| Date | Case | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Jul 2012 |
[2011] UKEAT 0050_20_3007
A completed repudiatory breach of the implied term of mutual trust and confidence cannot be cured by the employer. However, a prompt and fair investigatory or…
|
|
| 18 Jul 2012 |
[2011] UKEAT 0236_10_1807
An appellate tribunal should read an employment tribunal’s reasons as a whole. Reasons are sufficient if they identify the issues, material findings…
|
|
| 13 Jun 2012 |
[2011] UKEAT 0012_11_1306
Withdrawal of a trade union's legal assistance because proceedings against the union create a reasonable conflict of interest is not victimisation merely…
|
|
| 2 May 2012 |
[2011] UKEAT 0288_11_0205
An employment tribunal’s jurisdiction is statutory. Its jurisdiction to determine a discrimination complaint does not carry an implied jurisdiction to…
|
|
| 30 Mar 2012 |
[2011] UKEAT 0161_11_3003
A regulatory rule requiring barristers’ chambers to fund pupillages was not a provision, criterion or practice imposed upon an applicant for pupillage. It…
|
|
| 24 Feb 2012 |
[2011] UKEAT 0594_10_2402
A trained and senior employee may be summarily dismissed for serious procedural breaches without a specific prior warning where the employer was reasonably…
|
|
| 10 Feb 2012 |
[2011] UKEAT 294_11_1002
In a direct discrimination claim, a tribunal may infer discrimination only from the whole evidential picture. A difference in status and treatment alone is…
|
|
| 10 Feb 2012 |
[2011] UKEAT 197_11_1002
An employer’s legitimate decision on the allocation of financial resources may constitute a real need for the purpose of objectively justifying indirect…
|
|
| 7 Feb 2012 |
[2011] UKEAT 277_11_701
A clear resignation takes effect according to the ordinary meaning of its terms. It cannot be unilaterally withdrawn, although the employer may consent to its…
|
|
| 31 Jan 2012 |
[2011] UKEAT 0254_11_3101
An insult may constitute a detriment in discrimination law where, taking all the circumstances into account, a reasonable worker would or might regard the…
|
|
| 25 Jan 2012 |
[2011] UKEAT 0508_10_2501
A distinction must be drawn between failing to plead a discrimination complaint and failing to provide adequate particulars. The former limits the Employment…
|
|
| 16 Jan 2012 |
[2011] UKEAT 0038_11_1601
In unfair dismissal cases, the tribunal must identify and characterise the employer’s actual reason for dismissal. It must not substitute its own view of the…
|
|
| 13 Jan 2012 |
[2011] UKEAT 247_11_1301
An adjournment decision is generally reviewable only for legal error. Where refusal of an adjournment may imperil the fairness of the proceedings as a whole…
|
|
| 22 Dec 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0516_11_2212 (Rev 1)
An unless order for further and better particulars is breached only where the replies, considered individually or as a whole, are plainly incomplete or…
|
|
| 22 Dec 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0105_11_2212
In misconduct dismissals, the question under Employment Rights Act 1996, section 98(4), is whether dismissal fell within the range of reasonable responses open…
|
|
| 22 Dec 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0103_11_2212
Under section 98(4) of the Employment Rights Act 1996, the tribunal must assess whether dismissal fell within the range of reasonable responses open to a…
|
|
| 22 Dec 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0043_11_2212
In misconduct dismissals, the tribunal must assess whether the employer acted reasonably under section 98(4) of the Employment Rights Act 1996. It must not…
|
|
| 22 Dec 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0043_11_2211
In misconduct dismissals, the tribunal must assess whether dismissal fell within the range of reasonable responses open to a reasonable employer. It must not…
|
|
| 21 Dec 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0462_10_2112
For a service provision change under the TUPE Regulations 2006, the tribunal must first identify the activities carried out by the original contractor. It must…
|
|
| 21 Dec 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0293_11_1212
A complaint under Employment Rights Act 1996, section 45A, requires the tribunal to determine the reason why the employer acted. The protected act need not be…
|
|
| 21 Dec 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0023_11_2112 (21 December 2011)
The Service Provision Change (SPC) exclusion in regulation 3(3)(b) of the TUPE Regulations 2006 applies where the contractor's activities consist wholly or…
|
|
| 21 Dec 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0022_11_2112
For a service provision change under regulation 3(1)(b) of the TUPE Regulations 2006, the relevant activities must not consist wholly or mainly of supplying…
|
|
| 21 Dec 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0021_11_2112
For a service provision change under regulation 3(1)(b) of the TUPE Regulations 2006, the activities must satisfy the statutory conditions, including that they…
|
|
| 20 Dec 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 38_11_2012
An Employment Tribunal may order recovery only within the statutory powers conferred on it. Under rule 10, an order for documents must be no wider than an…
|
|
| 20 Dec 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0095_11_2012
An employment tribunal must determine the issues fixed by an appellate remittal, even if it considers the remittal order or the underlying analysis…
|
|
| 16 Dec 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0583_10_1612
In a mixed-motive dismissal, a prior wish to remove an employee does not automatically prevent subsequent misconduct from being the operative reason. The…
|
|
| 16 Dec 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0583_10_0612
In a mixed-motive dismissal, a prior desire or decision to remove an employee does not by itself prevent subsequent misconduct from being the operative reason…
|
|
| 13 Dec 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0029_11_1312
When assessing whether to reduce unfair-dismissal compensation for a claimant’s conduct, the tribunal must focus on the claimant’s own conduct. Under sections…
|
|
| 8 Dec 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0625_11_0812
An appellate tribunal may interfere with a case-management discretion where the decision-maker has taken an irrelevant factor into account, including a…
|
|
| 8 Dec 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0596_10_0812
An exemption from the national minimum wage for live-in domestic workers must be construed narrowly. Whether a worker is treated as a member of the employer’s…
|
|
| 8 Dec 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0553_10_0812
The family-household exemption from the national minimum wage is construed narrowly. Whether a domestic worker is treated as a member of the employer’s family…
|
|
| 8 Dec 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0238_11_0812
Under the repealed statutory grievance regime, a complaint must be identified by construing the relevant documents in their factual context. The question is…
|
|
| 8 Dec 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0071_11_0812
The family-household exemption from the national minimum wage is construed narrowly. Whether a live-in domestic worker is treated as a member of the employer’s…
|
|
| 8 Dec 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0070_11_0812
The family-household exemption from the National Minimum Wage applies only where the worker is genuinely treated as a member of the family. The assessment is…
|
|
| 1 Dec 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0287_11_0112
When considering a deposit order, an Employment Tribunal should adopt the same approach as when considering striking out a claim. Where the central facts are…
|
|
| 1 Dec 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0116_11_0112
Under section 141 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, suitability of alternative employment and the reasonableness of refusing it are separate questions.…
|
|
| 30 Nov 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0375_11_3011
An Employment Appeal Tribunal may interfere with an employment judge’s findings of fact only on a point of law. An employee who remains employed while…
|
|
| 29 Nov 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0585_11_2911
When deciding whether a preliminary hearing should be private under rule 16(1)(b), the Employment Tribunal must identify the evidence or representations to be…
|
|
| 29 Nov 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0418_11_2911
In a misconduct dismissal, an employment tribunal must determine the employer’s actual reason by reference to the case advanced and the evidence. It should not…
|
|
| 29 Nov 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0297_11_2911
Under section 1(3) of the Equal Pay Act 1970, an employer may rely on a material factor unrelated to sex where it explains the pay difference. Where a…
|
|
| 29 Nov 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0279_11_2911
Under section 1(3) of the Equal Pay Act 1970, an employer may rely on a non-discriminatory material factor that explains a pay difference. Where a…
|
|
| 29 Nov 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0253_10_2911
An Employment Tribunal may distinguish between a protected disclosure and the manner in which it is made. Employers may act on genuinely separable misconduct…
|
|
| 28 Nov 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0917_11_2811
An appeal notice sent by email is served when it reaches the Employment Appeal Tribunal’s server. It need not appear in an individual inbox or be acknowledged…
|
|
| 28 Nov 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0406_11_2811
An employment tribunal must keep the statutory tests for direct disability discrimination, disability-related discrimination and the duty to make reasonable…
|
|
| 25 Nov 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0225_11_2511
An Employment Tribunal may make a costs order under rule 40(1) where an application for postponement or adjournment causes the other party to incur costs. That…
|
|
| 24 Nov 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0292_11_2411
An Employment Tribunal’s factual findings and reasons should not be disturbed on appeal where it directed itself correctly in law and its conclusions were…
|
|
| 24 Nov 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0267_11_2411
Race discrimination under the Race Relations Act 1976 is assessed by reference to whether conduct is on racial grounds, not only by reference to the claimant’s…
|
|
| 24 Nov 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0014_10_2411
In an unfair dismissal case, the tribunal must apply the objective reasonable-employer test. It must determine whether the employer genuinely believed in the…
|
|
| 23 Nov 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0703_11_2311
An appeal to the Employment Appeal Tribunal under Employment Tribunals Act 1996, section 21(1), is not confined to a formal judicial decision. It may concern…
|
|
| 23 Nov 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0231_11_2311
An appeal against an Employment Tribunal judgment must be lodged within 42 days of the date on which the judgment is sent to the parties. A party pursuing a…
|
|
| 22 Nov 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0130_11_2211
Police officers may act as agents of a chief officer for discrimination purposes when exercising employment functions with the chief officer’s express or…
|
|
| 22 Nov 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0115_11_2211
An employee may be undertaking independent trade union activities when expressing opposition to workplace changes during a workforce presentation, particularly…
|
|
| 22 Nov 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0069_10_2211
A contract must be characterised by its principal object, assessed from the relationship as a whole. Where its primary purpose is training or education, it is…
|
|
| 18 Nov 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0378_11_1811
In assessing compensation for disability discrimination and unfair dismissal, an Employment Tribunal must address any continuing earnings loss after the…
|
|
| 18 Nov 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0218_11_1811
An Employment Judge sitting alone has no jurisdiction to determine complaints for a protective award under section 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations…
|
|
| 18 Nov 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0217_11_1811
An Employment Judge sitting alone has jurisdiction only over the complaints specified in section 4(3) of the Employment Tribunals Act 1996. A complaint for a…
|
|
| 17 Nov 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0387_11_1711
Strike-out is a draconian power and should be exercised sparingly in discrimination claims. A claim should not ordinarily be struck out where central facts…
|
|
| 11 Nov 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 49_10_1111
For the purposes of Employment Rights Act 1996, s.98(2), conduct need not be reprehensible. Any act or omission may constitute conduct, leaving the tribunal to…
|
|
| 10 Nov 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0015_11_1011
A discrimination claim should rarely be struck out before evidence has been heard. Where the pleadings disclose a reasonably arguable case that separate acts…
|
|
| 9 Nov 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0296_11_0911
An employer must have a reasonable opportunity to investigate an allegation before an employment claim alleging failure to investigate can properly…
|
|
| 9 Nov 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0007_11_0911
For disability status, the claimant must establish, at the relevant date, both a substantial adverse effect on normal day-to-day activities and a likelihood…
|
|
| 8 Nov 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0119_11_0811
The unreasonable initiation or conduct of disciplinary proceedings may amount to a fundamental breach of the implied term of mutual trust and confidence, even…
|
|
| 8 Nov 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0001_11_0811
Whether expiry of a fixed-term contract constitutes dismissal as redundant depends on the reason for dismissal in the particular circumstances. A fixed-term…
|
|
| 4 Nov 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0337_10_0411
Race-discrimination claims concerning separate recruitment advertisements are ordinarily separate acts, so time runs from each act unless the evidence…
|
|
| 4 Nov 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0202_11_0411
Section 12(1A) of the Race Relations Act 1976 does not import the specific acts in section 12(1)(a) to (c) directly into the harassment provision. The…
|
|
| 4 Nov 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0201_11_0411
Section 12(1A) of the Race Relations Act 1976 does not import the specific acts listed in section 12(1)(a) to (c). It nevertheless requires three constituent…
|
|
| 4 Nov 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0158_11_0411
At a preliminary hearing, an appearance of bias may be reasonably arguable where lay members of an Employment Tribunal have relevant personal or professional…
|
|
| 4 Nov 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0157_11_0411
Where circumstances objectively suggest that tribunal members may have had relevant personal or professional connections with parties or witnesses, the…
|
|
| 4 Nov 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0006_11_0411
In a direct discrimination claim, an Employment Tribunal must first identify and establish less favourable treatment as a comparative matter. Only then does it…
|
|
| 3 Nov 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0242_11_0311
Whether conduct breaches the implied term of mutual trust and confidence is principally a factual question for the Employment Tribunal, assessed objectively by…
|
|
| 2 Nov 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0284_11_0211
An Employment Tribunal must give sufficient reasons to show how it resolved the issues before it. In an unfair dismissal case involving several allegations, it…
|
|
| 27 Oct 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0450_10_2710
A repudiatory breach of the implied term of trust and confidence is assessed objectively, from the perspective of a reasonable person in the position of the…
|
|
| 26 Oct 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0089_11_2610
In an unfair dismissal case based on alleged misconduct, the tribunal must apply the statutory test in Employment Rights Act 1996, section 98(4). It should…
|
|
| 24 Oct 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0236_11_2410
Under the statutory time-limit extension, reasonable practicability and the reasonableness of the further period are distinct inquiries. The first concerns the…
|
|
| 21 Oct 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0304_11_2110
Where a representative assures a claimant that a hearing will be postponed, and then fails to communicate the refusal of postponement or withdraws while the…
|
|
| 21 Oct 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0262_11_2110
The effective date of termination is a statutory construct. It is determined by what happened between the parties under the statutory provisions, rather than…
|
|
| 21 Oct 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0216_11_2110
Claims of disability discrimination, victimisation and constructive dismissal involve distinct legal inquiries. The absence of direct discrimination, failure…
|
|
| 20 Oct 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0573_10_2010
In constructive dismissal cases, separate incidents of misconduct may form part of a continuing breach of the implied term of mutual trust and confidence. A…
|
|
| 19 Oct 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 174_11_1910
In a reasonable-adjustment claim, an employment tribunal must identify the disability’s relevant functional effects and explain how they caused the substantial…
|
|
| 19 Oct 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0395_11_1910
In an unfair redundancy appeal, it was reasonably arguable that an employee should have been retained where another employee in the same team was leaving, and…
|
|
| 19 Oct 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0109_11_1910
Under section 139 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992, a tribunal must first decide whether it was not reasonably practicable to…
|
|
| 19 Oct 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0029_11_1910
Conduct forming part of an employer’s grievance process may constitute part of a continuing discriminatory act where it directly concerns, and continues, the…
|
|
| 18 Oct 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0333_10_1810
An employment tribunal finding unfair dismissal must explain the possible remedies of reinstatement and re-engagement and ask whether the claimant seeks such…
|
|
| 18 Oct 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0021_11_1810
Where employees allege that their dismissals occurred by reason of a relevant transfer, the transferee may be liable under TUPE even though the dismissals were…
|
|
| 17 Oct 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0758_11_1710
An Employment Appeal Tribunal appeal must be properly instituted within the prescribed time. A notice lodged shortly before the deadline is defective where…
|
|
| 14 Oct 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0533_10_1410
An employment tribunal must determine the discrimination case actually advanced, including pleaded background matters capable of supporting an inference of…
|
|
| 14 Oct 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0121_11_1410
Rule 61(4)(h) of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure concerns service on an existing party. It does not govern the initiation of proceedings against a…
|
|
| 14 Oct 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0011_11_1410
A Polkey deduction is available only where unfairness arises from a procedural defect, such as failure to give an employee an opportunity to answer allegations…
|
|
| 13 Oct 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0019_10_1310
In a redundancy dismissal, fairness under section 98(4) requires an assessment of the whole process. A procedural omission does not automatically make the…
|
|
| 12 Oct 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0606_10_1210
An Employment Appeal Tribunal may dismiss an appeal at a preliminary hearing where the grounds have no reasonable prospect of success. A one-off act does not…
|
|
| 12 Oct 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0559_11_1210
An Employment Appeal Tribunal will rarely interfere with an Employment Judge’s discretionary costs order where the judge directed himself correctly, considered…
|
|
| 12 Oct 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0483_10_1210
Disadvantage suffered during maternity leave is not automatically direct sex discrimination. A claim under section 1 of the Sex Discrimination Act 1975…
|
|
| 12 Oct 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0381_11_1210
Documentary evidence first produced after the close of evidence may properly be refused where its admission would require an adjournment, the claim remains…
|
|
| 11 Oct 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 11_0210_1110
For automatic unfair dismissal under Employment Rights Act 1996, the fact that working arrangements are legally permissible does not prevent an employee from…
|
|
| 11 Oct 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0009_11_1110
In a long-term ill-health dismissal, fairness is not determined by whether the employer omitted a possible further enquiry or followed a particular procedure.…
|
|
| 7 Oct 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0569_11_0710
An Employment Appeal Tribunal may allow arguable protected-disclosure detriment grounds to proceed where the employment tribunal disposed of them solely on a…
|
|
| 6 Oct 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 10_049_0610
Where an agreed list of issues is reasonably capable of competing interpretations, an Employment Tribunal must resolve the procedural position fairly and in…
|
|
| 5 Oct 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0263_11_0510
An Employment Tribunal must determine the issues identified at case management, unless additional issues emerge during the hearing and the parties understand…
|
|
| 4 Oct 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0270_10_0410
An employment tribunal must determine a properly made application for review before treating a respondent as excluded from proceedings. Evidence informally…
|
|
| 29 Sep 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0204_11_2909
Unfair dismissal and wrongful dismissal involve different questions. In an unfair dismissal claim, the tribunal examines the employer’s reason, the…
|
|
| 29 Sep 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0163_11_2909
In assessing unfair dismissal for conduct, the question under section 98(4) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 is whether dismissal fell within the range of…
|
|
| 29 Sep 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0162_11_2909
In an unfair dismissal claim, a genuine belief in misconduct, supported by reasonable grounds and a reasonable investigation, may make dismissal substantively…
|
|
| 28 Sep 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0282_11_2809
Where an employee resigns on notice, the effective date of termination is ordinarily the date on which the notice expires. During the notice period, the…
|
|
| 27 Sep 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0331_10_2709
Directors or office-holders may be agents for discrimination purposes where they exercise authority to manage an organisation, even though they were not…
|
|
| 23 Sep 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0232_11_2309
For limb (b) worker status, the client-or-customer exception is not determined simply by asking whether the individual is self-employed or works under a…
|
|
| 23 Sep 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0020_11_2309
In an unfair dismissal case involving alleged negligence or incompetence, the tribunal must apply the Burchell framework. It must decide whether the employer…
|
|
| 22 Sep 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0178_11_2209
The Employment Appeal Tribunal’s exceptional costs jurisdiction may be exercised where proceedings are misconceived, vexatious or unreasonably conducted. A…
|
|
| 22 Sep 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0139_11_2209
In an unfair dismissal case involving allegedly inconsistent disciplinary treatment, the question is whether a reasonable employer could properly dismiss the…
|
|
| 22 Sep 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0017_11_2209
A claim is presented in writing when a fixed-form written complaint is successfully transmitted through a channel held out by an employment tribunal for…
|
|
| 21 Sep 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 531_10_2109
Where the Employment Appeal Tribunal makes, or varies, an order under regulation 15(8) of the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations…
|
|
| 21 Sep 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0492_10_2109
An employment tribunal must give a party a fair and reasonable opportunity to answer a wholly new point raised by the tribunal itself. It must not criticise a…
|
|
| 21 Sep 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0010_11_2109
Where an Employment Appeal Tribunal makes or varies an order under regulation 15(8) of the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations…
|
|
| 21 Sep 2011 |
UKEAT/0042/11
An employment tribunal must first determine whether rule 49 applies. Where proceedings involve an allegation of a sexual offence, anonymisation of the tribunal…
|
|
| 20 Sep 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 013_11_2009
An employee’s persistent and deliberate refusal to comply with a reasonable management instruction may amount to gross misconduct justifying summary dismissal…
|
|
| 19 Sep 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0291_11_1909
A claimant cannot reopen concluded employment proceedings merely because a settlement or compensation award later proves less advantageous than expected. Where…
|
|
| 16 Sep 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0452_10_1609
A tribunal need not follow a formal two-stage burden-of-proof analysis in an age-discrimination claim. However, where the burden of proof is central to the…
|
|
| 15 Sep 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 1853_10_1509
A tribunal may dismiss an ordinary unfair dismissal claim while upholding a claim of automatically unfair dismissal for whistleblowing. The two inquiries are…
|
|
| 15 Sep 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0379_11_1509
In redundancy selection, an Employment Tribunal must apply the range of reasonable responses test. It must not substitute its own view about the appropriate…
|
|
| 15 Sep 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0075_11_1509
In assessing mitigation of loss, the question is whether it was unreasonable for the claimant to refuse the employer’s offer, not whether the offer was…
|
|
| 14 Sep 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0245_11_1409
An Employment Tribunal does not err in law merely because an employer used imprecise language to describe the ending of a fixed-term contract. The tribunal…
|
|
| 13 Sep 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0192_11_1309
A non-EEA family member of an EEA national derives a right to reside and work from that status. The right does not depend on possession of a residence card or…
|
|
| 13 Sep 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0113_11_1309
In assessing the fairness of dismissal for a contractual change, the tribunal must consider all relevant circumstances. Where dismissal is linked to an offer…
|
|
| 12 Sep 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0424_09_1208
In whistleblowing claims, the belief required by section 43B of the Employment Rights Act 1996 is subjective but must also be objectively reasonable in light…
|
|
| 12 Sep 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0060_11_1209
In an unfair dismissal claim, the tribunal must determine whether dismissal was reasonable in the circumstances under section 98(4) of the Employment Rights…
|
|
| 9 Sep 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 470_11_909
An Employment Tribunal should ordinarily stay proceedings where a proposed High Court claim substantially overlaps with the Tribunal claim and the Tribunal’s…
|
|
| 7 Sep 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0568_10_0709
An Employment Appeal Tribunal should interfere with an Employment Tribunal’s factual decision only where an overwhelming case shows that no reasonable…
|
|
| 7 Sep 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0504_10_0709
A full Employment Tribunal must involve all members of the panel in case-management decisions made after the tribunal has been constituted for a full hearing.…
|
|
| 6 Sep 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0290_11_0609
On an appeal against a case-management decision, the Employment Appeal Tribunal intervenes only where the tribunal applied an incorrect legal principle…
|
|
| 1 Sep 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0116_11_0109
At a rule 3(10) hearing, permission to amend a Notice of Appeal should generally be granted where the proposed new ground is reasonably arguable, particularly…
|
|
| 31 Aug 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0172_11_3108
An employment tribunal may infer that a dismissal was motivated by trade union activities from the cumulative effect of its factual findings. The evidence must…
|
|
| 30 Aug 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0573_10_3008
In a redundancy unfair-dismissal case, an Employment Tribunal may find procedural unfairness because suitable alternative work was not offered, even where…
|
|
| 30 Aug 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0378_11_3008
An Employment Appeal Tribunal should interfere with an Employment Tribunal’s factual findings only where a clear error of law, perversity or inadequate…
|
|
| 30 Aug 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0355_10_3008
A worker’s entitlement to the national minimum wage depends on whether the relevant periods constitute work under the National Minimum Wage Regulations 1999.…
|
|
| 26 Aug 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0548_10_2608
When assessing compensation for unfair dismissal, a tribunal may consider whether the claimant would have lost employment in any event. That issue must be…
|
|
| 26 Aug 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0507_10_2608
Reasonable adjustments must address the substantial disadvantage caused by the relevant provision, criterion or practice. They are primarily directed to…
|
|
| 25 Aug 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0080_11_2508
Where a person with limited leave to enter or remain makes an in-time application to vary that leave, Immigration Act 1971, section 3C extends the existing…
|
|
| 24 Aug 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 1799_10_2408
An alleged continuing consequence of a decision does not, without a later review or a fresh omission arising when a decision should have been made, restart the…
|
|
| 24 Aug 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0123_11_2408
An Employment Tribunal’s decision should be read fairly and as a whole. An appellate tribunal should avoid microscopic criticism, appellate re-trial and…
|
|
| 23 Aug 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0406_10_2308
An Employment Tribunal directed to determine a costs application must do so, even where it lacks first-hand knowledge of the earlier hearing. The application…
|
|
| 19 Aug 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0570_10_1908
An employee’s protected disclosure may form part of the factual chain leading to a detriment or dismissal without being the reason for it. The statutory…
|
|
| 17 Aug 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0378_10_1708
A disclosure may be protected where, in the worker’s reasonable belief, it tends to show that a person is likely to fail to comply with a legal obligation. An…
|
|
| 17 Aug 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0138_11_1708
In a constructive dismissal claim, an employer’s introduction of additional disciplinary matters at a hearing may constitute a breach of the implied term of…
|
|
| 16 Aug 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0142_11_1608
An employment tribunal must make clear findings on the employer’s pleaded reason for dismissal where that reason is relevant to whether the treatment was…
|
|
| 10 Aug 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 227_11_1008
Where an employee is dismissed on notice and is summarily dismissed before the notice expires, the summary dismissal ordinarily displaces the earlier notice.…
|
|
| 9 Aug 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 117_11_908
Striking out discrimination claims is an extreme and rare measure. It is nevertheless proper where the claims are abusive, scandalous or vexatious, or have no…
|
|
| 9 Aug 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0239_11_0908
A qualifying protected disclosure requires the communication of information tending to show a relevant wrongdoing. It is distinct from a bare allegation, but a…
|
|
| 9 Aug 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0072_10_0908
In a redundancy dismissal, fairness is assessed under section 98(4) of the Employment Rights Act 1996. An Employment Tribunal must not substitute its own…
|
|
| 8 Aug 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0237_11_0808
Case management may require a discrimination claimant to identify and particularise the complaints advanced, so that the issues are clear to the parties and…
|
|
| 4 Aug 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0057_11_0408
An employer must give an employee sufficient information at the second statutory disciplinary step to understand and answer the case. Where the allegations…
|
|
| 3 Aug 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0526_10_0308
In an unfair-dismissal case, the Employment Tribunal must assess the employer’s conduct under section 98(4) of the Employment Rights Act 1996. It must not…
|
|
| 2 Aug 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 1819_10_0208
The Employment Appeal Tribunal has jurisdiction to grant relief from sanctions. Where helpful, it may apply Civil Procedure Rules 1998, rule 3.9, by analogy.…
|
|
| 2 Aug 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0159_11_0208
A litigant in person may use “wrongful dismissal” interchangeably with “unfair dismissal”. The claim must be construed from the claim form and supporting…
|
|
| 29 Jul 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 361_10_2907
An employee may establish constructive dismissal where several acts, viewed cumulatively, amount to a fundamental breach of the implied term of mutual trust…
|
|
| 29 Jul 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0211_10_2907
Compensation for unlawful discrimination extends to loss which directly and naturally flows from the discriminatory act. A factual but for connection alone…
|
|
| 27 Jul 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0110_11_2707
An employment tribunal must determine the issues identified by the parties and must not decide a material issue adversely to a party without giving that party…
|
|
| 26 Jul 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0593_10_2607
An employee’s repudiatory conduct does not, without acceptance by the employer, terminate the contract of employment or amount to a resignation. The employer…
|
|
| 25 Jul 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0084_11_2507
Section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 requires a two-stage analysis. First, the worker must have a legal entitlement to the sum said to be wages…
|
|
| 22 Jul 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0513_10_2207
Affirmation of an employment contract may be express or implied. Mere delay does not itself amount to affirmation, but prolonged delay may provide evidence of…
|
|
| 22 Jul 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0473_10_2207
In an unfair dismissal case, an employment tribunal must consider whether dismissal fell within the range of reasonable responses available to a reasonable…
|
|
| 22 Jul 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0112_11_2207
At a preliminary hearing, a claim should not be rejected as out of time where the pleaded facts arguably disclose a continuing act, an act extending over a…
|
|
| 22 Jul 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0019_11_2207
An employer establishes redundancy as the reason for dismissal by showing, on the balance of probabilities, that the dismissal was wholly or mainly…
|
|
| 21 Jul 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0364_10_2107
For unfair dismissal, the reason for dismissal and the fairness of that dismissal are separate questions. An employer’s mistaken belief that an employee has…
|
|
| 21 Jul 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0091_11_2107
An unless order takes effect automatically on non-compliance, but the resulting strike-out is a judgment and may be reviewed under rule 34 of the Employment…
|
|
| 21 Jul 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0034_11_2107
For an employer company to be treated as insolvent for the purposes of statutory notice-pay protection, there must be direct evidence of an event specified in…
|
|
| 20 Jul 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0449_10_2007
Strike-out powers in discrimination proceedings must be exercised cautiously. Claims involving disputed facts should ordinarily be determined after the…
|
|
| 20 Jul 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0067_10_2007
An employment tribunal may hear a claim for wages earned and due but unpaid under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. Section 13 does not provide a…
|
|
| 19 Jul 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 37_11_1907
For a TUPE transfer, an economic entity must retain its identity. The fact that the same service users continue to receive care, or that some employees…
|
|
| 19 Jul 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0308_11_1907
An employment tribunal must determine a recusal application according to the established bias principles. A party’s loss of confidence is insufficient without…
|
|
| 19 Jul 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0040_11_1907
In assessing unfair dismissal, an Employment Tribunal must determine whether dismissal fell within the range of reasonable responses. It must consider the…
|
|
| 18 Jul 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0187_11_1807
For wrongful dismissal, an employee’s dishonesty may justify summary dismissal where the contract expressly permits dismissal for dishonesty, or where it…
|
|
| 15 Jul 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 24_10_1507
An Employment Tribunal may consider a paying party’s ability to pay when making a costs or expenses order, but it is not required to do so. Where the party’s…
|
|
| 15 Jul 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0546_10_1507
When the identity of an employee’s employer is disputed, the tribunal must determine the contractual position from the circumstances in which employment was…
|
|
| 14 Jul 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0605_10_1407
An employment tribunal may strike out a claim for non-compliance with orders or scandalous, unreasonable or vexatious conduct where the claimant’s conduct…
|
|
| 14 Jul 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0008_11_1407
Whether dismissal is fair depends on all the circumstances and the objective range of reasonable responses under Employment Rights Act 1996, section 98(4). A…
|
|
| 13 Jul 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0499_10_1307
Where a dismissal is already unfair because a statutory dismissal procedure was not followed, the tribunal must still assess matters that could affect…
|
|
| 12 Jul 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0358_10_1207
Fairness must be assessed by considering the dismissal process as a whole. An Employment Tribunal must consider relevant events occurring between notice being…
|
|
| 8 Jul 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0527_10_0807
A contract of service or a contract for services may exist even where the parties have not agreed the amount of remuneration. The absence of an agreed sum is…
|
|
| 6 Jul 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0487_10_0607
For indirect discrimination, a claimant must show that the relevant provision, criterion or practice disadvantages more than the individual claimant. The…
|
|
| 5 Jul 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 1861_10_0507
For the purposes of establishing worker status, mutuality of obligation may arise from an agreed rota. Once work dates have been agreed, the employer may be…
|
|
| 1 Jul 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0129_11_0107
For a complaint under section 47B of the Employment Rights Act 1996, the three-month period runs from the relevant detriment, or from the last act in a series…
|
|
| 29 Jun 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0229_11_2906
An Employment Tribunal has broad case-management discretion to take witness statements as read, exclude irrelevant or without-prejudice material, and refuse an…
|
|
| 29 Jun 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0088_11_2907
A worker absent through sickness for the whole of a leave year does not lose accrued paid annual leave merely because no request was made before the year…
|
|
| 27 Jun 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 1783_10_2706
The Employment Appeal Tribunal has a broad discretion to extend time for instituting an appeal. The discretion is governed by clear principles and requires a…
|
|
| 24 Jun 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0445_10_2406
Illegality in the performance of an employment contract requires more than an erroneous classification of an employment relationship or the employee’s…
|
|
| 24 Jun 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0048_11_2406
Continuity of employment for calculating an unfair-dismissal basic award is a statutory construct. General service within the NHS does not, by itself, count as…
|
|
| 23 Jun 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 69_11_2306
Employment Tribunal jurisdiction under Part II of the Race Relations Act 1976 is confined to discrimination in the employment field. A public authority’s…
|
|
| 23 Jun 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0293_10_2306
An employer is not required to know the precise medical diagnosis before the duty to make reasonable adjustments arises. It must, however, know or reasonably…
|
1 |
| 23 Jun 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0087_11_2306
An Employment Appeal Tribunal should interfere with a costs decision only where the tribunal applied wrong legal principles, omitted a legally required…
|
|
| 23 Jun 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0066_10_2306
In a misconduct dismissal, the employer’s belief, reasonable grounds and investigation must be assessed by applying the objective standards of the reasonable…
|
|
| 21 Jun 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0068_11_2106
Where a respondent fails to lodge an ET3 in time, rule 9 operates automatically to prevent further participation. The proper procedure is to lodge the late…
|
|
| 21 Jun 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0001_11_2106
An exceptionally long delay in promulgating an Employment Tribunal judgment may be inexcusable without amounting to an error of law. The appellate question is…
|
|
| 17 Jun 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0244_10_1706
For the purposes of collective redundancy consultation, an election of employee representatives occurs where, following fair arrangements, the number of…
|
|
| 17 Jun 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0058_10_1706
An employer cannot unilaterally remove a fundamental aspect of an employee’s contractual role unless the contract permits the change or the employee agrees to…
|
|
| 17 Jun 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0036_11_1706
The territorial scope of unfair-dismissal protection under Employment Rights Act 1996, section 94(1), is assessed by reference to the employee’s position at…
|
|
| 16 Jun 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0495_10_1606
An employment tribunal must give sufficient reasons to show how it identified the issues, found the relevant facts, applied the law and reached its…
|
|
| 16 Jun 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0061_10_1606
Apparent bias is assessed by asking whether, in all the circumstances, a fair-minded and informed observer would conclude that there was a real possibility of…
|
|
| 15 Jun 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 1807_10_1506
An Employment Tribunal may strike out a claim under rule 18(7) where the claimant has not actively pursued it and a fair hearing is no longer possible.…
|
|
| 15 Jun 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0060_10_1506
A civilian employee of a Scottish police authority may owe duties to the police force whose constables he is employed to assist, even though he is not employed…
|
|
| 14 Jun 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0552_10_1406
For a reasonable adjustment to satisfy the duty under the Disability Discrimination Act 1995, it is sufficient that the adjustment offered a prospect of…
|
|
| 14 Jun 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0511_10_1406
An employment tribunal should not strike out unfair- or wrongful-dismissal claims where material facts are disputed and require evaluation at a hearing. A…
|
|
| 14 Jun 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0497_10_1406
An employer may be liable for third-party racial harassment where, having sufficient notice of continuing conduct, it fails to take reasonable and identifiable…
|
3 |
| 14 Jun 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0064_10_1406
When assessing compensation for procedurally unfair dismissal, an Employment Tribunal must assess the chance that the employee would have been dismissed fairly…
|
|
| 13 Jun 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0137_11_1306
An order for electronic disclosure of underlying computer data requires a demonstrated need connected with the fair disposal of the proceedings. A broad…
|
|
| 13 Jun 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0035_11_1306
An employer’s statutory defence to vicarious liability for discriminatory acts depends on reasonable preventive steps taken before the discrimination occurs.…
|
|
| 10 Jun 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 28_11_1006
An Employment Tribunal is ordinarily the primary fact-finder. However, it errs in law where it makes a material finding unsupported by evidence, including a…
|
|
| 10 Jun 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0554_10_1006
In a discrimination claim, a tribunal may find that the employer has discharged the burden of proof where, having examined the evidence, it concludes that the…
|
|
| 8 Jun 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0402_09_0806
A wasted costs order may be made only against a representative acting in pursuit of profit, including under a conditional fee arrangement. A representative’s…
|
|
| 3 Jun 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0610_10_0306
In an unfair dismissal case based on misconduct, an Employment Tribunal must assess the employer’s decision within the statutory range of reasonable responses.…
|
|
| 2 Jun 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0011_11_0206
Where a respondent has failed to lodge an accepted response in time, and no extension has been granted, rule 9 prevents participation in the proceedings. That…
|
|
| 27 May 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0430_10_2705
A payment described as ex gratia will ordinarily be understood as a payment made freely, rather than in satisfaction of a contractual entitlement. Construction…
|
|
| 27 May 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0104_11_2705
Victimisation requires a protected act. A claimant must have done something under or by reference to the Sex Discrimination Act 1975, or alleged facts…
|
|
| 27 May 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0065_10_2705
Strike-out at a pre-hearing review is a draconian measure requiring a high hurdle. Where the pleaded case raises factual issues that cannot be resolved from…
|
|
| 27 May 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0003_11_2705
For dismissal for some other substantial reason, establishing a substantial reason under section 98(1)(b) does not determine whether dismissal is fair. The…
|
|
| 26 May 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0318_10_2605
Whether an act is one extending over a period under section 68(7)(b) of the Race Relations Act 1976 is a question of fact for the Employment Tribunal. The…
|
|
| 26 May 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0020_11_2605
For unfair-dismissal purposes, the reason for dismissal is the set of facts known to, or beliefs held by, the employer which caused the dismissal. The employer…
|
|
| 25 May 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 54_11_2505
An Employment Tribunal cannot confer jurisdiction by agreement, waiver or estoppel. Where a final determination of a particular issue has been made under rule…
|
|
| 25 May 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0042_10_2505
In an equal-value claim, an employer establishes the Equal Pay Act 1970 material-factor defence by proving a genuine, causative and gender-neutral explanation…
|
|
| 24 May 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0512_10_2405
An employment tribunal must make a coherent link between its factual findings, the applicable law and its conclusions on each allegation of discrimination or…
|
|
| 24 May 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0379_11_2405
Indirect discrimination requires a provision, criterion or practice which places the claimant and the relevant religious group at a particular disadvantage…
|
|
| 24 May 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0379_10_2405
Indirect discrimination requires a provision, criterion or practice which disadvantages persons sharing the claimant’s religion or belief, places the claimant…
|
|
| 24 May 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0055_11_2405
In a misconduct dismissal case, fairness requires a reasonable investigation, not an investigation meeting a standard of perfection or necessarily the standard…
|
|
| 23 May 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0592_10_2305
An employment tribunal must address each distinct discrimination complaint, make findings on the relevant evidence and comparators, and explain how those…
|
|
| 20 May 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0708_10_2005
An extension of time may be granted exceptionally where the applicant gives a full and honest explanation which amounts to a good excuse for default. The…
|
1 |
| 20 May 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0015_11_2005
Where a collective agreement incorporated into an employment contract prescribes a procedure for poor artistic performance, the employer must comply with that…
|
|
| 19 May 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0424_10_1905
An application for review must be considered under every potentially applicable ground. An Employment Tribunal errs in law by treating an application solely as…
|
|
| 19 May 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0049_11_1905
In an unfair dismissal appeal, an employer must investigate the particular misconduct alleged, with sufficient clarity about the conduct under examination. An…
|
|
| 18 May 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0370_10_1805
An employer’s duty to notify an employee of the statutory right to request continuation of employment beyond compulsory retirement includes informing the…
|
|
| 18 May 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0310_10_1805
In a direct race-discrimination claim, a tribunal must apply the statutory burden of proof in Race Relations Act 1976, section 54A(2). It must assess the…
|
|
| 17 May 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0571_10_1705
An agency worker is an employee of the employment agency only where the evidence establishes a contract of employment with that agency. The essential…
|
|
| 17 May 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0418_10_1705
An employer need not devise selection criteria where the relevant business decision removes all posts within a discrete category and no choice is required…
|
|
| 17 May 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0030_11_1705
Where an employment agreement defines payable working time by reference to planned hours and provides that specified breaks are included within those planned…
|
|
| 16 May 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0007_11_1605
Under section 98(4) of the Employment Rights Act 1996, an employment tribunal must review the employer’s investigation, beliefs and decision by applying the…
|
|
| 12 May 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0609_10_1205
For a retirement dismissal, the operative termination date is determined by what was communicated between the parties. Subsequent payroll records or a P45 do…
|
|
| 11 May 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0052_10_1105
When assessing a Polkey reduction, an employment tribunal must consider all relevant circumstances affecting the chance that dismissal would have occurred…
|
|
| 11 May 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0025_11_1105
An Employment Tribunal has a broad discretion under rule 41(2) whether to take the paying party’s means into account when making or assessing a costs order.…
|
|
| 10 May 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0438_10_1005
A preparation time order may compensate only for time spent carrying out preparatory work directly relating to proceedings, up to but excluding time spent at…
|
|
| 10 May 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0055_10_1005
In assessing unfair dismissal, a tribunal must distinguish whether misconduct occurred from the separate question of the appropriate sanction. An employee’s…
|
|
| 9 May 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0551_10_0905
An Employment Tribunal must explain how its factual findings and the applicable law resolve the issues. Detailed factual findings do not compensate for a…
|
|
| 9 May 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0374_10_0905
In a redundancy dismissal, the tribunal must assess the overall fairness of the employer’s procedure under Employment Rights Act 1996, section 98(4). It must…
|
|
| 6 May 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0587_10_0605
Affirmation of a repudiatory breach and the statutory question whether it was reasonably practicable to present an unfair dismissal claim in time are distinct…
|
|
| 6 May 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0254_10_0605
For a detriment claim under section 47B of the Employment Rights Act 1996, the claimant must establish both the act and the resulting detriment. The act must…
|
|
| 6 May 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0254_10_0402
For a detriment claim under Employment Rights Act 1996 section 47B, the act must be done because the worker made a protected disclosure. The connection between…
|
|
| 6 May 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0005_11_0605
When deciding whether it is just and equitable to extend time for an out-of-time discrimination claim, the tribunal must consider the justice of extending time…
|
|
| 5 May 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0612_10_0505
An application to review an Employment Tribunal judgment must be made within the prescribed period. In deciding whether to extend time, the tribunal may…
|
|
| 5 May 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0216_09_0505
An employment tribunal deciding whether work was rated as equivalent must give adequate reasons for its factual and inferential conclusions. It must explain…
|
|
| 4 May 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0543_10_0405
In a wrongful-dismissal appeal, the employer must establish on the balance of probabilities that summary dismissal was contractually justified. Conduct…
|
|
| 26 Apr 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0562_10_2604
Section 98A(2) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 can cure a dismissal that would otherwise be unfair because of a failure to follow a fair procedure, provided…
|
|
| 21 Apr 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0407_10_2104
For the statutory dismissal procedure, an employer must provide information sufficient for the employee to understand the basis of the proposed redundancy and…
|
|
| 20 Apr 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0613_10_2004
An Employment Tribunal has a broad case-management discretion when deciding whether to permit a late amendment. The relevant question is the balance of…
|
|
| 19 Apr 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0589_10_1904
An Employment Tribunal must give sufficient reasons to explain why a claim has succeeded or failed. It must address the material issues identified for decision…
|
|
| 19 Apr 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0582_10_1904
An Employment Tribunal must assess whether the employer acted reasonably, rather than substitute its own view of the evidence or the appropriate response. In a…
|
|
| 18 Apr 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0406_09_1804
In discrimination proceedings, a claimant must prove facts from which a reasonable tribunal could properly conclude, in the absence of an adequate explanation…
|
|
| 18 Apr 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0320_10_1804
In a discrimination claim, the burden of proof does not shift merely because the claimant establishes a difference in race and a difference in treatment. Those…
|
|
| 18 Apr 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0164_11_1804
A restricted reporting order under rule 50 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure is discretionary and should be made only where necessary to protect…
|
|
| 14 Apr 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 659_10_1404
An appeal to the Court of Appeal under section 37 of the Employment Tribunals Act 1996 is not barred merely because the appellant has not exhausted the EAT’s…
|
|
| 13 Apr 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0335_10_1304
An appeal on a question of law may succeed where an employment tribunal makes an important factual finding unsupported by the evidence or contrary to…
|
|
| 12 Apr 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 51_11_1204
Under sections 188–189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992, a protective award is confined to employees in respect of whom the…
|
|
| 12 Apr 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0536_10_1204
The Igen v Wong burden-of-proof guidance is not a mechanical 13-stage procedure, but a tribunal must identify whether the claimant has proved facts capable of…
|
|
| 12 Apr 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0043_10_1204
Where an employee admits misconduct, the reasonable-investigation limb of the Burchell test may require little or no further investigation into whether the…
|
|
| 11 Apr 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 523_10_1104
An employment tribunal must identify and apply the statutory duty to make reasonable adjustments. Where a provision, criterion or practice places a disabled…
|
|
| 11 Apr 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0372_10_1104
Mutuality of obligation is not a necessary condition of a contract personally to do work under section 68(1) of the Disability Discrimination Act 1995.…
|
|
| 8 Apr 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0520_10_0804
For an extension of time, the claimant must show that it was not reasonably practicable to present the complaint within the statutory period and that it was…
|
|
| 8 Apr 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0369_10_0804
In pregnancy and maternity discrimination cases, the claimant need only provide evidence from which discrimination could be inferred. The burden then passes to…
|
|
| 8 Apr 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0024_11_0804
A discrimination claim should be struck out only where it has no reasonable prospect of success. The fact-sensitive nature of discrimination litigation…
|
|
| 7 Apr 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0541_10_0704
An Employment Tribunal may join a respondent on its own initiative. However, procedural fairness requires the proposed respondent to receive notice of the…
|
|
| 7 Apr 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0518_10_0704
In a constructive dismissal claim based on breach of the implied term of mutual trust and confidence, the correct question is whether the employer, without…
|
|
| 7 Apr 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0401_10_0104
Under Employment Rights Act 1996, section 98(4), an employment tribunal must not substitute its own view for the employer’s decision. The question is whether…
|
|
| 6 Apr 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0441_10_0604
For a transfer to fall within regulation 3(1)(a) of the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006, the tribunal must make findings…
|
|
| 5 Apr 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 563_10_504
An employment tribunal has a very wide discretion to recommend practical action following a finding of discrimination. Practicability is assessed by reference…
|
|
| 5 Apr 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 1189_10_0504
On an appeal limited to questions of law, the Employment Appeal Tribunal will not reargue factual findings or interfere with an Employment Tribunal’s…
|
|
| 5 Apr 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0537_10_0504
Under section 139(1)(b) of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992, extension of time involves two distinct stages. The tribunal must…
|
|
| 5 Apr 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0260_10_0504
An Employment Tribunal has no power to award interest as such on a compensatory award for unfair dismissal. An allowance for delayed receipt may, in principle…
|
|
| 31 Mar 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0326_10_3103
Knowingly participating in illegal performance of an employment arrangement may bar contractual claims. It does not automatically bar a statutory…
|
|
| 30 Mar 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 46_11_3003
An amendment to an employment claim is not a mere re-labelling exercise where the pleaded primary facts lack a causative link to the legal consequences…
|
|
| 28 Mar 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0469_10_2803
An Employment Tribunal deciding that a dismissal was unfair must still determine properly any pleaded issue concerning a reduction in compensation. A finding…
|
|
| 24 Mar 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0079_11_2403
Ignorance of the time limit for an unfair dismissal claim may make it not reasonably practicable to present the claim within time, provided the ignorance was…
|
|
| 23 Mar 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0500_10_2303
Under a contract of employment, wages may remain payable where a worker is ready and willing to work but is prevented by sickness, injury or another…
|
|
| 23 Mar 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0477_10_2303
An Employment Tribunal must first consider a costs order where a circumstance in rule 40(3) applies. It then retains a discretion whether an order is…
|
|
| 23 Mar 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0410_10_2303
For the three-month limitation period in an unfair dismissal claim, time runs from the effective date of termination. Where an employee has received skilled…
|
|
| 23 Mar 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0365_10_2303
An unfair-dismissal claim based on asserting a statutory right is not among the proceedings that an Employment Judge may hear sitting alone under Employment…
|
|
| 22 Mar 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0524_10_2203
An employer may dismiss an employee where it genuinely believes that the employee cannot lawfully continue working, provided that belief supplies a potentially…
|
|
| 22 Mar 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0228_10_2203
Under discrimination legislation, an employer is liable for discriminatory acts by an agency worker only if the worker was its employee within the statutory…
|
|
| 21 Mar 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 1245_10_2103
An appeal to the Employment Appeal Tribunal must be instituted within the prescriptive 42-day period running from the date on which the Employment Tribunal’s…
|
|
| 18 Mar 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0501_10_1803
An employment tribunal may make a 100 per cent reduction in compensation for unfair dismissal where the employee’s conduct wholly caused the dismissal, even…
|
|
| 18 Mar 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0123_10_1803
A pay differential following restructuring is not indirectly discriminatory merely because men occupy the higher-paid positions. Where the differential results…
|
|
| 17 Mar 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0491_10_1703
Fresh evidence may be admitted on appeal where it could not reasonably have been adduced earlier, is relevant and would probably have materially influenced the…
|
|
| 17 Mar 2011 |
UKEAT/0382/10
An issue can create an estoppel in later proceedings only where it was a necessary ingredient of the earlier cause of action and was determined by a tribunal…
|
|
| 16 Mar 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0413_10_1603
A contract of employment requires the irreducible minimum of mutual obligations. The individual must be obliged to provide work, and the putative employer must…
|
|
| 15 Mar 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 219_10_1503
A minister’s spiritual vocation does not, without more, prevent an employment contract from arising with a religious organisation. The question is assessed…
|
|
| 11 Mar 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0879_10_1103
The Employment Appeal Tribunal may extend the 42-day time limit for appealing in exceptional circumstances. Relevant considerations include the appellant’s…
|
|
| 11 Mar 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0824_10_1103
An Employment Appeal Tribunal may extend the time for appealing where the delay is short and the appellant gives a reasonable, cogent explanation for it.…
|
|
| 11 Mar 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0323_10_1103
In an unfair dismissal claim arising from redundancy, an employment tribunal must assess whether the employer’s selection process fell within the range of…
|
|
| 10 Mar 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0439_10_1003
At the first stage of the statutory burden of proof, a difference in age and treatment does not automatically establish a prima facie case. The question is…
|
|
| 10 Mar 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0197_10_1003
An Employment Tribunal must determine issues only after giving the parties a fair opportunity to make submissions on them. A Tribunal acts contrary to natural…
|
|
| 9 Mar 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0036_10_1003
For a compromise agreement to settle an equality complaint, the complaint need not have been presented to an employment tribunal or articulated before the…
|
|
| 8 Mar 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0488_10_0803
A tribunal must give proper reasons before finding that a witness has lied, including addressing the witness’s explanation and allowing a fair opportunity to…
|
|
| 8 Mar 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0442_10_0803
For unfair dismissal purposes, an employer’s mistaken application of an absence procedure does not automatically make dismissal unfair. The error is relevant…
|
|
| 8 Mar 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0301_10_0803
For qualification bodies, a requirement that an examination tests the ability to work under time pressure may be a competence standard. The duty to make…
|
|
| 8 Mar 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0183_10_0803
An Employment Appeal Tribunal may interfere with a costs assessment only for an error of law or principle. Costs thrown away by an adjournment may include…
|
|
| 3 Mar 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0338_10_0303
In unfair-dismissal proceedings, the Employment Tribunal must assess the employer’s conduct and decision, rather than substitute its own view of the facts or…
|
|
| 2 Mar 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0603_10_0203
For continuity of employment, a week without a contract of employment will ordinarily break continuity under Employment Rights Act 1996, section 212(1).…
|
|
| 2 Mar 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0465_10_0203
For the purposes of extending the time limit for an unfair dismissal claim, the question under Employment Rights Act 1996, section 111 is whether presentation…
|
|
| 1 Mar 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0490_10_0103
Judicial proceedings immunity applies to claims of discrimination by way of victimisation where the alleged detriment consists of evidence or witness…
|
|
| 1 Mar 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0258_10_0103
For disability discrimination, the comparator must reflect the disadvantage caused by the relevant provision, criterion or practice. Where the arrangement is…
|
|
| 24 Feb 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0248_10_2402
Fresh evidence may be admitted on appeal where it is credible, could reasonably not have been adduced at the original hearing, and could significantly affect…
|
|
| 24 Feb 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0031_11_2402
An Employment Tribunal may treat a single ET3 and accompanying grounds of resistance as a response by more than one respondent where, read as a whole, the…
|
|
| 24 Feb 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0019_11_2402
For limitation purposes, the tribunal must identify the substance of the act complained of. It must distinguish that act from its continuing consequences. An…
|
|
| 22 Feb 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0334_10_2202
An employment tribunal must determine only the reasonable adjustments identified as issues in the case. A tribunal cannot establish breach by reference to…
|
|
| 21 Feb 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0316_10_2102
Harassment on grounds of sexual orientation requires unwanted conduct, a connection with sexual orientation, and conduct having the statutory purpose or effect…
|
|
| 18 Feb 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0409_09_1802
Rule 30(6) of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2004 imposes mandatory requirements on the form and substance of…
|
|
| 17 Feb 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0460_10_1702
In deciding whether a proposed reasonable adjustment is required, an employment tribunal must have regard to the extent to which it would prevent the…
|
1 |
| 17 Feb 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0376_10_1702
An employment tribunal may exercise its discretion to allow an amendment joining a new respondent even where the relevant limitation period has expired. There…
|
|
| 17 Feb 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0051_10_1702
In a redundancy dismissal, an Employment Tribunal must assess whether the employer acted reasonably within the statutory band of reasonable responses. It must…
|
|
| 16 Feb 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0181_10_1602
In a constructive dismissal case, the tribunal must ask whether the employee resigned in response to the employer’s repudiatory breach. The breach need not be…
|
|
| 11 Feb 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0453_10_1102
In conduct unfair-dismissal cases, the tribunal must assess whether dismissal fell within the range of reasonable responses open to a reasonable employer. It…
|
|
| 11 Feb 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0336_09_1102
An application to adjourn must be determined by asking whether refusing it would make the hearing unfair. The appellate court reviews fairness directly, while…
|
|
| 10 Feb 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0377_10_1002
In a redundancy dismissal, an Employment Tribunal must review whether the employer’s selection procedure fell within the range of reasonable responses. It must…
|
|
| 8 Feb 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0400_10_0802
When disability is disputed under the Disability Discrimination Act 1995, the tribunal must focus on what the claimant cannot do, or can do only with…
|
|
| 7 Feb 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0578_10_0702
For interim relief in an alleged whistleblowing dismissal, “likely” requires a significantly higher degree of likelihood than a bare balance of probabilities.…
|
|
| 4 Feb 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0148_10_0402
An employment tribunal must decide clearly whether an employee’s departure was a redundancy dismissal or a consensual termination, particularly where the…
|
|
| 3 Feb 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0405_10_0302
Fresh evidence may be admitted on an employment appeal where it could not reasonably have been obtained for the tribunal hearing, would probably have…
|
|
| 3 Feb 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0264_10_0302
In an unfair dismissal claim, the Employment Tribunal must first determine the employer’s reason, or principal reason, for dismissal under section 98(1) of the…
|
|
| 3 Feb 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0031_10_0302
In a conduct dismissal, the tribunal must determine whether the employer held a genuine belief in misconduct, reached it after a reasonable investigation, and…
|
|
| 2 Feb 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0039_10_0202
For a misconduct dismissal to be fair, the employer must apply its disciplinary rules consistently and communicate the relevant prohibition clearly enough for…
|
|
| 1 Feb 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0339_10_0102
For dismissal before or after a relevant transfer to fall within regulation 7 of TUPE, the transfer need not have been specifically identified when dismissal…
|
|
| 1 Feb 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0290_10_0102
An Employment Tribunal’s factual conclusion will not be disturbed on appeal merely because the appellate tribunal might have evaluated documents differently.…
|
|
| 1 Feb 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0021_10_0102
An employee is entitled to a fair grievance procedure, including a fair appeal hearing. Apparent bias may render the procedure unfair even where actual bias is…
|
|
| 28 Jan 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0413-5_09_2801
Under section 1(3) of the Equal Pay Act 1970, an employer need only identify a factual explanation for a pay differential at the first stage. The explanation…
|
|
| 28 Jan 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0282_10_2801
The statutory safeguarding framework did not make it unlawful to employ a person in a nursery without an enhanced Criminal Records Bureau certificate during…
|
|
| 28 Jan 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0185_10_2801
Illegality in the performance of an employment contract requires careful analysis of both the employer’s conduct and the claimant’s participation. A failure to…
|
|
| 26 Jan 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0032_10_2601
Whether employment has ended by dismissal or agreement depends on the reality and substance of the parties’ communications and conduct. An agreed termination…
|
|
| 25 Jan 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0110_10_2511
A breach of contract claim under the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994 falls within Regulation 15 of the Employment…
|
|
| 25 Jan 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0110_10_2501
A breach of contract claim under the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994 falls within the jurisdictions listed in…
|
|
| 24 Jan 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0230_10_2401
A person cannot qualify as a worker under section 230(3) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 unless the relationship with the putative respondent is contractual.…
|
|
| 20 Jan 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0395_10_2001
Under section 111(2) of the Employment Rights Act 1996, the questions whether it was reasonably practicable to present an unfair-dismissal complaint within…
|
|
| 20 Jan 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0341_10_2001
A unilateral change to an employee’s work away from the contractual department, without the employee’s agreement where agreement is required, may amount to a…
|
|
| 19 Jan 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0088_10_1901
In a direct race-discrimination claim, the reverse burden requires the claimant first to establish facts from which discrimination could be inferred.…
|
|
| 14 Jan 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 85_10_1605
A mobile road-transport worker cannot be required to remain at the employer’s depot during a period of availability. Under the Road Transport (Working Time)…
|
|
| 14 Jan 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0159_10_1401
Continued employment does not, by itself, establish acceptance of a unilateral contractual variation. The relevant question is whether the employee’s conduct…
|
|
| 13 Jan 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0416_10_1301
An employment tribunal may look behind a final warning only in exceptional circumstances. The warning may be treated as valid where it was issued in good…
|
|
| 13 Jan 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0029_10_1301
Compliance with the standard statutory grievance procedure requires the grievance and the later tribunal complaint to concern essentially the same complaint.…
|
|
| 11 Jan 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0224_10_1101
A legitimate commercial policy to broaden a venue’s clientele does not justify discriminatory implementation. The tribunal must assess the overall factual…
|
|
| 10 Jan 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0543_09_1001
An individual is not liable for redundancy pay or breach of contract unless the evidence establishes that he was the claimant’s employer. Ownership or…
|
|
| 7 Jan 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 314_10_701
In a redundancy arising from reorganisation, selection for a newly created role is not governed by the selection principles applicable to choosing employees…
|
|
| 7 Jan 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0475_09_0701
For the purposes of Sex Discrimination Act 1975 s 6(6), a payment or benefit is regulated by the contract of employment only where the contract governs…
|
|
| 5 Jan 2011 |
[2011] UKEAT 0381_09_0501
Section 106 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 applies only where its cumulative conditions are satisfied. The written information given on engagement must…
|
|
| 1 Dec 2010 |
[2011] UKEAT 0911_10_0112
For interim relief in an automatically unfair dismissal claim, the statutory requirement that it appear likely that the complaint will succeed demands more…
|
|
|
[2011] UKEAT 0611_10_2005
Employee status depends on the true nature of the contractual relationship, assessed by applying the ordinary legal tests to all the facts. A person may…
|
1 | |
|
[2011] UKEAT 0436_10_1910
Direct discrimination requires attention to the relevant decision-maker’s mental processes. An unexplained stereotypical assumption that a black employee…
|
1 | |
|
[2011] UKEAT 0399_09_1803
An employee dismissed because working relationships with colleagues have irretrievably broken down is not necessarily dismissed for a reason relating to…
|
1 | |
|
[2011] UKEAT 0200_11_2109
Under regulation 7(1) of the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006, the question is the employer’s principal reason for changing…
|
1 | |
|
[2011] UKEAT 0128_11_0509
Under regulation 4(4) of the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006, a consensual variation of employment terms is void only…
|
1 | |
|
[2011] UKEAT 0074_11_2107
In redundancy cases, the suitability of alternative employment and the reasonableness of refusing it are separate questions. Suitability requires an objective…
|
1 |