| Date | Case | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| 17 May 2013 |
[2012] UKEAT 0271_12_1705
A claim under section 3A(1) of the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 requires proof of less favourable treatment by comparison with an actual or properly…
|
|
| 9 May 2013 |
[2012] UKEAT 138_12_905
An appellate tribunal may not set aside an Employment Tribunal’s inferential finding merely because a different conclusion was available. The question is…
|
|
| 9 May 2013 |
[2012] UKEAT 0137_12_0905
An appellate tribunal may not interfere merely because it would have drawn different inferences from the evidence. It may intervene where an inference of…
|
|
| 1 May 2013 |
[2012] UKEAT 0022_12_0105
A difference in race and less favourable treatment do not, without more, shift the burden of proof in a direct discrimination claim. Migrant status and…
|
|
| 12 Mar 2013 |
[2012] UKEAT 0305_12_1203
Recognition of a trade union for collective bargaining requires clear evidence of an express or implied agreement. Collective bargaining under Trade Union and…
|
|
| 14 Feb 2013 |
[2012] UKEAT 0457_11_1402
Where a qualifying body’s act falls within section 12(1)(c) of the Race Relations Act 1976, an Employment Tribunal has no jurisdiction if a statutory appeal or…
|
|
| 13 Feb 2013 |
[2012] UKEAT 0171_12_1302
A claimant may withdraw a claim orally at a hearing, and the withdrawal ordinarily ends the proceedings immediately. The Employment Appeal Tribunal may…
|
|
| 12 Feb 2013 |
[2012] UKEAT 0545_11_1202
An Employment Tribunal may strike out as an abuse of process a substantially identical claim brought after the claimant voluntarily withdrew earlier claims at…
|
|
| 6 Feb 2013 |
[2012] UKEAT 0307_12_0602
In deciding whether to reduce a basic award for contributory conduct under Employment Rights Act 1996, section 122(2), a tribunal may reach a percentage…
|
|
| 5 Feb 2013 |
[2012] UKEAT 0056_12_0502
An employer may have actual or constructive knowledge of disability where the information available identifies a longstanding mental impairment, even if its…
|
|
| 29 Jan 2013 |
[2012] UKEAT 0160_11_2901
An appeal on a point of law cannot challenge an Employment Tribunal’s permissible findings of fact merely because the appellant prefers a different view of the…
|
|
| 20 Dec 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0228_11_2012
For direct race discrimination, the question whether treatment was on racial grounds differs from the question whether it caused a detriment. A detriment is…
|
|
| 19 Dec 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0544_12_1912
An Employment Tribunal may find that a claimant was not disabled at the material date where contemporaneous evidence and the medical prognosis support that…
|
|
| 18 Dec 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0370_12_1812
An Employment Tribunal must make sufficient findings of primary fact and give reasons which explain why it found that a protected act caused the alleged…
|
|
| 18 Dec 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0359_12_1812
Where a contractual disciplinary procedure makes an alternative sanction conditional on the employee’s agreement, the employee may reject that sanction.…
|
|
| 17 Dec 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0576_11_1712
Compensation for disability discrimination is recoverable only for loss caused by the discriminatory act. A claimant cannot recover a benefit merely because a…
|
|
| 13 Dec 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0425_12_1312
Where a response has been struck out for non-compliance with an unless order, an Employment Tribunal must give reasons before revoking that order. A later…
|
|
| 13 Dec 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0329_12_1312
Where dismissal follows a third party’s demand that an employee be removed from its premises, fairness requires the employer to take all reasonable steps to…
|
|
| 12 Dec 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0303_12_1212
A tribunal decision must be set aside where the fair-minded and informed observer would conclude that there was a real possibility of bias. A lengthy passage…
|
|
| 12 Dec 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0234_12_1212
Whether it is just and equitable to extend the limitation period for a race-discrimination claim is a broad evaluative judgment. The tribunal may have regard…
|
|
| 11 Dec 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0453_11_1112
An appellate tribunal must not decide whether it regards a dismissal as fair or harsh. Where the Employment Tribunal has directed itself correctly, the…
|
|
| 11 Dec 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0252_12_1112
A contractual term may be inferred from custom and practice where the evidence, viewed objectively and as a whole, establishes agreement between employer and…
|
|
| 11 Dec 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0192_12_1112
An Employment Tribunal may control cross-examination to secure fairness and justice. It may prevent a party from putting a positive factual case which was…
|
|
| 10 Dec 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0352_12_1012
Where proceedings under section 146 require a finding that a trade union was independent, and no certificate of independence is in force and no refusal…
|
|
| 7 Dec 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 1425_11_0712
Whether a person is a joint employer is ordinarily a question of fact. Where the evidence shows that both spouses gave instructions to a domestic worker…
|
|
| 7 Dec 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 1424_11_0712
A tribunal may find that two individuals jointly employed a domestic worker where the evidence shows that each gave instructions, directed work for their own…
|
|
| 7 Dec 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0345_12_0712
An appellate tribunal may not overturn an Employment Tribunal’s finding of constructive dismissal merely because it would have reached a different conclusion.…
|
|
| 5 Dec 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0235_12_0512
A mental impairment does not establish disability unless, at the relevant time, it has a substantial adverse effect on normal day-to-day activities. The…
|
|
| 3 Dec 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0204_12_0312
An Employment Tribunal must decide whether the employer acted within the range of reasonable responses. It must not substitute its own assessment of a…
|
|
| 30 Nov 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0627_11_3011
Where a contractual pay-protection clause requires an average of payments earned in the three months immediately preceding The calculation must use the…
|
|
| 30 Nov 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0321_12_3011
In a redundancy selection case, the tribunal must decide whether the employer's choice of pool fell within the range of approaches open to a reasonable…
|
|
| 29 Nov 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 120_12_2911
Whether an employment contract is concluded orally depends on the parties’ objectively ascertained intention. An indication that the terms will be confirmed in…
|
|
| 28 Nov 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0219_11_2811
A contractual entitlement may arise from an employer’s enhanced redundancy practice only where an objective assessment of all the circumstances supports an…
|
|
| 27 Nov 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 243_11_2711
A provision, criterion or practice is applied to a disabled employee when the employer repeatedly requires the employee to return to a specified post. Actual…
|
|
| 27 Nov 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0052_12_2711
An Employment Tribunal commits an error of law where material findings central to its unfair-dismissal decision are demonstrably contrary to, or founded on a…
|
|
| 26 Nov 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 1919_12_2611
An appellate court will rarely interfere with an Employment Tribunal’s case-management discretion. Intervention is confined to Wednesbury grounds, including an…
|
|
| 22 Nov 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0240_12_2211
An Employment Tribunal may award costs under rule 40 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2004 where a party has…
|
|
| 21 Nov 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0043_12_2111
In assessing compensation for unfair dismissal, an Employment Tribunal may make predictions about what would have occurred had a fair procedure been followed.…
|
|
| 20 Nov 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0488_12_2011
Where additional claimants are clearly identified in a prescribed ET1 and accompanying schedule, minor formal defects, such as using a schedule rather than an…
|
|
| 20 Nov 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0354_12_2011
For the ETO exception to apply to a transfer-connected dismissal, the purpose must be to change the workforce while continuing to conduct the business. It does…
|
|
| 20 Nov 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0134_12_2011
An Employment Tribunal must give sufficient reasons to show how it resolved each material issue argued before it. Reasons are inadequate where they omit any…
|
|
| 20 Nov 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0048_12_2011
An employment tribunal considering an amendment to add a respondent must balance the injustice and hardship of allowing it against those of refusing it, in the…
|
|
| 16 Nov 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0289_12_1611
Where a party seeks a postponement on medical grounds, an Employment Tribunal must fairly investigate significant new information bearing on that party’s…
|
|
| 15 Nov 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0600_11_1511
In assessing a Polkey reduction for a hypothetical fair redundancy dismissal, a tribunal must apply the likely selection criteria in the light of all of its…
|
|
| 14 Nov 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0416_11_1411
An individual who is genuinely in business on his own account is neither an employee nor a worker under section 230 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The…
|
|
| 14 Nov 2012 |
UKEAT/0068/12
An employer’s disciplinary decision engages article 6 only where it determines, or is sufficiently linked to a determination of, a civil right to practise a…
|
1 |
| 12 Nov 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0148_12_1211
An implied term cannot negate an express contractual term. A permanent health insurance arrangement will not justify implying a restriction on dismissal where…
|
|
| 9 Nov 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0441_11_0911
In deciding whether to extend time on a just and equitable basis, an Employment Tribunal may give substantial weight to an unexplained delay and to the…
|
|
| 9 Nov 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0440_11_0911
An employment tribunal's decision whether it is just and equitable to extend time is discretionary. Where the tribunal has directed itself by reference to the…
|
|
| 9 Nov 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0273_12_0911
In a misconduct dismissal, the Burchell requirement of a reasonable investigation is assessed by the objective standards of a reasonable employer and falls…
|
|
| 9 Nov 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0036_12_0911
A compensatory award for unfair dismissal under section 123 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 must compensate actual loss and must not overcompensate the…
|
|
| 6 Nov 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0616_11_0611
A claim under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 must concern wages to which the worker has a legal entitlement and which are a specific, quantified…
|
|
| 6 Nov 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0223_12_0611
A written employment contract is construed objectively, by asking what its words would convey to a reasonable person with the relevant background knowledge.…
|
|
| 2 Nov 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 106_12_211
A signed employment contract remains binding according to its objectively construed terms unless a recognised basis for setting it aside is established.…
|
|
| 2 Nov 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0238_12_0211
Where a fixed-term contract expires without renewal, its expiry is the statutory mechanism of dismissal. It is not, without more, the employer’s reason for…
|
|
| 1 Nov 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 157_11_111
A party may waive an objection based on apparent bias if, knowing the material circumstances and the consequences of the choice, the party has a clear and…
|
|
| 31 Oct 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0537_11_3110
Employment status depends on the relationship established by the facts as a whole. A person initially engaged on a self-employed basis may become an employee…
|
|
| 31 Oct 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0459_12_3110
A respondent does not require permission to amend its ET3 merely to dispute an averment which it has not admitted. A prior preliminary hearing does not…
|
|
| 31 Oct 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0213_12_3110
Where an employee is dismissed because the employer’s requirement for employees to carry out work of a particular kind has diminished, the dismissal is one for…
|
|
| 30 Oct 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0142_12_3010
An Employment Tribunal must decide the issues put before it. If it proposes to determine a material issue which neither party has raised, it must first give…
|
|
| 30 Oct 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0058_12_3010
An extension of the 42-day appeal period may be granted where a late filing resulted from an administrative error of the Employment Appeal Tribunal and the…
|
|
| 30 Oct 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0031_12_3010
An impairment may affect normal day-to-day activities through an intermediate causal step. A direct causal link is not required. However, under Equality Act…
|
|
| 29 Oct 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0104_12_2910
A collective agreement may be incorporated into an individual contract only to the extent that its particular terms are apt for contractual enforcement. A…
|
|
| 26 Oct 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0584_11_2610
An Employment Tribunal must consider the overall factual picture when deciding whether an inference of direct racial discrimination may properly be drawn. A…
|
|
| 26 Oct 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0073_12_2610
Where refusal of an adjournment may prevent a party from participating in proceedings determining civil rights, the decisive question is whether the refusal…
|
|
| 25 Oct 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0215_12_2510
Where a respondent states that it will not resist a claim, the Employment Tribunal may give a default judgment determining liability and remedy on the…
|
|
| 24 Oct 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0275_12_2410
An employer cannot rely solely on an employee’s contractual duty to notify a change of address where an important recorded-delivery letter has been returned…
|
|
| 23 Oct 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0155_12_2310
In a misconduct dismissal case, the Employment Tribunal must assess the employer’s conduct by the objective standard of the reasonable employer. It must not…
|
|
| 23 Oct 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0057_11_2310
A redundancy situation does not itself establish that redundancy was the reason for a particular dismissal. The tribunal must determine, on all the evidence…
|
|
| 22 Oct 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0413_12_2210
In an unfair-dismissal case, the fairness of an employer’s investigation is assessed by reference to the material available to the employer and to whether it…
|
|
| 22 Oct 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0216_12_2210
An employer relying on some other substantial reason must establish its actual reason for dismissal. A dispute about contractual pay, bonus or share…
|
|
| 18 Oct 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0174_12_1810
An unfair-dismissal claim should be struck out for having no reasonable prospect of success only with great caution. Where central facts are disputed…
|
|
| 17 Oct 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0363_12_1710
An Employment Tribunal considering an amendment must first identify whether it merely relabels substantially the same facts or introduces genuinely new claims.…
|
|
| 17 Oct 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0080_12_1710
For a service provision change under Transfer of Employment (Protection of Undertakings) Regulations 2006, the tribunal must first identify the activities…
|
|
| 17 Oct 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0038_12_1710
An Employment Tribunal unless order under rule 13(2) of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2004 is a conditional…
|
|
| 16 Oct 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0183_12_1610
An appellate tribunal should not substitute its own assessment of the employee’s conduct or of the reasonable employer’s response for that of an Employment…
|
|
| 16 Oct 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0031_12_1610
A body is a qualifications body under sections 53 and 54 of the Equality Act 2010 only if it can confer a formal relevant qualification. The listed forms of…
|
|
| 15 Oct 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0228_12_1510
In a misconduct dismissal appeal, an appellate tribunal must not substitute its own view for that of either the employer or the Employment Tribunal. Where the…
|
|
| 15 Oct 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0202_12_1510
In deciding fairness, an Employment Tribunal must assess the employer’s actual reason for dismissal. It may not remove an unproved or procedurally unfair…
|
|
| 12 Oct 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0033_12_1210
An Employment Tribunal must determine the employer’s actual reason for dismissal in a pregnancy-discrimination claim. A causal sequence connecting pregnancy…
|
|
| 10 Oct 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0084_12_1010
An appeal may be dismissed under rule 26 where an appellant fails to comply with clear directions for the conduct of the hearing and thereby makes a fair…
|
|
| 9 Oct 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0230_12_0910
An Employment Tribunal determining an unlawful-deduction claim must make sufficient findings about the contractual terms, the basis on which those terms are…
|
|
| 9 Oct 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0025_12_0910
For the exclusion in regulation 3(3)(a)(ii) of the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006, a single specific event stands…
|
|
| 8 Oct 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0528_11_0810
An Employment Tribunal must give reasons which identify the legal test applied and explain how its findings of fact led to its conclusion. Reasons need not be…
|
|
| 5 Oct 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0143_12_0510
At a pre-hearing review, an Employment Tribunal may receive oral and documentary evidence and resolve material factual disputes before deciding whether a claim…
|
|
| 5 Oct 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0032_12_0510
A reasonable-adjustments claim requires identification of a provision, criterion or practice (PCP) which causes a disabled person a substantial comparative…
|
1 |
| 3 Oct 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0154_12_0310
For a protected-disclosure detriment claim, the limitation period runs from the employer’s causative act or deliberate failure to act, not from the continuing…
|
|
| 2 Oct 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0157_12_0210
An employer can rely on the economic, technical or organisational exception only where the changes in workforce numbers or functions form part of the reason…
|
|
| 27 Sep 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0282_12_2709
For the purpose of determining the reason for dismissal, the tribunal must identify the facts known or beliefs held by the employer which caused the dismissal.…
|
|
| 26 Sep 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0395_11_2609
An appellate tribunal will ordinarily refuse to permit a party to withdraw a clear concession and raise a new point which would require further factual…
|
|
| 26 Sep 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0195_12_2609
A person is not a limb (b) worker under section 230(3)(b) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 where the contract gives an unfettered and genuine right to have…
|
|
| 25 Sep 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0221_12_2509
A service provision change under the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 may occur where a client takes a service in-house…
|
|
| 24 Sep 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 562_11_2409
A written agreement by which an employee consents in advance to deductions from wages for a loan is a complete answer to an unauthorised-deduction claim under…
|
|
| 21 Sep 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0633_11_2109
An employee need not expressly plead an act extending over a period. However, the ET1, read as a whole, must plead facts capable of establishing a linked…
|
|
| 21 Sep 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0176_12_2109
Where an employer establishes a real chance that an employee would have been dismissed even if a fair redundancy procedure had been followed, compensation may…
|
|
| 21 Sep 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 016_12_2109
In assessing compensation for unfair dismissal, a tribunal may reduce the award for the chance that dismissal would have occurred despite a fair procedure. It…
|
|
| 20 Sep 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0189_12_2009
An Employment Tribunal considering an amendment must apply the Selkent approach. It must assess the nature of the proposed amendment, the relevance of time…
|
|
| 19 Sep 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 1918_11_1909
In a conduct dismissal case, the tribunal does not determine whether the employee in fact committed the alleged misconduct. It determines whether the employer…
|
|
| 19 Sep 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0548_05_1909
An Employment Tribunal may refuse an adjournment where the party seeking it could already have called the material witnesses and suffers no substantial…
|
|
| 19 Sep 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0079_12_1909
In assessing compensation for unfair dismissal where a fair procedure might have led to retention or alternative employment, an Employment Tribunal must…
|
|
| 18 Sep 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0114_12_1809
In a redundancy dismissal, an employer will normally be expected to give reasonable warning and consultation. The question under section 98(4) of the…
|
|
| 17 Sep 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0393_11_1709
A claimant need not expressly state a personal belief that treatment was discriminatory before a tribunal may draw an inference of race discrimination. The…
|
|
| 14 Sep 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0279_12_1409
At a preliminary hearing, a claimant need show a good arguable or prima facie case that alleged discriminatory acts formed a continuing act; the claimant need…
|
|
| 14 Sep 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0005_12_1409
Under section 98(4) of the Employment Rights Act 1996, the objective range of reasonable responses test applies to procedural fairness as well as investigation…
|
|
| 10 Sep 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0553_11_1009
Where an Employment Tribunal invites a party to show cause why a costs order should not be made, it must consider the reasons advanced in response and give…
|
|
| 7 Sep 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0186_12_0709
Where a self-represented party seeks an adjournment for ill-health, an Employment Tribunal must decide the application fairly in light of the available medical…
|
|
| 7 Sep 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0163_12_0709
A service member may pursue an employment tribunal discrimination claim only after complying with the statutory service-complaint procedure. A complaint is…
|
|
| 31 Aug 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0046_12_3108
A settlement agreement must be construed objectively from its words and context. An agreement that clearly settles proceedings against one named respondent…
|
|
| 30 Aug 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 182_12_3008
An Employment Tribunal has a wide discretion whether, and how, to take a party’s means into account when making a costs order. However, in deciding whether to…
|
|
| 29 Aug 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0638_11_2908
Under section 98(4) of the Employment Rights Act 1996, an Employment Tribunal must assess the employer’s decision by the objective standard of the reasonable…
|
|
| 23 Aug 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0119_12_2308
A claimant need not make a formal application before an employer’s refusal to consider a proposed part-time job-share can found an indirect sex-discrimination…
|
|
| 22 Aug 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0256_12_2208
An allegation of judicial bias, once withdrawn, may be dismissed. Such allegations are serious and should be supported by proper particulars and evidence. On a…
|
|
| 21 Aug 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0220_12_2108
An Employment Tribunal must determine direct-discrimination complaints as clearly defined by the claimant. It must not recast background material, narrative or…
|
|
| 20 Aug 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0149_12_2008
An Employment Tribunal may refuse a review where a party has not proved that a properly posted hearing notice was not received. A decision made in a party’s…
|
|
| 16 Aug 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 1928_11_1608
An appeal to the Employment Appeal Tribunal is not instituted in time merely by lodging a notice of appeal within 42 days. It must also include the prescribed…
|
|
| 16 Aug 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0140_11_1608
Whether an employee has unreasonably failed to mitigate loss by refusing alternative work is a fact-sensitive question. The employer must show that the…
|
|
| 15 Aug 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0008_12_1508
For an equal pay claim, the six-month limitation period runs from the end of the employment to which the claim relates. Employment with a transferor and…
|
|
| 15 Aug 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0007_12_1508
For an equal pay claim based on a transferor’s pre-transfer breach of an equality clause, the six-month limitation period runs from the end of the employment…
|
|
| 6 Aug 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 373_12_608
Where a claimant unreasonably refuses a medical examination required by the respondent, the decisive question is not simply whether the tribunal could…
|
|
| 6 Aug 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0636_11_0608
A short period of subsequent work does not automatically end loss attributable to an unfair dismissal. Under section 123(1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996…
|
|
| 6 Aug 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0123_12_0608
A written zero-hours agreement does not determine the parties’ true legal relationship where the evidence establishes a continuing agreement to provide and…
|
|
| 30 Jul 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0546_11_3007
A complaint may allege a continuing act where it is reasonably arguable that apparently disparate incidents form an ongoing situation or state of affairs. A…
|
|
| 26 Jul 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0394_11_2607
A claim under Part II of the Employment Rights Act 1996 may include substantial factual and quantification disputes. It remains within the Employment…
|
|
| 25 Jul 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0604_11_2507
For an individual assignment, the mutual obligations to perform work and to pay for it establish a contract while the assignment continues. This remains so…
|
|
| 25 Jul 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0428_11_2507
An employment tribunal may assess compensation for loss flowing from an established protected-disclosure detriment by considering what would probably have…
|
|
| 25 Jul 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0361_12_2507
An Employment Tribunal’s decision to grant or refuse an adjournment is a case-management discretion. An appellate tribunal may intervene only for an error of…
|
|
| 24 Jul 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0381_12_2407
An adjournment is a discretionary case-management decision. An appellate court will interfere where the tribunal gives inadequate reasons, fails to assess…
|
|
| 23 Jul 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0291_12_2307
For an unfair-dismissal claim presented after the primary time limit, the tribunal must decide first whether timely presentation was reasonably practicable and…
|
|
| 20 Jul 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 567_11_2007
An Employment Tribunal may consider oral or written evidence at a pre-hearing review when deciding whether to impose a deposit order. Rule 18(2) of the…
|
|
| 19 Jul 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 1821_11_1907
An extension of time for an Employment Appeal Tribunal appeal is exceptional. The 42-day limit applies equally to represented and self-represented litigants.…
|
|
| 19 Jul 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0586_10_1907
Unsuccessful compromise-agreement negotiations are privileged. An Employment Tribunal must not enquire into them, or admit evidence about them, unless both…
|
|
| 19 Jul 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0505_11_1907
An agreement is not unenforceable merely because a future payment is determined by reference to an external figure not yet fixed, or because it gives one party…
|
|
| 19 Jul 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0265_11_0308
Where the transitional provisions preserve section 98A of the Employment Rights Act 1996, an Employment Tribunal must consider its application in an unfair…
|
|
| 19 Jul 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0128_12_1907
Under Employment Rights Act 1996, section 98(4), fairness depends on the circumstances and substantial merits of the individual dismissal. There is no absolute…
|
|
| 19 Jul 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0069_12_1907
Where an employer has committed a repudiatory breach, an employee establishes constructive dismissal if the resignation was in response to that breach in part.…
|
|
| 19 Jul 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0017_12_1907
Under section 136 of the Equality Act 2010, a claimant must prove facts from which discrimination could properly be inferred before the evidential burden…
|
|
| 18 Jul 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0624_11_1807
Victimisation under the Race Relations Act 1976 requires a comparison between the treatment of the person who carried out a protected act and that of a person…
|
|
| 18 Jul 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0107_11_1807
Unreasonable or inadequate handling of a discrimination complaint does not, without more, establish direct discrimination. The tribunal must determine whether…
|
|
| 18 Jul 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0032_12_1807
An employee must receive fair notice of the disciplinary allegations to be met. An employer cannot fairly dismiss for a different and more serious reason which…
|
|
| 17 Jul 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0110_12_1707
An employment contract may be varied by implied agreement established through the parties’ conduct. That principle extends to the identity of the employer.…
|
|
| 17 Jul 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0022_12_1707
For time-limit purposes, alleged discriminatory acts amount to conduct extending over a period only where the facts establish a link between them which…
|
|
| 13 Jul 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0558_11_1307
For the purposes of section 212(3)(b) of the Employment Rights Act 1996, a temporary cessation of work is assessed by asking whether the employee’s job ceased…
|
|
| 12 Jul 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0111_12_1207
An Employment Tribunal must not refuse an amendment solely because it introduces new causes of action. Where the proposed amendment is arguable and…
|
|
| 11 Jul 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0531_11_1107
In a misconduct dismissal, an Employment Tribunal must determine whether the employer had a proper basis for its belief in misconduct following a reasonable…
|
|
| 11 Jul 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0511_11_1107
In an ill-health dismissal, the statutory question under section 98(4) is whether the employer acted within the range of reasonable responses. The tribunal…
|
|
| 10 Jul 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 71_12_1007
An Employment Tribunal's credibility findings cannot stand where it wrongly treats central, disputed facts as undisputed and thereby treats a claimant's…
|
|
| 10 Jul 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 61_11_1007
Under Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006, assignment is an individual and fact-sensitive inquiry. A service provision change…
|
|
| 10 Jul 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0190_12_1007
In a redundancy dismissal, Employment Rights Act 1996, section 98(4), requires the tribunal to decide whether the employer acted within the range of reasonable…
|
|
| 10 Jul 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0075_12_1007
An umbrella contract is not a contract of employment unless the individual is obliged to accept and perform at least some minimum or reasonable amount of work.…
|
|
| 10 Jul 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0006_11_1007
An appeal tribunal may not rehear disputed facts. A perversity appeal succeeds only where the tribunal reached a conclusion that no reasonable tribunal…
|
|
| 9 Jul 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0642_11_0907
For the ETO defence under Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006, the tribunal must identify the reason for dismissing the…
|
|
| 6 Jul 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0034_12_0607
A strike-out for having no reasonable prospect of success is exceptional, particularly in discrimination claims where central facts are disputed. It may…
|
|
| 4 Jul 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0093_12_0407
An Employment Tribunal has no jurisdiction over a discrimination complaint against a qualifications body where the impugned act may be challenged by statutory…
|
|
| 3 Jul 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0564_11_0307
A difference in racial status and less favourable treatment do not, without more, permit an inference of direct discrimination or shift the statutory burden of…
|
|
| 29 Jun 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0599_11_2906
An employer’s duty to make reasonable adjustments does not automatically end because a disabled employee begins sick leave. Where it is alleged that the…
|
|
| 29 Jun 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0014_12_2906
An Employment Judge has no power under rule 10 of the Employment Tribunal (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Rules 2004 to join as a respondent an…
|
|
| 28 Jun 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0072_12_2806
An Employment Tribunal must provide adequate reasons for its decision. Its duty under rule 30 cannot be confined to a particular issue raised in a party’s…
|
|
| 27 Jun 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0278_11_2706
A transferee alleging breach of the employee-liability-information duty must identify information that was not provided and show loss attributable to that…
|
|
| 27 Jun 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0003_12_2706
An Employment Tribunal may raise a legally relevant issue which the parties have not advanced, but it must determine the issues before it fairly. Where the new…
|
|
| 26 Jun 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0534_11_2606
An appellate tribunal need not research and formulate unadvanced grounds of appeal, particularly where neither party attends or makes adequate submissions. An…
|
|
| 25 Jun 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0540_11_2506
In a redundancy dismissal, the tribunal must apply the broad evaluative test in section 98(4) of the Employment Rights Act 1996. It must assess the employer’s…
|
|
| 22 Jun 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0490_11_2206
An employment tribunal commits a material procedural irregularity where it determines an issue capable of materially affecting an absent party without giving…
|
|
| 22 Jun 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0044_12_2206
An Employment Appeal Tribunal notice of appeal must be lodged with all required documents within the prescribed six-week period. The period applies equally to…
|
|
| 21 Jun 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0057_12_2106
In an unfair-dismissal case based on alleged disparity of treatment, the question under section 98(4) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 is whether dismissal…
|
|
| 21 Jun 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0019_12_2106
A dismissal on expiry of a fixed-term contract is not, without more, a redundancy dismissal. The tribunal must determine, on all the facts, whether the reason…
|
|
| 20 Jun 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 7_12_2006
A document required for an Employment Appeal Tribunal appeal is not validly lodged merely because the appellant emails a link to a third-party website from…
|
|
| 19 Jun 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0587_11_1906
An uplift for an employer’s unreasonable failure to comply with the ACAS Code under section 207A is available only to an employee. It is unavailable to a…
|
|
| 19 Jun 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0070_12_1906
A communicated and settled intention to implement a material reduction in contractual pay is capable of being an anticipatory fundamental breach. An employer's…
|
|
| 19 Jun 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0044_11_1906
Contractual pay-protection provisions must be construed in their factual and contractual context. A court may depart from a strict literal reading where the…
|
|
| 15 Jun 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0001_12_1506
A constructive dismissal may arise from an employer’s fundamental contractual breach, including an attempted material variation of contractual hours. That…
|
|
| 14 Jun 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0268_11_1406
An employer may be liable for a site manager’s trade-union-motivated withdrawal of an employment offer where the manager had actual or ostensible authority to…
|
|
| 13 Jun 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0472_11_1306
An unfair-dismissal compensatory award must reflect loss which is attributable to the dismissal and is just and equitable under Employment Rights Act 1996…
|
|
| 13 Jun 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0043_12_1306
Where an employment claim is struck out because a fair trial is no longer possible, the tribunal must assess the medical evidence, the likely prospect of the…
|
|
| 12 Jun 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0002_12_1206
In an unfair-dismissal appeal, the appellate tribunal must not retry factual issues merely because another inference was available. Where the Employment…
|
|
| 11 Jun 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0037_12_1106
An Employment Judge may summarily reject a review application under rule 35(3) only where that process can fairly resolve the application. A material factual…
|
|
| 7 Jun 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0055_12_0706
Failure to comply with an employment tribunal unless order results in automatic strike-out under rule 13(2) of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules…
|
|
| 1 Jun 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0637_11_0106
In an appeal under Employment Rights Act 1996, section 98(4), the Employment Appeal Tribunal must respect the Employment Tribunal’s evaluative judgment and may…
|
|
| 1 Jun 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0522_11_0106
A payment which originated as a travel allowance may become a contractual emolument if, as a matter of fact and degree, it has ceased to depend on travel…
|
|
| 1 Jun 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0049_12_0106
An Employment Tribunal has jurisdiction under Disability Discrimination Act 1995 section 17A(1)(b) to determine a victimisation complaint against a fellow…
|
|
| 31 May 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0054_12_3105
For the purposes of Employment Rights Act 1996 section 98(4), the relevant reason for dismissal is the reason actually operative in the employer’s mind. A…
|
|
| 29 May 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0605_11_2905
In a redundancy selection exercise among senior managers, criteria requiring commercial judgment are not unfair merely because they are subjective, unscored…
|
|
| 29 May 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0482_11_2905
Where evidence shows that counselling or other treatment would probably have made an impairment less severe, an Employment Tribunal determining disability must…
|
|
| 29 May 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0074_12_2905
An appellate court will not interfere with a discretionary refusal of relief from an unless-order sanction merely because it might have reached a different…
|
|
| 25 May 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0298_11_2505
Internal disciplinary proceedings conducted by an employer’s manager under a simplified contractual procedure are not judicial determinations capable of…
|
|
| 24 May 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0036_12_2405
An Employment Tribunal must determine whether the conduct which an employer reasonably believed had occurred was, as a matter of law, capable of constituting…
|
|
| 23 May 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0233_12_2305
An Employment Tribunal may refuse to postpone a preliminary hearing where its limited issues do not overlap with an impending criminal trial and do not create…
|
|
| 23 May 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0033_11_2305
An employee claiming constructive dismissal must prove both a fundamental contractual breach and that the breach was the effective cause of resignation. A…
|
|
| 22 May 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 11_12_2205
An Employment Tribunal has power in principle to require a witness to attend of its own initiative. That power must be exercised consistently with the…
|
|
| 22 May 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0594_11_2205
Fairness requires a party to have a proper and reasonable opportunity to prepare and present its case. That opportunity is assessed objectively. A party’s…
|
|
| 22 May 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0451_11_2205
In assessing the fairness of a dismissal, an Employment Tribunal must assess the whole disciplinary process under section 98(4) of the Employment Rights Act…
|
|
| 22 May 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0024_12_2205
For a service provision change under regulation 3(1)(b) of the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006, the activities before and…
|
|
| 22 May 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0008_12_2205
In a capability dismissal, the question is whether the employer's belief and decision fell within the band of reasonable responses. The tribunal must not…
|
|
| 21 May 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0050_12_2105
When assessing mitigation of loss, an employment tribunal must decide whether the employee took the steps that a reasonable employee would have taken to obtain…
|
|
| 21 May 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0019_12_2105
Where a respondent’s accepted response is struck out under an unless order, the procedural rules should be construed purposively. The respondent is ordinarily…
|
|
| 18 May 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0432_11_1805
An Employment Tribunal must substantially comply with the requirement to identify the issues, but need not use a rigid form where its reasons make clear that…
|
|
| 18 May 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0256_11_1805
Where an equal-pay claimant establishes disparate adverse impact, an employer may in principle show that the pay difference has no sex taint. That defence is…
|
|
| 18 May 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0255_11_1805
In an equal-pay claim, an employer may in principle rebut a statistical presumption of sex discrimination by proving that the pay disparity has no sex taint.…
|
|
| 17 May 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0635_11_1705
Under section 98(4) of the Employment Rights Act 1996, fairness in selecting a redundant employee for an alternative role depends on the particular procedure…
|
|
| 17 May 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0583_11_1705
In a wrongful-dismissal claim, an employer seeking to justify summary dismissal must prove that the employee actually committed a repudiatory breach of…
|
|
| 16 May 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0538_11_0903
An Employment Tribunal costs order will only be disturbed on appeal for an error of legal principle. Although costs orders remain exceptional, a tribunal may…
|
|
| 14 May 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0307_11_1405
A tribunal must determine employment status objectively from the parties’ true legal relationship. A contractual label of self-employment does not prevail…
|
|
| 14 May 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0001_12_1405
An Employment Judge considering a review application on paper under rule 35(3) must decide whether the application discloses a ground for review and whether…
|
|
| 11 May 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0058_11_1105
A transfer of a commercial lease does not, without more, establish a relevant transfer under the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment)…
|
|
| 11 May 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0015_12_1105
Under regulation 30(1) of the Working Time Regulations 1998, a complaint concerning daily or weekly rest requires an actual refusal by the employer to permit…
|
|
| 11 May 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0014_12_1105
For a complaint under regulation 30(1) of the Working Time Regulations 1998, a worker must have exercised, attempted to exercise, requested, or complained of…
|
|
| 10 May 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0643_11_1005
In determining whether a capability dismissal was reasonable under section 98(4) of the Employment Rights Act 1996, an Employment Tribunal must assess the…
|
|
| 9 May 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 582_11_905
Where dismissal is procedurally unfair, the Polkey assessment does not ask whether, on the balance of probabilities, the employee would have been dismissed…
|
|
| 9 May 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0053_11_0905
In an unfair-dismissal appeal based on perversity, the appellate tribunal will intervene only where the employment tribunal’s decision was plainly wrong or one…
|
|
| 8 May 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0618_11_0805
An appellate tribunal may interfere with a discretionary case-management decision only for legal error, disregard of principle, factual misapprehension, an…
|
|
| 8 May 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0519_11_0805
A tribunal must determine employment status from the practical reality of the relationship. A contractual label of consultant or self-employed person…
|
|
| 8 May 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0032_11_0805
An employer may establish some other substantial reason for dismissal where it imposes contractual change for genuine, sound and non-arbitrary business…
|
|
| 4 May 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0630_11_0405
Whether unwanted sex-related conduct creates the statutory proscribed environment is a fact-sensitive question. The tribunal must consider all the…
|
|
| 3 May 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0556_11_0305
An Employment Appeal Tribunal may make an indefinite restriction of proceedings order under Employment Tribunals Act 1996, section 33 where a person habitually…
|
|
| 3 May 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0498_11_0305
A party who deliberately deploys material referring to a without-prejudice settlement offer waives the privilege attaching to that offer. The opposing party…
|
|
| 3 May 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0397_11_0305
Fixed-Term Employees (Prevention of Less Favourable Treatment) Regulations 2002, regulation 18(1), excludes the Regulations only in relation to an employee who…
|
|
| 2 May 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0581_11_0205
The test for apparent bias is whether a fair-minded and informed observer, having considered all the facts, would conclude that there was a real possibility of…
|
|
| 1 May 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0388_11_0105
Under regulation 9(4) of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2004, substitution of an Employment Judge or lay member…
|
|
| 30 Apr 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 565_11_3004
When assessing compensation for a procedurally unfair dismissal, an employment tribunal must make a just and equitable assessment of loss under Employment…
|
|
| 27 Apr 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0612_11_2704
A paid suspension will generally not amount to harassment under Disability Discrimination Act 1995 where it is reasonably necessary, carefully considered, kept…
|
|
| 26 Apr 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 568_11_2604
An equity member of an LLP may be a limb (b) worker under section 230(3) of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The question is not resolved merely by profit…
|
|
| 26 Apr 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 168_12_2604
An equity member of an LLP may be a limb (b) worker under section 230(3) of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The decisive question is whether the statutory…
|
|
| 26 Apr 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0289_11_2604
Where an individual is engaged for a particular period, personal service, a bargain involving work or availability for work and a sufficient degree of control…
|
|
| 26 Apr 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0132_12_2604
An Employment Tribunal considering an amendment must apply the Selkent balancing exercise in all the circumstances. It may refuse an amendment which is utterly…
|
|
| 25 Apr 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 527_11_2504
In a dismissal for some other substantial reason based on a breakdown of trust and confidence, an Employment Tribunal may consider the history which produced…
|
|
| 25 Apr 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0076_09_2504
In national-security Employment Tribunal proceedings, the communication restriction in rule 8(4)(a) of Schedule 2 applies to all written grounds on which the…
|
|
| 23 Apr 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 35_12_2304
In assessing a Polkey reduction, a tribunal must assume that the employer would have adopted and carried out a fair procedure. It must then make a practical…
|
|
| 23 Apr 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0391_11_2304
An employer may deduct wages only where the deduction is required or authorised by statute, authorised by a relevant contractual provision, or previously…
|
|
| 20 Apr 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0271_11_0404
An Employment Tribunal has a discretion to award the whole of a party’s costs where unreasonable or misconceived conduct has affected the proceedings. It need…
|
|
| 19 Apr 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0614_11_1904
An Employment Tribunal may strike out a claim for lack of reasonable prospects only where, after careful consideration of the available material, there are no…
|
|
| 19 Apr 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0034_11_1904
For a service provision change under Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006, an organised grouping must have been deliberately…
|
|
| 18 Apr 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 306_11_1804
Under the Employment Tribunal Rules 2004, an Employment Judge may seek a respondent’s written comments when conducting the preliminary consideration of a…
|
|
| 18 Apr 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0049_11_1804
Withdrawal of an employment tribunal claim ends the proceedings for the purposes of a costs or expenses application. A respondent need not first obtain…
|
|
| 17 Apr 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0775_11_1704
An extension of time to lodge an Employment Appeal Tribunal appeal requires a sufficient explanation for the delay. A self-represented litigant’s location…
|
|
| 17 Apr 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0039_11_1704
For a constructive dismissal, the effective date of termination under Employment Rights Act 1996 is a statutory and objective question. It must be decided…
|
|
| 16 Apr 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0591_11_1604
For discrimination legislation defining employment to include a contract personally to do work, the dominant purpose of the contract is not the sole test. The…
|
|
| 16 Apr 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0554_11_1604
In a misconduct dismissal, the employer bears the burden under section 98(1) of showing the reason for dismissal, but not the burden of proving the…
|
|
| 16 Apr 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0021_12_1604
An Employment Tribunal’s costs jurisdiction under rule 40 is discretionary and costs remain exceptional. The threshold tests apply equally to represented…
|
|
| 13 Apr 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0590_11_1304
A person engaged through an agency may be employed under a contract personally to do work for the extended definition of employment in Disability…
|
|
| 13 Apr 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0573_11_1304
An Employment Tribunal’s reasons are legally adequate where, read as a whole, they identify the material instruction, state the essential factual findings and…
|
|
| 12 Apr 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0495_11_1204
A claim may be struck out for having no reasonable prospect of success only in the clearest case. The applicant must show no reasonable prospect, not merely…
|
|
| 12 Apr 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0493_12_1204
Under rule 40 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2004, an Employment Judge must first decide whether a party acted…
|
|
| 11 Apr 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 1247_10_1104
An appeal to the Employment Appeal Tribunal requires an arguable error of law. Once the substantive claims have been determined, earlier interlocutory…
|
|
| 11 Apr 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0410_11_1104
An Employment Judge may determine a confined factual issue at a pre-hearing review where a prior case-management direction requires it and the Tribunal rules…
|
|
| 11 Apr 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0281_11_1104
In assessing misconduct dismissal under Employment Rights Act 1996, section 98(4), a tribunal must determine whether the employer’s decision fell within the…
|
|
| 11 Apr 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0224_11_1104
In a constructive dismissal claim, a series of incidents may be assessed cumulatively. Individual incidents, including the final incident, need not each amount…
|
|
| 10 Apr 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0503_11_1004
An Employment Tribunal may find unreasonable conduct under rule 40(3) where a represented party continues a costly claim after a reasoned costs warning without…
|
|
| 4 Apr 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0213_11_0404
A discrimination complaint concerning an overseas post falls outside section 4 of the Race Relations Act 1976 where the post requires residence outside Great…
|
|
| 3 Apr 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0463_11_0304
An employee who resigns with immediate effect fixes the effective date of termination when the resignation is effectively communicated to the employer. For a…
|
|
| 3 Apr 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0462_11_0304
Where an employee resigns without notice, the effective date of termination is fixed when the resignation is effectively communicated to the employer.…
|
|
| 30 Mar 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0623_11_3003
For a reduction for contributory conduct under section 123(6) of the Employment Rights Act 1996, the conduct must be blameworthy and must have caused or…
|
|
| 28 Mar 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 1137_11_2803
An appeal to the Employment Appeal Tribunal must be validly instituted within the prescribed time, with all documents required by the rules and Practice…
|
|
| 28 Mar 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0224_11_2803
A tribunal must determine claims which remain extant and have not been withdrawn or abandoned. Where a limitation defence is raised, it may properly be…
|
|
| 27 Mar 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0535_11_2703
For a reduction for contributory conduct in an unfair-dismissal award, the tribunal must identify culpable conduct and find a causal link between that conduct…
|
|
| 23 Mar 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0417_11_2303
A reasonable-adjustments claim requires precise identification of an employer’s provision, criterion or practice, a substantial disadvantage caused by that…
|
|
| 23 Mar 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0056_11_2303
A decision whether to review and revoke a strike-out is a discretionary decision under Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations…
|
|
| 22 Mar 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0136_11_2203
Where an employee's conduct appears to have caused or contributed to dismissal, an Employment Tribunal must consider whether it was blameworthy and whether…
|
|
| 22 Mar 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0052_11_2203
Under section 98(4) of the Employment Rights Act 1996, the fairness of a dismissal must be assessed by reference to the employer’s actual reason for treating…
|
|
| 21 Mar 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0047_11_2103
In a conduct dismissal, the statutory range of reasonable responses applies equally to the employer’s investigation and to the decision to dismiss. An…
|
|
| 20 Mar 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0629_11_2003
A strike-out because a fair hearing is no longer possible is a last-resort and proportionate measure. The Employment Tribunal must determine whether a fair…
|
|
| 20 Mar 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0140_12_2003
An Employment Judge has no power to require a claimant to replace an accepted ET1 with a one-page concise statement where that direction may curtail the claims…
|
|
| 20 Mar 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0139_12_2003
An Employment Tribunal has no power to require a claimant to reduce an accepted claim form to a prescribed length where doing so may curtail the claims…
|
|
| 20 Mar 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0048_11_2003
Where a worker’s contracted and normal duties are performed separately from a period spent at or near the workplace awaiting a possible call, the latter is an…
|
|
| 19 Mar 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 523_11_1903
An Employment Tribunal may award costs where proceedings are misconceived, including where they have no reasonable prospect of success, or have been conducted…
|
|
| 16 Mar 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 97_11_1603
An ET1 must be construed as a whole. A claim for automatic unfair dismissal based on protected disclosure must nevertheless emerge from the claim form or its…
|
|
| 15 Mar 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0016_12_1503
For an allegation to be treated as an act extending over a period under section 68 of the Race Relations Act 1976, the claimant must show a reasonably arguable…
|
|
| 14 Mar 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 241_11_1403
A claim under Part II of the Employment Rights Act 1996 is confined to unpaid, quantified or quantifiable contractual sums. It cannot be used to obtain damages…
|
|
| 14 Mar 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0586_11_1403
Fresh evidence will exceptionally be admitted on appeal where it could not reasonably have been obtained for the tribunal hearing, would probably have had an…
|
|
| 14 Mar 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0149_11_1403
In a misconduct dismissal, a tribunal must address each element of the Burchell inquiry. It must determine whether the employer had reasonable grounds for its…
|
|
| 14 Mar 2012 |
Rogers v Dorothy Barley School [2012] UKEAT 0013_12_1403 (14 March 2012)
The Employment Appeal Tribunal held that an employment tribunal lacks jurisdiction to hear a breach of contract claim while the claimant remains employed.…
|
|
| 13 Mar 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 51_11_1303
A tribunal may exercise its strike-out power during a hearing, but a strike-out for no reasonable prospect of success is principally a pre-hearing remedy. It…
|
|
| 13 Mar 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0059_11_1303
An Employment Tribunal may assess the period of compensable loss by reference to the evidence of available work, the employee’s mitigation efforts and its…
|
|
| 9 Mar 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 1091_10_0903
An appeal to the Employment Appeal Tribunal must identify an arguable error of law. Where no such point is disclosed, the Tribunal has no jurisdiction under…
|
|
| 9 Mar 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0547_11_0903
An employee suspended pending investigation remains entitled to contractual salary unless the contract authorises suspension without pay. Arrest, charge or…
|
|
| 8 Mar 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 1104_11_0803
An extension of time for an Employment Appeal Tribunal appeal requires a persuasive and supported explanation for the delay. A medical condition will not…
|
|
| 8 Mar 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0276_11_0803
In a misconduct dismissal, the employer establishes the potentially fair reason by showing the facts or beliefs which caused the dismissal. Where misconduct is…
|
|
| 8 Mar 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0045_11_0803
Where a withdrawn employment tribunal claim has been dismissed under rule 25(4), a claimant cannot bring a later claim founded on the same or substantially the…
|
|
| 7 Mar 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0487_11_0703
Where an employer and individual employees are concurrent wrongdoers in a discrimination claim, they are jointly and severally liable to the claimant for an…
|
|
| 7 Mar 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0252_11_0703
An Employment Tribunal need consider the grounds for aggravated damages that a claimant has advanced in the schedule of loss and written or oral submissions.…
|
|
| 2 Mar 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 1804_10_0203
An appellant seeking an extension of time for an appeal from a Registrar’s order must provide a good reason for the whole delay. The EAT’s time limits and…
|
|
| 1 Mar 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0039_11_0103
In a redundancy dismissal, fairness requires an assessment of the process as a whole under section 98(4) of the Employment Rights Act 1996. Consultation may be…
|
|
| 28 Feb 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0270_11_2802
Fairness of a redundancy dismissal under Employment Rights Act 1996 depends on the overall reasonableness of the process. Consultation is unfair where an…
|
|
| 28 Feb 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0207_11_2802
For the purposes of Regulation 7(2) of the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006, a transferee’s workforce does not include…
|
|
| 28 Feb 2012 |
UKEAT/0206/11
For the purposes of regulation 7(2) of the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006, a transferee’s workforce does not include…
|
|
| 27 Feb 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0407_11_2702
Where a contract provides a shorter notice period during an employee’s probationary period, that specific term governs dismissal occurring within that period.…
|
|
| 24 Feb 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0595_10_2402
An employer may fairly dismiss a senior, trained employee for gross misconduct without a specific prior warning where the employee knew, or should have known…
|
|
| 24 Feb 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0496_11_2402
An appellate tribunal will rarely interfere with an employment tribunal's case-management discretion. It may do so where the decision rests on an erroneous…
|
|
| 24 Feb 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0491_11_2402
A transfer under Transfer Undertakings (Protection Employment) Regulations 2006 may occur before contractual completion where the transferee has assumed…
|
|
| 24 Feb 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0198_11_2402
Where compensation for an automatically unfair dismissal is assessed on a just and equitable basis, an Employment Tribunal must give adequate reasons for…
|
|
| 23 Feb 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 190_11_2302 (23 February 2012)
It is not correct that an employment contract transfers by operation of law without the employee's assent. Rather, at common law a contract of service cannot…
|
|
| 23 Feb 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0506_11_2302
A tribunal may strike out a party’s claim for conduct connected with the proceedings where that conduct makes a fair trial impossible and no lesser…
|
|
| 23 Feb 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0374_11_2302
An employment tribunal's discretion to adjourn is constrained by judicial fairness and the overriding objective. Where a self-represented litigant produces…
|
|
| 23 Feb 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0190_11_2302
At common law, a contract of employment cannot be transferred to a new employer without the employee’s real consent, whether express or implied. A change in…
|
|
| 22 Feb 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0549_10_2202
A tribunal may strike out a discrimination claim where the undisputed facts show that it has no reasonable prospect of success. Although strike-out is a…
|
|
| 22 Feb 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0188_11_2202
A trade union member is protected from unjustifiable discipline for a good-faith assertion that the union or its officials have breached union rules or the…
|
|
| 20 Feb 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0848_11_2002
An appellant seeking an extension of time for an Employment Appeal Tribunal notice of appeal must provide an acceptable explanation for the delay. A delay of…
|
|
| 20 Feb 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0257_11_2002
Striking out for breach of an unless order is an extreme step, but it may be proportionate where there is a sustained history of non-compliance, material…
|
|
| 17 Feb 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0485_11_1702
The reverse burden of proof in section 17A(1)(c) of the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 applies to a complaint of victimisation under section 55.…
|
|
| 16 Feb 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0476_11_1602
Where a dismissal is automatically unfair under section 98A(1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996, the reverse- Polkey provision in section 98A(2) does not…
|
|
| 15 Feb 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0466_11_1502
An Employment Tribunal may order costs where a party has conducted proceedings unreasonably. A solicitor and officer of the court should not exploit an…
|
|
| 15 Feb 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0465_11_1502
An Employment Tribunal may award costs or preparation time costs where a party’s conduct unreasonably frustrates the efficient resolution of the real dispute.…
|
|
| 15 Feb 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0012_11_1502
Under Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006, proof of a service provision change does not itself establish that an individual…
|
|
| 14 Feb 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0429_11_1402
For worker status under section 54(3)(b) of the National Minimum Wage Act 1998, mutuality concerns whether an agreement is capable of amounting to a contract…
|
|
| 14 Feb 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0041_12_1402
For a service provision change, the tribunal must identify the relevant activity and decide whether the activity carried on afterwards is fundamentally or…
|
|
| 10 Feb 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0145_11_1002
An Employment Tribunal may accept a party’s withdrawal or concession only where it is clear, unambiguous and unequivocal. It must take particular care where…
|
|
| 9 Feb 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0455_11_0902
A later notice of dismissal may validly supersede an earlier notice by bringing forward the effective date of termination. This is so even if the employer's…
|
|
| 9 Feb 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0409_11_0902
An ET1 must be construed as a whole to identify the claims actually presented. References to race discrimination, a tick in a discrimination box, or later…
|
|
| 8 Feb 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0179_11_0802
An employment tribunal must make findings on factual issues that are significant in its reasoning and explain whether it accepts or rejects material evidence.…
|
|
| 6 Feb 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 04193_11_0602
An Employment Tribunal’s decision to award costs for unreasonable conduct is primarily a factual and discretionary decision. An appellate tribunal should…
|
|
| 6 Feb 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0171_11_0602
In redundancy cases, the choice of selection pool is primarily a management decision. An Employment Tribunal must not substitute its own view merely because it…
|
|
| 2 Feb 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0454_11_0202
In a victimisation claim, the tribunal must identify the discriminator’s actual reason for the impugned act. It is a question of fact, but the tribunal cannot…
|
|
| 2 Feb 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0056_11_0202
Direct race discrimination may be established through a series of connected acts extending over a period. A racial insult may itself be race-specific, without…
|
|
| 27 Jan 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0547_10_2701
An employee’s grievance need only indicate the nature of the complaint and need not reproduce the later tribunal pleading. Whether a document raises a…
|
|
| 27 Jan 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0434_11_2701
Conduct referring to pregnancy or miscarriage is not necessarily harassment or direct sex discrimination merely because it concerns a sex-specific…
|
|
| 26 Jan 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0036_11_2601
Whether an employment relationship continues after a material change in duties depends on the whole factual circumstances. Written contractual arrangements…
|
|
| 25 Jan 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0427_11_2501
Whether wages have been unlawfully deducted depends on the sum properly payable under the employment contract. Contractual terms must be construed objectively…
|
|
| 25 Jan 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0041_11_2501
When assessing compensation for procedurally unfair dismissal, an Employment Tribunal must consider both the chance of dismissal following a fair procedure and…
|
|
| 24 Jan 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0134_11_2401
When a litigant cannot attend an Employment Tribunal hearing for a genuine reason beyond his control, the Tribunal must consider the effect of proceeding in…
|
|
| 24 Jan 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0085_11_2401
For the reasonable-adjustments duty, a provision, criterion or practice may place a disabled employee at a substantial disadvantage even where it is not…
|
|
| 24 Jan 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0037_11_2401
Reductions of compensation for contributory conduct under sections 122(2) and 123(6) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 are principally factual questions. The…
|
|
| 20 Jan 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0521_11_2001
Appellate interference with a discretionary review decision is justified where the Employment Judge applied the wrong legal approach or failed to consider…
|
|
| 20 Jan 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0420_11_2001
An appeal against a remedy judgment cannot be used to reopen liability conclusively determined by an earlier default judgment where the time for appealing that…
|
|
| 19 Jan 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0386_11_1901
In an appeal concerning limitation in a discrimination claim, the Employment Appeal Tribunal must assess whether the Employment Tribunal was entitled, on the…
|
|
| 19 Jan 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0368_11_1901
Whether a discrimination complaint is in time depends on identifying the act complained of and its latest date. An Employment Tribunal is entitled to determine…
|
|
| 18 Jan 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0384_11_1801
Before making a deduction for contributory fault in an unfair dismissal case, an Employment Tribunal must raise the issue with the parties and give them an…
|
|
| 17 Jan 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0412_11_1701
Where a contract states that overtime is voluntary, an employee becomes entitled to treat additional hours as overtime only when the employer gives notice…
|
|
| 12 Jan 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0631_11_1201
Under regulation 4(9) of the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006, “working conditions” extend beyond contractual terms and…
|
|
| 12 Jan 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0283_11_1201
Under regulation 4(9) of the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006, “working conditions” are wider than contractual terms and…
|
|
| 12 Jan 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0028_11_1201
For a continuing entitlement to daily or compensatory rest, time under regulation 30(2) of the Working Time Regulations 1998 runs separately from each occasion…
|
|
| 11 Jan 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0025_11_1101
In an unfair-dismissal case concerning admitted misconduct, the tribunal must apply the statutory test in section 98(4) of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The…
|
|
| 10 Jan 2012 |
[2012] UKEAT 0030_11_1001
There is no prescribed method for calculating a deposit order under rule 20. The amount must be reasonable in all the circumstances and is appealable only…
|
|
| 18 Nov 2011 |
[2012] UKEAT 0358_11_1811
For a detriment complaint arising from a protected disclosure, time runs from the act or failure to act identified in the claim. A later description of the…
|
|
|
[2012] UKEAT 0402_11_1010
Where an Employment Tribunal receives further written submissions after a remedies hearing, the practicability of reinstatement or re-engagement must be…
|
1 | |
|
[2012] UKEAT 0248_12_2802
In redundancy selection, an employment tribunal must assess whether the employer’s method fell within the range of reasonable responses, without substituting…
|
1 | |
|
[2012] UKEAT 0073_11_1302
An appellate tribunal should not substitute its own view for that of the employer when reviewing a conduct dismissal. It may intervene only where the…
|
1 |