| Date | Case | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Jun 2014 |
[2013] UKEAT 0124_12_0306
Under rule 35(3) of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2004, “not practicable” means not feasible, rather than inconvenient. An unfounded allegation of…
|
|
| 15 May 2014 |
[2013] UKEAT 0567_12_1505 (15 May 2014)
It is not enough for an employer to be unaware of a legal characterisation of an impairment; rather, before direct disability discrimination under Equality Act…
|
|
| 9 May 2014 |
[2013] UKEAT 73_13_905
A sole shareholder and managing director may be an employee of the company. The issue is one of fact, including whether an apparent contract of employment…
|
|
| 9 Apr 2014 |
[2013] UKEAT 0011_13_0904
An Employment Tribunal must assess whether dismissal falls within the range of reasonable responses open to a reasonable employer. It must not substitute its…
|
|
| 25 Mar 2014 |
[2013] UKEAT 0513_12_2503
In deciding whether a conduct dismissal was fair under Employment Rights Act 1996, an Employment Tribunal must assess whether the employer acted within the…
|
|
| 7 Mar 2014 |
[2013] UKEAT 0170_13_0703
In assessing compensation for unfair dismissal, an Employment Tribunal must estimate the chance that the actual employer, acting fairly, would have dismissed…
|
|
| 6 Mar 2014 |
[2013] UKEAT 52_13_604
An Employment Tribunal considering a review based on new evidence must exercise its broad discretion by balancing the interests of justice. It should not apply…
|
|
| 11 Feb 2014 |
[2013] UKEAT 0279_13_1102
For a detriment claim under section 47B of the Employment Rights Act 1996, it is insufficient that the protected disclosure and the employer’s treatment…
|
|
| 7 Feb 2014 |
[2013] UKEAT 0022_13_0702
An employment tribunal exercising its broad review jurisdiction in the interests of justice must balance the finality of litigation against all relevant…
|
|
| 30 Jan 2014 |
[2013] UKEAT 164_13_3001
An express contractual term permitting summary dismissal for breach of security rules must be construed in its commercial and contractual context. It will not…
|
|
| 19 Dec 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0359_13_1912
A complaint or grievance is not excluded from whistleblowing protection merely because it is framed as an allegation. The essential question under section 43B…
|
|
| 19 Dec 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0191_13_1912
In fixing a protective award or compensation for failures of collective redundancy consultation or TUPE information duties, the tribunal must focus on the…
|
|
| 18 Dec 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0211_13_1812
A deposit order requires more than a statement that the tribunal considered the party’s ability to pay. Under Employment Tribunal’s (Constitution Rules of…
|
|
| 17 Dec 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0576_12_1712
A tribunal may not dismiss proceedings under a settlement-related stay unless the express condition for dismissal in its order has occurred. Compliance with a…
|
|
| 13 Dec 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0274_13_0312
For the purposes of the Agency Workers Regulations 2010, an individual must be supplied to work temporarily. In this context, “temporary” means not permanent…
|
|
| 13 Dec 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0262_13_1312
An incorporated collective pay agreement must be construed objectively in its factual and industrial context. Industrial common sense may assist in choosing…
|
|
| 13 Dec 2013 |
UKEAT/0274/13
For the purposes of the Agency Workers Regulations 2010, a worker is supplied to work temporarily where the placement is not permanent. “Temporary” does not…
|
|
| 12 Dec 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0369_13_1212
Contractual pay terms must be construed in their agreed textual and practical context. A clause heading may legitimately assist construction where it forms…
|
|
| 12 Dec 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0352_13_1212
An Employment Tribunal must not treat a claimant’s untruthfulness as automatically establishing unreasonable conduct for the purpose of a costs order. Under…
|
|
| 12 Dec 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0101_13_1212
An appellate tribunal will interfere with an Employment Tribunal’s case-management decision only for an error of legal principle, a material failure to…
|
|
| 12 Dec 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0024_13_1212
Employment status depends on a qualitative assessment of the whole relationship. The tribunal must consider mutual obligations, contractual control and whether…
|
|
| 11 Dec 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0103_13_1112
A procedural defect in a dismissal or internal appeal does not of itself make a dismissal unfair under section 98(4) of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The…
|
|
| 10 Dec 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0288_13_1012
For an extension under section 111(2) of the Employment Rights Act 1996, reasonable ignorance of tribunal rights or time limits requires the claimant to have…
|
|
| 10 Dec 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0033_13_1012
A tribunal may decline to make a Polkey deduction where a fair-dismissal outcome cannot sensibly be predicted from the evidence. A degree of uncertainty is…
|
|
| 9 Dec 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0380_13_1211
An unsubstantiated allegation of historic sexual abuse does not automatically constitute some other substantial reason justifying dismissal. Under Employment…
|
|
| 9 Dec 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0380_13_0912
An allegation of historic sexual abuse may amount to some other substantial reason, but it does not make dismissal automatically fair. Under Employment Rights…
|
|
| 9 Dec 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0203_13_1211
An allegation of historic sexual abuse may be capable of constituting some other substantial reason for dismissal, but it does not make dismissal inevitably…
|
|
| 9 Dec 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0203_13_0912
An allegation of historic child abuse may constitute a potentially fair some other substantial reason for dismissal, but it does not make dismissal inevitably…
|
|
| 5 Dec 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 221_13_512
A rejected Calderbank -type settlement offer may be relevant to whether a party has conducted Employment Tribunal proceedings unreasonably for the purposes of…
|
|
| 5 Dec 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0325_13_0512
A claimant seeking holiday pay bears the burden of proving the holiday days for which payment is claimed. The civil standard is the balance of probabilities…
|
|
| 5 Dec 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0318_12_0512
An Employment Tribunal may properly assist an unrepresented party by explaining the issues to be determined and the consequences of choosing not to give…
|
|
| 5 Dec 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0158_13_0512
Where the available medical evidence does not establish that an impairment is likely to recur, an Employment Tribunal may find that there is no recurring or…
|
|
| 4 Dec 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0437_11_0412
Under section 54A of the Race Relations Act 1976, an Employment Tribunal must consider whether the proved facts could support an inference of race…
|
|
| 4 Dec 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0244_13_0412
A dismissal remains by reason of redundancy where that was the genuine reason when notice was given and a later offer to renew employment is made before…
|
|
| 28 Nov 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0492_12_2811
A reduction in the number of employees required to perform management work may amount to redundancy even where the duties formerly performed by a dismissed…
|
|
| 28 Nov 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0256_13_2811
A trade union rulebook may contain an implied term arising from the union’s custom and practice. Such a term may permit proportionate intervention in the…
|
|
| 26 Nov 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0097_13_2611
A duty to make reasonable adjustments is a continuing duty throughout employment while the relevant disadvantage and duty remain. A refusal of a proposed…
|
|
| 25 Nov 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0551_12_2511
In a redundancy dismissal, selection criteria should, so far as practicable, be objectively capable of assessment. Some criteria may properly require personal…
|
|
| 25 Nov 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0227_13_2511
Under Maternity and Parental Leave Regulations 1999, an employee’s contractual job title does not conclusively determine either the job from which she returns…
|
|
| 21 Nov 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0171_13_2111
An Employment Tribunal gives adequate reasons where, read fairly and as a whole, they identify the material issues and sufficiently explain why a full…
|
|
| 21 Nov 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0027_13_2111
A tribunal may recuse itself only on objectively reasonable grounds. A perceived conflict arising from criticism of, or a possible challenge to, a tribunal…
|
|
| 21 Nov 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0019_13_2111
An employment tribunal deciding the identity of an employer must determine which entity was in truth the employer. It must not decide the issue merely by…
|
|
| 19 Nov 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0550_12_1911
For liability under section 32(2) of the Race Relations Act 1976, it is insufficient to find that an end user had implied consent to manage a supplied worker…
|
|
| 15 Nov 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 415_12_1511
An appellate tribunal may seek specified clarification from an employment tribunal when considering whether its reasons adequately address material issues.…
|
|
| 15 Nov 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0320_13_1511
An Employment Tribunal should address the matters identified in Rowan when determining a reasonable-adjustments claim. The guidance is not a rigid formula. A…
|
|
| 15 Nov 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0042_12_1511
In an unfair-dismissal case, an Employment Tribunal must assess whether the employer’s decision fell within the range of reasonable responses. It must not…
|
|
| 15 Nov 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0040_12_1511
In an unfair-dismissal appeal, the Employment Appeal Tribunal must decide whether the Employment Tribunal erred in law. It must not re-evaluate the evidence or…
|
|
| 14 Nov 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0297_13_1411
An Employment Judge may refuse a review application at the preliminary stage where, even assuming an arguable review ground, there is no reasonable prospect…
|
|
| 14 Nov 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0214_13_1411
An Employment Tribunal must produce a valid judgment and written reasons after a remitted hearing. Under the applicable procedural rules, the Employment Judge…
|
|
| 13 Nov 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0056_13_1311
For the exception in Regulation 3(3)(a)(ii) of the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006, the tribunal’s primary factual finding…
|
|
| 13 Nov 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0030_13_1311
For a claim based on a transfer of an undertaking, whether the claimant was employed by the alleged transferee is an essential preliminary fact. If the…
|
|
| 12 Nov 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0275_13_1211
In a redundancy dismissal, fairness requires a proper assessment of consultation and of the employer’s attempts to identify alternative employment. A tribunal…
|
|
| 12 Nov 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0029_13_1211
In assessing fairness under section 98(4) of the Employment Rights Act 1996, an employer may take account of a valid final written warning which is live when…
|
|
| 9 Nov 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0104_13_0911
Where a claimant withdraws an Employment Tribunal claim, a dismissal under rule 25(4) of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure)…
|
|
| 7 Nov 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0317_13_0711
In a conduct-dismissal case, an Employment Tribunal must apply the Burchell requirements and determine whether dismissal fell within the range of reasonable…
|
|
| 6 Nov 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0489_12_0611
An employer may not determine dismissal before giving the employee a real opportunity to answer the allegations. A tribunal may infer pre-judgment from the…
|
|
| 6 Nov 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0330_13_0611
Written terms which describe an individual as an independent subcontractor do not conclusively determine worker status. A tribunal must examine the true…
|
|
| 5 Nov 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0448_13_0511
Where an appeal succeeds in full or in part, rule 34A(2)(a) of the Employment Appeal Tribunal Rules gives the Employment Appeal Tribunal a broad discretion to…
|
|
| 5 Nov 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0217_13_0511
There is no clear dividing line between holding a religious belief and manifesting it. Unjustified unfavourable treatment because an employee manifests…
|
|
| 5 Nov 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0024_13_0511
An unprofessionally drafted ET1 should be read generously. Where its factual allegations are capable of disclosing that the claimant supplied information…
|
|
| 1 Nov 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0248_13_0111
A governing body of a community school may determine that a teacher should cease to work at the school, but it does not thereby terminate the teacher’s…
|
|
| 1 Nov 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0233_13_0111
Victimisation under section 27 of the Equality Act 2010 turns on the reason for the detrimental treatment. It does not require a comparator or a finding of…
|
|
| 29 Oct 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0566_12_2910
The statutory-authority exception for age discrimination applies only where an enactment directly requires the discriminatory act. A local authority does not…
|
|
| 29 Oct 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0445_13_2910
Where an ET1 pleads a physical condition and describes mental effects flowing from that condition, the claim may encompass evidence of those effects even…
|
|
| 28 Oct 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0195_13_2810
An appeal may be dismissed where an appellant persistently fails to comply with procedural directions, including an unless order, despite repeated extensions…
|
|
| 28 Oct 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0162_13_2810
An employer’s duty to make reasonable adjustments under section 4A of the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 does not arise where it neither knew, nor could…
|
|
| 25 Oct 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0461_13_2510
An appeal tribunal will interfere with an employment tribunal's discretionary case-management decision to refuse a stay only where the tribunal took account of…
|
|
| 25 Oct 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0183_13_2510
Following the repeal of section 98A, the former statutory dismissal procedure continues to apply only if the conditions in the transitional Order are met. An…
|
|
| 24 Oct 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 67_13_2410
A tribunal considering an application to review a decision must consider whether the application, read fairly, raises a challenge to the substance or fairness…
|
|
| 24 Oct 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0138_13_2410
An employer is not required, as a reasonable adjustment, to impose a lesser disciplinary sanction merely because dismissal will adversely affect an employee’s…
|
|
| 24 Oct 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0040_13_2410
In determining whether a dismissal was fair under section 98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, the tribunal must assess the employer’s reasons and conduct…
|
|
| 23 Oct 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0577_12_2310
An Employment Tribunal cannot, without a material change of circumstances, direct a pre-hearing review after it has refused an application for that form of…
|
|
| 23 Oct 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0529_12_2310
An appellate court should read an Employment Tribunal's reasons fairly and as a whole. Where the tribunal has correctly directed itself on the burden of proof…
|
|
| 23 Oct 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0431_13_2310
An Employment Tribunal may not, without a material change of circumstances, direct a pre-hearing review after it has already refused an application for that…
|
|
| 23 Oct 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0028_13_2310
A review of an Appeal Tribunal sift decision should be exceptionally rare. Ordinarily, an inter partes hearing on a review application is better used to…
|
|
| 22 Oct 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0261_13_2210
A constructive-dismissal claim may properly be struck out where, after careful evaluation of the available material, it has no reasonable prospect of success.…
|
|
| 22 Oct 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0014_13_2210
Under the equal-terms provisions of the Equality Act 2010, a woman undertaking equal work who receives less favourable terms than a male comparator has a prima…
|
|
| 21 Oct 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0143_13_2110
Where an employee is unfairly dismissed for redundancy following inadequate consultation, compensation under section 123 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 may…
|
|
| 18 Oct 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0194_13_1810
An employee entitled to work under flexible-hours arrangements need not alter her chosen contractual start time to avoid a disability-related disadvantage. A…
|
|
| 18 Oct 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0174_13_1810
In a misconduct dismissal, the question under section 98(4) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 remains whether the employer acted reasonably in treating the…
|
|
| 16 Oct 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 249_13_1610
For the exception in Regulation 8(7) of the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 to apply, the transferor must be under the…
|
|
| 16 Oct 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0091_13_1610
An Employment Tribunal must determine pleaded time-limit issues which go to its jurisdiction, even where the respondent does not attend the hearing. It must…
|
|
| 16 Oct 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0025_13_1610
Under Schedule 8 paragraph 20(1)(b) of the Equality Act 2010, an employer’s actual knowledge of disability and the knowledge it could reasonably have acquired…
|
|
| 15 Oct 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0020_13_1510
In assessing the fairness of a conduct dismissal, an employment tribunal must apply the objective test in section 98(4) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and…
|
|
| 14 Oct 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0600_12_1410
In a redundancy reorganisation involving competitive appointment to a new role, fairness remains governed by Employment Rights Act 1996, section 98(4). An…
|
|
| 14 Oct 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0438_12_1410
An employer cannot treat an undifferentiated period of non-payment as resolved merely because an employee was later unwilling to perform any duties. Where the…
|
|
| 10 Oct 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0549_12_1010
An appellate tribunal may interfere with an Employment Tribunal’s assessment of injury-to-feelings compensation only where the tribunal applied a wrong…
|
|
| 10 Oct 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0157_13_1010
An Employment Tribunal may reject a reasonable-adjustments complaint where it permissibly finds that a requirement to attend meetings in person did not place…
|
|
| 8 Oct 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0392_12_0810
An Employment Appeal Tribunal costs order is discretionary even where the conditions in rule 34A are met. The rule extends to unreasonable conduct in…
|
|
| 8 Oct 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0046_13_0810
The duty to make reasonable adjustments under Disability Discrimination Act 1995 requires an objective assessment of the steps which it is reasonable for the…
|
|
| 4 Oct 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0166_13_0410
For discrimination protection under section 83 of the Equality Act 2010, a claimant relying on a contract personally to do work must establish both a contract…
|
|
| 4 Oct 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0020_13_0410
Where an employment claim against a foreign state falls within the material scope of EU law, a tribunal must disapply domestic state-immunity provisions that…
|
|
| 2 Oct 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0430_12_0210
An employer’s reasonable-adjustment duty may require payment for specific private psychiatric support or counselling where it is directed to overcoming a…
|
|
| 1 Oct 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0408_12_0110
For a service provision change under Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006, the tribunal must identify the activities actually…
|
|
| 1 Oct 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0147_12_0110
In determining the fairness of a misconduct dismissal, an Employment Tribunal must ask whether dismissal fell within the band of reasonable responses open to a…
|
|
| 30 Sep 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0352_12_3009
A certificate of independence under section 8(1) of the 1992 Act is conclusive while in force, but it does not retrospectively establish that a union was…
|
|
| 26 Sep 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0554_12_2609
An Employment Tribunal's assessment of future earnings and pension loss is a fact-sensitive exercise. It may adopt a structured period-by-period approach to…
|
|
| 24 Sep 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0986_12_2409
In a victimisation claim, the tribunal must first compare the treatment of the claimant with the treatment that would have been given to a person in materially…
|
|
| 24 Sep 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0461_12_2409
A claimant may recover loss flowing directly and naturally from disability discrimination, including psychiatric injury and, where proved, a labour-market…
|
|
| 20 Sep 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0378_12_2009
In a direct religion-or-belief discrimination claim, the hypothetical comparator must share the claimant’s relevant circumstances apart from the protected…
|
|
| 20 Sep 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0290_13_2009
A communication may be a qualifying disclosure where it conveys sufficiently specific facts, including facts about omissions. It need not be confined to…
|
|
| 19 Sep 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0593_12_1909
An employer’s clear written contractual term may be disapplied where, before agreement, it gives an employee an express oral assurance inconsistent with that…
|
|
| 19 Sep 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0118_13_1909
For redundancy under section 139(1)(b) of the Employment Rights Act 1996, the tribunal must distinguish between a reduction in work and a reduction in the…
|
|
| 19 Sep 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0051_13_1909
A label of zero-hours contract does not itself determine whether an individual remains employed under a contract of employment. The tribunal must make…
|
|
| 17 Sep 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 109_13_1709
An Employment Tribunal's decision to review and revoke a default judgment must rest on an accurate factual basis. An application made outside the 14-day period…
|
|
| 16 Sep 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0102_13_1609
A tribunal may not strike out a claim for unreasonable conduct or failure actively to pursue it without giving effective notice of the proposed order, its…
|
|
| 12 Sep 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0053_13_1209
Wrongful dismissal and unfair dismissal require distinct inquiries. For wrongful dismissal, the tribunal determines for itself whether the employee committed a…
|
|
| 11 Sep 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0098_13_1109
An Employment Tribunal considering an adjournment must apply the Employment Tribunal (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2004 overriding…
|
|
| 10 Sep 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 547_12_1009
Permission for a further appeal may be granted where the statutory requirement of a question of law is met and there is either a reasonable prospect of success…
|
|
| 10 Sep 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0548_12_1009
Permission to appeal from the Employment Appeal Tribunal is available only on a question of law. Applying the ordinary permission criteria, permission may be…
|
|
| 10 Sep 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0368_12_1009
An appeal to the Employment Appeal Tribunal must identify an error of law. It cannot succeed merely by challenging a tribunal’s fact-sensitive assessment of…
|
|
| 10 Sep 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0318_13_1009
An Employment Tribunal must follow a relevant Employment Appeal Tribunal decision unless it can properly distinguish it. Insignificant factual differences, or…
|
|
| 9 Sep 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0570_12_0909
For a service provision change under Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006, the tribunal must identify the activities and…
|
|
| 6 Sep 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0337_12_0609
A final tribunal determination that it lacks jurisdiction to entertain a claim is binding between the parties where jurisdiction was a necessary ingredient of…
|
|
| 6 Sep 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0285_13_0609
An Employment Tribunal must construe an unrepresented claimant’s claim form as a whole and in its context. A discrimination claim may be sufficiently pleaded…
|
|
| 5 Sep 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0386_13_0509
Whether an impairment has a long-term effect must be determined by reference to the evidence available at the relevant date. Later events cannot establish…
|
|
| 5 Sep 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0159_13_0509
Where a claimant has consulted a skilled adviser, a failure to meet the primary unfair-dismissal time limit caused by the adviser’s negligence will ordinarily…
|
|
| 5 Sep 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0047_13_0509
For time-limit purposes under Equality Act 2010, an act extending over a period is not confined to a policy, rule or practice. The inquiry is whether the…
|
|
| 4 Sep 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 462_12_409
Under section 98(4) of the Employment Rights Act 1996, the assessment of dismissal fairness is a neutral inquiry. The employer bears the burden of showing its…
|
|
| 4 Sep 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0161_13_0409
At a preliminary appeal hearing, it was reasonably arguable that a dismissal process was unfair where the manager deciding the internal appeal conducted…
|
|
| 4 Sep 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0116_12_0409
An Employment Tribunal may determine discrimination allegations individually and then assess the evidence cumulatively. Isolated, time-barred acts do not…
|
|
| 3 Sep 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0559_12_0309
An employer victimises an employee where dismissal is, to a significant extent, because the employee has done a protected act. The statutory question is the…
|
|
| 28 Aug 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0302_12_2808
An Employment Tribunal deciding racial-harassment allegations under Race Relations Act 1976, section 3A, must make clear findings on contested words and…
|
|
| 27 Aug 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0519_12_2708
On a costs or wasted-costs application, procedural fairness may require each side to have an opportunity to address substantial material relevant to ability to…
|
|
| 23 Aug 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0333_13_2308
Disclosure requires more than relevance. A document may be ordered only where its disclosure is necessary for the fair disposal of the proceedings.…
|
|
| 20 Aug 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0075_13_2008
An employer’s duty to make reasonable adjustments under Disability Discrimination Act 1995 section 4A depends on actual or constructive knowledge both that the…
|
|
| 13 Aug 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0486_12_1308
An Employment Tribunal may consider the case as it develops at the hearing. It need not adhere rigidly to an agreed list of issues where doing so would prevent…
|
|
| 13 Aug 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0398_11_1308
When assessing compensation for unfair dismissal, a tribunal must predict the loss flowing from the dismissal. It must consider reliable evidence that…
|
|
| 13 Aug 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0185_13_1308
Documents arising after the events in issue are not irrelevant merely because of their date. Their relevance must be assessed by reference to whether they may…
|
|
| 8 Aug 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0068_13_0808
An employee who lacks the qualifying service for ordinary unfair dismissal and alleges automatic unfair dismissal for making protected disclosures under…
|
|
| 8 Aug 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0013_13_0808
Whether an employment communication creates or varies contractual rights depends on an objective assessment of what the employer’s words and conduct would…
|
|
| 7 Aug 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0112_13_MC_0708
An Employment Tribunal deciding whether a transfer-related dismissal is automatically unfair must first identify the actual reason or principal reason for…
|
|
| 7 Aug 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0034_13_0708
On an appeal from an award of costs or expenses, intervention requires an error of law. The Employment Tribunal has a broad discretion. An appellate court will…
|
|
| 7 Aug 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0023_13_0708
An appellate court will rarely interfere with an Employment Judge’s procedural discretion. Intervention requires an error of law, assessed only by reference to…
|
|
| 7 Aug 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0010_13_0708
A contractual entitlement for transferred employees’ terms to mirror those of another employer for the duration of their employment is not cut down by a…
|
|
| 6 Aug 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0111_13_0608
An Employment Tribunal must read an ET1 and attached particulars fairly and as a whole, particularly where the claimant is unrepresented. A claim need not be…
|
|
| 6 Aug 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0011_13_0608
Under section 111(2) of the Employment Rights Act 1996, the tribunal must first decide whether presentation within three months was not reasonably practicable…
|
|
| 5 Aug 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0196_12_0508
For unfair-dismissal compensation, where concurrent medical conditions may have caused an employee’s inability to work, the tribunal must determine whether the…
|
|
| 31 Jul 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0616_12_3107
An Employment Tribunal may infer that dismissal was victimisation where the employer’s inadequate investigation, disciplinary process and appeal support an…
|
|
| 30 Jul 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0289_13_3007
An unambiguous communication of resignation ordinarily takes effect according to its objective and ordinary meaning. Words stating that the employee has no…
|
|
| 26 Jul 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0571_12_2607
An appellate court may interfere with a discretionary employment tribunal case-management decision only where the discretion was exercised under an error of…
|
|
| 26 Jul 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0517_12_2607
An appellate court may set aside a discretionary case-management decision where the tribunal acted under a material misapprehension of fact, overlooked a…
|
|
| 26 Jul 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0009_13_KN_2607
For the extended definition of employment in the discrimination Regulations, the decisive inquiry is whether the individual performs personal services for and…
|
|
| 26 Jul 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0009_13_2607
For the extended definition of employment in the discrimination Regulations, the decisive inquiry is whether the individual works personally for and under…
|
|
| 23 Jul 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 131_13_2307
For jurisdiction under the Brussels 1 Regulation, an employee may sue an employer domiciled in a Member State either in that State or, where article 19…
|
|
| 23 Jul 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0130_13_2307
A costs order does not follow automatically because an Employment Tribunal has jurisdiction to award costs for a misconceived claim. The tribunal must…
|
|
| 19 Jul 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 85_13_1907
For the basic award following unfair dismissal, a week’s pay must be calculated under the mandatory statutory formula in Part XIV, Chapter II of the Employment…
|
|
| 19 Jul 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0027_13_1907
Employment status requires a multifactorial assessment of the reality of the working relationship. Relevant indicators include mutual obligations, the…
|
|
| 18 Jul 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0065_13_BA_1807
In an unfair-dismissal claim, the tribunal must assess whether the employer had reasonable grounds for its honestly held belief in misconduct, on the material…
|
|
| 18 Jul 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0018_13_1807
Where an unrepresented party faces an unnotified application for substantial employment tribunal costs, fairness will usually require the costs hearing to be…
|
|
| 17 Jul 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 1207_12_1707
An Employment Tribunal may strike out discrimination claims where a fair hearing is no longer possible, the claimant has conducted proceedings scandalously…
|
|
| 17 Jul 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0074_13_1707
An Employment Tribunal must give a party facing a costs order a fair and reasonable opportunity to explain why no order should be made. Raising costs briefly…
|
|
| 17 Jul 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0015_13_1707
An accrued flexi-hours balance does not, without an express or necessary implied contractual term, create a right to payment in money on termination. A term…
|
|
| 16 Jul 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0416_12_1607
Whether an employee has a contractual entitlement to guaranteed work cannot be determined from a general term allowing a manager to specify working hours…
|
|
| 16 Jul 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0227_13_1607
The duty to make reasonable accommodation under Article 5 of Directive 2000/78/EC is directed to disabled persons in an employment or potential employment…
|
|
| 16 Jul 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0012_13_1607
An Employment Tribunal must make findings on disputed facts material to a TUPE transfer and give adequate reasons for concluding that an employee objected to…
|
|
| 15 Jul 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 115_13_1507
Whether a person is an employee cannot be determined solely from contractual wording which denies an employment relationship or mutual obligations. The…
|
|
| 15 Jul 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0107_13_1507
Whether presentation of an unfair-dismissal complaint was reasonably practicable must be assessed over the relevant three-month period. Illness arising only…
|
|
| 15 Jul 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0030_13_507
A tribunal may strike out a claim for want of active pursuit where delay is inordinate and inexcusable and creates a substantial risk of an unfair resolution…
|
|
| 12 Jul 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0442_12_1207
An employment tribunal must give sufficient reasons to identify its primary findings, explain its legal analysis, and show why the statutory tests are met. A…
|
|
| 12 Jul 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0084_13_1207
In a physical-feature reasonable-adjustments claim, the tribunal should determine whether the feature placed the disabled person at a substantial disadvantage…
|
|
| 12 Jul 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0079_13_1207
An employer cannot make an otherwise procedurally unfair dismissal fair by offering an appeal which would not be meaningful or result in reinstatement. The…
|
|
| 11 Jul 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0522_12_1107
Constructive dismissal depends on a fundamental contractual breach, not merely on unreasonable treatment. Where the alleged breach is the implied term of trust…
|
|
| 11 Jul 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0415_12_1107
Where an employer relies on misconduct as the reason for dismissal, an employment tribunal must distinguish the fairness inquiry into the employer’s reasonable…
|
|
| 11 Jul 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0331_12_1107
A contractual discretion does not ordinarily remove an employee’s right to have that discretion genuinely considered. Where its factual preconditions are…
|
|
| 11 Jul 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0055_13_1107
Where the burden of proof has shifted in a direct discrimination claim, the employer must give an adequate explanation for the treatment. An Employment…
|
|
| 11 Jul 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0049_13_1107
For a claim under Equality Act 2010 section 58, the alleged discriminatory act must be in relation to the local-authority member’s carrying-out of official…
|
|
| 11 Jul 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0021_13_1107
In an unfair-dismissal case, once the employer has established the reason for dismissal, there is no further burden upon it to prove that dismissal was fair.…
|
|
| 10 Jul 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0532_12_1007
An Employment Tribunal may strike out further victimisation claims where a claimant withheld an alternative case during earlier case-management and merits…
|
|
| 9 Jul 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0006_13_0907
An Employment Tribunal considering an unlawful-deduction complaint under sections 13 and 27 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 may determine incidentally…
|
|
| 8 Jul 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0054_13_0807
For a conduct dismissal, an employer’s loss of trust and confidence may relate to the employee’s conduct where it results from the employer’s belief that the…
|
|
| 5 Jul 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0180_13_0507
For certification as a trade union, an organisation’s principal purposes must in reality include the collective regulation of relations between workers and…
|
|
| 5 Jul 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0045_13_0507
A redundancy dismissal may be unfair where an employer rejects a volunteer for redundancy and instead dismisses a closely comparable employee, but only if the…
|
|
| 5 Jul 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0038_13_0507
An Employment Tribunal may strike out a claim under rule 18(7)(b) only where it has no reasonable prospect of success. It errs by asking whether the claimant…
|
|
| 4 Jul 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0207_13_0407
On a remission concerning reasonable adjustments, the tribunal must determine the functional effects of the disability, whether the relevant provision…
|
|
| 3 Jul 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 563_12_307
An employment tribunal may determine an issue that has emerged during the hearing without a formal amendment to the claim where the issue is sufficiently…
|
|
| 3 Jul 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0389_12_0307
For a just and equitable extension of time, an Employment Tribunal must consider all relevant circumstances. It need not mechanically address every factor in…
|
|
| 2 Jul 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 95_12_207
An employee entitled to resign for a fundamental breach must elect whether to do so within a reasonable time. Affirmation cannot arise from delay alone.…
|
|
| 2 Jul 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 610_12_207
A tribunal determining a reasonable-adjustments claim under section 4A of the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 must apply the statutory test in a structured…
|
|
| 2 Jul 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0624_12_0207
A later Employment Tribunal complaint may be struck out as an abuse of process where the claimant had a proper opportunity to advance it in earlier related…
|
|
| 2 Jul 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0117_13_0207
Where a default judgment records liability on alternative bases without deciding between them, the tribunal determining remedy may hear evidence and decide…
|
|
| 28 Jun 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0500_12_2806
An Employment Tribunal may strike out a response for failure to comply with a case-management disclosure order where the evidence permits the inference of a…
|
|
| 27 Jun 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0120_13_2706
In a redundancy dismissal appeal, the Employment Appeal Tribunal will not overturn an Employment Tribunal’s factual findings merely because the employee…
|
|
| 27 Jun 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0017_13_2706
In a constructive-dismissal claim, a repudiatory breach need not be the sole, principal or predominant cause of resignation. Where there are concurrent…
|
|
| 26 Jun 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0222_12_2606
Where misconduct is discovered after an unfair dismissal, compensation under section 123(1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 does not require the tribunal to…
|
|
| 25 Jun 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0527_12_2506
An Employment Tribunal may determine only claims that have been properly made and placed before it. A pleading alleging indirect sex discrimination and…
|
|
| 25 Jun 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0125_12_2506
An Employment Tribunal may award costs after finding that a party acted unreasonably in bringing or conducting proceedings. Once that threshold is met, the…
|
|
| 25 Jun 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0003_13_2506
For unfair-dismissal purposes, the question under section 95(1)(a) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 is whether the contract under which the employee is…
|
|
| 21 Jun 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 34_13_2106
In a misconduct dismissal, the employer must have a genuine belief in guilt, reasonable grounds for that belief, and an investigation that is reasonable in the…
|
|
| 21 Jun 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0336_12_2106
Where an employee faces a disputed allegation of conduct amounting to theft or another criminal offence, the employer must carry out a careful and…
|
|
| 21 Jun 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0010_13_2106
Where an Employment Tribunal is remitted to reassess compensation on the facts already found, it must not make fresh findings that contradict its original…
|
|
| 20 Jun 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0018_13_2006
Whether a claimant is disabled is a question of fact for the tribunal. Medical evidence is important but must be assessed with all the evidence bearing on the…
|
|
| 19 Jun 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0008_13_1906
An Employment Tribunal must give sufficient reasons for a finding that an asserted redundancy was a contrivance to dismiss an employee. A finding that…
|
|
| 19 Jun 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0007_13_1906
An Employment Tribunal must give sufficient reasons for a finding that an asserted redundancy was a contrived device to dismiss an employee. A finding that…
|
|
| 19 Jun 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0005_13_1906
An amendment which introduces distinct statutory discrimination claims is substantive, even where it relies on an existing factual narrative. It is not…
|
|
| 18 Jun 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0602_12_1806
A claim of pregnancy discrimination under section 3A(1) of the Sex Discrimination Act 1975 requires proof of adverse or unfavourable treatment on the…
|
|
| 18 Jun 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0484_12_1806
An Employment Tribunal may determine a discrimination complaint by asking why the claimant received the treatment complained of. It must examine the…
|
|
| 17 Jun 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0659_12_1706
Where anonymity and restricted reporting orders engage ECHR Articles 8 and 10, the tribunal must conduct a balancing exercise. Protection of the Article 8…
|
|
| 17 Jun 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0058_13_1706
Where a discrimination claimant seeks to join an end user as an alleged undisclosed principal in a triangular agency arrangement, an Employment Tribunal must…
|
|
| 14 Jun 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0358_12_1406
For unfair-dismissal purposes, the reason for dismissal is the employer’s set of operative facts or beliefs, rather than an emotive label such as fraud. A…
|
|
| 14 Jun 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0058_12_1406
An Employment Tribunal deciding unfair-dismissal claims must give sufficient reasons to identify material conflicts in the evidence, state its essential…
|
|
| 13 Jun 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0606_12_1306
A retirement notice which does not comply with paragraph 2 of Schedule 6 to the Employment Equality (Age) Regulations 2006 cannot satisfy the notification…
|
|
| 12 Jun 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0004_13_1206
An appellate court will not interfere with discretionary employment tribunal case-management decisions unless the judge made an error of legal principle or…
|
|
| 11 Jun 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0053_12_1106
An employee who accepts a voluntary exit scheme available only to continuing employees affirms the contract and leaves by mutual agreement. That method of…
|
|
| 10 Jun 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0586_12_1006
An allegation is a protected act under section 2(1)(d) of the Race Relations Act 1976 only if its language and context sufficiently indicate a complaint…
|
|
| 7 Jun 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0167_13_0706
A claimant may pursue a sexual-harassment complaint against a fellow employee without also bringing proceedings against the employer. Under the pre-2010…
|
|
| 7 Jun 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0077_12_0706
An Employment Tribunal may answer a Burns/Barke question by correcting a mistaken premise and explaining the evidence and findings on which its reasons rested.…
|
|
| 6 Jun 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0601_11_0606
In an ordinary unfair-dismissal claim, the tribunal must apply the range of reasonable responses test without substituting its own view for that of the…
|
|
| 6 Jun 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0533_12_0606
Under Employment Tribunal Rules, a costs jurisdiction requires a two-stage approach. The tribunal must first decide whether the claim was misconceived or the…
|
|
| 6 Jun 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0288_12_0606
Continuity of employment is preserved under the Employment Protection (Continuity of Employment) Regulations 1996 where a dismissed employee presents a…
|
|
| 5 Jun 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0007_12_0506
Under section 27 of the Equality Act 2010, victimisation turns on whether the claimant suffered a detriment because of a protected act. It does not require…
|
|
| 4 Jun 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0322_12_0406
In a direct race-discrimination claim, an Employment Tribunal must assess the totality of the primary facts. It should not determine each complaint in…
|
1 |
| 3 Jun 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0164_12_0306
In assessing compensation for future loss, an Employment Tribunal must determine the likely counterfactual course of employment had there been no unlawful…
|
|
| 30 May 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0548_12_3005
Where the United Kingdom chose the 90-day threshold in article 1(1)(a)(ii) of Directive 98/59/EC, the duty to consult is triggered by a proposal to dismiss 20…
|
|
| 30 May 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0547_12_3005
Where a member state has adopted the 90-day threshold in Article 1(1)(a)(ii) of Directive 98/59/EC, collective-consultation rights arise when an employer…
|
|
| 29 May 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 2037_12_2905
An appeal to the Employment Appeal Tribunal must identify an error of law. Findings of fact, including assessments of credibility and the preference for one…
|
|
| 29 May 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 1802_11_2905
An appeal to the Employment Appeal Tribunal must identify an arguable error of law. Under section 21 of the Employment Tribunals Act, the Tribunal has no…
|
|
| 29 May 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 1039_12_2905
An appeal to the Employment Appeal Tribunal must identify an error of law. It cannot be used to reargue findings of fact, credibility assessments, or a…
|
|
| 29 May 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0409_12_2905
A dismissal may be automatically unfair where the principal reason is a protected disclosure made in obtaining legal advice. The existence of other…
|
|
| 29 May 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0393_12_2905
A retirement dismissal regulated by the former statutory age-dismissal procedure was unfair where the employer's notice did not expressly identify the…
|
|
| 24 May 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0622_12_2405
An allegation of apparent bias requires sufficient evidential material. The burden lies on the party alleging bias. In the absence of such material, the…
|
|
| 23 May 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0591_12_2305
An Employment Tribunal may not award compensation for injury to feelings without some material evidence of that injury. Although the Tribunal need not apply…
|
|
| 23 May 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0348_12_2305
An Employment Tribunal does not commit an error of law merely because its written reasons do not expressly follow every item in rule 30(6). The question is…
|
|
| 22 May 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0617_12_2205
An employment tribunal must identify the pleaded provision, criterion or practice (PCP), or fairly redefine it after giving the parties an opportunity to…
|
|
| 22 May 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0569_12_2205
Under section 10 of the Employment Relations Act 1999, the requirement that a worker make a reasonable request qualifies the request to be accompanied, not the…
|
|
| 21 May 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0268_12_2105
Where facts permit an inference of disability victimisation, the burden shifts to the employer to prove a wholly non-discriminatory reason for the impugned…
|
|
| 17 May 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0605_12_1705
In determining whether a dismissal is fair, an employment tribunal must identify the employer’s real, operative reason as the facts and beliefs which caused…
|
|
| 17 May 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0365_12_1705
An employment tribunal must consider reinstatement and re-engagement before compensation where an unfairly dismissed employee seeks either remedy. Its…
|
|
| 17 May 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0364_12_1705
An employment tribunal must consider reinstatement and re-engagement before compensation where an unfairly dismissed employee seeks either remedy. Its…
|
|
| 17 May 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0064_13_1705
Before striking out discrimination proceedings for scandalous, unreasonable or vexatious conduct, an Employment Tribunal must address whether the conduct means…
|
|
| 17 May 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0041_12_1705
In an unfair-dismissal appeal, the Employment Appeal Tribunal must decide whether the Employment Tribunal made an error of law. It must not substitute its own…
|
|
| 16 May 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0590_12_1605
Harassment based on sexual orientation requires consideration of both the purpose and the effect of unwanted conduct. A tribunal must not treat a claimant’s…
|
|
| 16 May 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0481_12_1605
The statutory meaning of theft applies equally in employment. Theft requires dishonest appropriation of another’s property with an intention permanently to…
|
|
| 16 May 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0206_13_1605
A compromise agreement is construed narrowly where it restricts access to legal remedies. A term settling claims arising before the agreement does not, without…
|
|
| 16 May 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0040_12_1605
In a misconduct dismissal case, the Employment Tribunal must assess the employer’s decision without substituting its own view. It must decide whether the…
|
|
| 15 May 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0573_12_1505
In deciding whether dismissal for misconduct fell within the range of reasonable responses, an employer had to give genuine consideration to relevant…
|
|
| 15 May 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0572_12_1505
An employer may act outside the range of reasonable responses where it treats mitigation as irrelevant unless it wholly excuses misconduct, and fails to…
|
|
| 14 May 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0232_12_1405
An employment tribunal need not mechanically repeat the two-stage burden-of-proof analysis for every discrimination allegation. It must, however, determine the…
|
|
| 14 May 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0060_12_1405
An Employment Tribunal may find a dismissal unfair because of inconsistent sanctions only where the employer's distinction between comparators in truly…
|
1 |
| 10 May 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0623_12_1005
The standard required of Employment Tribunal reasons does not change because an Employment Judge sits alone. Reasons must enable the unsuccessful party to…
|
|
| 10 May 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0581_12_1005
In assessing reasonable adjustments for disability-related sickness absence, a tribunal may adopt more than one permissible method. It may analyse particular…
|
|
| 9 May 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT PA_1011_12_0905
An appellant seeking more time to challenge a Registrar’s procedural order must comply with the five-day limit or provide a satisfactory explanation for delay.…
|
|
| 9 May 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0090_12_0905
Where disability has caused an employee to occupy a lower-graded role, a redundancy redeployment rule that prevents an application for a role at the employee’s…
|
|
| 7 May 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0559_11_BA_0705
In an unfair-dismissal case, an Employment Tribunal may find that an employer reasonably relied on factual findings from a prior grievance investigation where…
|
|
| 3 May 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0553_12_0305
In a constructive-dismissal claim, the tribunal must determine whether the employer committed a repudiatory breach and whether the employee resigned in…
|
|
| 3 May 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0346_12_0305
A dismissal may be unfair because of serious procedural defects even where there were proper grounds to investigate misconduct. An employee may legitimately…
|
|
| 2 May 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0543_12_0205
Where an Employment Tribunal's reasons on Polkey and contributory conduct are unclear, particularly where those issues were not fully argued, its remedy…
|
|
| 2 May 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0518_12_0205
For the purposes of Disability Discrimination Act 1995, normal day-to-day activities must be construed consistently with European Union law. They include…
|
|
| 2 May 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0315_12_MC_0205
An appellate tribunal cannot allow an appeal solely because the parties agree that the underlying decision should be set aside. A judicial decision may be…
|
|
| 2 May 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0314_12_0205
An appellate tribunal cannot allow an appeal merely because the parties agree that it should be allowed. Setting aside a judicial decision requires the…
|
|
| 2 May 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0002_13_SM_0205
An Employment Tribunal is not required, of its own motion, to determine every allegation pleaded in an ET1 where the claimant has not pursued that allegation…
|
|
| 30 Apr 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0535_12_3004
An Employment Tribunal has no jurisdiction to apportion between liable respondents an award of compensation for breach of TUPE where the applicable provision…
|
|
| 30 Apr 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0509_12_3004
An employment tribunal may direct a detailed assessment of costs on the indemnity basis. In the employment tribunal context, that exceptional basis is…
|
|
| 30 Apr 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0502_12_3004
An Employment Tribunal gives sufficient reasons where it identifies the applicable legal principles, makes the essential factual findings, and explains why…
|
|
| 29 Apr 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0504_12_2904
In assessing compensation for future earnings loss, an Employment Tribunal may use the Ogden tables or another just and equitable method. It does not err…
|
|
| 29 Apr 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0503_12_2904
An Employment Tribunal assessing compensation for unfair dismissal and disability discrimination is not required to use the Ogden tables. It may instead adopt…
|
|
| 26 Apr 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0506_12_2604
Where an employee’s contract imposes a direct duty to report financial matters to a governing board, disclosure to individual chairmen does not, without more…
|
|
| 26 Apr 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0395_12_2604
For discrimination arising from disability under section 15 of the Equality Act 2010, the relevant consequence of disability must have operated, consciously or…
|
|
| 26 Apr 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0380_12_2604
Employment status must be determined from the objective reality of the parties’ contractual relationship. Mutuality of obligation does not require agreed…
|
|
| 25 Apr 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0527_12_2504
An Employment Tribunal may determine only claims that have been properly articulated. A pleading alleging indirect sex discrimination and unfavourable…
|
|
| 25 Apr 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0417_12_2504
An Employment Tribunal may permit a new jurisdictional point on appeal where it is a hard-edged point of law, requires no further evidence and may be…
|
|
| 25 Apr 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0247_12_2509
Where a contractual appeal procedure empowers an employer to replace a dismissal with a lesser outcome, a decision on appeal to reinstate the employee…
|
|
| 25 Apr 2013 |
I Lab Facilities Ltd v Metcalfe & Ors (Transfer Of Undertakings : Consultation : affected employees)
[2013] UKEAT 0224_12_2504
Employees are not “affected employees” for the purposes of regulation 13 merely because the transfer of one part of an undertaking leaves another part less…
|
|
| 23 Apr 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0525_12_2304
A dismissal is by reason of redundancy where the employer’s requirements for employees to perform one or more particular kinds of work have diminished and the…
|
|
| 19 Apr 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0537_12_1904
An employment tribunal on a limited remission may reconsider only the matters within the appellate order. Findings that were open to challenge in the first…
|
|
| 19 Apr 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0523_12_1904
Apparent bias in a trade union disciplinary process must be assessed contextually by applying the fair-minded and informed observer test to all the…
|
|
| 19 Apr 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0339_12_1904
For collective redundancies, an employer consulting pre-existing employee representatives must prove that the representatives had authority from the affected…
|
|
| 18 Apr 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0258_12_1804
In assessing a Polkey deduction, an Employment Tribunal must make its counterfactual assessment on evidence. An employer seeking a reduction must provide…
|
|
| 18 Apr 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0132_JOJ_1804
Compliance with an unless order is assessed qualitatively. The question is whether any non-compliance is material to the purpose of the order, including…
|
|
| 17 Apr 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0072_12_1704
The Employment Appeal Tribunal may intervene only for an error of law. A perversity appeal must meet the high threshold identified in [2002] IRLR 634; it…
|
|
| 17 Apr 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0049_12_1704
Where an Employment Tribunal grants a review in order to consider an argument omitted at an earlier preliminary hearing, it must determine the procedural…
|
|
| 16 Apr 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 91_12_1604
An employment tribunal determining a reasonable-adjustments claim must make clear findings on the relevant provision, criterion or practice, the substantial…
|
|
| 16 Apr 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0501_12_1604
For the purposes of section 98(4) of the Employment Rights Act 1996, an employment tribunal must assess the fairness of the decision to dismiss. Criticism of…
|
|
| 16 Apr 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0050_12_1604
In a misconduct dismissal, an employer need not establish proven misconduct. The relevant standard is whether the employer had a reasonable belief in the…
|
|
| 15 Apr 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 1163_12_1504
An employment tribunal may refuse an amendment which is, in substance, an attempt to advance an ordinary unfair dismissal claim under the label of wrongful…
|
|
| 15 Apr 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0194_12_1504
A duty to make reasonable adjustments may be engaged where a disabled employee is substantially disadvantaged by a competitive interview process. The employer…
|
|
| 11 Apr 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0592_12_1104
A contract of employment ends when an employee’s contractual notice of resignation expires. A purported disciplinary dismissal imposed after that employment…
|
|
| 10 Apr 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0454_2012_1004
A complaint is a protected act for victimisation only if, viewed in its context, it is capable of being understood as alleging conduct prohibited by the…
|
|
| 10 Apr 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0092_13_1004
Without-prejudice protection depends on the substance and context of communications, not on whether they are labelled “without prejudice” or “off the record”.…
|
|
| 8 Apr 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0483_12_0804
An Employment Tribunal should strike out a discrimination allegation for having no reasonable prospect of success only in an exceptional case where the central…
|
|
| 5 Apr 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0491_12_0504
A dismissal is properly characterised as redundancy where the employer reasonably expects a diminution in the need for employees to perform work of a…
|
|
| 5 Apr 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0375_12_0504
A protective award under section 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 is a sanction for breach of collective redundancy…
|
|
| 4 Apr 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0469_12_0404
An appeal on perversity is confined to the exceptional case where an Employment Tribunal has reached a conclusion that no reasonable tribunal, properly…
|
|
| 3 Apr 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT/0014/13/LA
Unless orders operate automatically when their terms are not complied with. Partial compliance with an otherwise clear unless order does not avert automatic…
|
|
| 3 Apr 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT PA_0250_12_0304
An appeal under rule 3(10) should proceed only where it discloses reasonable grounds raising an error of law. The EAT must form its own view on the material…
|
|
| 3 Apr 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0517_12_0304
When deciding whether it is just and equitable to permit a late amendment adding discrimination claims, an Employment Tribunal must take account of material…
|
|
| 27 Mar 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0422_12_2703
For the duty to make reasonable adjustments, a tribunal must identify the effects of the claimant’s disability. It need not investigate its causes. Anxiety or…
|
|
| 27 Mar 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0253_12_2703
A tribunal may reduce a compensatory award for contributory conduct to nil only where the employee’s conduct was the sole cause of the dismissal. Procedural…
|
|
| 22 Mar 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 57_12_2203
For limitation purposes, conduct extending over a period is determined by the substance of the complaint. The issue is whether the allegations disclose an…
|
|
| 22 Mar 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0465_12_2203
A retirement letter can amount to notice terminating employment on a specified date where, objectively construed, it notifies the employee of retirement on…
|
|
| 22 Mar 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0013_13_2203
On an application for interim relief for trade-union-related automatic unfair dismissal, the Employment Tribunal must make an expeditious summary assessment of…
|
|
| 21 Mar 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0472_12_2103
Where an employee has retained a solicitor to act in relation to a dismissal, the solicitor’s failure to advise on, or meet, the time limit for an…
|
|
| 21 Mar 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0059_12_2103
Under Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006, the fairness required by Regulation 14 concerns the election process itself, not…
|
|
| 20 Mar 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0004_13_2003
On an appeal from an Employment Tribunal’s discretionary decision on amendment, the Employment Appeal Tribunal may intervene only for an error of law, such as…
|
|
| 19 Mar 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0628_11_1903
An Employment Tribunal's exercise of the just and equitable discretion to extend time must rest on findings of primary fact which support its assessment of…
|
|
| 15 Mar 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0306_12_1503
A negligent failure to make reasonable adjustments is subject to the limitation regime for omissions in Schedule 3 to the Disability Discrimination Act 1995.…
|
|
| 15 Mar 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0294_12_1503
In a misconduct dismissal case, an Employment Tribunal must assess the employer’s genuine belief, the reasonableness of its grounds and investigation, and the…
|
|
| 15 Mar 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0006_13_1503
When deciding an application to amend an employment claim, the tribunal must consider all relevant circumstances and balance the injustice and hardship of…
|
|
| 14 Mar 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 107_12_1403
For disability-related discrimination under section 3A(1)(a) of the Disability Discrimination Act 1995, the comparator must have all the claimant’s relevant…
|
|
| 14 Mar 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0255_12_1403
Whether there has been a relevant transfer requires a multi-factorial assessment of whether an economic entity retained its identity under regulation 3(1)(a)…
|
|
| 14 Mar 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0015_12_BI_1403
Where a worker has been prevented by sickness from taking the four weeks’ annual leave protected by Article 7, the Working Time Regulations 1998 must, so far…
|
|
| 12 Mar 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0432_12_1203
A summary dismissal normally terminates employment immediately. A pending internal appeal does not preserve employment for transfer purposes. If the appeal…
|
|
| 12 Mar 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0051_12_1203
In an unfair-dismissal claim confined to the reasonableness question under Employment Rights Act 1996, section 98(4), an Employment Tribunal must determine…
|
|
| 11 Mar 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0456_12_1103
In deciding whether an impairment has a substantial adverse effect on normal day-to-day activities, an Employment Tribunal must focus on what the claimant…
|
|
| 11 Mar 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0249_12_1103
For liability under section 32(2) of the Race Relations Act 1976, common-law principles of agency apply. A contractual supply chain and day-to-day operational…
|
|
| 8 Mar 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0201_12_0803
For the purposes of Employment Rights Act 1996 section 211, continuous employment begins when the individual starts work under a contract of employment. It…
|
|
| 7 Mar 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0391_12_0703
Where the statutory notice-payment provisions apply, an employee who is incapable of work through sickness is entitled under Employment Rights Act 1996 section…
|
|
| 7 Mar 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0209_12_0703
An Employment Tribunal does not commit a serious procedural irregularity by accepting an explanation advanced in closing submissions where the opposing…
|
|
| 5 Mar 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0444_12_0503
An Employment Tribunal must give reasons sufficient to show why each material basis of an unfair-dismissal claim has failed. Where the reason or principal…
|
|
| 3 Mar 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0042_13_0303
In an ordinary unfair-dismissal redundancy case, the choice of selection pool is primarily for the employer. The Employment Tribunal must scrutinise whether…
|
|
| 1 Mar 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0536_12_0103
An order for reinstatement or re-engagement precludes an award of compensation for unfair dismissal. Under sections 112(4) and 118(1) of the Employment Rights…
|
|
| 28 Feb 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0421_12_2802
Where an employer’s managing-attendance policy applies only to sickness absence, the proper comparator for a disabled employee subject to that policy is an…
|
|
| 28 Feb 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0256_12_2802
In calculating the loss-of-earnings element of compensation for unfair dismissal, incapacity benefit received during the relevant period is deductible in full…
|
|
| 22 Feb 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0447_12_2202
Where an employer has established an honest belief in misconduct, an Employment Tribunal deciding whether that belief rested on reasonable grounds must engage…
|
|
| 21 Feb 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0230_12_2102
A remission must be construed objectively from its wording and context. A direction for a complete rehearing will ordinarily concern the subject matter of the…
|
|
| 20 Feb 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0436_12_2002
Where an employee is dismissed because a third party’s stance prevents continued employment, unfairness to the employee does not itself make the dismissal…
|
|
| 19 Feb 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 25_13_1902
Under section 7(3) of the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974, evidence of a spent conviction may be admitted only where justice cannot be done without it.…
|
|
| 19 Feb 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0207_12_1902
In an unfair-dismissal conduct case, an Employment Tribunal must decide whether dismissal, as well as the procedure and the employer’s belief, fell within the…
|
|
| 15 Feb 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 368_12_1502
Where serious complaints of racial harassment are not investigated or addressed with appropriate speed, diligence and effective management action, an…
|
|
| 15 Feb 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0427_12_1502
For victimisation under Race Relations Act 1976, it is insufficient to make a simple comparison between a claimant who has done a protected act and others who…
|
|
| 15 Feb 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0156_12_1502
On a review application seeking to set aside a default judgment, an Employment Judge must not treat an inadequate explanation for delay as determinative. The…
|
|
| 14 Feb 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0312_12_1402
Where an employer enters a company voluntary arrangement and remains insolvent until liquidation, it becomes insolvent only once for the purposes of Part XII…
|
|
| 14 Feb 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0078_12_1402
An Employment Tribunal is excluded by Equality Act 2010 section 120(7) only insofar as the particular discriminatory or harassing act complained of is subject…
|
|
| 13 Feb 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0161_13_1302
An Employment Tribunal need not give elaborate reasons, but it must give sufficient reasons to explain to the losing party why the claim failed and to permit…
|
|
| 13 Feb 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0096_12_1302
When assessing compensation for unfair dismissal, an Employment Tribunal must consider not only whether the employer has proved on the balance of probabilities…
|
|
| 12 Feb 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0371_12_1202
A failure to exercise care in a particular transaction, or to progress a disciplinary process efficiently, is not without more a provision, criterion or…
|
|
| 12 Feb 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0320_12_1202
An Employment Tribunal does not adopt an impermissible substitution approach merely because it concludes that dismissal was outside the range of reasonable…
|
|
| 12 Feb 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0039_12_1202
For national minimum wage purposes, remuneration is determined by the statutory scheme rather than by contractual labels. A payment calculated by reference to…
|
|
| 8 Feb 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0394_12_0802
An expressly incorporated term from a collective agreement remains a term of the individual contract unless it is varied by the agreement required for…
|
|
| 8 Feb 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0383_12_0802
A tribunal’s reasons must be read fairly and in their full factual and procedural context. In particular, infelicitous references to a claimant being clearly…
|
|
| 8 Feb 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0097_12_0802
For disability discrimination, the relevant question is whether the claimant has a physical or mental impairment with the statutory effects. The tribunal must…
|
|
| 7 Feb 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0317_12_0702
Procedural defects in a disciplinary process do not of themselves make a dismissal unfair. The question under section 98(4) of the Employment Rights Act 1996…
|
|
| 7 Feb 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0167_12_0702
Entitlement to contractual sick pay for an infectious illness contracted “in the course of” employment depends on the proper construction of the employment…
|
|
| 6 Feb 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 435_11_602
An appellate court should not interfere with an award for injury to feelings unless it is manifestly excessive or wrong in principle. The assessment must…
|
|
| 6 Feb 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0418_12_0602
An Employment Tribunal may strike out a discrimination claim with no reasonable prospect of success, even though discrimination claims are fact-sensitive and…
|
|
| 5 Feb 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0386_12_0502
A reduction of the basic or compensatory award for contributory conduct requires conduct by the employee which is blameworthy and which caused or contributed…
|
|
| 4 Feb 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0094_12_0402
In direct age-discrimination claims, the comparator exercise requires an assessment of whether the age-related differences are material for the purpose of the…
|
|
| 1 Feb 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0534_12_0102
Covertly made workplace recordings are not inadmissible merely because they were obtained covertly. Their admission depends on demonstrated relevance and…
|
|
| 1 Feb 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0455_12_0102
An employee working abroad falls within section 94(1) only exceptionally. The employment relationship must have a much stronger connection with Great Britain…
|
|
| 30 Jan 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0397_12_3001
An Employment Tribunal must determine a disability-discrimination claim on the legal basis pleaded and addressed by the parties. It is an error of law, and may…
|
|
| 29 Jan 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0571_12_2901
A strike-out remains an exceptional remedy, especially once a merits hearing has begun. It may nevertheless be proportionate where a party’s conduct has made a…
|
|
| 29 Jan 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0556_12_2901
A redundancy exists under section 139 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 where an employer has two employees effectively performing one role and reduces that…
|
|
| 23 Jan 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 382_12_2301
In assessing compensation for unfair dismissal, a tribunal should determine how long the employee would probably have remained employed but for the dismissal.…
|
|
| 23 Jan 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0383_11_2301
An appellate tribunal will not upset fact-sensitive Employment Tribunal findings unless the decision was one that no reasonable tribunal, properly directing…
|
|
| 23 Jan 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0362_12_2301
An appeal against a procedural decision should be dismissed where subsequent events have removed any practical significance from the issue raised. The…
|
|
| 23 Jan 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0177_12_2301
A contract of employment is assessed by the multi-factorial test in Ready Mixed Concrete. The essential control inquiry is whether the putative employer…
|
|
| 17 Jan 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 1305_12_1701
For religious-harassment claims, unwanted conduct must have the purpose or effect of violating dignity or creating an adverse environment, and must be on the…
|
|
| 17 Jan 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0539_11_1701
A business reorganisation does not itself establish redundancy. It may do so where it causes, or is expected to cause, a diminished requirement for employees…
|
|
| 17 Jan 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0340_12_1701
A tribunal may identify the actual provision, criterion or practice relied on in a reasonable-adjustments claim. A claimant is not confined to one PCP, but…
|
|
| 16 Jan 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0353_12_1601
On an application under Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure rule 25(4), withdrawal of Employment Tribunal proceedings does not automatically justify their…
|
|
| 16 Jan 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0274_12_1601
Where a claimant withdraws proceedings in order to commence fresh proceedings, an Employment Tribunal may dismiss the withdrawn proceedings under unknown, rule…
|
|
| 14 Jan 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0327_12_1401
A Polkey assessment is a predictive exercise directed to the likelihood that the actual employer, after a fair procedure, would have dismissed the employee. It…
|
|
| 10 Jan 2013 |
[2013] UKEAT 0324_12_1001
In a dismissal and re-engagement case, the fairness of a dismissal for some other substantial reason is assessed under section 98(4) at the effective date of…
|
|
|
[2013] UKEAT 0251_12_2802
An unless order which purports to impose automatic strike-out must state clearly and precisely what will occur on non-compliance. Wording that a claim will be…
|
1 | |
|
[2013] UKEAT 0126_13_RN_2203
An application to amend an Employment Tribunal claim must ordinarily be decided by reference to the actual proposed amendment. Where the amendment introduces…
|
1 | |
|
[2013] UKEAT 0095_13_1704
Compliance with an unless order is sufficient only where it is material, assessed qualitatively by reference to the order’s purpose. Where particulars are…
|
1 |