(1)A performer’s rights are infringed by a person who, without his consent—
(a)makes a recording of the whole or any substantial part of a qualifying performance directly from the live performance,
(b)broadcasts live, . . . the whole or any substantial part of a qualifying performance,
(c)makes a recording of the whole or any substantial part of a qualifying performance directly from a broadcast of, . . . the live performance.
(2). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(3)In an action for infringement of a performer’s rights brought by virtue of this section damages shall not be awarded against a defendant who shows that at the time of the infringement he believed on reasonable grounds that consent had been given.
Cases considering section 182 4
[2016] EWHC 1370 (Ch) · 20 May 2016
The court treated infringement of the recording right as arguable because consent depended on whether the Code of Conduct limited filming to personal use. The issue remained unresolved because incorporation of the Code was disputed (see paras [41], [44]).
[2006] EWHC 1009 (Ch) · 15 May 2006Limits
Applies the consent requirement for recording the whole or a substantial part of a qualifying performance, including recording directly from a live performance or broadcast (see paras [369], [373]-[375]).
The court noted the statutory defence to damages where the defendant reasonably believed that consent had been given, although the performers’ claims were resolved principally by consent and transitional arrangements (see para [369]).
[2025] EWCA Civ 66 · 6 February 2025Defines
Section 182 is identified as the fixation right. The court noted that section 182A replaced part of the original provision and conferred a related but not identical proprietary right. (see para [18])
What each judgment says about section 182 is in the case-law panel in the full Act.