(1)If a parent on whom a school attendance order is served fails to comply with the requirements of the order, he is guilty of an offence, unless he proves that he is causing the child to receive suitable education otherwise than at school.
(2)If, in proceedings for an offence under this section, the parent is acquitted, the court may direct that the school attendance order shall cease to be in force.
(3)A direction under subsection (2) does not affect the duty of the local authority to take further action under section 437 if at any time the authority are of the opinion that, having regard to any change of circumstances, it is expedient to do so.
(4)A person guilty of an offence under this section is liable on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding level 3 on the standard scale.
Cases considering section 443 3
[2004] EWCA Civ 45 · 30 January 2004
The offence and enforcement regime supports the conclusion that avoidable absence should be addressed through attendance powers, rather than by treating section 19 as requiring alternative provision. (see paras [40]; [44]–[46])
[2023] UKUT 10 (AAC) · 6 January 2023
The provision was used to explain the consequence of failing to comply with a school attendance order, subject to proving that suitable education was provided otherwise than at school. (see para [13])
The provision was used to explain that failure to comply with a school attendance order is an offence unless suitable education is being provided otherwise than at school. (see para [13])
[2003] EWHC 301 (Admin) · 10 February 2003Defines
Identifies failure to comply with a school attendance order as a statutory precondition capable of triggering a parenting order. (see paras [11]-[12])
What each judgment says about section 443 is in the case-law panel in the full Act.