Law firm

Leigh Day

Leigh Day is named as solicitors in at least 625 UK judgments from 2003 to 2026, most often in public and administrative law and planning and environment.

625
judgments
214
in the last five years
33
in the Supreme Court or Privy Council
158
in the Court of Appeal

Practice areas

  • Public and administrative law374
  • Planning and environment94
  • Civil liberties and human rights72
  • Employment54
  • Immigration and asylum52
  • Cross-border disputes29
  • Personal injury21
  • Social welfare and education17

Courts

  • Supreme Court32
  • Privy Council1
  • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)158
  • High Court419
  • Employment Appeal Tribunal15

Counsel most often instructed

  • David Wolfe75
  • Richard Hermer42
  • Ben Jaffey31
  • Jeremy Hyam17
  • Phillippa Kaufmann15
  • Edward Craven14
  • Alex Goodman13
  • Nikolaus Grubeck13

Judgments by year

  • 202639
  • 202540
  • 202455
  • 202347
  • 202233
  • 202121
  • 202029
  • 201937
  • 201842
  • 201731
  • 201635
  • 201529
  • 201432
  • 201328
  • 201220
  • 201114
  • 201018
  • 200915
  • 200812
  • 200710

Cases later courts cite most

Cases Leigh Day acted in that later judgments cite most often.

Date Case Cited by
10 Apr 2019
[2019] UKSC 20 · Supreme Court
Article 4 of the Recast Brussels Regulation confers mandatory jurisdiction over a domiciled defendant. Any implied abuse exception must be construed narrowly.…
116
3 Apr 2012
[2012] EWCA Civ 420 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Courts have an inherent common law jurisdiction to determine the requirements of open justice. Where documents have been placed before a judge and referred to…
69
19 Feb 2021
[2021] UKSC 5 · Supreme Court
Whether an individual is a “worker” is primarily a question of statutory interpretation, not contractual classification. A tribunal must apply the statutory…
59
10 Mar 2021
[2021] EWCA Civ 326 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
A negligence claim based on knowingly sending a vessel for demolition in notoriously unsafe conditions may arguably engage the creation-of-danger exception to…
47
3 Apr 2003
[2003] EWCA Civ 473 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Where neither European Union law nor rights under the European Convention on Human Rights are engaged, the legality of an administrative decision remains…
42
17 May 2013
[2013] EWHC 1236 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
A breach of immigration detention policy renders detention unlawful where it bears upon, is relevant to, and is capable of affecting the decision to detain.…
32
7 Dec 2012
[2012] EWCA Civ 1630 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
A list of issues prepared at an employment tribunal pre-hearing review is ordinarily a case management tool, rather than an order or final adjudication. An…
31
16 Oct 2019
[2019] UKSC 44 · Supreme Court
A judicial office-holder does not ordinarily qualify as a limb (b) worker where the statutory scheme, governing terms and constitutional context show no…
26
21 Apr 2020
[2020] EWCA Civ 542 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
A legislative scheme capable of being operated compatibly with Convention rights in all or nearly all cases is not inherently incompatible merely because some…
22
21 Feb 2014
[2014] EWCA Civ 13 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Disability discrimination arising from housing benefit bedroom criteria must be assessed within the whole scheme, including discretionary housing payments. In…
20

Recent cases

Date Case Cited by
10 Sep 2026
[2026] EWHC 2332 (KB) · High Court: King's Bench Division
An environmental tort claim does not become an impermissible global claim merely because some causative events are unidentified and causation is proved by…
7 Sep 2026
[2026] EAT 130 · Employment Appeal Tribunal
Under the Equality Act 2010, market-rate pay differences are neither automatically justified nor automatically discriminatory. A tribunal may find particular…
18 Aug 2026
[2026] EWCA Civ 1095 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
A highway authority which positively creates or materially contributes to a highway danger owes road users a duty to take reasonable care. The duty may extend…
11 Aug 2026
[2026] EWHC 2143 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
In an interim judicial review concerning closed material, the High Court exercises its own inherent Haralambous jurisdiction. It is not bound to reproduce the…
11 Aug 2026
[2026] EWHC 2138 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
In a challenge under Town and Country Planning Act 1990, s. 288, the court reviews an inspector’s regulation 63 decision on ordinary public-law principles and…
7 Aug 2026
[2026] EWHC 2107 (KB) · High Court: King's Bench Division
A stay pending an intended appeal is discretionary and fact-sensitive. The court must weigh the risk of injustice in granting or refusing it, the effect of…
4 Aug 2026
[2026] EWCA Civ 1040 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Planning policy is interpreted as a practical whole, in its policy and factual context. It is not construed as a statute or contract. The court distinguishes…
31 Jul 2026
[2026] EWHC 2002 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
A planning decision may rely on conditions and diplomatic obligations despite the limited domestic enforcement available at inviolable diplomatic premises. The…
27 Jul 2026
[2026] UKSC 25 · Supreme Court
Section 5 of the State Immunity Act 1978 removes state immunity where personal injury or tangible property damage is caused by a legally causative act or…
10 Jul 2026
[2026] EWCA Civ 889 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Employment provisions requiring repayment of salary in specified circumstances engage the restraint of trade doctrine. Financial disincentives are assessed by…
1 Jul 2026
[2026] EWCA Civ 838 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Under the Environmental Information Regulations 2004, whether requested environmental information is held is determined when the public authority receives the…
1
26 Jun 2026
[2026] EWHC 1573 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
A judicial review court should generally decide whether past or proposed public-authority action was lawful, rather than answer a hypothetical question…

Based on judgments published by The National Archives (Find Case Law) in which Leigh Day is named as solicitors, counted under the firm's current name. The figures are minimums: not every judgment names the solicitors, and a judgment is counted only when we are confident who acted. The selection of cases listed here is limited, and does not include family, criminal or anonymised cases. Firm details include data from the Solicitors Regulation Authority. zoomLaw is independent and not connected with Leigh Day. Something wrong or missing? Tell us. All law firms.