_0607
For the purposes of Equal Pay Act 1970, whether employees at different establishments are in the same employment depends on a broad, common-sense comparison of…
6 Jul 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0507_09_0607
A tribunal member should recuse themselves where they have already given a formal and apparently definitive decision on issues which a newly constituted…
6 Jul 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0139_10_0607
An employee must take reasonable steps to mitigate loss caused by dismissal, but the standard expected is not demanding because the employer is the wrongdoer.…
6 Jul 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0062_09_0607
Section 3A of the Sex Discrimination Act 1975 does not protect a man from less favourable treatment because of another woman’s pregnancy. Pregnancy…
2 Jul 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0541_09_0207 (2 July 2010)
For discrimination arising from maternity leave, the question is why the claimant received the treatment complained of. Where the treatment is not inherently…
30 Jun 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0156_10_3006
A claimant bringing a whistleblowing claim must identify the protected disclosure relied on with sufficient clarity for the respondent to understand the case…
25 Jun 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0106_10_2506
Non-payment of wages or holiday pay does not invariably amount to a repudiatory breach of an employment contract. The question is whether the breach, assessed…
24 Jun 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0167_10_2406
A qualifying disclosure requires a disclosure of information which the worker reasonably believes tends to show a statutory matter, such as danger to health…
24 Jun 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0069_10_2406
Whether an employee has been dismissed or has resigned is determined by identifying who really terminated the contract. An Employment Tribunal is entitled to…
24 Jun 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0005_10_2406
An Employment Tribunal has a discretion to permit an amendment adding a new comparator to an equal pay claim, even where the claim would have been out of time…
23 Jun 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0058_09_2306
Under Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2004, success in an unfair dismissal claim does not prevent a finding that the…
22 Jun 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0045_09_2206
In a redundancy dismissal, the tribunal must decide whether the employer acted reasonably under Employment Rights Act 1996, section 98(4). It must not…
21 Jun 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0226_09_2106
Direct discrimination under the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 requires treatment for a reason relating to, or on the ground of, the claimant’s actual…
18 Jun 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0322_09_1806
When determining disability under section 1 of the Disability Discrimination Act 1995, an Employment Tribunal must address four sequential questions…
17 Jun 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0094_10_1706
An Employment Tribunal should usually adjourn where a litigant whose presence is needed for a fair hearing is genuinely unable to attend or conduct the case…
17 Jun 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0061_09_1706
An employee’s entitlement to sick pay does not create an absolute rule that remunerative work during sickness absence can never justify dismissal. Where the…
16 Jun 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0485_09_1606
In an unfair dismissal case, the employer bears the burden of showing the potentially fair reason for dismissal. The burden is neutral on whether the employer…
16 Jun 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0057_10_1606
Under the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006, the duty to inform employee representatives is distinct from the duty to…
16 Jun 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0057_09_1606
Under the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006, the duty to inform employee representatives is distinct from the duty to…
15 Jun 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0154_10_1506
An Employment Tribunal must give intelligible reasons for each material element of a compensation award. This includes the basis and period of any future loss…
10 Jun 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0035_10_1006
Claims under the Fixed-Term Employees (Prevention of Less Favourable Treatment) Regulations 2002 require a staged analysis. The tribunal must first determine…
9 Jun 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0047_09_0906
For the statutory grievance regime, the relevant grievance is identified by its substantial subject-matter. It may embrace both the complained-of act or…
9 Jun 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0010_10_0906
Direct race discrimination requires less favourable treatment on racial grounds. A policy which reduces overtime opportunities across racial groups does not…
28 May 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0011_10_2805
Constructive dismissal requires a serious, repudiatory breach of the employment contract. For breach of the implied term of trust and confidence, the…
27 May 2010
[2010] UKEAT 54_9_2705
In an indirect discrimination claim concerning refusal of flexible working, the comparison pool should comprise employees who wanted the benefit in question.…
27 May 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0484_09_2705
An appeal is not properly constituted where an Employment Tribunal has issued judgment in separate tranches and the appellant fails to lodge the written record…
27 May 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0448_09_2705
Established fairness principles must be applied within the factual context. Although summary dismissal without the employee’s participation will ordinarily be…
27 May 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0103_10_2705
For the statutory dismissal procedure, an employer must provide sufficient information to enable an employee to make an informed response to a proposed…
26 May 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0366_09_2605
In a conduct dismissal, once the employer has shown a genuine belief in misconduct, reasonable grounds and a reasonable investigation, the tribunal must…
26 May 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0318_09_2605
Step 1 of the statutory dismissal procedure requires written notice of the circumstances leading the employer to contemplate dismissal and an invitation to…
26 May 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0044_09_2605
The statutory dismissal procedures required no advance notice of matters an employer intended to raise at an appeal meeting. The appeal stage differed from the…
25 May 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0540_09_2505
Under section 111(2)(b) of the Employment Rights Act 1996, the question whether it was reasonably practicable to present an unfair-dismissal complaint within…
25 May 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0250_09_2505
The without prejudice rule broadly excludes communications made in genuine negotiations to settle litigation or a legal dispute. Its exceptions remain narrow.…
25 May 2010
Nugent Care v. Boardman [2010] UKEAT 0277_09_2505
Tribunals must test fairness of a misconduct dismissal by asking whether the employer carried out a reasonable investigation and genuinely believed on…
21 May 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0104_10_2105
Under section 111(2) of the Employment Rights Act 1996, the further period allowed after expiry of the primary limitation period must itself be reasonable. The…
20 May 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0429_09_2005
An Employment Tribunal may find a conduct dismissal unfair where the employer’s investigation was not reasonable. An appellate tribunal should not interfere…
20 May 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0070_10_2005
In assessing pension loss after unfair dismissal, an Employment Tribunal must first identify the loss and then determine a just and equitable compensatory…
19 May 2010
[2010] UKEAT 1712_09_1905
An Employment Tribunal does not err by finding that an employer’s investigation of a grievance, raised in the context of anticipated disciplinary proceedings…
18 May 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0023_10_1805
For the purposes of regulation 9(1)(a) of the Employment Act 2002 (Dispute Resolution) Regulations 2004, a collective grievance is written to the employer when…
17 May 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0076_10_1705
An application to amend a claim by adding substantially new, out-of-time discrimination complaints may be refused where the proposed claims were not…
14 May 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0178_10_1405
Disclosure in employment proceedings is governed by necessity, not relevance alone. Documents created from the point when litigation became the dominant…
14 May 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0056_09_1405
An Employment Tribunal has a broad discretion to refuse a late amendment introducing a new discrimination claim. Relevant considerations include whether the…
13 May 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0132_10_1305
An appeal against refusal to revoke an unless order may be competent where the refusal itself is an order. However, an appeal will be dismissed as academic…
13 May 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0068_09_1305
In a direct race discrimination claim, unreasonable or differential treatment does not itself justify an inference of discrimination. The tribunal must…
12 May 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0060_09_1205
A settlement of employment tribunal proceedings is concluded when a sufficiently definite offer covering the essential terms is objectively accepted. A later…
11 May 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0412_09_1105
An Employment Tribunal’s erroneous view that illegality deprived it of jurisdiction does not require an appeal to succeed where its alternative findings…
7 May 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0537_09_0705
An Employment Tribunal has a broad case-management discretion when deciding whether to adjourn a hearing on health grounds. An adjournment is not automatically…
7 May 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0490_09_0705
An employer may bring a counterclaim under Article 4 of the Employment Tribunals (Extension of Jurisdiction) England and Wales Order 1994 where the employee…
7 May 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0155_10_0705 (7 May 2010)
On an appeal concerning refusal to review a decision rejecting a late response, the Employment Appeal Tribunal must consider more than the explanation for…
6 May 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0067_10_0605 (6 May 2010)
A warning that dismissal may occur after a future period does not itself terminate employment. Actual dismissal requires communication of termination and a…
5 May 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0510_09_0505 (5 May 2010)
For the purposes of Regulation 15(2) of the Employment Act 2002 (Dispute Resolution) Regulations 2004, the substance of the tribunal complaint means the…
29 Apr 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0491_09_2904
The duty to make reasonable adjustments under the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 is assessed objectively and according to the particular circumstances. The…
29 Apr 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0099_10_2904
An Employment Tribunal does not err in law merely because its conclusions are brief, provided its findings disclose the essential reasoning and the decision is…
29 Apr 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0087_10_2904
Article 6 does not entitle a claimant in civil discrimination proceedings to confront or cross-examine a particular witness for a corporate respondent. Article…
27 Apr 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0545_09_2704
For limitation purposes, the relevant date is the date fixed by the applicable statutory provision: the effective date of termination for unfair dismissal and…
27 Apr 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0526_09_2704
A penalty under the Information and Consultation of Employees Regulations 2004 is mandatory following a declaration by the Central Arbitration Committee and an…
27 Apr 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0333_09_2704
Under section 31(3) of the Employment Act 2002, a 10 per cent uplift is mandatory where the statutory procedure was not completed because of the employer’s…
27 Apr 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0254_09_2704
An employment tribunal deciding whether an employer has made reasonable adjustments may evaluate management evidence for itself. It is not required to accept…
23 Apr 2010
[2010] UKEAT 1510_09_2304
An application under rule 3(10) to extend time is governed by an open discretion. The tribunal may consider the explanation for delay, the applicant’s ability…
23 Apr 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0509_09_2304
For a claim under section 4A of the Disability Discrimination Act 1995, an Employment Tribunal must identify the relevant provision, criterion or practice, the…
23 Apr 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0270_09_2304
In misconduct dismissals, an employment tribunal must review whether the employer acted reasonably. It must not substitute its own assessment of the evidence…
22 Apr 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0469_09_2204
An appellate tribunal will not revisit an issue recorded by the Employment Tribunal as having been withdrawn, particularly where no application was made to…
22 Apr 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0212_10_2204
Appeals against interim case-management decisions are exceptional, but intervention is justified where the decision is wrong in principle. The overriding…
21 Apr 2010
[2010] UKEAT 1570_09_2104
An Employment Appeal Tribunal appeal based on fresh evidence will usually be more appropriately pursued by applying to the original Employment Tribunal for a…
21 Apr 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0453_09_2104
In a misconduct dismissal, an Employment Tribunal must decide whether dismissal fell within the range of reasonable responses open to the employer. It must not…
21 Apr 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0276_09_2104
An employment tribunal may reformulate the juridical basis of a complaint where the factual basis remains unchanged and the opposing party suffers no…
21 Apr 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0174_09_2104
Constructive dismissal requires a repudiatory breach of contract, not merely unreasonable conduct. The statutory inquiry has two stages: whether the employee…
20 Apr 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0433_09_2004
When reviewing a dismissal for misconduct, an Employment Tribunal must assess whether the employer’s investigation, disciplinary process and sanction fell…
20 Apr 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0062_09_2004
An amendment adding an associative disability discrimination claim cannot be refused on the assumption that a statutory grievance was required for every form…
19 Apr 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0029_10_1904
An unfair dismissal claim must be presented within three months of the effective date of termination. Where the evidence supports a finding that termination…
16 Apr 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0465_09_1604
In a misconduct dismissal, an employer may proceed under disciplinary procedures where it reasonably suspects dishonesty, even if an absence-management…
16 Apr 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0338_09_1604
For a claim under section 146 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992, the tribunal must determine on the evidence whether the…
15 Apr 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0505_09_1504
A contractual redundancy policy expressed in mandatory terms may confer an entitlement even where the benefit is subject to a stated cap. The words “not more…
15 Apr 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0442_09_1504
A protected disclosure requires information which, in the worker’s reasonable belief, tends to show a breach of a legal obligation. An expression of…
15 Apr 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0232_09_1504
An Employment Tribunal must address the central facts and legal issues on which its discrimination findings depend. In claims of direct discrimination, less…
1
15 Apr 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0102_10_1504
A claim form should be accepted where it contains the required information and is sufficiently legible to be read in the original. Partial difficulty in…
14 Apr 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0175_10_1404
An appeal rendered redundant by subsequent events may be dismissed on withdrawal. The Employment Appeal Tribunal may encourage conciliation, but should not…
14 Apr 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0002_09_1404
For equal-pay purposes, an establishment is not necessarily confined to a single workplace. The proper question is whether it is fair and reasonable to treat…
13 Apr 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0351_09_1304
In an unfair-dismissal case involving alleged professional misconduct, the reasonableness of the employer’s investigation and sanction must be assessed in…
9 Apr 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0025_10_0904
An appellate tribunal may intervene for error of law where the reasoning of an Employment Tribunal falls outside the range of reasonable responses, or where no…
8 Apr 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0084_10_0804
The effective date of termination is a statutory construct. It depends on what passed between the parties, rather than on the date they seek to agree or…
7 Apr 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0516_09_0704
In an unfair-dismissal compensation assessment, a tribunal must distinguish reasonable mitigation from a voluntary career change. Where an employee retrains…
6 Apr 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0480_09_0604
Employment status must be assessed from the contract and the parties’ conduct throughout the relationship. A tribunal should not treat post-termination…
6 Apr 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0126_10_0604
Rule 3(9) does not prevent an Employment Judge, at a later pre-hearing review, from reconsidering whether a claim was validly presented merely because an…
31 Mar 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0488_09_3103
Under Employment Rights Act 1996, an employer will only rarely act outside the range of reasonable responses by beginning disciplinary proceedings before…
30 Mar 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0080_10_3003
Claims for holiday pay under regulations 14 and 16 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 may be brought as unauthorised deduction from wages claims under…
29 Mar 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0233_09_2903
In a constructive dismissal claim, the question is whether the employer’s conduct breached the implied Malik term of mutual trust and confidence. The tribunal…
26 Mar 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0966_09_2603
Where an unfair dismissal claim is presented outside the statutory time limit, the claimant must show that it was not reasonably practicable to present it in…
25 Mar 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0471_09_2503
For a service provision change under the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006, the relevant activities are identified as a…
24 Mar 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0539_09_2403
Where disciplinary allegations are also investigated by the police, the employer’s decision-maker has a wide discretion whether to continue or postpone the…
24 Mar 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0380_09_2403
An Employment Tribunal determining a constructive dismissal claim must identify and decide whether the employer committed the alleged fundamental breach…
23 Mar 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0007_10_2303
An individual may be a worker’s employer even where the worker remains technically employed by a company. The question is determined from the factual…
22 Mar 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0416_09_2203
Compensation for unfair dismissal is assessed on a just and equitable basis by reference to loss caused by the dismissal. Where there is a firm finding that…
19 Mar 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0382_09_1903
In disability discrimination claims, the tribunal must identify the relevant comparator or comparators and assess the claimant’s circumstances against those of…
18 Mar 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0414_09_1803
Employment tribunals may use case-management powers to require detailed particulars and evidence in complex discrimination and protected-disclosure claims.…
15 Mar 2010
[2010] UKEAT 525_9_1503
In an unfair dismissal claim, the employer’s reason and investigation must be assessed by reference to the standards in Burchell and the band of reasonable…
12 Mar 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0528_09_1203
For a transfer under regulation 3(1)(a) of TUPE 2006, an economic entity may retain its identity despite a temporary cessation of operations at the putative…
12 Mar 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0474_09_1203
An Employment Tribunal gives adequate reasons where its fact-finding method is rational and sufficiently explains why particular allegations are accepted or…
12 Mar 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0051_09_1203
When an amendment introduces a fresh claim which would have been time-barred if presented independently, the statutory time limit is not an absolute bar to…
12 Mar 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0018_10_1203
When assessing compensation for unfair dismissal, a tribunal must estimate the loss flowing from the dismissal, including employment benefits the claimant…
11 Mar 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0262_09_1103
An Employment Appeal Tribunal may interfere with factual conclusions only where an overwhelming case shows that no reasonable tribunal, properly applying the…
11 Mar 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0096_10_1103
A discrimination claim may allege a continuing act where later grievance proceedings are said to continue the discriminatory treatment complained of. At a…
11 Mar 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0004_10_1103
A written grievance must be read in its factual and procedural context. Where an employee makes a protected disclosure by grievance and later alleges detriment…
9 Mar 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0534_09_0903
A tribunal reducing compensation for unfair dismissal because of contributory conduct must identify conduct that is culpable or blameworthy. For a compensatory…
9 Mar 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0346_09_0903
An employment tribunal has a broad discretion to exclude evidence obtained through covert recording of private deliberations in disciplinary or capability…
9 Mar 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0039_09_0903
The doctrine of lis pendens has no separate application in Employment Tribunals. Its underlying purpose is addressed through the statutory procedural rules…
4 Mar 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0391_09_0403
An employer’s mistaken interpretation of statutory deadlines does not, without more, constitute a reasonable excuse for failing to implement default…
4 Mar 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0347_09_0403
A claim should be struck out for having no reasonable prospect of success only in exceptional circumstances where central facts are disputed. Whistle-blowing…
2 Mar 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0269_09_0203
Victimisation requires less favourable treatment because the claimant carried out a protected act. The tribunal must identify the treatment, ask whether it was…
1 Mar 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0378_09_0103
An employment tribunal assessing compensation for unfair dismissal must evaluate any realistic chance that the employee would have been dismissed following a…
23 Feb 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0486_09_2302
Apparent bias is assessed by asking whether the fair-minded and informed observer, having considered all relevant circumstances, would conclude that there was…
23 Feb 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0371_09_2302
A child who performs work is not necessarily employed under a contract of service. The question remains whether the ordinary requirements of employment are…
22 Feb 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0411_09_2202
Under section 188(7) of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992, the tribunal must ask whether special circumstances existed, whether…
22 Feb 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0373_09_2202
In a racial harassment claim, unreasonable or unfair treatment does not, without more, shift the burden of proof. The claimant must establish facts from which…
19 Feb 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0392_09_1902
A tribunal must give the parties a fair opportunity to address a material point on which it proposes to decide the case, particularly where that point…
19 Feb 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0289_09_1902
An employment tribunal deciding whether an employer failed to make reasonable adjustments must identify the relevant provision, criterion or practice, any…
19 Feb 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0251_09_1902
At a preliminary hearing, discrimination complaints should not be treated as out of time where the pleaded facts are capable of amounting to an act extending…
18 Feb 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0243_09_1802
Allegations of apparent bias and procedural irregularity must be assessed on the facts found by the appellate tribunal, applying the fair-minded and informed…
17 Feb 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0278_09_1702
Liability for discrimination by an agency worker cannot be imposed on the end-user merely because the worker was treated like an employee in day-to-day…
15 Feb 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0368_09_1502
A contested review of an automatic strike-out under rule 36(1) of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2004 should ordinarily be determined at a hearing. The paper…
15 Feb 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0364_09_1502 (15 February 2010)
Interim relief under Employment Rights Act 1996 ss.128–129 is not limited to disputes of a "clear and simple" factual nature. A tribunal must decide the…
11 Feb 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0221_09_1102
An employment contract may reserve an employer a unilateral power to vary contractual terms, including pay and working arrangements, but the language must…
10 Feb 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0376_09_1002
A dismissal is automatically unfair where the employer has decided to dismiss before completing the statutory capability procedure. The tribunal’s finding on…
10 Feb 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0360_09_1002
A valid written grievance under the statutory grievance procedure need not use technical language or identify itself as a grievance. It must, however, identify…
10 Feb 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0034_09_1002
An office-holder is not an employee merely because the office carries remuneration or other benefits. An office-holder may also be an employee, but only where…
8 Feb 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0315_09_0802
Failure to comply with step 2 of the Standard Procedure under the Employment Act 2002 makes a dismissal automatically unfair. An employee must be told not only…
5 Feb 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0458_09_0502
An employment tribunal does not impose a legal burden of proof merely because it expects an employer to answer strong evidence suggesting that a dismissal…
5 Feb 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0419_09_0502
In a discrimination appeal, an Employment Tribunal need not treat the hypothetical-comparator question as confined to the initial stage of the burden-of-proof…
5 Feb 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0201_09_0502
An originating application must be read as a whole to decide whether it contains a particular discrimination complaint. Particulars may explain a claim, but…
4 Feb 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0339_09_0402
Employment Tribunal claim forms must be considered judicially, not by mechanical checklist. Where the material identifying a claimant and pleading the claim…
2 Feb 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0443_09_0202
An employment tribunal must identify the issues, make relevant findings of fact, state the applicable law and explain how that law was applied. Reasons must…
28 Jan 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0377_09_2801
Where an employer takes over a going-concern business and communicates total continuity of employment, including protection of wages and accrued holiday, that…
28 Jan 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0359_09_2801
An Employment Tribunal’s findings of persistent unwanted sexual harassment and constructive unfair dismissal will not be disturbed on perversity grounds where…
28 Jan 2010
UKEAT/0206/09
An employer may, subject to safeguards, rely on an official police disclosure that an employee presents a risk to children, even where the information is…
16
27 Jan 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0407_09_2701
The Employment Appeal Tribunal dismissed the appeal. A finding by the Certification Officer on whether a union branch existed was essentially factual and could…
26 Jan 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0340_08_2601
An Employment Tribunal must give adequate reasons identifying the factual findings and statutory route by which a disability discrimination claim succeeds.…
26 Jan 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0309_09_2601
In an indirect sex discrimination claim, an employer must objectively justify a requirement for full-time work by balancing its business reasons against the…
26 Jan 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0296_09_2601
In a direct race-discrimination claim, an employer may rely on a mistake as the reason for adverse treatment. The reason need not be morally or objectively…
26 Jan 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0229_09_2601
An employee’s appeal under the statutory disciplinary procedure must be assessed by reference to the statutory requirements, rather than the employer’s…
26 Jan 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0029_09_2601
A collective agreement may supply enforceable terms of an individual employment contract even though the agreement itself is presumed not to be legally…
25 Jan 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0500_08_2501
For statutory grievance purposes, each equal-pay comparison gives rise to a distinct claim. A failure to correlate one comparator does not bar claims based on…
25 Jan 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0370_09_2501
A contract of employment is not tainted by illegality merely because immigration-related conditions may have been breached. Illegality depends on the…
25 Jan 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0303_09_2501
Constructive dismissal requires an objective assessment of whether the employer, without reasonable and proper cause, seriously damaged the relationship of…
22 Jan 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0324_09_2201
Where an Employment Tribunal fails to consider material evidence capable of affecting its conclusions on the fairness of a dismissal, its decision cannot…
22 Jan 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0317_09_2201
In an unfair dismissal case, the reasonable range of responses test applies to the disciplinary process as a whole, including the investigation and the…
21 Jan 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0355_09_2101
An Employment Tribunal’s assessment of whether conduct breaches the implied term of trust and confidence must be made objectively and in context. Conduct that…
20 Jan 2010
[2010] UKEAT 55_9_2001
Employment has a sufficient connection with Great Britain where the employee performs work there that is more than de minimis. The statutory gateway for work…
20 Jan 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0799_09_2001
Under Rule 3(8) of the Employment Appeal Tribunal Rules 1993, an appellant may lodge one fresh Notice of Appeal after a Rule 3(7) rejection. The fresh notice…
20 Jan 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0386_09_2001
Whether an implied agreement exists under Regulation 24 of the School Staffing (England) Regulations 2003 is determined by ordinary contractual principles. The…
19 Jan 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0498_08_1901
For the statutory grievance procedure to confer jurisdiction, the grievance must remain extant when the tribunal claim is presented. A grievance which has been…
19 Jan 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0182_08_1901
For an unfair dismissal claim, time may be extended only where it was not reasonably practicable to present the claim within the statutory period. For…
18 Jan 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0496_09_1801
For the purpose of calculating time for an appeal to the Employment Appeal Tribunal, a judgment is “sent” when it is handed to the Post Office, rather than…
18 Jan 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0123_09_1801
An employment tribunal may find disability-related discrimination where the employer’s reasons for dismissal include disability-related assumptions…
15 Jan 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0423_09_1501
An employment tribunal must give adequate reasons for preferring one witness’s evidence over another on a crucial disputed issue. A bare preference is…
15 Jan 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0147_09_1501
An Employment Tribunal must give sufficient reasons for a costs award and for a substantial assessment of future loss. Where serious issues arise about the…
14 Jan 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0476_09_1401
An employment tribunal’s territorial jurisdiction depends on whether the employer resides or carries on business in England and Wales, rather than simply where…
14 Jan 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0390_09_1401
For disability under the Disability Discrimination Act 1995, the question whether an impairment is likely to last at least twelve months requires the statutory…
14 Jan 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0134_09_1401 (14 January 2010)
An application for adjournment based on religious observance is a case-management matter to be decided by balancing competing rights. Tribunals retain a wide…
13 Jan 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0487_09_1301
Relief from an unless order is determined by a broad assessment of the interests of justice and the overriding objective. Relevant considerations generally…
1
13 Jan 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0455_09_1301
An Employment Tribunal must determine the issues presented by the parties. Where a pre-hearing review identifies the issues, the Tribunal may ordinarily…
11 Jan 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0252_09_1101
A perversity appeal is not a rehearing on the facts. The appellate tribunal must respect findings made by the Employment Tribunal, which heard the evidence…
7 Jan 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0553_08_0701
Constructive dismissal requires a repudiatory breach of contract. Unreasonable employer conduct, without more, is insufficient. In a claim based on trust and…
7 Jan 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0369_08_0701
An Employment Appeal Tribunal will interfere with an employment tribunal’s factual decision on perversity grounds only where an overwhelming case shows that no…
7 Jan 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0086_09_0701
An Employment Appeal Tribunal should assess an employment tribunal’s reasons as a whole and should not subject them to unrealistically detailed scrutiny.…
5 Jan 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0356_09_0501
When deciding whether to extend time for an employment claim, the tribunal must apply the statutory test and consider all the circumstances. It need not…
5 Jan 2010
[2010] UKEAT 0020_09_0501
Pregnancy discrimination law does not create a general regime of positive discrimination or require employers to abandon disciplinary or other management…
[2010] UKEAT 0495_08_2306
An unless order takes effect on the date specified if the required act is not completed. An application to vary, revoke or extend time does not itself amount…
1
[2010] UKEAT 0439_09_0103
An employment tribunal has a wide discretion to regulate its procedure and to determine the weight given to hearsay evidence. A written witness statement is…
1
[2010] UKEAT 0399_10_1304
Under section 98A(2) of the Employment Rights Act 1996, the employer bears the burden of proving, on the balance of probabilities, that the employee would have…
2