General Medical Council v Gill

[2013] EWHC 2651 (Admin)

Case details

Case citations
[2013] EWHC 2651 (Admin)
Court
High Court (Administrative Court)
Judgment date
5 July 2013
Judgment text

This feature is available to zoomLaw Pro members.

Subjects
Administrative Civil procedure
Keywords
procedural extension costs lack of engagement Administrative Court
Outcome
application granted (period extended; costs of £1,922 awarded)
Judicial consideration

This feature is available to zoomLaw Pro members.

Summary

The Administrative Court may extend an existing procedural period where the application justifies an order. Costs may be awarded against the respondent where the application could not be consented to because of the respondent’s lack of engagement.

Factual background

The General Medical Council applied for an extension of an existing period. The respondent did not attend and was not represented. The court was also asked to determine the costs of the application.

Held

  1. The court extended the unspecified existing period by five months, until 14 December 2013.
  2. The respondent was ordered to pay the applicant’s costs of the application, assessed at £1,922. The court accepted that the application could not be consented to because of the respondent’s lack of engagement.

The court’s approach to earlier authorities

This feature is available to zoomLaw Pro members.

Key cases cited

This feature is available to zoomLaw Pro members.

Cases citing this case

This feature is available to zoomLaw Pro members.